logo
‘Crime pays': Criminals driving Lamborghinis abroad to sell thanks to legal loophole

‘Crime pays': Criminals driving Lamborghinis abroad to sell thanks to legal loophole

Telegraph25-04-2025

Lamborghinis and other luxury cars bought with the proceeds of crime are being driven abroad to be sold off, the National Crime Agency (NCA) has warned ministers.
The agency said a gap in the law means police officers cannot intervene to seize the vehicles unless there is direct evidence to link them to a crime.
It said the loophole means criminals are being left free to launder their illicit gains by selling the cars and using the cash receipts to either fund further crime or their lifestyles.
The NCA has asked the Government to legislate to add cars to the group of 'listed assets' – which already include items such as fine art and jewellery – that can be seized by officers on suspicion that they have been bought with unlawful funds.
Expensive cars such as Lamborghinis have been a traditional asset used by criminals to launder their profits. One, with the numberplates 'crime pays', was among £6 million of assets seized from county lines dealers who flooded the UK with cocaine.
Three members of the gang, Leon Ley, 34, Dale Martin, 28, and Daniel Harris, 40, saw assets also including a Range Rover, luxury caravans and cash confiscated after they were caught trafficking 50kg of drugs from London and Essex to Wales.
The proposed law change would give officers the power to detain the cars before they leave the country and to later pursue forfeiture proceedings at court to take ownership of them.
To avoid this, the owner would have to convince a judge that the car being targeted by the NCA had been bought with legally earned money and counter the agency's case that it had instead been acquired as a way of laundering the proceeds of crime.
The NCA's push for a legal change followed a succession of cases in which officers have had to watch high value vehicles being driven abroad despite concerns about the criminal background of their owners.
In one example, in August last year a Lamborghini with a declared value of £130,000 was spotted leaving the country to be delivered to the EU by two people with extensive criminal records for serious offending.
It was supposedly being driven abroad for 'diagnostic engine work' on behalf of the absent owner. But there was no evidence of bookings for accommodation, garage or return travel, and officers believed the true reason was to launder criminal proceeds by selling the vehicle.
In another case, in June last year, a Lamborghini with a trade value of £182,000, which was driven by the target of a law enforcement investigation, was transported out of the UK via Dover on a trailer. It has not returned.
Officers were unable to act because there was no direct evidence of criminality and no border offence was committed. That meant the vehicles could not be seized to stop them from leaving the UK.
A source said similar cases involving high end vehicles being taken out of the UK in suspicious circumstances were 'regularly' seen by other agencies including Border Force, HMRC, Immigration Enforcement and Home Office Intelligence.
By adding cars to the 'listed assets' in the Criminal Finances Act of 2017, they could be seized. Items already included on this list also include precious metals, precious stones and watches.
The latest Home Office asset recovery bulletin, published in September last year, showed there was a total of 163 'listed asset seizures' with a value of £7 million in the financial year to the end of last March – the highest annual total since the seizure power was introduced.
Among those who have laundered criminal assets into cars is Alexander Surin, a fugitive crime lord from London who was dubbed 'Don Car-leone' because he owned so many expensive cars.
Surin was forced to hand over four – three Ferraris and a Rolls-Royce – as well as the profits from the sale of a Bugatti Veyron after admitting in High Court litigation brought by the NCA that they were bought with the proceeds of crime.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man charged after 'items thrown' from one vehicle to another on A90
Man charged after 'items thrown' from one vehicle to another on A90

STV News

time42 minutes ago

  • STV News

Man charged after 'items thrown' from one vehicle to another on A90

A man has been charged after items were thrown from one vehicle to another in Aberdeenshire. The incident occurred on the A90 heading northbound near Laurencekirk between 12.30pm and 12.45pm on Thursday. A grey BMW 3 and a grey Range Rover Sport were travelling at low speeds at the time of the incident. Items were thrown from the BMW towards the Range Rover, causing damage. A 33-year-old man has been charged in connection with a road traffic offence and a report is due to be sent to the Procurator Fiscal. Constable Scott Walmsley said: 'Enquiries remain ongoing and we are appealing for anyone who witnessed the incident to contact us. 'We also ask drivers in the area at the time with dash-cam footage to please come forward.' Those with information are urged to contact Police Scotland on 101 quoting incident 1548 of Thursday, June 5, 2025. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Complete list of 15 jobs 'not entitled' to National Minimum Wage
Complete list of 15 jobs 'not entitled' to National Minimum Wage

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Complete list of 15 jobs 'not entitled' to National Minimum Wage

The Government-set National Minimum Wage rates are typically updated every year on April 1 If you assumed that everyone is entitled to the National Minimum Wage, you'd be wrong. A small handful of career paths aren't guaranteed this basic pay or the National Living Wage - and that even includes company directors. While the National Living Wage offers a higher rate for people aged 21 and over, the National Minimum Wage sets the minimum legal hourly wage for workers. Yet, not every worker is entitled to these rates, with a staggering 15 job categories being exempt. ‌ Among those who might forgo this fundamental wage are members of the armed forces and even fishermen. The Government also lists the following: ‌ Members of the armed forces Self-employed people running their own business Workers on a government employment programme, such as the Work Programme People living and working in a religious community Workers on government pre-apprenticeships schemes People on the following European Union (EU) programmes: Leonardo da Vinci, Erasmus+, Comenius People shadowing others at work People working on a Jobcentre Plus Work trial for up to 6 weeks People who are volunteers or voluntary workers Prisoners Workers younger than school leaving age (usually 16) Family members of the employer living in the employer's home Higher and further education students on work experience or a work placement up to one year Company directors Share fishermen Meanwhile, employees are entitled to the correct minimum wage if they are: Casual labourers, for example someone hired for one day Agency workers Offshore workers Apprentices Trainees, workers on probation Agricultural workers Foreign workers Seafarers Workers and homeworkers paid by the number of items they make Part-time Disabled workers Non-family members living in the employer's home who share in the work and leisure activities and are treated as one of the family, for example, au pairs Apprentices are also entitled to an apprentice rate if they are under 19 or over 19 and in the first year of their apprenticeship. "Apprentices over 19 who have completed the first year of their apprenticeship are entitled to the correct minimum wage for their age," the Government adds. ‌ What is the current National Minimum Wage? The Government-set wage rates are updated every year on April 1. As of April 1 2025, the rates are now: £12.21 (aged 21 and over) £10 (aged 18 to 20) £7.55 (aged under 18) £7.55 (apprentice rate) Brits are encouraged to use the Government's minimum wage calculator to check whether they are receiving the National Minimum Wage. Reach out to Acas if you're not getting the National Minimum Wage and think you should be. For more information, head to the Government's website.

Is YOUR pension safe? Concerns over new law letting companies take 'surpluses' from schemes relied on by nine million Brits
Is YOUR pension safe? Concerns over new law letting companies take 'surpluses' from schemes relied on by nine million Brits

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Is YOUR pension safe? Concerns over new law letting companies take 'surpluses' from schemes relied on by nine million Brits

Concerns have been raised over plans to let firms take profits from pension funds used by around nine million Brits. Proposed changes to 'defined benefit' schemes would mean that 'surplus' cash can be extracted for profit or re-investment. The government argues the move will free up £11.2billion over the next decade that would be partly shared with members. It would also provide a £.28billion windfall for the Treasury, as the drawdown would be taxable. However, the impact assessment for the Pensions Bill acknowledged that the overhaul removes a 'cushion' and might make it more likely schemes will 'struggle'. DB pensions - such as final salary and career average arrangements - have diminished in the private sector since the 1980s. They have been replaced largely by 'defined contribution' schemes, where the individual and employer pays into a specific 'pot' to fund retirement. The Pensions Bill impact assessment said: 'If schemes choose to modify their rules to enable surplus extraction, this adds an indirect cost to members in terms of the increased likelihood of members not receiving their pension benefits in full. 'A scheme surplus can act as a financial cushion for members, to absorb unexpected costs or investment losses for the scheme. 'Without this cushion, the scheme may be more likely to struggle to meet its obligations to members, especially in times of financial stress or economic shocks.' The document stressed that schemes would be required to meet conditions to extract a surplus, in order to 'protect members'. As a result the risk of members not receiving benefits in full was seen as 'very low'. 'For employers with a weak covenant, accessing a surplus may improve the employer financial position but may risk the pension scheme becoming underfunded,' the assessment said. 'If sponsoring employers of underfunded schemes were to also become insolvent, these schemes may then transfer into the PPF, increasing its liabilities and may mean members potentially losing out. 'Overall, it is assumed this increased likelihood of members not receiving their benefits in full to be very low given the important role trustees will play in overseeing any decision.' The Pension Security Alliance (PSA), which includes campaigning group Silver Voices, told the Telegraph: 'It's shocking to learn that civil servants have told ministers that if these plans go ahead, some pension schemes could struggle to meet their obligations to pay pensions.' Steve Webb, partner at pension consultants LCP, said: 'There really is a lot of 'surplus' money locked up in these schemes, over and above what is needed to comfortably pay the pensions. 'If done responsibly, some of this money can be used to boost the pensions of people in these schemes (eg give them better inflation protection) and boost the position of British business (who have paid in the lion's share of the money). 'Note that companies cannot simply dip in to the fund - this all has to be agreed with the trustees who are there to look after the interests of members.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store