Divided Supreme Court rejects public religious charter school in Oklahoma
'The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court,' the court wrote in its one-sentence, unsigned opinion.
Only eight justices sat for the case, since Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused.
The decision lets stand a ruling from the Oklahoma Supreme Court rejecting the bid to establish St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, which spurred a major constitutional battle over the role of religion in state-funded education.
The deadlocked opinion from the nation's highest court landed swiftly, just weeks after the justices heard the case at the end of April.
It marks the culmination of a multiyear, high-profile legal battle over religious rights that began after the Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board approved St. Isidore's contract.
Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond (R) led the fight against the school, bringing the case directly to the state's top court and winning.
Both the charter school board and St. Isidore then appealed to the nation's top court, saying the opinion was 'riddled with missteps.'
James Campbell, the attorney who argued on behalf of the charter school board, said in a statement that Thursday's decision was 'disappointing' but stressed the court could still return to the issue in the future.
'Oklahoma parents and children are better off with more educational choices, not fewer,' Campbell said.
At the crux of the dispute was whether the school could be considered a state actor.
The school argued its case was no different than recent ones from Maine, Montana and Missouri, where the justices said state programs that fund private education cannot carve out religious schools.
Drummond's office asserted the dispute fell into another line of Supreme Court precedent, where the court has long held that states can require their public schools to be secular.
'The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of my position that we should not allow taxpayer funding of radical Islamic schools here in Oklahoma,' Drummond said in a statement. 'I am proud to have fought against this potential cancer in our state, and I will continue upholding the law, protecting our Christian values and defending religious liberty.'
The court's opinion does not provide reasoning or disclose how the individual justices voted.
But at oral arguments, four of the court's conservatives appeared sympathetic to the school's contentions, while the court's three liberal justices appeared to lean toward Drummond's side. That would leave Chief Justice Roberts as the swing vote.
Barrett did not publicly explain her recusal from the case, but court-watchers believe it stems from her close friendship with Nicole Garnett, a professor at Notre Dame Law School, whose religious liberty clinic represented St. Isidore.
The decision was one of two opinions handed down by the Supreme Court on Thursday.
In the other case, the court unanimously sided with the federal government in a wire fraud case it brought against Stamatios Kousisis and Alpha Painting & Construction over contracts Pennsylvania's Transportation Department awarded them for painting projects in Philadelphia.
The contracts required Alpha to include disadvantaged businesses as part of its work, which the company falsely claimed it was. Kousisis and the company argued the allegations against them, which relied on what is known as the 'fraudulent inducement' theory, are not covered by the federal wire fraud statute, so the charges should be dismissed.
'The fraudulent-inducement theory is consistent with both the text of the wire fraud statute and our precedent interpreting it,' Barrett wrote in the court's opinion.
Updated at 11:48 a.m. EDT
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Oakland Schools Must Allow Christian After-School Clubs: Judge
Public schools in Oakland, California, discriminated against a Christian group seeking to hold after-school meetings, according to a new ruling. The facts in the case show the Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) violated the free speech rights of Child Evangelism Fellowship and its Good News Club, U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr. said in the Aug. 15 decision.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
The plot to destroy Black political power
Get ready for the rage: The conservative majority on the Supreme Court looks likely to gut the last remaining parts of the Voting Rights Act. Prompted by a Black conservative, Justice Clarence Thomas, the high court will consider in October a question that answers itself — whether it is wrong to stop openly racist tactics in drawing congressional districts. Even if the right-wing justices manage to close their eyes to the racial politics involved, they will feel the heat and hear the explosive impact of the backlash to a one-sided ruling. The fuse will be lit in several Republican-controlled states, largely in the South, as white politicians begin diluting votes in Black-majority districts to silence Black voices in Congress. Deep-red state legislatures — think of South Carolina, Alabama and Mississippi — will be free to demolish their Black-majority congressional districts. Those white-majority, Trump-backing state legislatures aim to bring an end to the careers of several Black Democrats in Congress, such as Reps. Cleo Fields (D-La.), Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.), Terri Sewell (D-Ala.) and Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.). As a purely political exercise, Trump and his Republican allies have wanted to eliminate these districts for years, because Black voters are key to the Democratic Party's congressional strength. The Voting Rights Act allows for federal courts to look for racial damage done by gerrymandering districts. In the case now before the high court, involving redistricting in Louisiana, the state was forced to add a second Black-majority district. A federal court ruled that, with 33 percent of the state being Black, it was wrong for only one of its six congressional districts to be majority Black. But that led to a lawsuit over the new map. Along the lines of Thomas's recent call for a total end to the Voting Rights Act, the challengers contend that the law — which was created to protect equal voting rights for Black Americans — now prohibits the court from stopping white Republicans from playing politics and crushing Black power as a proportional representation of a state's racial makeup. Thomas makes the case that attention to 'race-based' construction of congressional districts is out of touch with recent history. He argues that 'specific identified instances' of racial bias, including violent voter suppression, are now distant and amount to relics of the nation's past. Last week, a federal appeals court disagreed. The Fifth Circuit ruled that Louisiana's congressional district map 'packed' and 'cracked' Black populations to limit their political power. The ruling stated there are 'decades of binding precedent' under the 15th Amendment allowing Congress to contest racial bias in redistricting. The 1965 Voting Rights Act was written in response to the nation's long history of keeping political power in white hands. Even after Black men gained the right to vote, it was common for that vote to be suppressed through violence. For perspective, South Carolina is 26 percent Black and 67 percent white. But white-majority Republican congressional districts are 86 percent of South Carolina's seven congressional districts. Only one of seven districts has a majority of Democrats and Black voters — Clyburn's district. The Supreme Court plans to hear arguments on racial redistricting on Oct. 15 — early enough for a decision that could affect the 2026 midterms. If the Black vote is diluted, the Democratic Party's ability to win seats in Congress shrinks, increasing Republican chances of retaining majorities in the House and Senate in 2026. That would keep Trump from becoming a lame duck facing a divided Congress. The Republicans' goal is to maintain majorities in Congress for Trump's last two years in the White House. Then Republicans can appoint more judges to issue more rulings that further weaken Democrats. The downward spiral for Black political power will go on and on. Trump is not hiding his interest in the outcome of gerrymandering efforts in Texas. 'We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats,' Trump told CNBC earlier this month. 'We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas … and we are entitled to five more seats.' Excuse me, Mr. President? Neither you nor the Republican Party is entitled to any seats. Those seats belong to Americans of all colors and parties. Texas Republicans' threats to send law enforcement to forcibly return Texas Democratic legislators to the state capitol to provide a quorum for passing gerrymandered maps are a sideshow. They distract from the real effect that racially-designed gerrymandering can have on race relations and politics for decades to come. Comedian Dave Chappelle famously called Trump 'an honest liar.' In the fight over Texas redistricting, the 'honest liar' is saying that the people looking at redistricting's racial impact are themselves racist. Don't let Trump or his partisans on the high court fool you. Racial justice in Congress is at stake. Democrats will have to fight fire with fire to prevent Trump from diminishing Black voting power. Democrats owe that much to Black voters, who have carried them to electoral victories over the last 60 years. They owe it to the memory of the brave people who marched, were beaten and even died to demand voting rights only 60 years ago.
The Intercept
2 hours ago
- The Intercept
Inside Gaza's Only Catholic Church, One Month After Israel's Attack
The funeral of Fumya Ayaad and Saad Salama inside the Holy Family Church on the night of July 17, 2025. Photo: Khamis Al-Rifi Since the beginning of the genocide in Gaza, Israel has repeatedly attacked religious sites, including mosques and churches. In October 2023, only days after the brutal attacks began, the Israeli military struck the Church of Saint Porphyrius, the oldest church in Gaza, resulting in the deaths of at least 18 people. On July 17, 2025, in what survivors describe as a blatant violation of human and religious values, an Israeli fighter jet bombed the Holy Family Church, the only Catholic church in Gaza, without any prior warning. The strike killed three people and injured at least nine others, three of them critically. Among the dead were Saad Salama, the parish's 60-year-old janitor; Fumya Ayaad, an 84-year-old woman receiving psychosocial support inside a Caritas tent within the church compound; and Najwa Abu Dawood, 71. Najeeb Tarazi, a man with disabilities, was among the seriously injured. The parish priest, Father Gabriel Romanelli, also suffered a leg wound. One month after the attack on the church, I spoke to some of the survivors about what they experienced that day — and how they are continuing to survive, and worship, within the walls of Holy Family, which remain standing despite the damage. This was not the first time the Holy Family Church had been targeted. Israeli raids had previously struck the church twice during the ongoing genocide. Since the beginning of the onslaught, the compound had sheltered between 500 and 600 Palestinian Christians — about 200 families — including children, the elderly, and 54 people with disabilities. For them, the church had been a sanctuary amid the destruction and horror. Father Romanelli was known for his daily calls with the late Pope Francis, who remained in contact with Gaza's Christians until his death in April 2025. These conversations brought a sense of comfort to the Christian people. Pope Francis had repeatedly condemned Israel's conduct and even suggested that accusations of genocide in Gaza warranted investigation. Father Gabriele Romanelli attends to the injured after Israel bombed the Holy Family Church on July 17, 2025. Photo: Khamis Al-Rifi On the morning of the strike, after completing his prayers and a work meeting, Father Romanelli encountered Suhail Abu Dawood, 19, a young postulant of the Institute of the Incarnate Word, on the staircase. When the attack began, Romanelli rushed to help someone else before being injured himself. Suhail sustained a serious shrapnel wound to his side and was hospitalized. Videos circulated on social media later showed Romanelli with his right leg bandaged. The shelling of the church damaged its compound, and the main church building sustained heavy damage. This latest assault on civilians who had sought safety within the church has left us heartbroken. Israel said, as always, that it regretted the incident, describing it as accidental, and promised an investigation. Shadi Abu Dawood, 46, lost his mother, Najwa, that morning. His son Suhail was critically injured alongside Father Romanelli. The day before she died, Najwa asked her son to take her picture. Shadi Abu Dawood with hi mother, Najwa Abu Dawood, on July 16, 2025, one day before the Israeli strike killed her. Photo: Courtesy Shadi Abu Dawood 'She told me, 'Take a photo for me, my son. I want to travel and get treatment,' Shadi said. She had been suffering from a hip fracture since the beginning of the genocide; she could barely walk. That morning, Shadi went to get bread from a nearby baker. Najwa sat in the courtyard with other women. 'Then came the massacre, exactly at 10 a.m. The scene was horrifying — my mother was covered in blood and wounded in the head. I kept calling her: 'Mom, wake up, Mom, wake up.' She's now gone to a place where there is no pain, no sorrow,' Shadi lamented. Najwa was known for her deep faith. 'She always taught the children to pray, to love the Bible, and to hold on to faith. She prayed constantly,' Shadi told me. 'Attacking churches by the Israeli occupation is unjustified, brutal action. We love peace and call for it.' Read our complete coverage Mosa Ayaad, 41, lost his aunt, Fumya Ayaad, 84, in that bombing. 'My aunt Fumya was a calm and gentle soul, she loved to pray and served those around her with a warm smile despite the toll of the years,' Mosa said. Fumya lived deeply rooted in this land, knowing the faces of neighbors and the names of every child in the neighborhood. She shared in people's joys and sorrows without ever distinguishing between Muslim and Christian. Over the years, she was honored multiple times for her excellence and creativity. She worked her way up until she became a school principal, always proud to have raised generations of her neighbors. 'Though she had no children of her own, her legacy lives on in the thousands of Gazans who learned under her care,' Mosa said. The funeral of Fumya Ayaad and Saad Salama inside the Holy Family Church on the night of July 17, 2025. Photo: Khamis Al-Rifi On the day she was killed, the bombing of the church was sudden and fierce. Explosions shook the building, and rubble rained down on worshippers and displaced people who had sought shelter within the church walls, believing it to be a safe haven. 'My aunt died beneath the debris, alongside many others who carried nothing but their faith and a small hope for survival,' he said. 'Seeing the church targeted was a wound to the soul. For us, it is not just a building — it is a house of prayer, a house of gathering, a refuge for the weak.' At that moment, Mosa felt that the attack was not only on the place, but on the spirit that unites us as one community in Gaza. 'Here, Muslims and Christians share the same fate: the same fear, the same loss, the same siege. And under these conditions, our bonds grow even stronger, because we are all fighting to survive and to protect what remains of our lives and dignity,' Mosa highlighted. 'Seeing the church targeted was a wound to the soul.' In Mosa's work as an administrative coordinator at the al-Ahli Arab Hospital, the day of the church bombing was one of the harshest he has ever experienced. He accompanied a paramedic during rescue efforts, helping to evacuate the injured. 'The wounds were severe and varied: deep cuts, burns, fractures. Some victims arrived late because of the shortage of ambulances and transport; some were brought in civilian cars,' continued Mosa. 'The hospital was working far beyond its capacity, but we all gave everything we could to save lives, without the luxury of stopping for a moment.' 'This land carries our story and the memory of those who are gone.' 'Despite the genocide and the fear we live through, what keeps me rooted is that this land carries our story and the memory of those who are gone,' Mosa said. His hope comes from ordinary people — from the solidarity of neighbors, from every hand that reaches out to bandage a wound or wipe away a tear. 'This land is us. As long as we live, we will carry it in our hearts and tell its story,' Mosa emphasized. Montaser Tarazi, 37, was inside with his family when the missile struck. 'We heard a massive explosion. The ground shook. Smoke and ash filled the air. I thought it was the end. I felt terror and deep sadness — especially seeing the children cry.' The church, he said, was more than a house of worship. 'It was a home for everyone who lost theirs. When part of it was destroyed, it felt like our faith itself had been broken. But at the same time, it became even more precious, because it now stands as a witness to our pain.' 'It's hard to describe pain and anger. Churches should be beyond the reach of war. This was a blow to our faith and our peace of mind,' Tarazi said. The church 'became even more precious, because it now stands as a witness to our pain.' Despite the devastation, Gaza's Christian community has refused to fracture. 'There was deep grief and tears, but also great solidarity. People helped each other. We keep praying and still hold Mass despite everything — it gives us hope. We are still rooted here, even if every day we wonder if it's our last,' said Tarazi. Christians share food, treat each other's wounds, care for the children, clean the place, and pray together. The church has become a center of life and solidarity for them. A delegation from the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem visited to check on the injured Christians after the bombing. 'Enough silence. We are human beings, not numbers. We want to live in peace on our land and pray safely in our church,' Tarazi said. Tarazi echoed Mosa, noting that Christians and Muslims share the same fate: 'We are one people. We live with the same fear, hunger, and siege. Our bond was strong before, and now it's even stronger.' Pope Leo XIV expressed his 'profound sorrow' over the Israeli strike on the Catholic parish in Gaza and demanded 'an immediate end to the barbarity' in the Strip. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni directly blamed Israel for the attack. 'The strikes against the civilian population that Israel has carried out for months are unacceptable,' she said. Even amid destruction, Mass is still celebrated in the Holy Family Church. Candles are lit beside shattered windows. Prayers rise above the dust. Children still play in the courtyard, though their laughter is quieter now. What conscience accepts the killing of unarmed civilians who took refuge in churches after losing everything? Attacking places of worship and killing the innocent people inside — a stain on humanity's conscience. The Israeli occupation is arrogant: It doesn't care if you're Christian or Muslim, nor does it care whether it's striking a church, a mosque, a home, or even a school. We are living in the midst of a brutal, merciless genocide that swallows everything.
