logo
From rivalry to realignment, China shifts to seek better fortunes amid trade friction with US

From rivalry to realignment, China shifts to seek better fortunes amid trade friction with US

BEIJING: Rather than being fixated on its trade dispute with the United States (US), China is refocusing its efforts towards bolstering ties with non-confrontational partners, including developing nations, to boost trade and investments.
Clearly, Beijing is exploring all options to find new markets and export opportunities to mitigate the fallout from the continuing tariff war with Washington, hedging against downside risks by forging links with Southeast and Central Asia, the Gulf, Africa, Australia, New Zealand and Latin America.
China's renewed zest to reach out far and wide was not lost on some 119 journalists from all over the world who joined the three-month China International Press Communication Centre (CIPCC) programme in the Chinese capital.
It was difficult for them not to notice that Chinese authorities -- deeply concerned over the welfare of the nation's 1.4 billion citizens -- realise the need to intensify efforts to reap more economic opportunities.
This was clearly evident after China ramped up its presence in high-level summits, forums and trade expos to woo investments and explore trade opportunities as well as alternative markets after the US tariffs announcement in April.
A busy calendar for economic diplomacy
The list of engagements includes the Central Conference on Work Related to Neighbours, which set the tone for stronger regional engagement; the Hainan Free Trade Port Investment Conference; and the China-ASEAN Media Forum in Luoyang.
Beijing also hosted the China-CELAC Ministerial Forum in May to deepen ties with Latin America, followed by the China-Africa Economic and Trade Expo in Changsha in June.
From another perspective, such an evolving strategy opens up new space for ASEAN and the 15-member Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), including Malaysia, to play a bigger role in global trade.
After US President Donald Trump imposed sweeping and record-high tariffs on China, Beijing began distancing itself from Washington, turning instead to multilateral platforms, trade corridors, and South-South partnerships
From courting Southeast Asia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, to Africa, Central Asia and Latin America, China is actively expanding its global reach.
More recently, it also sought closer ties with New Zealand, which will implement on a trial basis a visa waiver in November for Chinese travellers from Australia holding valid visas
The ASEAN Advantage
The ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur last month, the RCEP Local Government Forum in Anhui and outreach to oil-rich Gulf countries via ASEAN platforms further underscored this new orientation.
In this changing global environment, ASEAN and RCEP find themselves in a favourable and complementary position, more so with China's trade with ASEAN already surpassing its trade with the US in recent years.
Now, with RCEP in full force, there's even greater momentum for bolstering intra-Asian trade.
The Manila-based Asian Development Bank (ADB) estimates RCEP could boost regional incomes by over a staggering US$240 billion annually by 2030.
China has signalled its commitment to the ASEAN-led framework, praising the bloc's neutrality and centrality in regional affairs.
Chinese investments in ports, tech infrastructure, semiconductors and clean energy across Southeast Asia reflect this shift.
Looking beyond the West
What makes this shift momentous is not just China's pivot but also the opportunity for developing regions to balance superpower rivalry with multilateral gains.
By engaging with Latin America through the CELAC (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) forum and consolidating economic partnerships with Africa and ASEAN, China is expanding the Global South's role in shaping trade flows.
While the US imposes new tariffs, restricts chip technology and limits access to rare earths, China appears increasingly justified in managing its risks by working with partners more focused on mutual gains.
A Foreign Ministry official here aptly quoted a Chinese proverb: "A single win is not good, but a shared win is better."
It also reflects China's success in galvanising its human resource of more than 700 million workers through sheer tenacity and industriousness – traits which have entrenched its prowess in manufacturing as a global benchmark.
Malaysia's role in a shifting trade landscape
Closer to home, for Malaysia, China's shifting tides offer both opportunities and responsibilities.
With its strategic location, diverse economy and mature trade infrastructure, Malaysia is well-placed to benefit from redirected Chinese investments and supply chain shifts.
The recent ASEAN-Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries-China summit in Kuala Lumpur, alongside Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's engagements with China and Gulf leaders, marked a turning point, reinforcing Malaysia's role as a regional connector.
Malaysia can attract more manufacturing and tech investments, and as the ASEAN chair, Malaysia also carries the duty to promote unity and openness within the bloc.
Nevertheless, rising US-China trade tensions still pose risks to regional stability and global trade flows.
Markets did rally after the constructive June 5 phone call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, offering temporary relief amid heightened tension.
Both countries had earlier agreed on a 90-day tariff rollback deal on May 12. Trump signalled interest in visiting Beijing, while Xi emphasised mutual respect.
Observers believe this 'trade chill' offers a brief pause. China's pivot toward ASEAN, RCEP and the Global South, upholding their win-win policy or 'Shuāngyíng', will continue unabated.
For Malaysia, this moment is a strategic opening—not only to benefit from trade shifts but also to help shape a more balanced and inclusive regional order.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

North Korea condemns US strikes on Iran
North Korea condemns US strikes on Iran

Sinar Daily

time21 minutes ago

  • Sinar Daily

North Korea condemns US strikes on Iran

It marks nuclear-armed North Korea's first commentary on the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. 23 Jun 2025 04:13pm The latest statement marks nuclear-armed North Korea's first commentary on the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. - AFP file photo SEOUL - North Korea condemned on Monday US strikes on Iran, calling it a violation of the United Nations charter and blaming the tension in the Middle East on the "reckless valor of Israel". It marks nuclear-armed North Korea's first commentary on the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. A demonstrator burning sage speaks to US Marines from 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines, standing guard at a protest condemning the US and Israeli strikes on Iran, outside the Westwood Federal Building in the Westwood neighbourhood of Los Angeles, on June 22, 2025. (Photo by Bing Guan / AFP) "The Democratic People's Republic of Korea strongly denounces the attack on Iran by the US which severely violated the UN Charter with respect for sovereignty," said a spokesperson of the North's foreign ministry, according to a statement carried by the state news agency. The ongoing regional tension was an "inevitable product brought by the reckless valor of Israel", the unnamed spokesperson added, claiming the Jewish state "has promoted its unilateral interests through ceaseless war moves and territorial expansion". Washington said Sunday its strikes "devastated" Iran's nuclear programme, but has insisted it is not seeking to topple the government in the Islamic republic. "Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term!" US President Donald Trump wrote on social media, without sharing the images he was referencing. North Korea is believed to possess dozens of nuclear warheads and various delivery systems as it faces off against South Korea and its key ally, the United States, which maintains around 30,000 troops on the peninsula. The two Koreas remain technically at war, with the 1950-53 Korean War ending in an armistice rather than a peace treaty. - AFP More Like This

Oil surges to five-month high after US hits Iran's key nuclear sites
Oil surges to five-month high after US hits Iran's key nuclear sites

The Star

time30 minutes ago

  • The Star

Oil surges to five-month high after US hits Iran's key nuclear sites

NEW DELHI: Oil prices jumped on Monday to their highest since January as the United States' weekend move to join Israel in attacking Iran's nuclear facilities stoked supply concerns. Brent crude futures were up $1.52 or 1.97% to $78.53 a barrel as of 0503 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude advanced $1.51 or 2.04% to $75.35. Both contracts jumped by more than 3% earlier in the session to $81.40 and $78.40, respectively, touching five-month highs before giving up some gains. The rise in prices came after U.S. President Donald Trump said he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes over the weekend, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer. Market participants expect further price gains amid mounting fears that an Iranian retaliation may include a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of global crude supply flows. "The current geopolitical escalation provides the fundamental catalyst for (Brent) prices to traverse higher and potentially spiral towards $100, with $120 per barrel appearing increasingly plausible," said Sugandha Sachdeva, founder of New Delhi-based research firm SS WealthStreet. Iran's Press TV reported that the Iranian parliament had approved a measure to close the strait. Iran has in the past threatened to close the strait but has never followed through. Iran and Israel exchanged air and missile strikes on Monday, as global tensions rose over Tehran's expected response to a U.S. attack on its nuclear facilities. "The risks of damage to oil infrastructure ... have multiplied," said Sparta Commodities senior analyst June Goh. Although there are alternative pipeline routes out of the region, there will still be crude volume that cannot be fully exported out if the Strait of Hormuz becomes inaccessible. Shippers will increasingly stay out of the region, she added. Goldman Sachs said in a Sunday report that Brent could briefly peak at $110 per barrel if oil flows through the critical waterway were halved for a month, and remain down by 10% for the following 11 months. The bank still assumed no significant disruption to oil and natural gas supply, adding global incentives to try and prevent a sustained and very large disruption. Brent has risen 13% since the conflict began on June 13, while WTI has gained around 10%. Given the Strait of Hormuz is indispensable for Iran's own oil exports, which are a vital source of its national revenues, a sustained closure would inflict severe economic damage on Iran itself, making it a double-edged sword, Sachdeva added. Meanwhile, Japan on Monday called for de-escalation of the conflict in Iran, while a South Korean vice industry minister voiced concern over the potential impact of the strikes on the country's trade. - Reuters

Iran face possible 2026 World Cup ban
Iran face possible 2026 World Cup ban

New Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • New Straits Times

Iran face possible 2026 World Cup ban

LONDON: Iran could be barred from the 2026 FIFA World Cup following escalating tensions and rising fears of war with one of the tournament's host nations — the United States. Iran became the sixth Asian team to qualify for the World Cup, which will be jointly hosted by the US, Mexico and Canada next year. But with recent airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities drawing global attention, fears of a full-scale military conflict are mounting, and Team Melli's place in the tournament now hangs in the balance. A suspension is a real possibility, with FIFA having a precedent of barring countries involved in war or international conflict. Russia, for example, remain suspended from all FIFA competitions following their invasion of Ukraine. In the 1990s, both FIFA and UEFA banned Yugoslavia due to the Balkan wars. Given the rising tensions, it appears increasingly unlikely that Iran's players will be allowed to set foot on American soil. Even if Iran are cleared to play, they could be forced to play without their supporters as the country remains under strict US travel restrictions. These restrictions, introduced by Donald Trump in March, also apply to more than 40 countries including Afghanistan, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Any travel exemptions would likely apply only to players and officials, leaving fans locked out of the tournament.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store