Nexus card applications no longer accepting 'X' gender marker
Canadians who apply for a new or renewed Nexus card can no longer select an "X" gender marker on their applications, and instead must choose either "M" or "F."
The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) confirmed the change in a statement on Tuesday, saying it followed U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order in January that the U.S. will only recognize male or female on documents such as visas and passports.
The corresponding changes by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) also changed the application process for Nexus cards, the CBSA said in an email to CBC News.
The change went into effect in February, it said.
The Nexus program, run jointly by the CBSA and CBP, allows card holders to fast-track through customs and security lines at airports and land crossings. While many use the cards for cross-border travel, some use them primarily for shorter wait times while travelling within Canada.
The CBSA says there were more than 1.8 million program members in April 2024, "with the majority of members being Canadian."
Breaking down Trump's 'two genders' executive order
6 months ago
The agency says Canadians who currently have a valid Nexus card with an "X" will still have the document recognized, but they will no longer be able to choose "X" when it comes time to renew or replace their cards.
Trump's executive order declared federal agencies will only recognize "two sexes, male and female," which "are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality."
The presidential order said passports and other forms of government-issued identification must reflect the sex assigned at birth.
The website for the U.S. Bureau of Consular Affairs, the agency that issues passports, said it will "only issue passports with an 'M' or 'F' sex marker that match the customer's biological sex at birth" and will no longer use the "X" marker for nonbinary people, citing Trump's order.
Canada began recognizing the "X" marker on passports for those who don't identify as male or female in 2019. About 3,600 Canadians had the marker on their passports as of 2021, according to the federal government.
The CBSA says Canadians with an "X" marker on their passport can continue to use it to apply for a Nexus card, even though that marker cannot be used on the card itself.
Statistics Canada data shows there are more than 100,000 transgender or non-binary people across the country.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
25 minutes ago
- National Post
The Howard Stern Show, a radio fixture since the 1980s, is said to be ending soon
The Howard Stern Show, which has been on the air now for more than 40 years, first on terrestrial radio and since 2005 on SiriusXM satellite radio, is said to be on the verge of ending. Article content Reports in Britain's tabloid The Sun and elsewhere say that the host's latest five-year contract expires in the fall, but that it won't be renewed. Article content 'Stern's contract is up in the fall and while Sirius is planning to make him an offer, they don't intend for him to take it,' an unnamed insider told the paper. 'Sirius and Stern are never going to meet on the money he is going to want. It's no longer worth the investment.' Article content Article content The insider added that Sirius may strike a deal for Stern's library of content. 'But as far as him coming back to doing the show, there's no way they can keep paying his salary.' Article content Article content 'If Sirius isn't going to give Stern a good offer, I don't think it would have anything to do with his ratings,' the source said. 'It's more likely everything to do with the political climate.' Article content The source added: 'After you saw what happened with Stephen Colbert, it's like they just can't afford to keep him going.' Article content The comparison is an apt one. Colbert, host of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, was told last month that the show would end in May 2026. It was a move that many — not least Donald Trump himself — suggested was influenced by Colbert's criticism of the now U.S. president over the years. Article content Similarly, Stern has in recent years become openly critical of Trump. In 2020 he called on Trump to resign from his first term as president for his response to the COVID-19 pandemic. When Trump's son Donald Trump Jr. mocked him, he sarcastically referred to the the younger Trump as a 'wit' and a 'genius.' Article content Article content And in 2023, Trump posted on social media that 'The real Howard Stern is a weak, pathetic, and disloyal guy, who lost his friends and MUCH of his audience.' He added: 'I did his show many times in the good old days, and then he went Woke, and nobody cares about him any longer.' Article content Article content Stern's radio persona has evolved over the decades. Originally known as a 'shock jock' broadcaster — his move to SiriusXM was in part a way to get away from the censorship regulations of terrestrial radio — he gradually became a more serious and politically savvy interviewer. Article content Guests on his show have included U.S. President Joe Biden, who gave his first on-air interview while in office to Stern in April 2024, and U.S. Vice-President Kamala Harris, who spoke to him last October, just weeks before the nation went to the polls. Article content Stern, 71, got his start on radio in the late 1970s, with The Howard Stern Show beginning in 1981 on WWDC, a radio station near Washington, D.C. It moved to WNBC in New York the following year, and in 1985 landed at WXRK, where it stayed until its move to SiriusXM in 2005.
Globe and Mail
25 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
The Democrats won't be in the dumps for long
It's not news that Canada needs. Our party in the United States, the Democratic Party, which we've always favoured over the less progressive Republicans, appears to be in dire straits. Typical of its troubles is a Wall Street Journal poll saying the party has reached a 35-year-low in public esteem, with 63 per cent of voters holding a negative view. The Democrats are despondent and divided from their election defeat. Their credibility has taken a hit on account of their apparent cover-up of Joe Biden's cognitive decline. They are being steamrollered in Congress by the Republicans. They lack a coherent message, a strong leader. It is all happening when, more than ever, a strong Democratic Party is needed to restrain the authoritarian impulses of Donald Trump, who is going so far as to have Barack Obama investigated. But the party's condition isn't as dire as it is being made out to be. Much of what we're seeing is not unusual for a party in the months after losing a presidential election. Since first being based in Washington in 1978, I've seen the same pattern repeatedly. Initially it's all doom and gloom for the defeated party. Then the midterm elections come and that party invariably makes big gains and all the griping and crying and bad media stops. Andrew Coyne: The final obstacle to Trump's dictatorship may be the people he needs to borrow from Trump says Vance 'most likely' to lead as Republican nominee in 2028 It's only natural that in the wake of the Trump defeat, there is dissent and finger pointing and division among the Democrats. It's standard fare to be trailing well behind the honeymooning victors in the polls. It's hardly surprising to appear rudderless given that in the American system, there is no opposition party leader as such. And it's to be expected that with the Republicans in control of the House, the Senate and the White House, they are having their way. But despite their follies, the Democrats currently lead the Republicans in generic polls for Congressional control. The Trump victory has not translated in a boost in support for Republicans. In three polls released Wednesday, he was an average of negative-seven in favourability ratings. Only 38 per cent of Americans say the country is on the right track. What is being overlooked by those attacking the Democrats is their talent pool. The party is stacked with talent. There's California Governor Gavin Newsom, there's former transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, Representative Ro Khanna, Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker. That doesn't include firebrand representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who political analyst Nate Silver and others are already touting as the favourite to win the party's 2028 nomination. Ms. Ocasio-Cortez's prominence, however, is one of the reasons the party is said to be doing so poorly. She's dragging the party to the far left. She is therefore deemed to be a gift to Republicans. That could well be the case. It could also be old-think, another example of an out-of-touch establishment mentality, discounting how American politics has changed and is changing. Polls by Gallup and AtlasIntel show AOC scoring a higher positive impression than Mr. Trump. An Emerson College poll shows her neck-and-neck with Vice-President J.D. Vance. AOC has passion and star power. She is inheriting Bernie Sanders's base of support. As a Latina, that base potentially extends to Hispanic America. At the age of just 35, her base extends to the youth of the country. She represents generational change in spades. Clobbering all comers in fundraising, she brought in almost US$10-million in the first quarter of this year. The party needs a fighter who connects with working people; AOC is that too. An anti-establishment rising star like her is hardly an example of a party in decline. On the Republican side, Mr. Trump has been scoring foreign policy wins, but they aren't vote-getters. The party just received rotten economic numbers, leading Mr. Trump to idiotically blame it on his statistics chief and, in banana-republic style, fire her. Most every economist is of the view that the Trump trade war will spark high inflation, handing the Democrats the affordability issue. His recently passed 'big beautiful bill' is getting a big ugly reception for cutting into social security and catering to the rich. The Epstein controversy is fracturing unity in the party's base. This is all going to help Democratic Party disarray go away. In keeping with precedent, we can expect the party to vigorously reassert itself by the midterms, just like it did in the midterms in 2018. We recall how down in the dumps the Democrats were after losing to Mr. Trump two years earlier. It didn't last.
CBC
26 minutes ago
- CBC
Manitoba Métis Federation boycotts PM's summit on major projects law
Manitoba Métis leaders announced Wednesday they intend to boycott this week's summit with Prime Minister Mark Carney because the Liberal government is including the Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO). Other Métis groups are also expressing concerns about the process after confirming they weren't invited to Thursday's meeting in Ottawa to discuss the federal government's recently passed law to fast-track major projects. It's the last of three summits called this summer to ease Indigenous Peoples' concerns about the law, known as bill C-5, yet it's unclear how many people will even be there. "We will not be attending that summit," Manitoba Métis Federation President David Chartrand said at a news conference inside the Chateau Laurier hotel in Ottawa on Wednesday morning. Flanked by his cabinet, Chartrand told reporters he considers MNO a "fraudulent" organization with which Manitoba leaders can't share a table. "To the prime minister, the door is open. If you want to come and sit down with my cabinet in a government-to-government relationship, we will meet," he said. "But if you want to insult us, then we'll see each other in a different political realm in the future. So unfortunately, it's a sad day for us. Truly." In an interview earlier Wednesday, an MNO spokesperson pointed to the group's signed self-government agreement with Canada, brushing off any concerns from Manitoba. "We're here to talk about our serious concerns about C-5 and our serious concerns about Canada's position globally," said Mitch Case, MNO provincial secretary for Métis rights, intergovernmental relations and communications. In 2003, the Supreme Court of Canada recognized the existence of a rights-bearing Métis community in and around Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. At issue, however, are six "new historic" Métis communities MNO and the Ontario government jointly recognized in 2017. First Nations in Ontario contest the communities' legitimacy and MMF, the federally recognized government for the Red River Métis, withdrew from the Métis National Council in 2021 over the dispute. Case said it would be indefensible for Canada to exclude the Ontario Métis, adding that the goal should be finding a collaborative way to address the United States' economic threats while protecting the environment and respecting Indigenous rights. "That's the conversation we're here to have. If people want to try to distract from that conversation with their own political goals, well, that's up to them. But we're here to do important work," he said. Not all Métis invited Chartrand indicated Canada invited the four Métis groups that have signed self-government agreements: Otipemisiwak Métis Government (OMG) in Alberta, Métis Nation-Saskatchewan, MMF and MNO. But there are some communities, like Fort Chipewyan Métis Nation in northern Alberta, that don't belong to any provincial body. An official with that community said this process is "not proper consultation," as the Fort Chipewyan Métis aren't represented by OMG. "It goes against reconciliation, and the process appears to be flawed right out of the gate," said Carmen Wells, lands and regulatory director for the Fort Chipewyan Métis Nation. Wells said the community chooses to have its own voice because it's situated at "ground zero," in a region most impacted by industrial development in Canada — the oilsands. "We also expect not to be left out of those conversations, as we are our own sovereign nation with constitutionally protected rights," said Fort Chipewyan Metis Nation President Kendrick Cardinal in a statement. Up until recently the Métis National Council had five members, but the MMF's exit was followed by the Métis Nation-Saskatchewan and the Métis Nation British Columbia (MNBC) in 2024. Chartrand said the national council shouldn't be included at the summit, even as an observer. The B.C. group wasn't invited to participate in Carney's summit except as an observer, MNBC President Walter Mineault told CBC Indigenous. He said MNBC is still an important stakeholder that deserves to be at the table even if it lacks a formal self-government agreement. "It's very disrespectful to our nation here in B.C. and our government, and it should not happen," he said. "We are very concerned about these issues as well going forward." Back in Ottawa, Otipemisiwak Métis Government President Andrea Sandmaier focused on the meeting itself, calling it as a chance to ensure Métis voices are heard. "I believe that it's possible for the Crown and our nation to prosper together. We're not here to hold up or block progress," she said. "We're here to help shape a future where economic growth, environmental protection and Indigenous rights advance together, and I think that we have a really good opportunity to make that happen." Chartrand said he would not consider withdrawing the MMF's support for C-5, but he did offer Carney a heated warning against "back stabbing" the Red River Métis and ignoring their rights.
