B2 Bombers, Bunker Busters, Tomahawks: The Weapons US Used To Strike Iran
The airstrikes have been followed by a narrative war, with US President Donald Trump claiming that the three nuclear enrichment facilities have been "totally obliterated" and Iran stressing that there were "no signs" of contamination. All eyes are now on how Tehran responds to the situation. While a mega military offensive might lead to further escalation of the conflict, an inadequate response may cause Iran's ruling dispensation to lose popular support.
6 B-2 Spirit Stealth Bombers: A mong the most advanced strategic weapons in the US inventory, B-2 bombers can counter very sophisticated air defence systems and carry out precision attacks. According to the US Air Force, the B-2 has massive firepower and its "stealth" features threaten heavily defended targets. "The B-2's low observability is derived from a combination of reduced infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual and radar signatures. These signatures make it difficult for the sophisticated defensive systems to detect, track and engage the B-2," it says. Priced at about $2.1 billion each, B-2 bombers are the most expensive military aircraft ever built.
GBU-57 Bunker Busters: While Trump did not explicitly mention these, the B-2 bombers that struck Iran likely used this heavy ammunition to target Fordow. The GBU-57 is a massive 30,000-pound -- about 13,600 kg -- bomb that can penetrate up to 200 feet underground before exploding, giving it the name "bunker busters". What sets it apart from other missiles or bombs is that it penetrates the earth's surface before detonation, multiplying the impact exponentially.
The GBU-57 is the most powerful bunker buster in the US arsenal. It is about 20 feet in length and has a diameter of 2.6 feet. This sophisticated weapon was developed by the Air Force Research Laboratory's Munitions Directorate, and Boeing conducted its design and testing. Twelve such bombs are reported to have been used as the US struck Iran today.
Tomahawk Cruise Missiles: According to reports, US submarines launched 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles during their strikes on Iranian facilities today. A long-range cruise missile used for deep land attacks, the Tomahawk can be fired from US ships and submarines. What makes these missiles lethal is the option to change targets in-flight through satellite communications. According to the US Navy, these missiles can loiter over a target area to respond to emerging targets and also provide battle damage information. This provides the military control room the flexibility to attack long-range fixed targets or support Special Operations Forces. The first operational use of Tomahawk missiles was in Operation Desert Storm in 1991. They were also used in Operation Odyssey Dawn in Libya and Operation Inherent Resolve in Syria. The US reportedly used submarines from its Virginia and Los Angeles line-up to launch the Tomahawk missiles at its targets in Iran.
F 22 Raptor
F-22 Raptor and F-35A Lightning IIs
The US reportedly used F-22 Raptors and F-35A Lightning fighters to provide air support during the operation. According to the US Air Force, the F-22 Raptor combines stealth, supercruise, manoeuvrability, and integrated avionics and these are coupled with improved supportability. It is designed to project air dominance, rapidly and at great distances and defeat threats trying to intercept the US charge.
F 35 Lightning II
Joining F-22 Raptors today were F-35A Lightning fighters. A fifth-generation fighter of the US Air Force, this aircraft has high-end stealth capabilities and is designed to provide the pilot with unsurpassed situational awareness and the ability to carry out precision strikes in all-weather conditions. The F-35A Lightning IIs have a wingspan of 35 feet, are 51 feet long can carry a payload of over 8,000 kg.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
18 minutes ago
- First Post
'Not a single policymaking person who knows Russia,Ukraine' as Trump heads for talks with Putin
Negotiations with Moscow have been handled not by diplomats steeped in years of Russia policy, but by real estate developer Steve Witkoff, who has no background in foreign affairs When Donald Trump steps into a room with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday (August 15), the setting will be a far cry from his first headline-grabbing encounter with the Russian leader in Helsinki six years ago. That summit went so poorly that Fiona Hill, his then top Russia adviser, later admitted she had considered faking a seizure to shut it down. This time, there are unlikely to be any Russia specialists within arm's reach of the president. In his second term, Trump has purged swathes of the federal workforce, elevated loyalists over seasoned experts and sidelined the traditional machinery of foreign policy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Negotiations with Moscow have been handled not by diplomats steeped in years of Russia policy, but by real estate developer Steve Witkoff, who has no background in foreign affairs. Former ambassador Eric Rubin says Trump 'does not have a single policymaking person who knows Russia and Ukraine advising him', Financial Times reported. Ordinarily, before a meeting of this magnitude, the US national security council (NSC) would be corralling input from across government to prepare the president for anything Putin might throw at him. Known for his command of detail and skill in exploiting gaps in an opponent's knowledge, Putin has been in power for a quarter of a century. That process has been hollowed out. Dozens of foreign policy and national security officials were forced out of the NSC in May. More than 1,300 state department employees were let go last month, including many analysts covering Russia and Ukraine. The diplomatic corps has also been hit hard; the American Foreign Service Association estimates around a quarter of foreign service officers have quit since January. Top posts dealing with Russia and Ukraine remain unfilled. The administration insists the cuts will make the government 'leaner' and more responsive. Deputy White House press secretary Anna Kelly said Trump still gets input from leaders at the state department, NSC and intelligence agencies before making decisions. But in practice, the most senior roles are concentrated in the hands of a few figures, including secretary of state Marco Rubio, who is also serving as acting national security adviser. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump has said the Alaska meeting will be 'a feel-out' and that he will know 'within two minutes' whether progress is possible. 'I may say 'lots of luck, keep fighting', or I may say 'we can make a deal',' he told reporters this week. For many former officials, that approach rings alarm bells. Daniel Fried, a former ambassador to Poland, warned: 'You can't have him and Witkoff winging it because they just don't know enough. You need somebody in the room who can just look at the president, roll his eyes and shake his head.' In Helsinki in 2018, Trump publicly questioned his own intelligence agencies' findings on election interference, accepting Putin's denials instead. Back then, he had what were described as the 'adults in the room' – experienced hands who tried to temper his impulses. John Bolton, his national security adviser at the time, recalled trying to brief Trump on nuclear weapons during the flight to Helsinki, while the president watched a football match. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This time, those guardrails are gone. Fried put it bluntly: 'This is not an administration that is going to have an experts-led process.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
18 minutes ago
- First Post
Lula hits back at Trump over judiciary attacks, says US president would face trial in Brazil if January 6 riots happened there
President Lula da Silva has rebuked Donald Trump's escalating campaign against the country's judiciary, saying the US leader would face trial in Brazil if the January 6, 2021 Capitol riots had happened there. Read here Brazilian President Lula da Silva has pushed back against President Donald Trump's campaign targeting the country's judiciary, saying the US leader would face trial in Brazil had the January 6 US Capitol attacks taken place there, the Guardian reported. Lula's comments come amid what analysts describe as one of the deepest diplomatic rifts between Washington and Brasília in decades. Trump has imposed 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports and sanctioned a supreme court justice, the moves which are widely considered as an attempt to aid Trump's far-right ally and former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who faces up to 40 years in prison over allegations of plotting a coup after losing the 2022 election to Lula. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bolsonaro could face up to 40 years in prison when Brazil's supreme court delivers its verdict in the coming weeks. Trump has denounced the case as a 'witch-hunt' and urged Brazilian authorities to drop the charges. Lula also dismissed US criticism of Brazil's human rights record after the State Department's annual report accused his administration of stifling democratic debate and restricting the speech of Bolsonaro supporters, journalists, and elected officials. 'There was really no reason to hit Brazil with tariffs, and nor will we accept being told that we don't respect human rights here in Brazil,' Lula said. Drawing a sharp contrast between Brazil's handling of political unrest and Trump's pardons for January 6 participants, Lula noted that 141 people are serving prison terms for joining the 8 January 2023 riots in Brasília, which prosecutors say formed part of Bolsonaro's coup attempt. In the US, Trump granted 'full, complete and unconditional' pardons to about 1,500 people involved in the Capitol assault soon after taking office last year. Lula urged Brazilians not to be intimidated by Trump's pressure campaign, adding that his administration had repeatedly tried to negotiate with Washington before the tariffs were enacted. According to Brazilian diplomats, those overtures went unanswered, with key decisions reportedly taken within Trump's inner circle, a group to which they had no access. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Unveiling a long-anticipated aid package on Wednesday to offset the impact of steep US tariffs, Brazil's government said it would offer credit lines for exporters and increase government purchases of goods struggling to find new markets. A delegation of Brazilian senators travelled to Washington in the final week of July in a last-ditch effort to defuse tensions. The group, led by Senator Nelsinho Trad, met with business leaders with ties to Brazil and nine US senators, only one of them Republican, Thom Tillis of North Carolina. 'We found views on Brazil were ideologically charged,' Trad told The AP. 'But we made an effort to present economic arguments.' While the delegation was in Washington, Trump signed the order imposing the 50% tariff. But there was relief: not all Brazilian imports would be hit. Exemptions included civil aircraft and parts, aluminium, tin, wood pulp, energy products and fertilizers. Trad believes Brazil's outreach may have helped soften the final terms. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I think the path has to remain one of dialogue and reason so we can make progress on other fronts,' he said. With inputs from agencies
India Today
18 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump warns Russia of ‘very severe consequences' if Putin blocks Ukraine deal
US President Donald Trump issued a stark warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin, threatening "severe consequences" if Moscow obstructs peace in on Wednesday, Trump hinted that punitive measures -- possibly economic sanctions -- could follow if their scheduled meeting in Alaska on Friday fails to produce Trump did not specify what the consequences could be. He stressed that the talks would serve as a stepping stone for a possible second meeting, this time involving Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy."Will Russia face any consequences if Vladimir Putin does not agree to stop the war after your meeting on Friday?"@POTUS: "Yes, they will." Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) August 13, 2025advertisement "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Trump told reporters. "I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelenskyy and myself, if they'd like to have me there."The US president also said the conflict in Ukraine was the result of the Biden administration's policies, saying, "This is Biden's work, this is not my work. He got us into this thing. This war would have never happened if I were the President. But it is what it is. I am here to fix it."He emphasised his record on global conflicts, claiming, "If we can save a lot of lives, it will be a great thing. I have stopped five wars in the last six months. On top of that, we wiped out the nuclear capability of Iran, obliterated it."EU, UKRAINE DRAW RED LINES AHEAD OF ALASKA TALKSThe warning comes after a high-level virtual call between Trump, Zelenskyy, and European leaders, hosted by Germany, to outline non-negotiable positions ahead of the Alaska talks."We had a very good call. He was on the call. President Zelenskyy was on the call. I would rate it a 10, very friendly," Trump President Emmanuel Macron said Trump had agreed that Ukrainian land could not be negotiated away without Kyiv's consent. Macron also noted that Trump backed the idea of security guarantees for Ukraine in any post-war Chancellor Friedrich Merz reiterated that the principle of borders being respected must remain intact. "If there is no movement on the Russian side in Alaska, then the United States and we Europeans should increase the pressure," Merz said, adding that Trump "shares this position very extensively."The Alaska meeting is intended to address the nearly three-and-a-half-year-old war -- the largest conflict in Europe since World War II. Trump has previously suggested that some form of territorial exchange might be necessary to end the fighting, an idea met with deep concern in Kyiv and across travelled to Berlin for consultations before the virtual call, warning allies that Putin's recent military gains in eastern Ukraine were part of a broader strategy to pressure Kyiv into told the US president and all our European colleagues that Putin is bluffing about wanting to end the war," Zelenskyy said. "Russia is trying to show that it can occupy all of Ukraine, but this is an attempt to intimidate before the Alaska talks."Meanwhile, the Kremlin has shown little sign of softening its stance. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Alexei Fadeev reiterated that Moscow's demands remain unchanged since last the scenes, officials have been considering potential locations for a three-way summit involving Trump, Putin, and Zelenskyy, should the Alaska meeting yield progress. European governments have welcomed Trump's initiative but remain firm that no agreement should be made without Ukraine's direct participation.- EndsWith inputs from AgenciesTune InMust Watch
