logo
Obsessive step counts are ruining walking

Obsessive step counts are ruining walking

Vox30-06-2025
According to my phone, I've been averaging about 6,600 steps a day so far this year. My meager effort pales in comparison to the 15,000, 20,000, or even 30,000 steps I see influencers on my feed bragging about regularly.
To be clear: There is nothing wrong with walking — it's a free and low-impact exercise that, compared to running, has greater mass appeal. Americans are overwhelmingly sedentary, spending an average of 9.5 hours a day seated, and anything that inspires people to move more is good news. But quantifying your every step, tracking every ounce of protein ingested, or hours slept can border on obsessive. The current cultural fixation on nutrition and fitness also speaks to a shift toward beauty standards that once again idealize thinness. Mix that with American hustle culture, and you have a recipe for turning a low-key activity into a compulsion.
'This all comes down to how much our culture values productivity above everything else,' says Keith Diaz, an associate professor of behavioral medicine at Columbia University Medical Center. 'It's just another metric that we measure ourselves by.'
From leisure to optimization
Walking is perhaps one of the most functional and accessible forms of movement: It gets you where you want to go, and you don't need any special equipment to do it. The vast majority of people walk at some point during their day without having to think too much about it. It makes sense, then, that walking has come in and out of fashion as a form of exercise throughout history. In the late 1800s, leisure walking became a popular sport. A century later, at the height of the fitness boom in the 1980s, walking got a rebrand and a refresh, thanks to a book called Heavyhands touting the benefits of walking with weights. 'That became,' says Danielle Friedman, the author of Let's Get Physical: How Women Discovered Exercise and Reshaped The World, 'a way to make walking not seem weak.'
To achieve a textbook hot girl walk, you must walk four miles while expressing gratitude and envisioning your goals.
The pandemic was a major boon for walking. With gyms and fitness studios closed and cabin fever setting in, many took to strolling as a way to get moving out of the house. Walking was gentler and less punishing than the high-intensity fitness trends of the early 2000s, Friedman says. 'The pendulum swung a little bit more toward just appreciating movement for movement's sake,' she says. But as social media caught on — the original 'hot girl walk' clip was posted on TikTok in January 2021 — walks became more performative. Walking now had a purpose. To achieve a textbook hot girl walk, for instance, you must walk four miles while expressing gratitude and envisioning your goals. Over time, the step counts ballooned.
Keeping careful track of your mileage also has a long history. The first modern pedometer was designed in 1965 in Japan. Called the manpo-kei, or 10,000 steps meter, this simple act of marketing helped cement the 10,000-step threshold as a benchmark that one should strive to hit for good health and well-being.
The science doesn't quite back up the marketing. Recent research has found that among women in their 70s, as few as 4,400 steps a day is related to lower mortality, compared to 2,700 steps or less. Those who walked more had even less risk for early mortality, but those benefits tapered off at more than about 7,500 steps. Another study of middle-aged adults found that those who took 8,000 steps were less likely to die early from heart disease and cancer compared to those who only took 4,000 steps. Again, the benefits plateaued after 8,000 steps. Similar findings suggest that 7,000 steps was the magic number (the studies, it should be noted, were observational and could not prove causation.) If you're walking for health, 7,000 to 8,000 steps, however, seems like a pretty good bet.
These days, everyone's got a step counter in their pocket or on their wrist. Health tracking apps on phones and wearables like the Apple Watch, Oura, Fitbit, and Whoop have made it much easier to account for every single step. Health-related tracking can be extremely motivating when it comes to behavior change. When you have specific health or fitness goals, tracking is a good way to measure success. 'You have a target and you have a means to measure it,' Diaz says, 'which is great.'
At the same time, you should want to engage in that activity because you like it and not because your watch or an influencer is telling you to move. Unless you're intrinsically motivated to achieve that goal — I walk because I like the way it feels — tracking can veer into compulsion. Once you've hit a benchmark of 10,000 or 15,000 or 20,000 steps, you may feel compelled to meet, or exceed, it every day or else fall into a shame and anxiety spiral. 'When the Fitbit first came out,' Diaz says, 'I used it for a couple weeks, and I just had to put it away because I couldn't do it anymore. If I didn't hit 10,000 steps in a day, it'd be nine o'clock at night and…I'd be circling my little, tiny living room for 20 minutes just to get my steps to where I need them to be. I'm sitting there, like how is this healthy in any way, shape, or form that I'm obsessing over a number?'
Although quantifying an activity increases how often you do it, you start to enjoy it less.
Soon, something that previously brought you enjoyment can start to feel like work. Although quantifying an activity (like counting steps or the number of pages read) increases how often you do it, you start to enjoy it less, a 2016 study found. This change can happen within a few days of tracking, the study's author Jordan Etkin, a professor of marketing at Duke University, says.
When participants were able to see their results, they would continue the activity. But when they weren't shown their data, they lost the motivation to continue. 'The reasons for doing the activity shift from being because you like it or find some other value in it,' Etkin says, 'to being because it gives you this sense of accomplishment and productivity. When you don't get that anymore, because you're not tracking how many of these things you're doing, it's less valuable to you.'
Instead of just moving for movement's sake, perpetual tracking assigns status and morality to basic bodily functions. Hitting a certain step count is 'good' and having a low readiness score is 'bad.' The number acts as a marker of wellness. These days, the ideal embodiment of that wellness has pivoted back toward thinness. No longer is a step just a step or a gram of protein a bit of nourishment — it's all in service of optimization of a skinnier, healthier self. People who track their health want every step to count, to matter, Etkin says. If it isn't being documented, it may as well not have happened. 'That introduces new dynamics into how people decide what and whether and when to do things,' she says, 'based on whether it's going to be recorded.'
A healthy balance
By no means should you stop walking if it improves your mental and physical health. But if the pressure of hitting a specific target every day causes anxiety or you're unable to forgo walking for a day, you may need to reconsider your relationship with your goals. This is 'because you're obsessing over this outward signal, and it becomes this unhealthy striving for perfectionism,' Diaz says. People can start to ignore their body's cues for rest and push themselves to injury.
Related Take off your Oura Ring
In order to maintain a more flexible outlook on your goals, Diaz suggests setting a range target — maybe 8,000 to 12,000 steps a day — or weekly benchmarks. If you know you're going to be moving a lot on the weekend, you won't be so fixated on a weekday where your step count is lower.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Young Adults Increasingly Choose Weed Drinks Over Alcohol, Poll Shows
Young Adults Increasingly Choose Weed Drinks Over Alcohol, Poll Shows

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Young Adults Increasingly Choose Weed Drinks Over Alcohol, Poll Shows

American young adults are increasingly choosing cannabis-infused beverages over alcohol, according to the results of recent survey. The poll found that one out of three millennial and Gen Z adults choose weed drinks over alcoholic beverages at after-work functions such as happy hours, Marijuana Moment reported this week. The survey was conducted by Drug Rehab USA to gauge the recreational choices of 1,000 employed adults. The poll found that nearly two-thirds (66%) of respondents had tried alcohol alternatives over the previous six months. Nearly a quarter (24%) said that they had 'at least partially' replaced alcohol with cannabis-infused or non-alcoholic beverages. Among millennials and Gen Zers, one in three said that they were opting for THC beverages over alcoholic drinks. 'To unwind after work, 45 percent drink alcohol, while 24 percent use nicotine, 20 percent turn to cannabis, and 16 percent choose alcohol alternatives like mocktails, non-alcoholic beer, or CBD,' the survey found. 'When it comes to winding down after a long day, Americans are reaching for a mix of familiar comforts and emerging alternatives,' Drug Rehab USA wrote in the Key Takeaways of the survey. 'While alcohol still dominates, the competition between nicotine and cannabis shows how habits are evolving across generations.' 'After-work rituals are no longer limited to a nightly drink—or even to alcohol at all. From THC-infused beverages to nicotine pouches and non-alcoholic alternatives, today's habits reflect a broader redefinition of what it means to unwind,' Drug Rehab USA noted. 'While motivations vary—stress, routine, social connection—the through-line is clear: Americans are turning to consumable rituals to draw a line between work and rest. For many, those rituals begin within the hour and recur multiple times a week.' Consumers Spend Billions On Weed Drinks Lambert Perkins, chief marketing officer at Triple Cannabis Beverages, says that the poll's results illustrate young adults' evolving views on alcohol. 'Gen Z is rewriting the rules of social drinking. They are mindful, intentional, and looking for experiences without the tradeoffs that come with alcohol,' Perkins writes in an emailed statement about the survey. 'Many still want the ritual of having a drink with friends, but they are over the hangover, the calories, and the bloat. Cannabis beverages give them the best of both worlds: something to sip on that is social, but with more control and fewer consequences.' 'We hear from consumers every week that they are swapping cannabis beverages into moments where alcohol used to be the default such as happy hours, concerts, and winding down at home,' he adds. The global cannabis beverage market is expected to reach $3.1 billion per year by 2030, according to a business data analysis report from Research and Markets published last month. Hemp-derived THC beverages are especially popular, both with manufacturers that avoid the red tape of regulated marijuana and customers who appreciate the accessibility of hemp products, which were legalized with the passage of the 2018 Farm Bill. Today, cannabis beverages can be found in many areas, with products including infused seltzers, malted brews and other drinks available in bottles, cans and on-tap available in most states.

AAP splits with CDC advice in new vaccine guidelines
AAP splits with CDC advice in new vaccine guidelines

UPI

time2 hours ago

  • UPI

AAP splits with CDC advice in new vaccine guidelines

The American Academy of Pediatrics issued vaccine recommendations that differ from U.S. Centers for Disease Control guidelines for the first time in 30 years. File Photo by Debbie Hill/UPI | License Photo For the first time in 30 years, the American Academy of Pediatrics has issued vaccine recommendations that differ from U.S. government guidelines. In new guidance released Tuesday, the AAP strongly recommends COVID-19 vaccines for children between 6 months and 2 years of age. For older children, shots are also advised but ultimately left to parents' discretion. That contradicts recommendations from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Under U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the CDC does not recommend COVID-19 shots for healthy children of any age but says families may choose to get the vaccine after consulting with a doctor, CBS News reported. In a statement, AAP President Dr. Susan Kressly said "the AAP will continue to provide recommendations for immunizations that are rooted in science and are in the best interest of the health of infants, children and adolescents." She added: "Pediatricians know how important routine childhood immunizations are in keeping children, families and their communities healthy and thriving." However, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has some concerns. In a statement to CBS News, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said the American people "deserve confidence that medical recommendations are based solely on science and public health." He made a direct appeal to the pediatricians' group. "We call on the AAP to strengthen conflict-of-interest safeguards and keep its publications free from financial influence, ensuring every recommendation reflects only the best interests of America's children," Nixon added. Dr. Céline Gounder, CBS News medical contributor and editor-at-large for public health at KFF Health News, urged parents to stay on top of routine vaccinations. "Parents should really stick the course and make sure that their children get all of the routine childhood vaccinations," Gounder said. She added that the AAP's new COVID-19 advice mostly reaffirms what it has said in the past. "The first encounter with COVID should be with the shot, not with the virus," Gounder said. "There is still a very high risk in younger children, particularly 6 months to 2 years, for hospitalization and severe complications if they get COVID." The AAP also updated its guidance for RSV and flu vaccines, CBS News reported. It recommends: RSV: Infants younger than 8 months should get an RSV immunization unless protected because their parent was vaccinated during pregnancy. Children ages 8 to 19 months at high risk for severe illness should also get vaccinated. Flu: Annual flu vaccines are recommended for all children 6 months and older, unless there's a medical reason not to get the shot. More information The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on COVID vaccines. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

1 in 30 U.S. Teens Identify as Transgender
1 in 30 U.S. Teens Identify as Transgender

Time​ Magazine

time2 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

1 in 30 U.S. Teens Identify as Transgender

Nearly 3 million Americans identify as transgender, including one in 30 of those aged 13 to 17, according to a new report. But data on the country's trans community may soon be hard to come by, its authors warned, as the Trump Administration and a number of GOP-led states seek to limit the recognition, and rights, of transgender people. The UCLA Williams Institute has been publishing reports about transgender Americans since 2011, tracking information such as the race, ethnicity, age, regional location, and mental health of transgender individuals. Trans adults and youth make up 1% of Americans aged 13 and older and 3.3% of 13-to 17-year-olds, according to the institute's Wednesday report. Researchers found that younger adults, those aged 18 to 34, were more likely to identify as transgender than their older counterparts, making up more than 50% of the country's transgender population. For its initial 2011 report, the institute relied on just two state-level population surveys. Researchers noted that they have since been able to access broader and higher-quality data through the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): To generate the most recent findings, they used data from the CDC 2021-2023 Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System and 2021 and 2023 Youth Risk Behavior Survey. The report authors noted that the Youth Risk Behavior Survey in particular 'currently provides the best available data for our estimates of the size and characteristics of youth who identify as transgender in the U.S.' But the agency will no longer collect information on transgender people in compliance with President Donald Trump's Executive Order calling for federal recognition of only two biological sexes. Since Trump returned to office in January, information regarding trans people and health resources for LGBTQ+ people has been quietly removed or modified on federal websites. And the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has stepped away from its previous practice of supporting gender-affirming-care, in spite of numerous statements from all major medical associations in the U.S., including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics, declaring the care as best practice. In May, HHS called for 'exploratory therapy' or psychotherapy to treat individuals with gender dysphoria instead of the medically recommended care. Multiple states have also sought to restrict access to gender-affirming care, particularly for minors, amid broader global efforts to target such care for trans youth. A June Supreme Court decision upholding a Tennessee state-level ban on gender-affirming-care for youth delivered a heavy blow to the U.S. LGBTQ+ community, permitting similar bans that have been enacted across the country and presenting a significant obstacle to future efforts to challenge restrictions in the courts. Amid the current political climate, the authors of Wednesday's Williams Institute report say they are unsure whether survey respondents will accurately respond to questions regarding their gender identity moving forward. In addition to the uncertain future of data on the U.S. transgender population, they wrote, 'It is also unclear whether individuals' willingness to disclose on surveys that they identify as transgender will remain unchanged in the years to come.' Despite those looming challenges in gathering information, however, the authors noted it is already clear that younger people are more likely to identify as transgender and they anticipate that to continue being true. 'This has implications for institutions in our society, including educational institutions, the U.S. Armed Forces, civilian workplaces, health care settings, and other areas, regarding how to meet the needs of and provide opportunities for current youth and future generations,' they said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store