logo
FEMA declines to test soil after California fires despite Newsom administration concerns

FEMA declines to test soil after California fires despite Newsom administration concerns

Yahoo28-02-2025

Federal officials have declared they will not order soil sampling after completing debris removal on Los Angeles properties that succumbed to the region's devastating fires earlier this year, rebuffing concerns raised by state officials about potential contamination.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) administration last week appealed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in a bid to revive the once-routine testing.
'As practice on all past major fire recoveries, we urge FEMA to conduct comprehensive soil sampling as part of the debris removal process at affected properties,' Nancy Ward, director of the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), wrote in a letter to Curtis Brown, federal coordinating officer for FEMA Region 9. 'Without adequate soil testing, contaminants caused by the fire can remain undetected.'
She warned that failing to implement such sampling could 'expose individuals to residual substances during rebuilding efforts and potentially jeopardize groundwater and surface water quality.'
FEMA, however, has reaffirmed its decision to forgo the sampling and instead task the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) with eliminating waste and clearing the top 6 inches from ravaged properties without conducting follow-up soil tests.
'The mission assignment USACE was given does not include soil testing,' said Susan Lee, a spokesperson for the Army Corps, in an emailed statement. 'The decision regarding soil testing is outside of USACE's role, as it is not part of our assigned responsibilities for this disaster.'
Although FEMA has funded and conducted soil sampling at some of California's biggest wildfires over the past two decades, the federal agency changed its approach in 2020, Brandi Richard Thompson, a spokesperson for FEMA Region 9, told The Hill in an emailed statement.
Based on lessons learned from past fires and in consultation with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), FEMA 'stopped funding soil testing as a routine practice and adopted the 6-inch removal standard,' Richard Thompson said.
These instructions by no means bar private individuals or state entities from conducting soil testing themselves, and scientists from the University of California and Loyola Marymount University have begun conducting soil sampling efforts themselves.
Seth John, an associate professor of earth sciences at the University of Southern California who is working on the sampling, told The Hill in a recent interview that although he believes 'it's always better to have more information,' the lack of FEMA-funded soil sampling is not necessarily a cause for alarm.
But local officials have expressed concern about the lack of federal involvement, as originally reported by the Los Angeles Times.
While FEMA's debris removal instructions align with similar guidelines set by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), the stage agency also calls for an additional cleanup phase that involves further soil testing at burn sites.
Wildfire cleanup efforts in the Golden State usually begin with a first phase focused largely on household hazardous waste removal, which was declared complete this week by the EPA.
Following a subsequent debris removal stage — cleanup of asbestos, concrete, metals and other waste — CalRecycle's state guidelines indicate that the top 3 to 6 inches of soil should be cleared.
But those instructions stress, in bold type, that 'after a fire, toxins like arsenic, lead, mercury, and chlorine seep into the top soil.' The goals of testing are 'to leave a property safe for families, children and pets to occupy,' as well as 'protect groundwater, wildlife and air quality.'
Echoing these concerns, Ward referred in her letter to FEMA to past incident data indicating 'that without thorough testing, these materials can remain at depths exceeding 6 inches.'
She asked 'that FEMA prioritize soil sampling as part of the recovery process,' noting 'the urgency of this matter' in enabling the safe return of residents to their homes.
In response to Ward's requests, Brown wrote back that 'FEMA has not funded soil testing on properties impacted by fires' over the past five years. He verified that up until 2018 — after California's historic and catastrophic Camp Fire — FEMA's policy involved clearing 3 inches of soil and sampling it, prior to digging up another 3 inches to test it again.
'This practice was tedious, inefficient, and a barrier to timely clean up and recovery,' Brown wrote, noting that positive results were typically linked to pollutants present in the soil prior to the fires.
'FEMA's position since 2020 has been to fund the removal of the full 6 inches of soil right away but not fund any further testing,' he added. 'To err on the side of caution, FEMA implemented the practice of removing the full 6 inches of soil, rather than 3.'
Any further excavation, Brown explained, would be 'related to economic recovery and restoration activities' rather than to 'public or environmental health concerns.'
While noting that soil testing would prolong recovery by months, Brown stressed that FEMA does not prevent others from engaging in such efforts. He added that California covered the costs for soil sampling following blazes in 2020 and 2021 that were declared disasters by the then-presidents.
'We encourage the state to conduct soil testing if they wish to do so but are confident that our current practices speed up recovery while protecting and advancing public health and safety,' Brown concluded.
Richard Thomspon, the FEMA Region 9 spokesperson, explained that soil sampling was never 'a universal practice' but that prior to 2020, the agency 'conducted soil testing in certain wildfire recoveries.'
But upon consulting with the EPA and determining that contamination deeper than 6 inches was usually preexisting, the agency ultimately adopted its 'streamlined approach beginning with the August 2020 California wildfires,' she added.
One exception to this approach that Richard Thompson cited was in 2023 following the Lahaina, Hawaii, wildfires, which 'burned through a densely developed urban area, with industrial and commercial zones covering over 20 percent of the burn area.'
'Because historical wildfire soil contamination data was lacking in the Pacific, FEMA approved targeted soil testing at the request of the Hawaii Department of Public Health,' she said.
Those tests only further cemented FEMA's approach, Richard Thompson explained, noting that the results confirmed that most pollutants detected at those depths were present before the blazes.
John and other USC researchers started measuring lead levels in samples they gathered of roadside dust, playground sand and stormwater runoff near the Eaton Fire burn zone at the end of January as part of their effort to provide residents with general safety updates about potential exposures.
In the heart of the burn zones, they detected lead concentrations in roadside dust that surpassed the EPA's regional screening thresholds for residential soils. But they found that playgrounds posed less of a concern, as lead levels in sandboxes remained low.
John said that team has also identified high concentrations of lead and arsenic in stormwater, with the latter likely coming from wood rot treatment used in homes.
After conducting super-high-resolution sampling throughout Altadena, the researchers obtained preliminary results that showed elevated lead levels adjacent to burn structures but no such issues 'even a short distance outside of those areas,' according to John.
In the coming months, the USC team intends to expand their measurements to include other heavy metals, while providing free lead samples to affected community members, he added.
Another soil sampling effort is also being offered to residents of the Palisades and Eaton areas by researchers at Loyola Marymount University.
Regarding lead contamination in particular, John explained that cleanup usually involves removing the top layer of soil, where most lead is localized, and replacing it with new material — pretty much in line with FEMA's approach.
Nonetheless, John said he as a parent is 'very aware that there's a huge amount of uncertainty and maybe even distrust of the process among people who live there.'
'Testing will make people feel much more comfortable with the situation,' he continued. 'But when it actually comes to the question of, 'Do we need testing in this situation from a scientific perspective?' I'd say maybe not.'
Julia Van Soelen Kim, a food systems advisor at the University of California Cooperative Extension, noted in an email 'that urban soils have the potential for contamination even before a fire and urban fires also pose unique soil safety risks.'
With the disclaimer that she is a social scientist and not a soil scientist, Van Soelen Kim maintained that testing is considered 'best practice before planting a food garden, regardless of whether a fire has taken place.'
'I absolutely do think there is good reason to test soil after an urban wildfire of this nature,' she added.
Backing up these assertions, John acknowledged the legitimacy in the perspectives of, 'Why not just go ahead and test?' or, 'Better safe than sorry.'
'But testing also takes time,' he said, noting the expensive nature of sampling for certain compounds.
'There's some value in that information, and certainly value in having that information in terms of making people feel more comfortable,' John added.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump trades barbs with California's Gavin Newsom over protests: ‘Civil war would happen'
Trump trades barbs with California's Gavin Newsom over protests: ‘Civil war would happen'

News24

timean hour ago

  • News24

Trump trades barbs with California's Gavin Newsom over protests: ‘Civil war would happen'

US President Donald Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom shot barbs at each other. Trump's border czar Tom Homan threatened to arrest Newsom. The protests in California put Newsom on the national stage. US President Donald Trump said Monday it would be 'great' if California Governor Gavin Newsom was arrested, in an extraordinary threat as the two men sparred over protests in Los Angeles. Republican Trump, 78, deployed the National Guard in America's second city on Saturday after clashes erupted over immigration raids - but he did not seek the Democratic governor's consent, the first time a US president has taken such an action in 60 years. As temperatures rose, Newsom, 57, then dared Trump's border czar Tom Homan over the weekend to arrest him, after Homan said the governor and LA Mayor Karen Bass could face federal charges of trying to impede immigration agents. 'I would do it if I were Tom. I think it's great,' Trump told reporters when asked if Homan should arrest Newsom, as the Republican president arrived on his Marine One helicopter at the White House. 'Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing.' Trump said Newsom, who has been widely tipped as a possible 2028 presidential candidate, had 'done a terrible job' in curbing the Los Angeles clashes. 'Look, I like Gavin Newsom, he's a nice guy - but he's grossly incompetent, everybody knows,' Trump said. Jason Armond/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images Trump later said that 'I don't want a civil war,' but that 'civil war would happen if you left it to people like him.' Newsom has bitterly accused Trump of manufacturing the crisis for political gain, saying that local law authorities could have handled the protests without the National Guard. On Sunday, he blasted border chief Homan, telling MSNBC: 'Come after me, arrest me, let's just get it over with, tough guy.' The Democrat then branded Trump as 'dictatorial' later on Monday after the Trump administration deployed 700 active-duty Marines to Los Angeles. Immigration protests in Los Angeles are proving a stern test of Newsom's leadership of California, but the unrest also hands the ambitious governor a unique opportunity, say analysts, as he weighs a presidential run in 2028. Rarely a shrinking violet, the 57-year-old chief executive of the country's largest and richest state has eagerly taken up the Democratic Party's cudgel against Trump's immigration crackdown. A presumed frontrunner for the Democratic leadership, Newsom has made no secret of his political ambitions and appears to be relishing his chance for a public showdown with Trump. As the latest front in Trump's immigration crackdown played out on the streets, the Democrat was brawling on social media, vowing to sue Trump over a 'serious breach of state sovereignty'. 'Every political crisis is a political opportunity,' Jeff Le, a former senior official in California state politics who negotiated with the first Trump administration, told AFP. In California, where President Trump polls at 30%, it's a potential gift for the governor to showcase stark differences between the two. Jeff Le Le said Newsom's defiant showing would delight a Democratic base 'desperate for a fighter'. But he warned that a prolonged stand-off in LA - and particularly an escalation of violence or vandalism - could erode public sympathy, especially if Trump seeks to target California's federal funding. A former mayor of San Francisco, Newsom has been at the helm of the Golden State for six years, making it a haven for liberal priorities such as abortion access and anti-deportation 'sanctuary cities'. He has been talked of as a future Democratic president for years, and has bolstered his national profile with bold overtures beyond his own state, including debating Florida Governor Ron DeSantis on Fox News. Mandel Ngan/AFP But he has courted controversy on his own side for appearing at times too chummy with Republicans, a criticism fuelled by the launch in March of a podcast featuring friendly chats with provocative right-wing guests. His reputation also lost some of its sheen among centrists during the pandemic, when he was slammed by business owners for onerous public health restrictions. A lunch that Newsom attended with lobbyists at an opulent Napa Valley restaurant during the partial lockdown became infamous. The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward… — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) June 9, 2025 An Economist/YouGov poll released last week showed Newsom has ground to make up, as his net popularity rating of -13 points is significantly worse than Trump's still underwhelming -7 points. 'There's no question Gavin Newsom is trying to use this moment to elevate his national profile, casting himself as the face of Democratic resistance to Donald Trump,' said veteran political strategist Charlie Kolean. But the analyst cautioned that Newsom would damage his presidential ambitions if voters thought he was taking the side of criminals over security forces in his drive to be seen as a defender of civil rights. 'Voters overwhelmingly want law and order - it's one of the core issues Trump ran on and won big with,' Kolean told AFP. 'Americans want leaders who protect public safety and stand with law enforcement - not ones who politicise unrest.'

LA protests: California questions Trump's military response
LA protests: California questions Trump's military response

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

LA protests: California questions Trump's military response

The Pentagon mobilized 700 Marines and doubled the National Guard troops in response to immigration enforcement protests Marines expected to reach Los Angeles by Tuesday morning California Governor Gavin Newsom sues the Trump administration over deployment of the National Guard and Marines Australia speaks to US over reporter shot with rubber bullet while covering anti-Ice protests This blog covers the latest developments in the United States on Tuesday, June 10, as President Donald Trump's administration deploys active-duty Marines to deal with the LA protests: Australia has raised concerns with the United States government after a reporter was seemingly targeted and shot with a rubber bullet while covering protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said. "We don't find it acceptable that it occurred," Albanese said. The incident during which Australia's Nine News US correspondent Lauren Tomasi was shot live on camera. Albanese said he also spoke to Tomasi. She wrote on Sunday that she was a "bit sore" but otherwise well, adding it was "important we keep on telling the stories that need to be told." President Donald Trump's administration has announced the deployment of 700 active-duty US Marines and an additional 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles. The move has drawn sharp criticism from California Governor Gavin Newsom, who described the deployment as "deranged" and accused the President of using the military to serve his own political interests. "This isn't about public safety," Governor Newsom said. "It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego." The deployment of active-duty military personnel within US cities is highly unusual and has raised concerns among local officials. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said the arrival of Marines without prior coordination posed a significant logistical and operational challenge. He expressed confidence in the police department's ability to manage large-scale demonstrations independently. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass also condemned the move, calling it a "deliberate attempt to create disorder and chaos in our city." "I feel like we are part of an experiment that we did not ask to be a part of," she said. About 700 active-duty Marines are heading to Los Angeles on Tuesday - a move that state and city officials say will only make things worse. What started as peaceful demonstrations against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations on Friday has become more heated. The situation escalated after President Donald Trump ordered in the National Guard, despite California Governor Gavin Newsom's opposition. Protesters and law enforcement clashed, with cars set on fire in the streets. It's the first time in 60 years that a president has deployed active-duty troops to back up the National Guard at home. Stay with DW for real-time news, analysis, and insights from our correspondents on the ground as we continue to cover the LA protests.

Why Waymo's Self-Driving Cars Became a Target of Protesters in Los Angeles
Why Waymo's Self-Driving Cars Became a Target of Protesters in Los Angeles

Time​ Magazine

time2 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Why Waymo's Self-Driving Cars Became a Target of Protesters in Los Angeles

As protesters and police clash across Los Angeles and beyond, a striking image from the mayhem has been that of graffiti-strewn white cars engulfed in flames. But these aren't ordinary cars. They've got sensors protruding from the top and sides—and, critically, they've got no drivers. Waymo, a robotaxi company, found itself at the center of the demonstrations against the Trump Administration's Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids after a group of protesters over the weekend, according to the Los Angeles Times, approached a parked row of the autonomous vehicles and smashed their windows, slashed their tires, spray-painted them with anti-ICE slogans, and set them on fire. While eye-catching, the trend is also extremely dangerous. Electric vehicles, like those in Waymo's fleet, have lithium-ion batteries, and in a post on X, the L.A. Police Department warned: 'Burning lithium-ion batteries release toxic gases, including hydrogen fluoride, posing risks to responders and those nearby.' According to Scientific American, first responders exposed to the fumes of burnt lithium-ion batteries without protection historically 'have developed throat burns and breathing difficulties upon arriving,' and, depending on the hydrogen fluoride levels, individuals can start coughing up blood within minutes of exposure. At least six Waymo vehicles across the county have reportedly been the target of vandalism, resulting in the company temporarily suspending operations in the area 'out of an abundance of caution.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have condemned the violence and destruction, which Newsom attributed to 'insurgent groups' and 'anarchists' who have infiltrated otherwise peaceful protests. President Donald Trump, who mobilized the National Guard to respond to the situation, has called the demonstrators ' troublemakers ' and ' paid insurrectionists.' Here's what to know. What is Waymo? Waymo is a subsidiary of Alphabet, Google's parent company, and grew out of the Google Self-Driving Car project that began in 2009. It launched its robotaxi business in 2020 in limited markets, which grew to include Los Angeles in 2024. While the company says its mission 'is to be the world's most trusted driver,' a national survey earlier this year found that '6 in 10 U.S. drivers still report being afraid to ride in a self-driving vehicle' while the proportion of people enthusiastic about the development of the technology has actually decreased from 18% in 2022 to 13% in 2025. Waymo vehicles were involved in 696 accidents across the U.S. between 2021 and 2024, or about one accident every other day. MKP Law Group, a Los-Angeles based firm that represents clients involved in accidents, acknowledged in a blog post that this statistic 'is not necessarily indicative of Waymo causing those accidents, as some may have been the fault of the other involved drivers.' Studies show that self-driving technology is likely safer than most human drivers. Waymo has also reportedly annoyed some people, including those who find self-driving vehicles to be an eyesore as well as locals where the vehicles routinely get stuck. Neighbors near a Waymo charging station in Santa Monica have complained about noise pollution caused by the driverless vehicles honking at each other in the parking lot. Waymo vehicles as well as other self-driving cars have previously been the target of vandals, particularly in California, where Waymo is headquartered. In January, a Waymo car was torn apart in Los Angeles. In February 2024, another Waymo car was smashed and set ablaze in San Francisco. And in July 2024, a man was charged with slashing the tires of 17 Waymo cars in San Francisco. Why is Waymo being targeted in the L.A. protests? Several potential explanations have emerged for why Waymo vehicles were targeted during the protests in Los Angeles. The Wall Street Journal reported that part of the reason the cars were vandalized was to obstruct traffic—a traditional, albeit controversial, protest tactic. Some social media users have suggested that self-driving vehicles in particular have become a new target because they are seen by protesters as ' part of the police surveillance state.' Waymo's cars are equipped with cameras that provide a 360-degree view of their surroundings, a tool that has been tapped by law enforcement, according to reports. Independent tech news site 404 Media reported in April that the Los Angeles Police Department obtained footage from a Waymo driverless car to use as part of an investigation into an unrelated hit-and-run. And Bloomberg reported in 2023 that police have increasingly relied on self-driving cars and their cameras for video evidence. Chris Gilliard, a fellow at the Social Science Research Council, told Bloomberg that self-driving vehicles are 'essentially surveillance cameras on wheels,' adding: 'We're supposed to be able to go about our business in our day-to-day lives without being surveilled unless we are suspected of a crime, and each little bit of this technology strips away that ability.' Waymo told Bloomberg at the time that it 'carefully' reviews every request from police 'to make sure it satisfies applicable laws and has a valid legal process.' Some activists have also suggested that the burning of Waymo vehicles should garner less sympathy from onlookers. 'There are people on here saying it's violent and domestic terrorism to set a Waymo car on fire,' racial justice organizer Samuel Sinyangwe posted on X. 'A robot car? Are you going to demand justice for the robot dogs next? But not the human beings repeatedly shot with rubber bullets in the street? What kind of politics is this?' 'There is no human element to Waymo,' climate and labor organizer Elise Joshi similarly posted on X. 'It's expensive and bought-out politicians are using it as an excuse to defund public transit. I pray on Waymo's downfall.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store