logo
ABAD claims major tax reductions to boost property investment

ABAD claims major tax reductions to boost property investment

Express Tribune10-02-2025

Listen to article
Mohsin Sheikhani, the Patron-in-Chief of the Association of Builders and Developers of Pakistan (ABAD), has stated that a new era for property investment is about to begin.
He was asked if the government is planning to reduce taxes in order to boost investment in the sector. In a statement, Sheikhani said that the government would reduce the tax on property transactions and transfers for filers from 13% to 2-3%.
He stated that other taxes, including Capital Value Tax, Capital Gains Tax, Federal Excise Duty, and Super Tax, would also be reduced or eliminated.
Sheikhani claimed that no new taxes would be imposed on filers in the property sector. He added that the government was also working to resolve issues related to land encroachments, with Sindh IG being tasked with clearing land occupied illegally.
'ABAD has proposed affordable housing schemes to foreign investors at lower prices,' he said. He also mentioned plans to collaborate with the city government to transform a slum area in District South into a model project.
Sheikhani further revealed that a delegation from ABAD would meet with the prime minister later this week to discuss further developments and strategic plans for the property sector.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Finance Bill 2025 nearly done: Rs200bn new tax measures of GST, FED expected
Finance Bill 2025 nearly done: Rs200bn new tax measures of GST, FED expected

Business Recorder

time2 days ago

  • Business Recorder

Finance Bill 2025 nearly done: Rs200bn new tax measures of GST, FED expected

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has almost finalized Finance Bill (2025-26) and expected to announce new taxation measures of nearly Rs 200 billion of sales tax and Federal Excise Duty (FED) in the fiscal budget (2025-26). Sources told Business Recorder that the working on the new Finance Bill has been given final touches on Thursday. The revenue generation measures may include 18 percent sales tax on the import of solar panels. Unregistered taxpayers: 4pc 'further sales tax' to be abolished Among other proposals, 18 percent sales tax would be imposed on e-commerce. The FBR has finalized items which would be deleted from the Sixth Schedule (Exemption Schedule) and Eighth Schedule-lower rate of sales tax of the Sales Tax Act. The government my increase sales tax rate on a large number of items subjected to lower rate of sales tax or concessionary sales tax rates in coming budget (2025-26). In this regard, the FBR is compiling a list of items on which sales tax rate would be increased. However, some cancer related medical equipment and lifesaving drugs would be added in the sales tax exemption schedule of the Sales Tax Act. According to sources, the FBR may expand the scope of sales tax on services within the territorial jurisdiction of federal capital in budget (2025-26). The FBR has also decided to impose 18 percent sales tax on goods manufactured in erstwhile tribal areas in the federal budget (2025-26). The scope of the Third Schedule would be expanded to include more items for charging sales tax on the basis of printed retail price. The imported chocolates, coffee and imported cereals would be included in the Third Schedule of the Sales Tax Act. Sources added that the FBR may impose 5 percent FED on a wide range of ultra-processed foods covering frozen foods, chips, carbonated drinks, instant noodles, ice cream, biscuits, frozen meat, sauces, ready-made meals, sausages and many other kinds of ultra-processed foods. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Hoping against hope for a ‘bold budget'
Hoping against hope for a ‘bold budget'

Business Recorder

time2 days ago

  • Business Recorder

Hoping against hope for a ‘bold budget'

EDITORIAL: The finance minister, Mohammad Aurangzeb, is describing the upcoming budget as a 'bold budget.' However, the FBR (Federal Board of Revenue) is attempting to impose regressive and lazy taxes through the backdoor measures that can be called anything but certainly not bold. The tax machinery remains fixated on extracting revenue without broadening the tax base, and in doing so it is, in fact, strangling the formal economy. A glaring example is the government's last-minute attempt to impose a Capital Value Tax (CVT) on movable assets such as cash and gold — a move rightly objected to by the IMF (International Monetary Fund). The government's mindset appears to be to offer relief through populist measures, while making up the revenue shortfall with ad hoc, irrational proposals. There remains no considerable effort to expand the tax base or bring the under-taxed and untaxed segments into the net. Simultaneously, the government is proposing to increase the withholding tax (WHT) rate on income from bank deposits and investments in mutual funds — while also attempting to apply CVT on cash. Such steps will only push the economy further into informality, encouraging people to withdraw funds from the banking system and divert savings into gold, foreign currency, or even hide the money under their mattresses. Pakistan's tax system is already highly regressive, with one of the highest sales tax rates and widespread application of Federal Excise Duty (FED) and WHT (Withholding Tax) across transactions of various goods and services running in parallel with sales tax and federal excise duty in VAT mode. A sizeable portion of income tax is collected at the import stage. Now, the proposal for a wealth tax adds another layer of burden, not reform, but regression. Previously, the government imposed CVT on foreign assets, including those declared under the amnesty scheme — despite the explicit promise that, upon paying the specified tax, wealth would be accepted as legitimate. The government later backtracked on this commitment, and the CVT, therefore, is now being challenged in court. Those who declared their wealth feel betrayed, while those who did not are reaping the benefits. Now, even those who have fully declared and paid taxes on their assets are being pushed toward informality. The kind of taxes FBR is proposing will only deepen the grey areas of the economy. Needless to say, Pakistan already suffers from an abysmally low savings rate, which translates into low investment. The savings-investment gap perpetrates current account deficits, triggering recurring balance of payments crises. Regressive tax measures will only worsen this trend by discouraging savings. The continuation of high-income taxes, including super taxes, is also a significant deterrent to investment and capital formation. The talk of a wealth tax causes further uncertainty and dampens investor confidence. The core issue is that the government seems intent on taxing everything that is documented — merely plugging in numbers wherever feasible. This mindset, along with coercive tactics, erodes trust between the state and the taxpayer and undermines efforts to broaden the tax base. Domestic investors and family business groups are shifting their wealth abroad. Salaried professionals are seeking jobs outside Pakistan. Talent and capital are both leaving the country. This outflow seriously threatens privatisation efforts, especially since history shows that when domestic investors have earned returns — such as in the case of IPPs — the state has reneged on its commitments. Foreign investors, on the other hand, have at times been spared the same treatment. This disparity has made local investors reluctant to bid for Discos unless backed by foreign partners — yet foreign interest remains weak, as seen in the case of KE shareholders who have not received a single rupee as dividend in 20 years. The government urgently needs to improve investor sentiment and foster an enabling environment for investment. However, the current approach — milking the formal sector to implicitly subsidise the informal one — is exacerbating the problem. If the government genuinely wants to be bold, it must do the right things: build trust, broaden the tax net equitably, and create policies that support sustainable, inclusive economic growth. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Tola suggests MAT via CVT
Tola suggests MAT via CVT

Business Recorder

time3 days ago

  • Business Recorder

Tola suggests MAT via CVT

LAHORE: Taxonomist Ashfaq Yousuf Tola has suggested introduction of Minimum Asset Tax (MAT) via Capital Value Tax (CVT) and modernization of the definition of 'Resident Individual' for tax purposes to broaden the tax base and ensure equity within the tax system. To ensure high-net-worth individuals contribute a fair share to national revenue, he has proposed to introduce MAT by expanding the scope of Capital Value Tax CVT. He said the MAT would apply to resident individuals whose domestic assets exceed PKR 100 million and the tax would be charged at 1% of the fair market value of the assets exceeding this threshold. According to him, MAT would be adjustable against the individual's income tax liability, serving as a minimum threshold for direct taxation rather than imposing an extra tax burden. Regarding modernization of the definition of 'Resident Individual' for tax purposes, he said the current residency definition under Section 82 of the Income Tax Ordinance. 2001, which classifies a resident as someone spending 183 days or more in Pakistan, is outdated and lacks alignment with more nuanced residency rules in other jurisdictions. Tola has proposed a revised framework, saying that a more appropriate definition of residency would classify individuals as a 'resident' if they stay in Pakistan for 182 days or more during a financial year. For individuals who stay between 120 and 181 days, he said, their residency status should depend on both citizenship and income. Specifically, Tola pointed out, a Pakistani citizen (as defined under the Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951) or a person holding a Pakistan Origin Card (POC) who earns income exceeding a prescribed threshold (excluding foreign-sourced income), and has no tax liability in any other country, should be treated as a Resident but Not Ordinarily Resident (RNOR). Those who do not meet these criteria should be classified as non-residents, he stressed. Also, he said, individuals who spend less than 120 days in Pakistan during the financial year should be treated as Non-Residents, regardless of their income or nationality. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store