
Extra school places created in Wolverhampton to deal with demand
A combination of factors were behind the rise, according to the council report, which included migration, regeneration and housing, and the popularity and Ofsted ratings of Wolverhampton schools.The funding would help with the demand for places in the north of the city including Oxley, Bushbury, Low Hill and Fallings Park, the council said.
'Exceed admission limits'
Historically each year group would grow by about 300 pupils – or 10 classes – from the start to the end of primary school, according to the council.But the level of growth was already exceeding the average, the report said.Pupils starting secondary school in Wolverhampton next year have seen their year groups grow by more than 330 pupils from starting primary school in 2018.The city's year five cohort has already grown by nearly 360 pupils according to the same figures.The current year two cohort has grown by nearly nine classes in three years and the city's year one cohort has already increased by nearly six class sizes in two years."The impact of this level of growth has made it increasingly difficult to allocate a school that is a parental preference," the report stated."This can result in increased appeals, families having to travel a further distance and schools having to exceed admission limits without extra accommodation or resources."In addition to this there is a real risk regarding sufficiency and ensuring that there are enough good quality school places in the local area."
This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations.
Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Ofsted's new inspection proposals are vague and out of date, say experts
Proposals for overhauled school inspections have been criticised as cosmetic, vague and potentially out of date by school leaders and Department for Education (DfE) officials, just days before approval by Ofsted's management. Ofsted, the schools inspectorate, has made changes to its new school inspection toolkit – how it will carry out inspections – after earlier criticisms. It plans on renaming grades and shrinking the number of evaluations areas from nine to seven, in the latest draft seen by the Guardian, but appears unlikely to win over sceptical teachers in England. The new system is part of efforts to implement the government's manifesto pledge to replace inspection reports with a 'report card' format and do away with single summary grades such as 'inadequate' that have become controversial since the death of Ruth Perry in 2023. But Ofsted's struggle to reform its inspection framework is turning into a headache for Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, who is also juggling a curriculum review and an overhaul of special needs education in England that are all scheduled to be published in autumn. The draft proposals, to be approved by Ofsted's executive on Wednesday, has ditched controversial plans for a 'secure' grade and instead renamed it 'expected standard', after complaints that the original term was confusing. The top grade, previously proposed as 'exemplary', has been replaced by 'exceptional', the 'strong' grade amended to 'strong standard', while the lowest 'causing concern' grade is changed to 'urgent improvement'. There are also plans to cut the number of evaluation areas from nine to seven, by combining the teaching and curriculum areas into one, and merging the attendance and behaviour areas. It also revises the report card's 'traffic light' colour codes for grades, with the top exceptional grade to be blue instead of dark green. But the changes have been criticised as 'cosmetic' by school leaders and are unlikely to settle the fears of teaching unions and multi-academy trusts, with one describing the proposals as 'a pick-and-mix of statutory rules taken from random documents and turned into an inspection framework'. Those who have seen the revisions say it is studded with ill-defined language asking inspectors to evaluate categories such as leadership or assessment as 'broadly,' 'typically' or 'on the whole' in line with national performance. 'Some of the things that have made it in, you're thinking, how do you inspect that? There's a whole lot of vague language. I don't think they are going to implement it,' one school leader said. 'A lot of schools are going to end up in the middle bracket [of grades] because Ofsted won't be able to argue against it. It's a mess, it lacks precision, and there's too much overlap between different categories.' DfE officials have raised concerns that the proposals fail to take account of the government's plans to have mainstream schools open more units for children with special educational needs and disabilities (Send), as part of the overhaul of special needs provision in England to be announced in autumn, around the same time as the new inspection framework is being introduced. Feedback by DfE officials seen by the Guardian describes 'future-proofing and sequencing concerns' about the toolkit, including that the expectations around pupils with Send 'may become out of date'. The DfE feedback also suggests schools may be put off enrolling pupils with special needs because of Ofsted's requirement that schools must achieve 'above average outcomes' in Sats or GCSEs to be awarded high inspection grades. A spokesperson for Ofsted declined to respond directly to the criticisms but noted: 'Our proposals, including the toolkits, will be formally finalised when we publish our response to the consultation in early September and not before. 'We don't recognise the 'DfE criticism' assertion – we are not out of step with government proposals. We have already made clear in recent press releases that we're revising the toolkits to tighten language, in response to feedback – we are confident this will be recognised in September.' A DfE spokesperson said: 'Our Send reforms will make sure there is more early intervention in mainstream schools, and we are working closely with Ofsted to ensure their education inspection framework enables this. 'We are laying the groundwork to ensure all children have access to the help they need, from more early support in mainstream schools across ADHD, autism and speech and language needs, through to £740m investment to encourage councils to create more specialist places in mainstream schools.' Ofsted's full proposals are due to be implemented from November. However, the Association of School and College Leaders and the National Association of Head Teachers have said that timetable is 'entirely unacceptable', adding: 'It will significantly add to workload pressures, negatively affect leaders' and teachers' wellbeing and mental health, and further undermine trust in the proposed framework.' Relations between Ofsted and the teaching profession have been deeply strained since a coroner's finding that Perry's death was 'contributed to by an Ofsted inspection'. Perry's sister, Julia Waters, has described Ofsted's proposed changes to inspections as 'a rehash of a deeply flawed system'.


BBC News
3 days ago
- BBC News
Youth detention centre in Milton Keynes removes 33 staff members
Thirty-three members of staff working at a young offenders centre have been suspended or dismissed since November, Ofsted's chief inspector said. Sir Martyn Oliver wrote a letter to Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood ahead of the release of an official report into Oakhill Secure Training Centre (STC) in Milton wrote that between November 2024 and the end of July this year, 30 members of staff had been suspended, 23 of which were related to allegations about their conduct with 20 July, the centre's director and one of its deputy directors were also suspended. A second deputy director was later dismissed. Inspectors from Ofsted, HM Inspectorate of Prisons and the Care Quality Commission carried out a full inspection between 21 and 25 letter said the report, which has not yet been published, had found children living in unsanitary conditions, a lack of staff and poor also mentioned how allegations about staff conduct had not been shared with the human resources department, which meant staff were continuing to inappropriately work with children had experienced unintentional pain when staff attempted to use physical restraint, according to the Martyn wrote how medicines were not safely administered and visitors were not stopped from bringing in foods to which some children were was also found that all children were made to pay towards charities from their personal Martyn has invoked the urgent notification process which will require the secretary of state to respond within 28 days outlining how Oakhill STC will be improved. Oakhill STC was found to be inadequate at a previous inspection in October 2024. At that time, there were 68 boys and two girls living at the centre.G4S, which runs Oakhill, appointed an interim director who has been in post since 14 justice minister Sir Nic Dakin said: "This is a truly shocking and unacceptable report."I have already visited Oakhill Secure Training Centre this week to ensure urgent action is being taken by G4S to prioritise the safety of the young people in their custody, and to further address the very serious concerns raised by Ofsted and the chief inspector."We will publish an action plan within the month to support them further in these efforts - and will not hesitate to take further action if needed." A spokesperson for Oakhill STC said: "The safety and welfare of children at Oakhill STC is our highest priority and we take the Ofsted inspection findings extremely seriously."We are working collaboratively with the Youth Custody Service and His Majesty's Prison and Probation Service to develop a robust action plan to address the concerns raised." Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


The Independent
4 days ago
- The Independent
‘Serious and systemic failures' at Oakhill youth jail prompt Government action
The Government has promised urgent reforms at Oakhill Secure Training Centre after inspectors uncovered 'serious and systemic failures' putting children at risk. Youth justice minister Sir Nic Dakin described the findings as 'truly shocking and unacceptable' following an inspection that led Ofsted, the CQC (Care Quality Commission) and HMI Prisons to issue an urgent notification to Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood. Inspectors found safeguarding systems in disarray, a fractured leadership team, and 30 staff suspended since November 2024 – 23 of them before mid-July this year, including 16 over allegations involving children. Sir Nic said: 'This is a truly shocking and unacceptable report. 'I have already visited Oakhill Secure Training Centre this week to ensure urgent action is being taken by G4S to prioritise the safety of the young people in their custody, and to further address the very serious concerns raised by Ofsted and the chief inspector. 'We will publish an action plan within the month to support them further in these efforts – and will not hesitate to take further action if needed.' Inspectors said Oakhill, in Milton Keynes, is no longer child-centred and found staff conduct to be of 'significant concern'. One deputy director has been dismissed, while the other and the centre's director are suspended. An interim director and new deputy have started work but have had 'limited opportunity' to make an impact. In response, G4S has appointed an interim director, and all staff implicated in allegations have been suspended. Concerns have been reported to local authorities, statutory bodies and the police where necessary. Each child's placement is now being reviewed, with the option to reduce the number of children at the centre if required. A governing governor has been also installed to provide additional oversight, alongside another appointed to lead on the urgent notification process. The Ministry of Justice said a full action plan would be published within 28 days. A spokesperson for Oakhill said: 'The safety and welfare of children at Oakhill STC is our highest priority and we take the Ofsted inspection findings extremely seriously. 'We are working collaboratively with the YCS (Youth Custody Service) and HMPPS (HM Prison and Probation Service) to develop a robust action plan to address the concerns raised.' The inspection, carried out between July 21 and 25, follows years of concerns about the centre. Oakhill was rated inadequate at its last full inspection in October 2024 and has not received a rating higher than 'requires improvement' since 2017. The urgent notification process was introduced in 2017 to allow inspectors to trigger immediate action in cases of serious failure. It comes amid wider concerns about the youth custody estate, with MPs warning in a recent report that delays to secure schools and centre closures have left vulnerable children – particularly girls – in 'unsafe conditions'. The Public Accounts Committee said the system was 'totally unsuited' to meeting children's complex needs and warned that custody numbers are expected to more than double by 2024. Dame Meg Hillier, who chairs the committee, said the Government lacked a coherent strategy for youth custody and urged ministers to 'get a grip'.