SC refuses to stay Madras HC order restraining DMK from using OTP verification
Supreme Court
on Monday refused to stay an interim injunction by the
Madras High Court
against the use of
OTP verification
messages for the
DMK
's
enrolment drive
'
Oraniyil Tamil Nadu
'.
A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar dismissed the appeal filed by the DMK, saying the issue is sensitive. The whole process is suspect, it said.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Design Thinking
CXO
Operations Management
Data Analytics
Finance
Digital Marketing
Product Management
Leadership
Degree
Others
Data Science
Project Management
Data Science
Management
Cybersecurity
PGDM
Artificial Intelligence
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
25 Weeks
IIM Kozhikode
CERT-IIMK PCP DTIM Async India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
25 Weeks
IIM Kozhikode
CERT-IIMK PCP DTIM Async India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
"The court has to protect the citizens. Go back to the high court. We are not inclined to interfere in the matter. Dismissed," the bench said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Helping Organizations Close The Gap Between Technical Invention And Commercial Innovation; Interview with Colin Scott, Senior Vice President of DownSelect® at Innventure. - TechBullion
TechBullion
Undo
Senior advocate P Wilson, appearing for the DMK, submitted that the party was not collecting
Aadhaar details
.
He contended that the high court had wrongly passed the order as there was no injunction sought in the matter.
Live Events
"My whole programme has come to a standstill. 1.7 crore members have come and offered thematic. I am doing what other parties like BJP and Aam Aadmi Party are doing. I am not collecting Aadhaar details," Wilson said.
On July 21, the high court issued an injunction restraining the DMK from using OTP verification messages for its enrolment drive, saying the matter involves aspects of
data protection
and privacy which are to be examined by the court.
The HC said since personal data is being collected from people, the PIL raises serious concerns about the
right to privacy
and the infrastructure available for data protection.
It passed the order while hearing a plea filed by
S Rajkumar
, a resident of T Athikarai village in Sivaganga district.
The plea said DMK cadres and functionaries are collecting the personal and Aadhaar details from the public in his locality under the guise of 'Oraniyil Tamil Nadu'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Exit of Pannerselvam from NDA will not affect strength of NDA in Tamil Nadu: Nainar Nagendran
Former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister O. Pannerselvam leaving the National Democratic Alliance will not weaken the strength of the BJP-led front in Tamil Nadu, said BJP State president, Nainar Nagendran. Talking to reporters here on Monday, he said that the State Assembly election was still eight months away. 'It is the people who are going to decide the outcome of the polls. I cannot be predicting anything now,' he said. When a question was raised about Mr. Pannerselvam being criticised for trying to get closer with the DMK, Mr. Nagendran said that it was not fair on his part to comment on Mr. Pannerselvam, who had left the NDA. Stating that the recent visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Thoothukudi and Gangaikondacholapuram had created a good resurgence among the people, he said that Mr. Modi is likely to make more visits to Tamil Nadu. To a question on the controversy over the Centre's stand on Keeladi archaeological excavation, Mr. Nagendran said that the DMK government should instead focus on containing drug abuse and incidents of sexual assault on women and children. The increase of property tax and electricity charges has affected the DMK's image among the people, he claimed.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Legal arrest, linguistic misstep: Delhi Police FIR stirs 'Bangladeshi language' row
A legitimate arrest of an illegal immigrant in Delhi has spiralled into a politically charged controversy, after an internal communication by the Delhi Police allegedly referred to Bengali as a "Bangladeshi language". The error, though seemingly minor, stirred a political storm, especially in poll-bound West Bengal, where language and identity are deeply intertwined. The alleged error pitted the Centre and the Trinamool Congress against each LANGUAGE THAT DOES NOT EXISTThe controversy erupted with an internal police note during the investigation of an FIR registered on March 11, 2025. The document referenced evidence in the "Bangladeshi language" — a term that has no linguistic basis. The official language of Bangladesh is Bengali, which is also widely spoken in Indian states like West Bengal, Tripura, and parts of semantic slip was swiftly politicised. West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee took to X (formerly Twitter), writing, "See now how Delhi police, under the direct control of the Ministry of Home, Government of India, is describing Bengali as 'Bangladeshi' language!"THE FIR THAT SPARKED ROW The case involves 27-year-old Mohammad Jewel Islam, a Bangladeshi national arrested from the Bhogal–Jangpura area in South Delhi. According to the FIR filed at Lodhi Colony Police Station, Islam had entered India illegally in 2021 via the Cooch Behar border in West Bengal, without valid interrogation, Islam submitted a Bangladeshi National ID (No. 3325183683) and the identity cards of his mother and brother, confirming his Bangladeshi citizenship. He had procured an Aadhaar and PAN card in Delhi using allegedly forged documents, with the help of an agent from Hazrat has since been booked under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Foreigners Act, and the Aadhaar Act. Seven more individuals were arrested in connection with similar document-related GAP THAT'S OVERSHADOWING THE CASEWhile the arrest and evidence appear legally sound, the fallout from the language misstep has dominated headlines. The mention of "Bangladeshi language" was not part of the FIR, but a note accompanying a translation request. However, it has become the focal point of political argue that such errors reflect a lack of cultural and linguistic awareness within enforcement bodies. Film personalities and community leaders across the Bengali diaspora have condemned the terminology as reductive and harmful, particularly in a country as linguistically diverse as VS PROFILING: WHERE'S THE LINE?The case has raised uneasy questions about how identity is perceived in law enforcement. While the FIR process demonstrated procedural diligence, the reference to language has sparked concerns over ethnic is no language called "Bangladeshi." Bengali, the official language of Bangladesh, is also a constitutionally recognised Indian language. Dialects such as Sylheti, Rarhi, Rajbanshi, and Chittagonian are spoken across both India and Bangladesh, often with indistinguishable warn that using language as a proxy for nationality is dangerous. In a multilingual country like India, dialects don't follow borders. A resident of Cooch Behar or Malda may speak in a dialect nearly identical to someone from across the border in Rajshahi or Khulna. Mistaking that for evidence of foreignness risks criminalising speech and misidentifying OF SPEECH: WHY DIALECT CAN'T DECIDE CITIZENSHIPThe Bangladeshi national's arrest was based on tangible documents, not speech. Yet, the fallout underscores a deeper flaw: the assumption that language can denote citizenship. This case highlights the urgent need for training law enforcement in linguistic and cultural competence.A speaker's dialect cannot serve as biometric data. As experts and politicians have pointed out, legitimate Indian citizens across Tripura, Assam's Barak Valley, and Meghalaya speak dialects like Sylheti, which are also common in POLICE'S SILENCE, BJP'S REBUTTALThe Delhi Police has not issued a formal statement on the language error, allowing political parties to dominate the narrative. The BJP defended the terminology, with National Information in-charge Amit Malviya writing on X, "Nowhere in the Delhi Police letter is Bangla or Bengali described as a 'Bangladeshi' language."advertisementMalviya added, "Delhi Police is absolutely right in referring to the language as Bangladeshi in the context of identifying infiltrators.' However, his comment that 'dialects like Sylheti are nearly incomprehensible to Indian Bengalis" triggered Susmita Dev responded sharply: 'Now BJP calls Sylheti a Bangladeshi language... We have lived in this region since 1874 as part of Assam, and before that, Bengal. Zero knowledge of history.' Congress's Gaurav Gogoi also joined in, saying, 'Today the BJP IT cell insults the Bengali language spoken by lakhs of people in Tripura, Meghalaya and the Barak Valley of Assam.'WHAT THIS COMES AROUND ASThis case underscores how fragile public trust becomes when administrative errors collide with questions of identity. In the context of West Bengal's politics, where language is central to cultural and political identity, such a mistake is seen as more than a bureaucratic enforcement agencies acknowledge the complexity of India's linguistic landscape, and communicate with greater precision, even a misused word risks overshadowing legitimate law enforcement work — turning proof into politics and mistakes into movements.- EndsMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Pollution control boards can seek bank guarantees for damage, says SC
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that environmental regulators, such as the Pollution Control Boards, can impose environmental compensation and seek bank guarantees from polluting entities as part of their preventive measures against potential environmental damage. 'We hold that the environmental regulators, the Pollution Control Boards, can impose and collect as restitutionary and compensatory damages fixed sums of money or require furnishing bank guarantees as an ex-ante measure towards potential environmental damage in exercise of powers under Sections 33A and 31A of the Water and Air Acts,' the Supreme Court said. A Bench of Justices PS Narasimha and Manoj Misra held that such actions by State Boards are lawful and fall within their powers. However, the Bench stressed that this authority must be exercised fairly and transparently. 'While we hold that the Boards have the power to direct the payment of environmental damages, we make it clear that this power must always be guided by two overarching principles. First, that the power cannot be exercised in an arbitrary manner; and second, the process of exercising this power must be infused with transparency,' the judgment said. The court emphasized that such action must be distinguished from a penalty. 'There is a distinction between a direction for payment of restitutionary and compensatory damages as a remedial measure for environmental damage or as an ex-ante measure towards potential environmental damage on the one hand; and a punitive action of fine or imprisonment for violations under Chapters VII of the Water Act and VI of the Air Act on the other hand.' The Bench also referred to the polluter pays principle in Indian environmental jurisprudence, stating that actual environmental degradation is not a prerequisite for demanding compensation. Instead, the potential for environmental harm is sufficient. 'The actual degradation of the environment is not a necessary condition for the application of the polluter pays principle, as long as the offending activities have the potential of degrading the environment," the judgment said. The Court also echoed the view taken by the National Green Tribunal in Swastik Ispat Pvt Ltd, where the tribunal had upheld the use of bank guarantees as a lawful method of securing environmental compliance. In the present case, the Delhi Pollution Control Committee had appealed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court, which had held that it was not empowered to levy compensatory damages under Section 33A of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, and Section 31A of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The High Court ruled that such action amounted to a penalty under Chapters VII and VI of the respective Acts, and as such, the procedure for imposing and collecting compensatory damages outlined thereunder should be the only method available.
