
Adverse Events Post-Colonoscopy Rise With Age but Are Rare
METHODOLOGY:
Guidelines recommend surveillance colonoscopy for patients with precancerous adenomas due to an increased colorectal cancer risk but lack recommendations for stopping surveillance after the age of 75 years despite older adults experiencing increased comorbidities.
Researchers analyzed data from 84,172 surveillance colonoscopies performed from 2010 to 2019 within a large integrated US healthcare system.
Participants (59.5% men; 66.4% White individuals), aged 45-85 years, had a prior adenoma and were followed up to 30 days post-procedure for adverse events.
Outcomes included emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths due to specific conditions (eg, colonic perforation and stroke), cardiovascular conditions, or any cause.
Logistic regression was used to assess the association between age and adverse event risk, adjusting for various factors.
TAKEAWAY:
Adverse events occurred in < 1% of procedures, with gastrointestinal bleeding being the most common.
Adverse event rates increased with age, with the highest rates observed in patients aged 76-85 years (69.6 events per 10,000 procedures), particularly for gastrointestinal bleeding (39.2 events per 10,000 procedures) and stroke (18.3 events per 10,000 procedures).
Patients aged 76-85 years had significantly higher odds of adverse events than younger age groups in unadjusted analyses, but these odds were attenuated after adjusting for covariates.
Significant risk factors for adverse events across all age groups included anticoagulant use, higher comorbidity scores, polypectomy, and advanced neoplasia detection during surveillance colonoscopy.
IN PRACTICE:
'The findings suggest that the decision to perform colonoscopy surveillance after age 75 should be individualized based on patient preference, prior colonoscopy findings and procedure quality, comorbidities, and medication usage, rather than age alone,' the authors wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Jeffrey K. Lee, MD, Kaiser Permanente Northern California in Oakland, California. It was published online in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology .
LIMITATIONS:
Findings may not be generalizable, as all participants were insured and had access to comprehensive care. The observational design lacked a noncolonoscopy comparison group, making it difficult to attribute adverse events directly to the procedure. Limited numbers of certain adverse events resulted in wide CIs, and potential confounders like polyp size or number and sedation type were not adjusted for.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was conducted within the National Cancer Institute-funded Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process consortium and supported by a career development grant from the same agency. The authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
12 minutes ago
- Medscape
Brain Stimulation Promising for Progressive Aphasia
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may augment standard language therapy to help slow the progression of primary progressive aphasia (PPA), a neurodegenerative disorder that erodes communication. In a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial, 6 months of active intermittent theta-burst TMS plus language therapy improved or mitigated decline in regional brain metabolism, trained language abilities, functional impairment, and neuropsychiatric symptoms in adults with PPA. The study was published online on August 11 in JAMA Network Open . Added Value? PPA is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome marked by progressive speech and/or language impairment. Most cases stem from frontotemporal degeneration or Alzheimer's disease. There are currently no effective drug treatments, although speech-language therapy has proven to be helpful. TMS can induce changes in cortical excitability, potentially promoting the reorganization of language networks, and has shown promise as adjunctive treatment for post-stroke aphasia. Previous studies examining the short-term effects of TMS on PPA reported 'encouraging' results, but the longer-term effects, beyond more than a few weeks of intervention, have not been examined, until now. For the study, the researchers led by Jordi Matias-Guiu, MD, PhD, with the Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain, recruited 63 adults with early-stage PPA (42 women; mean age, 72 years). Participants were randomized (2:1) to either active intermittent theta-burst TMS or sham TMS for 6 months, immediately followed by evidence-based language therapy for PPA. The trial consisted of a 24-week treatment that included a 2-week intensive course, in which active TMS or sham TMS combined with language therapy was applied daily, followed by a maintenance phase in which the same stimulation was applied weekly for 22 weeks. Participants were assessed at baseline, 3 months after the start of the treatment, and at the end of the treatment (6 months following baseline). The main outcome was the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) on FDG PET imaging in the left hemisphere, assessed at baseline and at 6 months (immediately following the intervention). Feasible, Effective Option The primary outcome was positive with higher adjusted mean SUVR in the active group than in the sham TMS group (0.78 vs 0.77; P = .046). Active TMS was also associated with significant improvement on all secondary language outcomes at 6 months, including the mini linguistic state examination, with an adjusted mean difference at 6 months of 7.71 ( P = .002). Patients in the sham group worsened on this measure compared with those in the active group. Active TMS also led to improvement in confrontation naming of trained words, which improved by a mean 23.8 points in active recipients compared with sham TMS recipients. Functional independence also benefited, with daily-living scores falling (indicating better performance) by 5.4 points in the active group compared with the sham TMS group. Neuropsychiatric symptoms eased as well, with a 4-point advantage on the neuropsychiatric inventory scale. There were no significant differences in the number of adverse events. Adherence to treatment protocol was high (92%). 'Overall, these findings suggest that the combination of TMS and language therapy is a feasible and effective treatment option for PPA,' the researchers concluded. They said future studies should investigate the potential for TMS paired with an evidence-based speech-language intervention to sustain or extend these benefits beyond 6 months.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Next-Gen Heart Trial and Raised Outlook Might Change the Case for Investing in TransMedics (TMDX)
TransMedics Group, Inc. recently received conditional FDA approval to begin its Next-Generation OCS ENHANCE Heart trial, the largest heart transplant preservation study to date, and reported strong quarterly results with increased full-year revenue guidance. This combination of clinical and financial milestones highlights TransMedics' efforts to expand both the use and market reach of its organ transplant technology. We'll assess how the launch of this major clinical trial could impact TransMedics' broader investment outlook and future growth drivers. These 14 companies survived and thrived after COVID and have the right ingredients to survive Trump's tariffs. Discover why before your portfolio feels the trade war pinch. TransMedics Group Investment Narrative Recap To be a TransMedics Group shareholder, you need to believe that advances in organ preservation technology and successful clinical outcomes will drive broader adoption, fueling long-term growth. The FDA's conditional approval for the Next-Generation OCS ENHANCE Heart trial is an important development that could influence short-term sentiment but does not fundamentally change the biggest immediate catalyst: further clinical validation of OCS platforms; nor does it remove the largest risk, which remains the possibility of underwhelming trial results or advances from competitors. Among the company's recent updates, the revised full-year 2025 revenue guidance, now set at US$585 million to US$605 million, stands out. This more optimistic outlook directly relates to expanded clinical activity and increasing OCS system adoption, reinforcing the importance of future clinical milestones as potential inflection points for both revenue acceleration and investor confidence. On the other hand, investors should be aware of challenges if next-generation OCS trials fail to meet… Read the full narrative on TransMedics Group (it's free!) TransMedics Group is projected to reach $913.8 million in revenue and $151.1 million in earnings by 2028. This outlook assumes annual revenue growth of 19.8% and nearly doubles earnings, with an increase of $79.4 million from the current $71.7 million. Uncover how TransMedics Group's forecasts yield a $142.29 fair value, a 12% upside to its current price. Exploring Other Perspectives Nine fair value estimates from the Simply Wall St Community range from US$65.24 to US$308.09 per share. With heightened expectations pinned to new clinical trials, these wide opinions reflect just how differently you and other investors may assess future business risks and opportunities. Explore 9 other fair value estimates on TransMedics Group - why the stock might be worth over 2x more than the current price! Build Your Own TransMedics Group Narrative Disagree with existing narratives? Create your own in under 3 minutes - extraordinary investment returns rarely come from following the herd. A great starting point for your TransMedics Group research is our analysis highlighting 3 key rewards that could impact your investment decision. Our free TransMedics Group research report provides a comprehensive fundamental analysis summarized in a single visual - the Snowflake - making it easy to evaluate TransMedics Group's overall financial health at a glance. Interested In Other Possibilities? Our top stock finds are flying under the radar-for now. Get in early: The best AI stocks today may lie beyond giants like Nvidia and Microsoft. Find the next big opportunity with these 20 smaller AI-focused companies with strong growth potential through early-stage innovation in machine learning, automation, and data intelligence that could fund your retirement. The latest GPUs need a type of rare earth metal called Terbium and there are only 26 companies in the world exploring or producing it. Find the list for free. The end of cancer? These 26 emerging AI stocks are developing tech that will allow early identification of life changing diseases like cancer and Alzheimer's. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include TMDX. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Medscape
42 minutes ago
- Medscape
Race, Ethnicity Influences Depression Risk in Vitiligo
TOPLINE: In a study, Black and Hispanic patients with vitiligo were at a significantly greater risk for depression than control individuals, which was not the case for White and Asian patients with vitiligo. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 1087 patients with vitiligo using electronic health records from the National Institutes of Health All of Us Program between 2018 and 2024. They were compared with 5435 individuals without vitiligo, matched by age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and insurance status. In both groups, the mean age was 63.2 years; about 63% were women; 49% were White, 19% were Black, 3% were Asian, and 24% were Hispanic patients. The primary outcome was risk for depression after adjusting for comorbidities such as autoimmune and thyroid diseases, Hashimoto thyroiditis, and diabetes. TAKEAWAY: Overall, patients with vitiligo showed an increased risk for depression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.16-1.54) compared with those without vitiligo. Black patients with vitiligo had more than a twofold higher risk for depression (aOR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.55-2.91) than Black patients without vitiligo. Hispanic patients also had a significantly higher risk for depression (aOR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.09-1.94), and non-Hispanic patients were also at a higher risk for depression (aOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.52) than Hispanic and non-Hispanic control individuals without vitiligo, respectively. The risk for depression in White individuals (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.85-1.29) and in Asian individuals with vitiligo (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.15-2.38) was not significantly increased when compared with White and Asian patients without vitiligo, respectively. IN PRACTICE: 'These findings underscore significant variation in the mental health burden of vitiligo across racial and ethnic groups,' the study authors wrote. 'Black and Hispanic patients with vitiligo,' they added, 'experience significantly elevated depression risk, potentially reflecting greater lesion visibility, cultural stigma, and differences in access to mental health and dermatologic services.' SOURCE: The study was led by Matthew J. Yan, BS, BA, Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, and was published online on August 5 in JAAD International. LIMITATIONS: The study did not assess vitiligo lesion visibility, treatment details, or age of onset. Sample sizes for Asian patients were small and could limit generalizability. DISCLOSURES: The study did not receive any funding. One author disclosed receiving research support, advisory, and speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Almirall, Arcutis, ASLAN, Beiersdorf, BI, BMS, EPI, Incyte, LEO, UCB, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Ortho, Sun, Dermavant, Dermira, Sanofi, Takeda, Regeneron, and Pfizer. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.