DHL Express to suspend operations countrywide amid strike, lockout
DHL Express Canada plans to shut down operations across the country this week amid a strike and lockout involving 2,100 truck drivers and other workers, adding to turmoil in the parcel market.
With the two sides at an impasse, the company said it will halt thousands of daily deliveries starting Friday — the same day that federal legislation banning replacement workers takes full effect.
DHL will stop receiving inbound packages to Canada from abroad on Tuesday at 9 p.m., DHL said in an email.
Spokeswoman Pamela Duque Rai pointed to stalled negotiations with Unifor and the legislation known as Bill C-58, 'which prohibits the use of replacement workers during industrial action,' she noted.
On June 8, the German-owned carrier said it was rolling out a 'contingency plan' that allowed it to keep serving its more than 50,000 customers, which range from retailer Lululemon to e-commerce giants Shein and Temu.
Duque Rai had said in an email at the time that DHL did not expect 'significant disruptions' to its service.
Unifor, which represents DHL truck drivers, couriers and warehouse and call centre employees, had warned against any steps to supplant unionized workers with temporary ones, with president Lana Payne saying the move would impose a chill on contract talks.
Last Friday, Unifor's bargaining committee said it had met with DHL Express Canada CEO Geoff Walsh, who stressed the possibility of a halt the following week.
'We will not be intimidated by the company's threats to disrupt service or shut down operations,' the committee said in a June 13 bulletin to members.
The upcoming pause adds to the labour tumult in the parcel sector, as Canada Post remains at loggerheads with 55,000 workers amid strained negotiations and an overtime ban imposed by the union last month.
Canada is not the only country struggling with falling mail volumes — a key factor in the impasse between the two sides — and DHL is among those feeling the pinch.
In March it announced plans to cut 8,000 jobs in Germany this year, marking the largest set of layoffs in its home market in decades.
Back in Canada, Duque Rai sought to frame the union's proposals as unreasonable.
'While we are committed to fair compensation for our employees, our position is that Unifor's demands — a 22 per cent salary increase for hourly employees, as well as a 42 per cent salary increase for owner-operators — do not reflect the current economic landscape and would jeopardize our operational viability,' she said.
Payne said DHL has been seeking concessions since negotiations kicked off nearly a year ago.
She highlighted a push by the company to change the pay model for owner-operators — roughly 500 independent contractors drive for DHL and also have union membership — in a way she claimed would reduce their compensation, not boost it.
'What we've seen over many months of bargaining are what I would say is an attempt to divide workers in classifications, pit one group against another, pit one region against another,' Payne said in a phone interview on June 8.
A group of employers expressed concerns Tuesday about the effect of legislation passed under the previous Liberal government to ban replacement workers in federally regulated workplaces, pointing to DHL as the latest example of potential disruption.
'Canadians should prepare for more frequent and prolonged work stoppages that can impact supply chains, critical infrastructure and the broader economy,' said Daniel Safayeni, CEO of Federally Regulated Employers – Transportation and Communications, in a statement.
The group called for a more 'balanced labour relations framework.'
In contrast, labour groups have decried federal intervention in labour disputes over the past year, including strikes by railworkers, B.C. dockworkers and WestJet mechanics.
Unifor has said its bargaining priorities with DHL revolve around wages, working conditions and surveillance and automation in the workplace.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 17, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump must show remarkable leadership qualities if he makes the tough call – a preemptive strike on Iran to thwart nuke threat
On Wednesday, July 3, 1940, Winston Churchill had a decision before him as hard as any he ever had to take in his long career of statesmanship. If the Vichy French fleet stationed at Oran in Algeria were to fall into German hands, as seemed highly likely, it would, when combined with the German and Italian navies, pose an existential threat to his country, which after the Fall of France was already gearing itself up for the Battle of Britain. The French admiral would neither hand his fleet over to the Royal Navy, scuttle it, nor sail it to Canada. So, after some anguished heartache, the lifelong Francophile Churchill ordered it to be sunk, which it was with the loss of 1,299 French sailors. There are some moments in history when a sudden act of opportune ruthlessness readjusts the world toward a safer path. In the Middle East, these include Israel's surprise attacks that saved her from certain invasion in the Six-Day War of 1967 and her destruction of Iraq's Osirak nuclear facility in 1981. Going back far further, impending invasions of Britain were foiled by Francis Drake sending fireships against the Spanish Armada in August 1588 and then-Vice Admiral Horatio Nelson preemptively destroying the Danish fleet at Copenhagen in 1801. Preemptive action sometimes works, but it requires remarkable leadership qualities. Does President Trump have them? History in the making For iIf Iran's centrifuges are still spinning in its nuclear facility 300 feet underground at Fordow, then Israel will have only scored a tactical win, rather than the strategic victory she it needed. The successes against the upper echelons of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, military high command and nuclear scientists are commendable, but nothing like enough. Only the United States US has the 30,000-pound bunker-busting bombs necessary to shatter Iranian nuclear ambitions. So what does Trump do then? Benjamin Netanyahu certainly feels the weight of history on his shoulders. The son of a distinguished historian and an avid reader of books by and about Churchill, he said three days ago, 'Generations from now, history will record our generation stood its ground, acted in time, and secured our common future.' He is right. And history could record that about President Trump, too, if he acts decisively. If Trump has before him the Churchillian option, it is not hard to see who represents Neville Chamberlain in all of this. President Barack Obama's adamant and repeated refusal to help the Iranian opposition — either overtly or covertly — during his eight years in office wrecked its brave efforts to replace the regime, and gave the lie to his pretensions to be a new John F. Kennedy. His cringing, appeasing Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) utterly failed to stop the sinister, inexorable spinning of the centrifuges, and came at the cost of lifting key sanctions and unfreezing assets. It was neither joint (because Iran cheated) nor comprehensive (because it did not require Iran to abandon its nuclear program) nor a viable plan of action, although it did produce the sickening detail of pallets being loaded with billions of dollars and transferred to the regime in Tehran. Joe Biden then continued his master's policy of trying to mollify Iran, unsuccessfully. For all his obtuse, dangerous wrongheadedness throughout the 1930s, at least Chamberlain never subsidized the Nazi regime with British taxpayers' money in the way Obama and Biden have with Americans'. The United States has suffered so much at the hands of Iran since the humiliations of the Carter administration during the US embassy hostage crisis between November 1979 and January 1981 that no one would resent it finally setting things right. Fighting for peace There is hardly a government in the world that would not sleep easier knowing that the theocracy in Iran had been denied the power to initiate a third world war. Counterintuitively, perhaps, President Trump would never deserve the Nobel Peace Prize more than if he destroyed Iran's capacity for nuclear blackmail. For once Iran goes nuclear and thus becomes inviolate, it is only a matter of time before it acquires the intercontinental delivery systems that will threaten the rest of the world, including the United States. There are grave risks attached, of course, which should not be underestimated. Iranian terrorist sleeper cells will probably be activated in the West, such as the one plotting kidnappings and assassinations recently uncovered in London. The mullahs' penchant for attacking soft civilian targets such as synagogues and cultural centers is well known, and indicative of their frustration and rage at their failure to devastate Israel due to the technical genius of its Iron Dome defenses. We should believe the threats of dictators. History is littered with times that the West assumes that dictators were exaggerating or merely playing to their domestic audiences, but were in fact being coldly truthful. When Hitler stated in January 1939 that a world war would destroy the Jewish race in Europe only eight months before he deliberately started it, or Stalin promised that the Comintern would strive to undermine Western democracies, or Vladimir Putin claimed that there was a 'historical unity of the Russian and Ukrainian peoples' while massing an army on Ukraine's borders, the West ought to have listened, rather than assuming they were bloviating. We should similarly believe the Iranian mullahs' considered and oft-repeated promises to use a nuclear bomb to annihilate Israel. These threats are not idle; they are meant in cold blood. The imams of Tehran want to turn Israel into a sea of molten, irradiated glass, and even the hitherto-pussycat International Atomic Energy Agency now admits that it is ramping up efforts to obtain the means to do so. 'Axis of Ill Will' Western leaders such as Friedrich Merz, Emmanuel Macron, and Keir Starmer who are currently bleating about 'de-escalating the Middle East' should recognize that easily the best way of doing that is to defang the chief exporter of terror there. The United States has never had such an opportunity to rid the world of a specter that has haunted the Middle East for decades, and possibly might not again while what my friend and Free Press columnist Sir Niall Ferguson calls 'the Axis of Ill Will' — China, Russian, Iran, North Korea and their proxies — builds ever-closer ties. Donald Trump today has it in his power to act with Churchillian ruthlessness and wreck Iran's nuclear — and thus regionally strategic — ambitions for a generation. I fear he will not do this, however, for as his constant tergiversations over tariffs have shown, his bark tends to be much worse than his bite. If he does not, he ought to remove Winston Churchill's bust from the Oval Office, as he should not be able to look in the eye the man who said at the time of the Munich Agreement in October 1938, 'Do not suppose that this is the end. This is only the beginning of the reckoning. This is only the first sip, the first foretaste of a bitter cup which will be proffered to us year by year, unless by a supreme recovery of moral health and martial vigor, we arise again and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.' From The Free Press
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine left in lurch as Trump rushes out of G7 without meeting Zelenskyy
Ukrainian diplomats have been left frustrated – and in some cases embittered – at Donald Trump's refusal to make Ukraine a priority after Volodymyr Zelenskyy flew 5,000 miles to the G7 conference in Canada only for the US president to return home the night before the two leaders were due to meet. Trump said he needed to focus on the Israel-Iran conflict. In a further blow for Kyiv the US vetoed a joint statement on Ukraine from the summit, on the grounds that the wording was too anti-Russian and could compromise negotiations with Vladimir Putin. Instead, some of the language around the war will be included in Canadian prime minister Mark Carney's 'chair's statement'. Some Ukrainian officials said they were not sure now if it will be worth Zelenskyy attending the Nato summit in The Hague next week since there was no guarantee that Trump would attend. One said: 'It is an permanent hazard that Ukraine is a victim of events and Trump's short attention span. Vladimir Putin knows that, which may be why there was such a large attack in Ukraine last night. There had been all sorts of promises for this summit – including new US arms deliveries being offered.' Ukraine was proposing to buy US weapons including new air defences, so getting round the Trump complaint that Ukraine is a drain on the US budget. Related: Trump leaves Europe in the cold in the Rocky Mountains, and Iran with a stark choice The German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, said Trump had promised to attend the Nato summit. With the US chair at the G7 summit removed, Zelenskyy instead sat down with the other members of the group at a special session dedicated to Ukraine, but the central purpose of the session – to try to enlist Trump's support to put pressure on Putin to agree a ceasefire – had been nullified by the US president's abrupt departure announced to fellow G7 leaders in the afternoon. Zelenskyy was also due to have a one to one meeting with Trump. The sense of upset, impossible for Ukraine to express in public due to the need to retain Trump's support, was intensified by the fact that Zelenskyy was being relayed news of Russia's massive attack across Ukraine as he flew by plane to the meeting in Canada. As he met the G7 host, Canada's Mark Carney, Zelenskyy made no direct reference to Trump's decision to absent himself. Looking downbeat, he said: 'We need the help of our allies to for our soldiers to stay strong until Russia is ready for peace negotiations.' He stressed: 'We are ready for an unconditional ceasefire.' Zelenskyy had billed that the G7 summit as one of two golden chances to apply collective western pressure on Trump, and to discuss Ukraine's plans to buy as much as $30bn to $50bn worth of air defense systems and weapons from the United States as a form of security guarantees. There had been signals that the US was willing to sell the arms to Ukraine, but Trump – who spoke again to Putin this week – sometimes argues that providing Ukraine with arms will only prolong a war he is committed to ending. Zelenskyy had also been seeking US agreement to a cut in the oil cap from $60 a barrel to $45 in a bid to cut Russian oil revenues. The oil price cap requiring complex enforcement was introduced by G7 nations and it would need at least tacit US support for it to be instituted effectively. Although there has been a recent spike in the price of oil due to the Iranian crisis, the debate around lowering the price cap had become centre stage due to the slow fall in the price of oil. The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, acknowledged the immediate pressure to lower the cap had been reduced. In discussions at the summit, Trump on Monday expressed reluctance to impose any further sanctions, saying Europeans should 'do it first' and that 'sanctions cost us a lot of money, billions and billions of dollars'. Keir Starmer meanwhile pushed for allies to tighten the oil price cap on Russia and announced sanctions on 20 Russian oil tankers as well as new measures targeting companies managing the vessels, Downing Street said on Tuesday. Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada, the British prime minister said he 'strongly' believed that restrictions on the price of Russian crude oil should be strengthened to deplete its energy revenues. Related: Russian missile and drone attack on Kyiv kills at least 15 people On the way to the G7, Zelenskyy had visited Austria to recruit the country as another potential mediator in the conflict with Russia. Austria has strong ties with Russia, and is seen by some Ukrainian leaders as a more trustworthy intermediary than Turkey, which has much to gain commercially from a peace settlement. Speaking in Brussels, the EU foreign affairs chief, Kaja Kallas, addressed the latest Russian attacks, saying: 'Russia remains unrelenting in its attacks, targeting civilians and prolonging its war. This is yet another sign: Russia is just not interested in peace, so we must keep up the pressure.' The EU is close to agreeing an 18th package of sanctions that will include a ban on the importation of Russian oil refined by third-party countries and then exported to Europe. The EU plan intends to designate oil as Russian and therefore banned unless the importer has clear documentation demonstrating it has originated elsewhere. Countries will also have to publish new 'diversification plans' showing how they will end reliance on both Russian oil and gas. Kallas is convinced that although sanctions have taken longer than expected to have an impact, a corner has been turned. She said last week: 'Russia has lost tens of billions in oil revenues. Its economy is shrinking, and its GDP has dropped.' Sanctioning the 'shadow fleet' [of unflagged Russian tankers] has been particularly impactful: after our last sanctions package, the 17th sanctions package, the oil exports from Russia via the Black Sea and Baltic Sea routes declined by 30% in a week. 'Only in the month of May, Russia's sovereign wealth fund declined by $6bn, from $42bn to $36bn, and it could run out of money by next year. By cutting off revenue streams, we prevent them from refilling their war chest'.
Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Trump meets with security team after demanding Iran ‘surrender'
WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump was meeting with his national security team in Washington on Tuesday to discuss the escalating Middle East conflict, according to people familiar with the matter, fueling fresh speculation that the U.S. is on the verge of joining Israel's attack on Iran. Before gathering his advisers in the White House Situation Room, Trump posted a demand for Iran's "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER" and warned of a possible strike against the country's leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. "We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now," Trump posted on social media. Israel also sought to ratchet up pressure on Iran, signaling it will intensify a campaign of air strikes that have targeted the country's nuclear facilities as well as military leaders and infrastructure. U.S. weapons are seen as key to achieving a more complete destruction of the Islamic Republic's atomic program than anything Israel can do alone. The escalating war began with an Israeli attack late last week and has seen the sworn enemies trade missile salvos for five days. Trump departed early from the Group of Seven leaders meeting in Canada to deal with the crisis. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who's also attending that summit, told the country's public broadcaster ZDF that a U.S. decision on whether to join the war militarily would come "in the course of the day" and said that if Iran doesn't return to the negotiating table, then "the complete destruction of Iran's nuclear program may be on the agenda." Iran had been negotiating with the U.S. for weeks over a nuclear deal before Israel launched its surprise assault. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz vowed to step up the campaign on Tuesday, saying the military will attack "very significant targets in Tehran" and adding that residents should evacuate. Earlier in the day, a spokesman for the Israel Defense Forces said that, while it's too early to assess the success of the current campaign in Iran, strikes on the country's nuclear facilities are "deepening" every day. Iran's state-run Islamic Republic News Agency cited the country's armed forces chief of staff as saying that it plans a "punitive operation" against Israel and warned Israelis to evacuate Tel Aviv and Haifa. Trump earlier Tuesday posted on social media that "we now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran," crediting U.S. military equipment for helping Israel gain air superiority. Katz didn't elaborate on what targets Israel might aim to hit and Trump hasn't spelled out his next steps. Vice President JD Vance told reporters Tuesday that Trump is "making clear to the American people and the entire world that the U.S. policy is that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon, and part of that is that they are not allowed" to enrich uranium, adding that "there are many different ways and different options at the president's disposal for how to accomplish that policy goal." U.S. stocks declined on Tuesday as Trump played down the possibility of negotiations with Iran, fueling widespread fears the war will spread to other countries in the oil- and gas-producing region. Trump's exit from the G-7 followed another 24 hours of intense bombardments, with Iran firing ballistic missiles and Israel striking targets across the Islamic Republic, including the capital of Tehran. The USS Nimitz aircraft carrier strike group is sailing to the Middle East ahead of schedule, marking the first significant move of American military assets to the region since Friday. Reuters reported that the U.S. military was deploying more fighters and other warplanes to the region. New satellite images suggest Israeli strikes damaged underground uranium-enrichment facilities at Natanz, Iran's primary nuclear-fuel production site, the United Nations nuclear watchdog said in a post on X. The International Atomic Energy Agency has yet to detect damage at Iran's other underground enrichment site in Fordow, according to the statement. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a longtime advocate of war against Iran, said he "100% supports" U.S. participation in striking Fordow. "I'm all in for destroying their nuclear program. You can't do it without destroying Fordow," he told reporters in Washington. "If it takes bombs, bunker-buster bombs, so be it. If we need to fly with Israel, so be it." Graham added that "the window for diplomacy has passed, we're in the land of force." Israel has sought to draw the U.S. - which has provided defensive support against Iranian missile fire - deeper into the conflict. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told ABC News on Monday that the countries share a common enemy in Iran, and that it's in America's interest to support Israel. Trump has left open the possibility of further talks on Iran's atomic activities after five earlier rounds, but continued to hammer the idea that Tehran is at fault for not having already agreed to a deal that would have prevented Israel's attacks. He told reporters that he "may" send a high-level official, such as special envoy Steven Witkoff or Vance, to meet with Iran. Trump is "telling Iran you can put a stop to this," Missouri Republican Senator Josh Hawley said after speaking with the president on Tuesday. Israel said it saw a drop-off in Iranian fire on Tuesday, with a military spokesperson saying "a few dozen" missiles had been launched since midnight compared with the hundreds seen over the weekend. Still, Israel's Oil Refineries Ltd. shut down its refinery after the complex was damaged and three employees were killed, the company said Monday. The site has a peak production capacity of close to 200,000 barrels of oil per day, with 70% of products distributed in the Israeli market, according to the company's website. Israeli petrol station chain Sonol, which has 245 gasoline stations in the country, warned Tuesday that the closure of the Haifa refinery will likely cause disruptions to fuel supply to its Israeli customers, according to the Globes newspaper. Long-standing tensions between Iran and Israel erupted into open fighting last week, when Israel launched surprise attacks on Iranian military and nuclear sites and killed senior commanders and atomic scientists. Since then, it has achieved air superiority over much of Iran, allowing it to bomb major cities and infrastructure at will. For Iran's government, the showdown poses a strategic dilemma. It can't risk appearing weak, yet its retaliatory options are shrinking. Proxy forces it supports across the region have been largely degraded by Israeli wars since Oct. 2023. More than 200 people have been killed in Iran by Israel's strikes, according to the last official tally from the Iranian government. In Israel, the government has said 24 people have been killed - the same number reported the day prior - and over 600 injured. Oil prices have climbed in the past week as the conflict escalated, raising concerns about a wider hit to the global economy. Many analysts say Iran has the ability to shut down the Strait of Hormuz, a key energy trade route. Qatar on Tuesday asked liquefied natural gas vessels to wait outside the strait until they're ready to load amid the escalating tensions. Two large tankers collided and caught fire near the strait early on Tuesday. The owner of one of them said the incident was "unrelated to the current regional conflict." _____ (With assistance from Erik Wasson, Natalia Drozdiak, Alisa Odenheimer, Jonathan Tirone, Dan Williams and Steven T. Dennis.) _____ Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
