Syria Says to be Relinked to SWIFT Payment System
Syria will be fully reconnected to the SWIFT international payment system "in a matter of weeks" after more than a decade of sanctions, central bank governor Abdelkader Husrieh told the Financial Times in an interview published on Monday.
We 'aim to enhance the brand of the country as a financial hub given the expected foreign direct investment in rebuilding and infrastructure — this is crucial," Husrieh said. 'While significant progress has been made, there's still much work ahead.'
Interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa received a major boost last month when US President Donald Trump unexpectedly lifted sanctions.
While that was a welcome step, 'a full policy shift is still needed', said Husrieh, who began his new job in April. 'So far, we've only seen license issuance and selective sanctions removal. Implementation must be comprehensive, not ad hoc.'
According to the Financial Times, Husrieh has been working with the finance ministry on 'a six to 12 month stabilization plan.' This involves reforming banking laws and the central bank, and overhauling social security and housing financing to encourage Syrians in the diaspora to invest in the country, among other initiatives.
Husrieh wants to end the Assad regime's interventionist legacy, and restore lending capabilities, transparency and trust.
'The central bank previously micromanaged the financial system, over-regulated lending, and restricted deposit withdrawals,' he said. 'We aim to reform the sector through recapitalization, deregulation and by re-establishing their role as financial intermediaries between households and businesses.'
SWIFT's return will help encourage foreign trade, cut import costs and facilitate exports, he said. It would also bring much-needed foreign currency into the country, strengthen anti-money laundering efforts and ease the dependence on informal financial networks for cross-border trade.
'The plan is for all foreign trade to now be routed through the formal banking sector,' Husrieh said, thereby eradicating the role of money changers who would charge 40 cents of every dollar that came into Syria. He said banks and the central bank have been assigned Swift codes, and the 'remaining step is for correspondent banks to resume processing transfers.'
Foreign investment will also be shored up by guarantees, he said. While the public banking sector is already fully backed by the government, Husrieh is looking to establish a state institution to guarantee private banks' deposits.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
28 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump to speak with Netanyahu, Axios reports
US President Donald Trump is expected to speak with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday, an Axios reporter said in a post on X, citing a source familiar.
Arab News
29 minutes ago
- Arab News
Beirut, Damascus and the challenge of being a normal country
The Lebanese people often complain about advice from ambassadors and dictates from international financial organizations. They believe that the outside world is paving their road and setting their goals for them. They are annoyed that their country is being treated like a minor; that the world has no faith in its ability to get itself out of the abyss. The abundance of doctors and treatments often deepen the patient's confusion. There can be no arguing that the Lebanese people, like all other peoples, have the right to address their present and shape their future. However, reclaiming this right cannot be achieved simply by reminding people of the obvious. Hegemonies begin when countries start to break apart under the weight of divisions and interventions. The Lebanese divisions are old and so are the interventions. The most dangerous thing that can happen to a country is the loss of its ability to take a decision. A lack of this ability depletes what remains of the fortifications that should be available to a sovereign and independent nation. The problem is compounded when the country is surrounded by wars and conflicts that are beyond its ability to either join or distance itself from. And so, the country becomes captive both on the inside and before the outside world. Al-Sharaa surprised the Syrians, the region and the world. His choice was Syria first and foremost Ghassan Charbel The truth is that the Lebanese patient has suddenly found himself floundering in a cycle of wars that erupted after Operation Al-Aqsa Flood. Then it found itself confronted with the difficult endings of these wars, which were contrary to the goals of the ones who launched the flood and the 'support front.' The people of the region did not need new experiences to become acquainted with Israel's hostility and the savagery of its army. But what has happened has given the Israeli killing machine the opportunity to go to the extreme in its destruction and killing, even going so far as to commit genocide. Observers of Israel's behavior in Gaza, the West Bank, Syria and Lebanon sense that the balance of power has been broken and is now tipped heavily to the Israeli side. There is no need to remind the reader of the blood being shed at the aid distribution points in Gaza; no need to explain the meaning of the Israeli army warning residents of Beirut's southern suburbs to evacuate specific buildings before striking. The daily assassinations carried out by Israeli drones in Lebanon hold clear messages and so does the continued destruction of the remaining capabilities of the former Syrian army. The people of the region do not need someone to explain to them the significance of the collapse of the former Syrian regime. The end of the Assad regime changed certain features and roles in the region. The collapse broke the chain of the so-called Axis of Resistance that started in Tehran and ended in Beirut, passing through Baghdad and Damascus. This is a massive change that confronted officials with very difficult choices. Ahmad Al-Sharaa entered the Syrian presidential palace and was confronted with dangerous new facts. A country broken and without an army and state institutions. A country drowning in fear and poverty, where millions live in refugee camps near the border. Al-Sharaa had to choose and take decisions. The era of factions means endless wars, the fragmentation of Syria and more blood and death. Al-Sharaa had to convince the Syrians and the world. There needed to be a moment for Syria to catch its breath, regroup and bring in aid. Al-Sharaa surprised the Syrians, the region and the world. His choice was Syria first and foremost. He has no desire to surrender to old formulas, unyielding beliefs and outdated treatments. He decided to understand the balance of power in the region and the world and deal with it. The obsession of saving Syria and reclaiming it from militias and hegemonies took precedence. Al-Sharaa sent a frank message that the new Syria wants to be a normal country. One where the state monopolizes control over decisions of war and peace and the possession of arms. This is not an easy task at all. The establishment of a normal state demands respecting local and international laws and ensuring equality between segments of society. It means abandoning the rhetoric of eliminating the other and changing features. The world is demanding that Lebanon return to being a normal country that can be trusted, helped and supported Ghassan Charbel The emergence of such determination encouraged countries eager to help Syria. Al-Sharaa said the new Syria does not want to pose a threat to any of its neighbors. This desire to quit the military aspect of the conflict with Israel paved the way for handshakes and recognitions. Despite the difficulties, there is a sense that Al-Sharaa's journey has kicked off with regional and international support. This has taken place at the same time as the Lebanese people have been dreaming that their country could also kick off the journey of returning toward being a normal state. This dream was reawakened with the election of Joseph Aoun as president and the appointment of Nawaf Salam as prime minister. The Lebanese people were hopeful as a result of the president's swearing-in speech and the government's policy statement. Months have since passed and the Lebanese ship has not yet sailed. The conditions that led to Al-Sharaa's arrival to power differ from those that led to Aoun and Salam's arrival. Lebanon's composition is very complicated and uniting the people is not easy. It is evident that Hezbollah's reading of what is taking place in the region is different from those of other Lebanese segments and of Aoun and Salam. The world is demanding that Lebanon return to being a normal country that can be trusted, helped and supported. Aoun and Salam cannot do this alone. The responsibility equally lies with Speaker Nabih Berri, given his standing in the Shiite community and throughout the country. A return to being a normal state cannot take place without Hezbollah reading how the war ended and what is taking place in Syria. Keeping Lebanon hanging in the Iranian and non-Iranian balances will leave it at risk of wasting its international support. The world set a condition for the new Syria to agree to become a normal country, and it did. Lebanon's lack of serious collective decision-making to move toward such a goal will leave it vulnerable to many surprises. This article first appeared in Asharq Al-Awsat.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Iran obtaining IAEA documents is ‘bad,' shows poor cooperation, Grossi says
Iran 's acquisition of confidential UN nuclear watchdog documents is a 'bad' step that goes against the spirit of cooperation that should exist between the agency and Tehran, its chief Rafael Grossi said on Monday. The International Atomic Energy Agency said in a confidential report on Iran to member states on May 31 seen by Reuters that it had 'conclusive evidence of highly confidential documents belonging to the Agency having been actively collected and analyzed by Iran.' The report said that 'raises serious concerns regarding Iran's spirit of collaboration' and could undermine the IAEA's work in Iran, but Tehran said in a statement to member states last week that the accusation in the report was 'slanderous' and had been made 'without presenting any substantiated proof or document.' The IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors is holding a quarterly meeting this week. The United States, Britain, France and Germany plan to propose a resolution for the board to adopt that would declare Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations over other failings outlined in the report. 'Here, unfortunately, and this dates to a few years ago ... we could determine with all clarity that documents that belong to the agency were in the hands of Iranian authorities, which is bad,' Grossi told a press conference. 'We believe that an action like this is not compatible with the spirit of cooperation.' Asked about the nature of the documents and whether they were originally Iranian ones that had been seized by Israel and supplied to the agency, Grossi said: 'No. We received documents from member states, and also we have our own assessments on documents, on equipment, etc.'
