Trump and Musk's extraordinary spat minute-by-minute
They were once the best of friends, but last night that came to an end - and it all unfolded online as people across the world looked on... and retweeted.
Tensions between Elon Musk and Donald Trump had been building for several days after the SpaceX billionaire criticised the US president's signature tax bill.
While initially it remained cordial, the president suggested his former backer and adviser missed being in government and suffered from "Trump derangement syndrome", leading to a sudden and dramatic deterioration in relations between the pair.
They have two of the largest platforms in the world, and last night, they turned them on each other. While much of Europe slept through it, here is every insult and barb as it happened... so far.
6.39pm: 'Big ugly spending bill'
Musk tells Trump his "big ugly spending bill" will make the economic situation worse.
Five minutes later he retweets a video in which he says the bill will increase the US's deficit to $2.5 trillion (£1.85 trn).
AT 6.48pm he shares a post about the bill's popularity, simply saying: "Kill bill".
6.49pm: Trump's 'body double'
Earlier in the evening, Musk reshares a series of posts (dating back to 2012) from Trump's X account, including ones saying deficits should not be allowed.
He then reshares a post of someone praising him, adding: "Where is the man who wrote these words? Was he replaced by a body double!?"
He then retweets a meme, making light of Trump's plan, which links to a poll he had run the previous day.
7.23pm: Back to the bill
Musk starts tweeting about the "big ugly spending bill" again, saying members of Congress didn't even have time to read it before it was passed.
He continues to tweet about this for most of the night, including accusing the government of "spending America into bankruptcy".
7.30pm: Who is right?
Musk retweets a poll that shows 76% of 1.5 million voters think he is right in his spat with the president.
7.37pm: Elon was 'wearing thin'
Trump shares a post on his Truth Social site that accuses Musk of going "crazy" after the president took away his EV mandate.
Musk responds by sharing a number of former interviews, including a video from 2021 where he says the industry does not need EV tax credits.
Trump then shares a post in which he writes the "easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts".
8.10pm: The Epstein 'bomb'
Arguably the largest moment in their fight - Musk accuses Trump of being in the Epstein files.
He gives no evidence for the claim. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt dismisses the comment.
9.06pm: Musk 'turning against me'
Trump says he doesn't mind Musk turning against him, but adds that "he should have done so months ago".
He then goes on to voice continued support for his bill, calling it "one of the greatest bills ever presented to Congress".
9.09pm: Decommissioning DragonX
Following Trump's statement about terminating his contracts, Musk tweets: "In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately."
Dragon is the only US spacecraft available to deliver crew to and from the International Space Station.
Two minutes later he retweets a post calling on Trump to be impeached, adding simply: "Yes."
9.29pm: Trump's tariffs
Musk hits out at Trump's tariffs, resharing a tweet from someone who called them "stupid".
"The Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year," he adds.
For the rest of the evening, Musk reshares posts from other users, often adding a laughing face emoji, or the occasional comment, including the words: "If America goes broke, nothing else matters."
2.20am: Musk says he won't decommission spacecraft
Just after 2am, an account with a few hundred followers tweets Musk: "This is a shame this back and forth. You are both better than this. Cool off and take a step back for a couple days."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Five Proud Boys leaders sue DOJ for $100 million over their Jan 6 prosecution
Five Proud Boys leaders who were convicted of spearheading the January 6 Capitol riot are suing the federal government and claiming that their constitutional rights were violated. The lawsuit, which was filed on Friday in a federal court in Florida, is seeking $100 million in restitution and comes after President Donald Trump pardoned almost all of the January 6 defendants on the first day of his second term, The Hill reports. The five men bringing the suit are Enrique Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Zachary Rehl, Joe Biggs and Dominic Pezzola. Four of the men were convicted on charges of seditious conspiracy. Pezzola was acquitted but was convicted on other felonies associated with the infamous riot. They are claiming that "political prosecution" violated their constitutional rights. 'What follows is a parade of horribles: egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump, by any and all means necessary, legal, or illegal,' their lawsuit alleges. In the filing, the Proud Boys accuse the FBI of using paid informants to spy on their defense team, allege they were denied bail, and claim that federal agents had altered what they say was exculpatory evidence relevant to their defense, according to the New York Times. The lawsuit will force the Department of Justice under Trump to either defend its prosecution of Capitol rioters or offer a payout to the right-wing gang members. Ed Martin, who is now the Justice Department's pardon attorney, has said he believes that the Capitol riot convicts deserve compensation for what he claimed was mistreatment by the federal government. Tarrio was sentenced to 22 years in prison, the longest for any January 6 defendant before he was pardoned by Trump. The Proud Boys' lawsuit cites Trump's pardon in its language, arguing that it sought to "end a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years."
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Elon Musk's crash-out killed conservatives' momentum — and likely guaranteed passage of Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
Earlier this week, it looked like Elon Musk had delivered arch conservatives a gift when he trashed President Donald Trump's ' One Big, Beautiful Bill.' On Tuesday, Musk called the legislation an ' outrageous, pork-filled, disgusting abomination.' It seemed like a boon for some of the fiscal conservatives in the Senate like Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin who criticized the fact the bill still blows up the deficit. Had Musk stopped there, he probably would have given fiscal conservatives additional leverage. House Speaker Mike Johnson had spent much of the first part of the year getting every faction of the House GOP on board with the bill despite fiscal conservative grumbling. But Johnson admitted during his weekly press conference that he had tried to call Musk with no response. Immediately, House Republicans and members of the Freedom Caucus — including its former chairman Scott Perry and Andy Ogles, who has tried to allow Trump to run for a third term — voiced their criticisms of the bill that they had when it was being deliberated. They could have voiced them at any moment but did not. It clearly showed that they had abandoned their fiscal conservative principles in fear of the pressure campaign from Trump. Had Musk kept his critiques strictly to the bill, the tech tycoon could have offered an effective counterweight to give conservatives leverage against leadership given his immense wealth and his wide reach as owner of X. But the world's richest man chose to blow that to smithereens when he turned the attacks personal. First, he said that Trump would not have won the presidency, Republicans would have lost the House and would have a smaller minority in the Senate had it not been for Musk's money, before huffing 'such ingratitude.' Then Musk lobbed the ultimate grenade when he said that Trump had not fully released the 'Epstein files' —information related to the late — because Trump was mentioned in them. The Tesla founder took it a step further by calling for Trump's impeachment. Not only did Musk's words permanently spike any chance for reconciliation, it killed any chances for budget reconciliation, the arcane process through which Republicans hope to pass the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, who has spent much of the legislative process in the House trying to make the bill more conservative but ultimately voted for it, tried to split the difference. 'He's got concerns with the bill, he's a free American, and he can speak freely and and God bless him for what he's been doing to try to make improvements,' Roy told The Independent. 'Again, is it what Chip Roy would draft? Not even close. But did it move in the right direction to get to a place that I felt comfortable sending it to the Senate to see if they could make it better? Sure.' Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, who has spent much of the new Congress trying to declassify information related to Epstein, said it was too early to tell about the Senate bill since text did not exist. 'I've always been a big fan of going back to pre-Covid spending levels,' Luna told The Independent, but understood it would require negotiation. Rep. Andy Harris, the chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, who ultimately voted 'present' on the bill last month, said he agreed. 'I still think his concerns about the deficit are real,' he said. But the damage might already be done. If Republican elected have learned anything in the past decade, they've learned that their voters are not so much devoted to conservative ideals; they're devoted to Trump. Deviation from Trump, even in the name of conservative principles like restraining spending and balanced budgets, amounts to heresy. Musk's decision to start talking about forming another political party further alienates him from the GOP. He is now no longer part of the Trump coalition or even the Republican coalition. That means that fiscal conservatives cannot depend on him to drop millions of dollars for people opposed to the reconciliation bill or if he does, that it will immediately be tainted as money coming from a heretic. This makes Senate and House leadership's job easier. It gives them a foil to oppose and allows critics of the bill to tied to Musk. And they've already seen that most Republicans' bluster about spending levels are just that given that they will ultimately fold. Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee spent much of the early parts of the reconciliation process intimating to reporters that he would not vote for the bill only to fold. As votes wrapped on Thursday, he did not seem worried about it all. 'It's just two biggest dogs in the pound, they're both gonna fight a little,' he said. Except now, Musk just defanged fiscal conservatives.
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
US brings Kilmar Ábrego García, mistakenly deported to El Salvador, back to face charges
Kilmar Ábrego García, a 29-year-old from El Salvador who was mistakenly deported in March, has been returned to the US to face prosecution on two federal criminal has been accused of participating in a trafficking conspiracy over several years to move people from Texas to other parts of the country. El Salvador agreed to release Mr Ábrego García after the US presented it with an arrest warrant, Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Friday. His lawyer has called the charges "preposterous".The White House had been resisting a US Supreme Court order from April to "facilitate" his return after he was sent to a mega-jail in El Salvador alongside more than 250 other deportees. In a two-count grand jury indictment, sealed by a Tennessee court last month, Mr Ábrego García was charged with one count of conspiracy to transport aliens and a second count of unlawful transportation of undocumented said the grand jury found that Mr Ábrego García had played a "significant role" in an alien smuggling ring - bringing in thousands of illegal immigrants to the indictment additionally alleges he transported members of MS-13, designated a foreign terrorist organisation by the US. The Trump administration had previously alleged Mr Ábrego García was a member of the transnational Salvadorian gang, which he has denied. Bondi also accused Mr Ábrego García of trafficking weapons and narcotics into the US for the gang. Mr Ábrego García's lawyers have previously argued that he has never been convicted of any criminal offence, including gang membership, in the US or in El Sandoval Moshenberg, one of his attorneys, called the charges "preposterous" and the events an "abuse of power" at a Friday news conference. Mr Ábrego García entered the US illegally as a teenager from El Salvador. In 2019, he was arrested with three other men in Maryland and detained by federal immigration an immigration judge granted him protection from deportation on the grounds that he might be at risk of persecution from local gangs in his home countryWhat is the 1798 law that Trump used to deport migrants?What we know about Kilmar Abrego Garcia and MS-13 allegationsOn 15 March, he was deported amid an immigration crackdown form the Trump administration, after President Donald Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act, a war-time law that allows presidents to detain or deport the natives and citizens of an enemy Ábrego García was taken to the notorious mega-prison Cecot in El Salvador, known for its brutal conditions. While government lawyers initially said he was taken there as a result of "administrative error", the Trump administration refused to order his return. Whether or not the government had to "facilitate" his return to his home in the US state of Maryland became the subject of a weeks-long legal and political Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen demanded to see Mr Ábrego García in El Salvador, he was released to a different prison in that country. El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, a close ally of Trump, said on social media on Friday that if the administration "request the return of a gang member to face charges, of course we wouldn't refuse". Mr Ábrego García is expected to make an initial appearance at a Tennessee court on Friday, where US will request he be held in pretrial custody "because he poses a danger to the community and a serious risk of flight", according to the detention motion.
