SC asked to issue TRO vs. proclamation of party-list winners
The One Filipinos Worldwide (OFW) party-list on Monday filed a petition asking the Supreme Court (SC) to issue a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the declaration of party-list winners in the 2025 elections.
In a 28-page petition for certiorari, the party-list sought a TRO and/or status quo ante order and/or writ of preliminary injunction directing the Commission on Elections (Comelec) from implementing NBOC resolution 14-25.
The resolution declared the winners in the May 12 elections, following the formula provided in the ruling of Banat v. Comelec.
'The BANAT formula should be modified, if not abandoned, as it is inconsistent with, and fails to reflect, the spirit and intent of the 1987 Constitution and Republic Act No. 7941,' the petition read.
Under the Banat formula, the parties that receive at least 2% of the total votes cast for the party-list system shall be entitled to one seat each.
An additional seat will be granted to a party-list which will be able to secure more than 2% of the votes cast proportional to the additional percentage it got, but the maximum number of seats is only three.
EXPLAINER: How does the PH party-list system work?
'It is politely advanced that the formula introduced in BANAT resulted into double counting of votes in favor of party-list groups who attained 2% of the total votes cast by all party-list groups,' the petition read.
'Nowhere from the text of the law was it stated that the 2% shall be used for the purpose of determining the number of guaranteed seats. The 2% threshold already provides an equivalent seat that must be definitively allocated,' it added.
The party-list argued that it should be proclaimed as one of the winners and get one seat in the House of Representatives.
It said that the Akbayan party-list should get three seats, the Duterte Youth party-list should get two seats instead of three, the Tingog party-list should get two seats instead of three, and that the 4Ps, ACT-CIS, and Ako Bikol party-lists should get one seat each.
Aside from this, the OFW party-list asked the SC to direct Comelec to review the accreditation, disqualify and disallow the continued participation of non-marginalized groups in the party-list system.
'Sana po 'yung mga nagre-represent, totoo naman na nagre-represent. Ang dami pong party-list na nakita namin. Hindi ko alam kung sino sino itong mga ito, nanalo? Anong sector, nanalo?' OFW party-list president Marissa Del Mar Magsino said in a press conference.
(I hope that those who claim to represent actually do represent. We saw so many party-list groups. I don't even know who they are, and they won? What sector?)
The party-list also asked the SC to direct Comelec to allocate 64 seats instead of 63 seats.
'Public Respondents committed grave abuse of discretion in promulgating NBOC Resolution 14-25 which allocated only 63 seats for Party-List Representatives,' the petition read.
Meanwhile, Magsino called on the High Court to grant their petition.
'For as long as we win this fight, winner na po tayo in the very sense of the word. Justice is rendered, justice is given to the OFW and the seafarers and their families,' Magsino said.
'I don't think naman aabutin ito ng last two months of 20th Congress. I'm very positive that SC will heed our request because this is a valid, legal, and constitutional request. Dahil ito po ay dinesign ng Constitution to be able to serve the marginalized and the underrepresented,' she added.
(I don't think this will reach the last two months of the 20th Congress. I'm very positive that the SC will heed our request because this is a valid, legal, and constitutional request. This was designed by the Constitution to be able to serve the marginalized and the underrepresented.)
The respondent in the petition is the Comelec. GMA News Online has asked the poll body for comment and will publish it once available.—AOL, GMA Integrated News
For more Eleksyon 2025 related content and updates, visit GMA News Online's Eleksyon 2025 microsite.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
12 hours ago
- GMA Network
Outgoing Cebu guv Garcia files electoral protest
Cebu Gov. Gwen Garcia meets with the province's mayors on June 3, 2025. Screenshot from video on her official page Outgoing Cebu Governor Gwen Garcia has filed an election protest with the Commission on Elections (Comelec) challenging the results of Eleksyon 2025. At a meeting with Cebu mayors on Tuesday, Garcia questioned the recently concluded May polls, saying the results of the Cebu gubernatorial race 'did not reflect the honest will of the people.' 'We filed an electoral protest,' said Garcia. 'We hope that the Comelec will act with dispatch on this electoral protest and we have, as a sign of good faith to all of you mayors, we have decided to contest all of the clustered precincts and that's over 4,100. Why? Because as I said, I truly believe that the results for the gubernatorial election here in Cebu did not reflect the honest will of the people,' she added. Garcia, who served as Cebu governor from 2004, lost in the recent gubernatorial race, lagging behind closest rival Pam Baricuatro, who won with 1,107,728 votes. The outgoing official garnered 764,884 votes. Independent bet Valeriano Gingco garnered 33,545 votes. Meanwhile, Garcia's running mate Glenn Soco won as Cebu vice-governor with 1,089,957 votes. His closes rival Joselito Rizal garnered 414,341 votes. — BM, GMA Integrated News For more Eleksyon 2025 related content and updates, visit GMA News Online's Eleksyon 2025 microsite.
GMA Network
13 hours ago
- GMA Network
SC launches ‘burnout' app for judges
The Judicial Burnout Scale was launched by the Supreme Court, an application that will help judges detect warning signs of burnout. (Photo from the SC website) The Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday announced that it has launched the Judicial Burnout Scale, an application that will help judges detect warning signs of burnout. In a statement, the High Court stressed that burnout can impair the judgment, decision-making, and well-being of judges, which may threaten the fairness and integrity of the justice system. 'This tool not only detects warning signs of burnout, it will also guide the Court in designing mental health programs, policy reforms, and interventions that promote our judges' overall well-being,' Associate Justice Mario Lopez said. According to the court, the application was developed by the SC Governing Council for Mental Health as part of the SC Compassion, Awareness, Education, and Save Program. The SC said the app was inspired by the Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey and considered Filipino cultural values such as sense of shame, sense of community, and empathy. Though the application is currently limited to judges, the SC said there are plans to make the tool available to all court personnel. —LDF, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
15 hours ago
- GMA Network
SC: Prosecutors must raise all objections to plea bargain
The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that prosecutors must raise all their objections during a plea bargain as any objections not raised are considered waived. In a 14-page decision promulgated in January, the SC En Banc updated its Clarificatory Guidelines on Plea-Bargaining in Drug Cases, also known as the Montierro guidelines. 'In effect, where the prosecution's objection is anchored only on one or a few-but not all-grounds for opposing such proposal, all other possible grounds not thus raised shall be deemed waived,' the SC said. The SC issued the remark as it found an individual guilty of illegal possession of drug paraphernalia under the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002. He was initially charged for selling and possessing shabu. The court said he asked the regional trial court (RTC) to allow him to plead guilty to illegal possession of drug paraphernalia, a lesser crime, for both charges. The prosecution agreed to the possession charge but objected to the drug sale as it violated the rules of the Department of Justice (DOJ). However, the RTC allowed the plea and convicted the man of the lesser crime. The ruling was overturned by the Court of Appeals (CA), which said that the plea bargain required the prosecution's consent. For its part, the SC disagreed with the Court of Appeals, citing the case of People v. Montierro, where it ruled that courts may reject the prosecution's objection to a plea bargain in drug cases if they are only objecting due to violations of DOJ rules. However, the SC also clarified that courts do not have unlimited authority and cannot reject the objection if it is based on valid grounds. The SC promulgated the following additional guidelines to supplement those already laid down in Montierro: Where the prosecution's objection to an accused's motion for plea bargaining is grounded on only a few but not all possible grounds for opposing the motion, it is understood that the prosecution is waiving the grounds not thus raised Where the prosecution has raised multiple grounds in its position, but the trial court only ruled in one but was silent with regard to the rest, the trial court shall be directed to rule on such pending issues in accordance with the principles in Montierro and this case Where the records before the Court are incomplete to determine if it falls in any of the preceding scenarios, the trial court shall be directed to rule again on the matter following the principles laid down in Montierro and this case. — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
