Bill C-5 passes the House of Commons vote after accelerated process
The bill would grant cabinet the power to override laws and regulations to get major projects built. In a marathon committee meeting Wednesday evening, the Bloc Québécois and Conservatives worked together to increase transparency and reporting requirements in the bill and prevent the government from overriding more than a dozen laws.
But the government can still override important environmental statutes including the Fisheries Act, Species at Risk Act, Canadian Navigable Waters Act, Canadian Environmental Protection Act, Migratory Birds Convention Act and Impact Assessment Act. The same goes for regulations including Wildlife Area Regulations, Marine Mammal Regulations, two migratory birds regulations as well as port and mining effluent regulations.
MPs had their last chance to amend the bill Friday afternoon in the House of Commons.
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May tried to add the Species at Risk Act to the list of laws cabinet cannot override. The Liberals and Conservatives defeated May's motion, with Liberal MP Nate Erskine-Smith breaking rank and voting with the Bloc Québécois, Green Party and NDP. Erskine-Smith has been critical of Bill C-5 and previously voted against his own government's order to limit debate on the bill, which would also remove some federal barriers to internal trade.
The Liberals and Conservatives voted together not just on the bill itself, but also on a motion to ensure the bill cleared the House of Commons before MPs leave Ottawa for the summer. Parliament will resume sitting in mid-September.
MPs ended up voting on the bill in two parts, as originally requested by the Bloc Québécois. NDP MP Jenny Kwan made the request again today, and the Speaker of the House decided to split the bill into two different votes — one on the internal trade components and one on national interest projects — both of which passed.
'This legislation is an abomination'
The Bloc Québécois, NDP and Green Party say the major projects bill is undemocratic because of the unprecedented powers it grants cabinet and lack of respect for Indigenous rights.
The Chiefs of Ontario and many Indigenous leaders mobilized on Wednesday for a rally on Parliament Hill calling on Carney's government to drop bill C-5 and do it right this time.
On June 16, Sen. Paul Prosper said he plans on putting forward an amendment to slow C-5 down if and when it gets to the Senate in 'hopes that more rational minds prevail in terms of consulting with Indigenous groups.'
Elizabeth May, in the bill's final moments before the House of Commons, reiterated what many have said since it was introduced: that the speed of the bill and the vagueness of its application means much now rests on what exactly the government decides to do with it.
'There are many great projects … I'd love to see move ahead: east-west-north-south electricity grid, a passenger rail and bus interlinked system,' she said.
'There are many projects in the national interest, but we don't know what they will be and the factors in the bill are not requirements. We could have a great project that we all want to see go ahead — or we could have a nightmare."
In the end, May — the sole MP to vote against both parts of the bill — did not mince words.
'This legislation is an abomination and one that will be a stain on the reputation of this government and of our Prime Minister.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
Poilievre calls for Bishnoi Gang to be designated a terrorist group as part of tough-on-crime agenda
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is the latest politician calling for the federal government to designate the India-based Bishnoi Gang as a terrorist entity. His urging came during a visit to Surrey, B.C. RCMP there announced last month it had made two arrests in an extortion investigation targeting the South Asian business community. Police have linked some extortion cases back to the gang, whose leader Lawrence Bishnoi is in prison in India. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Poilievre says the Conservatives are planning to push a tough-on-crime agenda in the House of Commons, when Parliament resumes in the fall. A terror designation for the Bishnoi gang will be part of that, he promised. The move is intended, he says, to help police and prosecutors deal with the international group, which has been active in Surrey, as well as cities such as Calgary and Brampton. Poilievre also says his party will push to increase mandatory prison sentences for extortion, starting with four years for a first offence. 'Our plan repeals catch-and-release bail, brings in mandatory jail time for repeat offenders and ensures that we have a ban on the Bishnoi terrorists, so that this network of extortionists and terrorists are automatically criminalized,' Poilievre said during a news conference. Poilievre is following B.C. Premier David Eby, who asked the federal government to declare the gang a terrorist organization back in June, and the same call made by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith last month. The Conservative Party released a statement about the Bishnoi Gang on Aug. 11. Frank Caputo, the Conservative Shadow Minister for Public Safety, wrote to the federal Minister of Public Safety stating that the gang activities 'include political shootings, extortion of South Asian Canadians and extreme violence … Additionally, Gang members boast of such activities to intimidate other potential targets.' As a result, wrote Caputo, 'law enforcement and all levels of government (should be given) the tools necessary to address the Gang's activities. The designation would permit the government to push back against the Gang with financial, criminal and property sanctions. BREAKING Conservatives call on the Liberals to designate the Lawrence Bishnoi Gang as a terrorist organization. Communities are being terrorized. It's time for the Liberals to act. My letter👇🏼. Canada is home to about 770,000 Sikhs – the largest number outside India. Many moved to Canada in the 1980s when Indian forces launched a violent crackdown on alleged supporters of a movement demanding a separate Sikh homeland, Khalistan, to be carved out of the northern state of Punjab. India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government have faced allegations from Canadian officials, including Canada's former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the RCMP, that Indian intelligence agents have been attempting to carry out targeted assassinations of Sikh separatists overseas, including Canada. The killing of Sikh separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, 45, outside a Sikh temple in B.C. on June 18, 2023, pushed Bishnoi and his gang into the centre spotlight of the ongoing diplomatic tensions between Canada and India. Lawrence Bishnoi gained notoriety back in May 2022, when the gang allegedly murdered prominent Punjabi singer and rapper Sidhu Moosewala in Punjab. Police said Bishnoi's colleague Goldy Brar allegedly orchestrated Moosewala's killing from Canada. The Bishnoi group has also claimed responsibility for attacks on the homes of two prominent Punjabi singers , AP Dhillon and Gippy Grewal, in B.C., over the past two years, as its empire of fear has expanded from Mumbai to Mississauga, Ont. And, on Aug. 7, an alleged Bishnoi gang member claimed responsibility for gunshots fired at a cafe in Surrey, B.C. owned by Indian comedian Kapil Sharma. Indian police officials have said that Bishnoi, 32, controls more t han 700 sharpshooters who carry out murders and extortion globally. And he does this from behind bars, shuffling between various prisons for nearly a decade now. The South Asian community in Surrey and Brampton has been campaigning for more safety on social media, uploading videos of various shootings in the two cities. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .


Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
'Nothing to fear' from Sunshine Coast land deal: NDP
VICTORIA — When the New Democrats concluded a secret agreement with the Sunshine Coast shíshálh Nation a year ago, they included commitments regarding private land that remain secret to this day. The 44-page agreement was withheld from the public until after the 2024 provincial election and not released until January of this year. The province provided the shíshálh with $104 million over five years, the transfer of six square kilometres of Crown land, and committed to expedite exclusive decision-making and Aboriginal title for the nation. But even then, significant passages were redacted, including two full-page schedules detailing tracts of private land that were also targeted for acquisition and/or protection. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Other blanked out passages left one guessing as to what exactly was up. For instance: 'The province recognizes that the (blank) lands are invaluable to the shíshálh Nation and is committed to work collaboratively with shíshálh Nation to seek to ensure the protection of the (blank) lands for future generations.' Also: 'The province has (blank) provided funding directly to shíshálh Nation to allow the shíshálh Nation to attempt to acquire the (blank) lands on a willing-seller, willing-buyer basis and to cover due diligence and transaction costs and expenses, including fees and taxes.' The latter commitment was set out in a separate Lands and Funding Agreement, which was also kept confidential. The province further agreed to 'make reasonable efforts to purchase the (blank) lands within 18 months' of the signing of the agreement on Aug. 16, 2024, meaning by February of next year. The secrecy combined with the sense of urgency generated a lot of questions when the government organized two online information sessions about the agreement in March of this year, months after the deal was struck behind closed doors. Sunshine Coast residents wanted to know what the government was hiding behind the redactions. What private land and how much private land was included? What would it cost to acquire those lands and transfer them to the Indigenous nation? What would then be the status of the formerly private land? Would the public still have access? The ministry of water, land and resource stewardship responded to the more than 300 questions posed by the public with written assurances and explanations, some more persuasive than others. Most of the redacted passages 'relate to commitments made by the province to support shíshálh Nation in protecting certain privately owned land parcels,' said the statement from the ministry. 'These lands hold significant cultural importance for shíshálh Nation.' 'Information on the current property owner or owners is being kept confidential, so as not to divulge the location of the lands being discussed, given that they are extremely sensitive cultural sites (and) to safeguard these lands from any potential disturbance or desecration.' The ministry said it was also standard practice 'to not release information about private property owners during sales to protect their interests as well.' I'm guessing that protection would only apply if the private land owners had already been approached with offers to purchase. There was no word from the ministry on what those purchases would add to the total cost of the agreement. 'We do not have an estimate of the potential cost to protect some of these parcels yet.' The province also tried to assure Sunshine Coast residents that owners of private land had nothing to fear from the move to expedite recognition of Aboriginal title within the traditional territory of the shíshálh Nation. 'The recognition of Aboriginal title by B.C. will respect and protect private lands — private landowners will have the same rights, privileges, and obligations that they do now,' the statement read in part. 'The province does not include fee-simple lands in any land return agreement except on a willing-buyer, willing-seller basis.' Negotiations on recognizing Aboriginal title had not yet begun, so 'it is too early to determine the scope of a potential shíshálh Aboriginal title agreement (and) it is not possible to answer detailed questions about what will be in such an agreement.' As for the secrecy that had characterized the negotiations up to this year, the New Democrats now promised that 'negotiation of an Aboriginal title agreement will require engagement with local government, interest holders, overlapping First Nations, and the public.' Believe it when you see it, as they must be saying on the Sunshine Coast. The NDP's assurances on private property can be seen in a different light in the wake of the recent B.C. Supreme Court decision that questioned what remains of private property title once Aboriginal title has been recognized. Justice Barbara Young, thinking out loud, suggested that in such cases 'the hardship will be borne by non-Indigenous Canadians.' Her findings may make it difficult to sell private land in the part of Richmond where she recognized Aboriginal title. On the Sunshine Coast, the New Democrats maintain that the only transfers of private land will take place on a willing-buyer, willing-seller basis. But if the province fails to overturn Justice Young on appeal, the unwilling-to-sell owners of private property could someday find their land captured by a court-finding of Aboriginal title. vpalmer@


Vancouver Sun
4 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
B.C. Conservatives register new municipal party ahead of next year's local elections
With the registration of a new political party, Conservative candidates could be on ballots for local councils in several of B.C.'s biggest cities for next year's municipal elections. Elections B.C.'s newest list of registered political parties shows that the Conservatives have, as of this week, registered as a civic political party, to operate in 15 B.C. municipalities, including Vancouver, Surrey, Abbotsford, and Kelowna. The municipal Conservative party was registered by David Denhoff, deputy director for the B.C. Conservatives, Elections B.C. records show. The B.C. Conservatives surged from less than two per cent of the vote in 2020 and not a single candidate elected, to electing 44 MLAs last year with 43 per cent of the vote and nearly forming government. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Despite Denhoff's role with the new municipal party, it's not clear at this stage what level of co-ordination — if any — exists between the upstart municipal organization and the B.C. Conservatives. B.C. Conservative leader John Rustad declined to comment Thursday on the launch of the municipal Conservatives. The full list of jurisdictions where the Conservatives are registered to operate includes Abbotsford, Chilliwack, Delta, Fort St. John, Kamloops, Kelowna, the Township of Langley, Maple Ridge, Prince George, Richmond, Saanich, Surrey, Vancouver, Vanderhoof, and West Vancouver. Reached Thursday, Denhoff declined to discuss the new party but said he would share more information soon. dfumano@