logo
Man found inside Senate Chamber Friday, again Saturday; investigation underway

Man found inside Senate Chamber Friday, again Saturday; investigation underway

CBS News4 days ago
An investigation is underway after capitol security found a man inside the Minnesota Senate chamber late Friday night even though the building was closed to the public, according to an email obtained by WCCO News sent to senators and staff.
Around 11:30 p.m. Friday, "an individual experiencing mental health concerns was discovered inside the Senate Chamber. The individual made statements indicating he was the governor, among other remarks, and was found disrobed," Sven Lindquist, chief sergeant at arms for the chamber, wrote in an email sent Saturday afternoon.
He said capitol security "responded promptly" and the person was sent to nearby Regions Hospital for evaluation" but was later deemed "non-threatening to himself or others" and was released. But he returned to the capitol grounds Saturday morning at 7:30 a.m., Lindquist explained.
WCCO News reached out to the Minnesota State Patrol, which oversees capitol security, for comment but messages have not been returned.
It's unclear how the man got into the capitol building and inside the Senate Chamber after-hours. The email said officials are investigating, and that the individual has a probation violation warrant on record in Wisconsin, though it "did not initially authorize a custodial transfer."
The warrant has since been updated, and "appropriate measures will be taken upon next contact," Lindquist said.
The incident comes a month after Rep. Melissa Hortman, the House DFL leader, and her husband Mark were shot and killed in an attack at their homes, which authorities say was a political assassination by a masked gunman impersonating a police officer. DFL Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette were also shot and wounded and investigators say the accused assassin had a hitlist with other Democratic officials' names on it.
"We are examining all aspects of the incident to address any security concerns," Lindquist told senators and chamber staff in the email. "I want to reiterate that the safety and security of all individuals within the capitol remain the top priority for Capitol Security and the Sergeants at Arms for both the House and Senate."
The June 14 attacks are putting a spotlight on concerns about safety for elected officials and security at the capitol, where there are no metal detectors or other screening before the public can enter. The capitol building closes at night.
Senate Republican Leader Mark Johnson, R-East Grand Forks, in a statement said he was "disappointed" in the security breach.
"We are living in a heightened threat environment," Johnson said. "I expect the State Patrol and Capitol Security teams will thoroughly review what happened and give Capitol officials and staff, and the public, their assurances that this will not happen again."
House Speaker Lisa Demuth, R-Cold Spring, said in a statement that anyone who trespasses at the state capitol should be arrested and prosecuted for breaking the law.
"I look forward to learning why this did not take place in this highly disturbing incident," Demuth said.
DFL leadership in both chambers has not yet commented on what happened.
In wake of the lawmaker shootings, the Minnesota House and Senate will assist in paying for home security upgrades for their members with state funds through their existing chamber budgets. Before the change, lawmakers could only draw from campaign funds for such measures or out of their own pockets.
Earlier this month, the top law enforcement official in Ramsey County urged lawmakers to consider additional security measures at the state capitol amid what he called "a troubling increase in the use of political violence, threats and intimidation."
In a letter addressed to Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, Sheriff Bob Fletcher said "recent heartbreaking events highlight the urgent need to reexamine security measures within the Capitol Complex."
This story is developing and will be updated.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Editorial: Hands off — Trump's off-base attack on NYC's sanctuary immigration policy
Editorial: Hands off — Trump's off-base attack on NYC's sanctuary immigration policy

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Editorial: Hands off — Trump's off-base attack on NYC's sanctuary immigration policy

Intentionally misstating New York City's sanctuary immigration policy as thwarting the prosecution of violent criminals, the Trump administration continued its war on local government by filing suit in federal court last week, one of a number of similar lawsuits across the country that conflate civil noncooperation with active criminal interference and attempt to conscript local officials into President Donald Trump's destructive crackdown. This should prove to Mayor Mayor Adams and other state and city leaders that no amount of appeasement is going to forestall the targeting from Trump. Adams met multiple times with immigration coordinator Tom Homan, insisting that the two men had 'the same goal,' making concessions like signing off on the opening up of an ICE office on Rikers Island years after a city sanctuary law had kicked them out. It's clear that Trump and Homan were not and probably could not be placated to the extent that they would leave Adams and New York City alone. The reality is that this is a totalizing project; Stephen Miller and the rest of the White House want to rid the country almost entirely of immigrants, with or without legal status, and regardless of where they are or what effect that will have on our economy and society. They've been routinely violating the law to do so. It's worth noting once more that Trump's is a political movement that often proclaimed itself a defender of state rights and local control, but apparently that only extended to allowing local officials to detain immigrants, pull books from school shelves, limit access to abortion, curb labor and environmental protections and drive LGBTQ people from public life. When it comes to a refusal to participate in federal operations that have so far involved masked and unidentified agents shoving people into unmarked vehicles — just the sort of thing that we would call authoritarianism and tyranny anywhere else — then states and localities get no say beyond being extensions of a central government. We're not particularly worried that any competent judge would accept these nonsensical claims. A day after the New York case was filed, a federal judge in Chicago dismissed the Trump lawsuit against that city's sanctuary immigration policy. We just want to remind readers that sanctuary is not immunity from prosecution, especially prosecution for violent crimes. What it is however is that when someone is treated at a city health clinic for TB or enrolls a child in school or reports a crime to the police as a victim or a witness, the person's civil immigration status is irrelevant. We want everyone in the city to get treated when sick, we want all children to be in school, we want all crime victims and witnesses to come forward to the cops. The idea of anti-commandeering — the notion that the federal government can't force state and local governments to carry out its own agenda and enforcement functions — has been foundational from the genesis of our country's federalized system. The right of jurisdictions to enact sanctuary provisions that block the use of local resources for this federal function has been litigated over and over again, and always found to be on solid legal footing. We are, however, more worried about the U.S. Supreme Court, which has in the past several months taken it upon itself to sign off on Trump's expansive power grabs. It has allowed among other things Trump to fire federal employees and independent agency members in direct contravention of statute, allowed the limiting of a nationwide order blocking Trump's attempt to overturn the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship provisions and allowed parents to impose religious beliefs on whole school curricula. If these questions get up to that high court level, we hope that the justices will exercise some of their independent power, as they did on other absolutely egregious instances like Trump's efforts to remove people without due process under the Alien Enemies Act proclamation. Anything else will destroy the trust of people in their own local officials and governments and strike at the very foundation of this country's system of government. _____

China Summons Nvidia Over H20 Chip Security Days After US Talks
China Summons Nvidia Over H20 Chip Security Days After US Talks

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China Summons Nvidia Over H20 Chip Security Days After US Talks

(Bloomberg) -- Chinese authorities summoned Nvidia Corp. to discuss alleged security risks related to its H20 chips, casting doubt over the domestic business of the world's most valuable company weeks after co-founder Jensen Huang met senior officials in Beijing. The World's Data Center Capital Has Residents Surrounded An Abandoned Art-Deco Landmark in Buffalo Awaits Revival Budapest's Most Historic Site Gets a Controversial Rebuild San Francisco in Talks With Vanderbilt for Downtown Campus We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach The Cyberspace Administration of China called company representatives into a meeting to discuss what it deemed serious security vulnerabilities with the artificial intelligence chip. In a statement, the internet watchdog cited comments by US lawmakers about the need to install tracking capabilities into advanced chips sold to other countries. The agency asked staff to explain potential risks and provide documents as needed, the CAC said without elaborating. The revelation came just days after US and Chinese officials met in Stockholm to extend their tariff truce, talks Chinese state media said had 'deepened mutual trust.' Huang himself recently concluded a high-profile visit to Beijing, where he feted national Chinese champions such as DeepSeek and celebrated the country's rising prowess in AI. The billionaire had denied Nvidia installed backdoors in its product, saying that wouldn't make business sense. The Trump administration had only recently pledged to drop export restrictions on the H20 to China, reversing its earlier stance on the AI chip. On Thursday, shares in chipmakers including Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. and Cambricon Technologies Corp. rose more than 5% after the CAC's notice. Nvidia didn't respond to a request for comment outside of regular business hours. Its stock rose 2.5% on Germany's Tradegate, boosted in part by positive earnings from Meta Platforms Inc. and Microsoft Corp. 'The CAC's scrutiny over H20 security risks could further erode Nvidia's Chinese market share amid rising domestic competition, and immediate H20 sales resumption may face delays due to regulatory uncertainty,' Forrester's Principal Analyst Charlie Dai said. 'It also aligns with China's broader push to accelerate domestic semiconductor alternatives for technological self-reliance amid US export controls. In addition, the timing amplifies China's leverage in ongoing US trade talks.' Washington in recent weeks had lifted a spate of export controls — including on chip design software, imposed ahead of last month's trade talks in London. That's in return for China allowing more sales of rare-earth minerals needed to make a range of high-tech products, something US negotiators thought they'd achieved during prior talks in Geneva. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had touted the resumption of sales of the H20 as a breakthrough that came from discussions in London, framing it as a concession to Beijing. Thursday's revelation however may send a signal that China doesn't view the H20 — a less-advanced chip originally designed to comply with US sanctions — as a valuable offering. Chinese agencies have previously singled out major American companies for scrutiny. In the past, they've announced probes into acquisitions by US firms — including Nvidia — an arena in which regulators wield approval powers. In October, an arm of the CAC warned of potential security flaws and high failure rates in Intel Corp. processors. The government in 2023 barred Micron's chips from critical infrastructure over cybersecurity concerns, though the US company has since moved to repair ties. Both companies have stressed their commitment to product security. 'US lawmakers have previously called for advanced chips exported from the US to be equipped with location-tracking features,' the CAC said in its latest statement. 'The location-tracking and remote shutdown capabilities on Nvidia computing chips are ready, according to US AI experts.' Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. said this month they would resume sales of some AI chips in China after securing Washington's assurances that such shipments would get approved. Such export license approvals could generate billions of dollars in total revenue for the companies this year. However, US lawmakers slammed risks it would boost Beijing's military capabilities and expand its ability to compete with the US in AI. Companies like Huawei Technologies Co. now spearhead a nationwide effort to develop homegrown technologies to reduce China's reliance on American hardware and circuitry, and catch the US in potentially game-changing technologies. Huawei's Ascend chips have evolved into the closest equivalent to Nvidia's accelerators within China. Its 910C is considered competitive with the H20 particularly for inference, or hosting AI services. During his trip to China this month, Huang took almost every opportunity to celebrate China's technological ambitions, name-checking prominent local firms from Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. to Deepseek and Tencent Holdings Ltd. 'I have no information to offer on this,' Ministry of Commerce spokesman He Yadong said during a regular briefing Thursday, when asked whether the move by CAC could impact trade negotiations. --With assistance from Jenni Marsh, Colum Murphy and Jing Li. Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

What's in the US-EU trade deal depends on who is doing the talking
What's in the US-EU trade deal depends on who is doing the talking

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What's in the US-EU trade deal depends on who is doing the talking

President Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen shook hands Sunday over a trade agreement touted as being largely concluded, but days later, there are still plenty of disagreements about exactly what is in the pact. Perhaps nowhere is the divide more stark than in the summaries published by each side — one from the White House and another from the European Commission. They depart in at least five areas, both in terms of the deal and the firmness of the commitments. In just one example, the White House summary touts "historic structural reforms and strategic commitments," while the Europeans call the handshake deal "not legally binding," with more negotiations to come. Trump quipped Sunday that a deal would be "the end of it" and that it would be a number of years "before we have to even discuss it again." That is unlikely to be the case, which even Trump's aides acknowledge. The difference is likely to come to a head quickly as negotiations continue between the US and Europe over legally binding text and as trade watchers wait for a formal joint statement on the deal that the teams still hope to unveil this week. A range of areas of disagreement Clarity on at least one headline area is clear: an agreement for 15% tariffs on nearly all EU goods, including autos, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals, that will be exempt from separate Trump plans there. But the divides are evident once you go deeper. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick acknowledged that a lot remains to be worked out when he told CNBC on Tuesday that "there's plenty of horse trading still to do," even as he argued that the "fundamentals" are set. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet Trump has also already set a pattern of fuzzy initial details on his deals, including a recent pact with Japan, but a comparison of the two documents summarizing the Europe deal underlines differences on many of the key aspects. On the issue of new investments by Europe — $750 billion in US energy and additional corporate investments of $600 billion — the summary from the US side described them as firm commitments. The European language is much less solid, saying it "intends to procure" additional energy and that European companies "have expressed interest" in additional investments. More differences are seen on whether the deal will mean European markets are "totally open," as Trump has said. The European summary of provisions around fish says they will allow "limited quantities" and only "certain non-sensitive" agricultural products. Another highly touted part of the agreement from the US side is a provision for Europe to purchase military equipment. As Trump said on Sunday, "They're going to be purchasing hundreds of billions of dollars worth of military equipment." That part isn't even mentioned in the European summary. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store