logo
A look at India's sports policy journey post independence

A look at India's sports policy journey post independence

The Hindu02-07-2025
The story so far: Sport in India can trace its roots back to pre-historic times, when physical skills that are now foundational to modern sports were then integral to daily life. As hunters and gatherers, humans relied on abilities like archery, wrestling, swimming, and climbing, not for recreation, but for survival. These have now evolved into the individual and team sports that we are familiar with today.
How did sports do post 1947?
India's sports policy journey since 1947 must be seen in the context of the nation's broader socio-economic development. Post the British Raj, India's prime focus was on rebuilding the nation by addressing poverty, health, and education. It is therefore understandable that sectors like sports did not feature prominently in the national agenda. Even so, India hosted the first Asian Games in New Delhi in 1951, a bold assertion of the country's regional aspirations and soft power. In 1954, the government set up the All-India Council of Sports (AICS) to advise on sports matters, support federations, and fund elite athletes.
However, allocations were modest, resulting in athletes missing international competitions due to a lack of financial support. For nearly three decades, nothing notable transpired on the policy front. Yet, India's men's hockey team dominated the Olympics from 1920 to 1980. And Indian athletics saw stars emerge such as Milkha Singh (200/400m), Gurbachan Singh (decathlon), Praveen Kumar Sobti (discus and hammer throw), and Kamaljeet Sandhu, the first Indian woman to win an individual gold medal at the Asian Games.
When did India's sports policy begin?
The 1982 Asian Games catalysed change. The government created a dedicated Department of Sports under the Ministry of Human Resource Development. Riding the post-Games momentum, India finally unveiled its first National Sports Policy (NSP) in 1984. The NSP 1984 aimed to improve infrastructure, promote mass participation, and raise standards in elite sports. It also stressed the importance of integrating sports with education, which was formalised in the 1986 National Education Policy. That same year, the Sports Authority of India (SAI) was established to implement policy, and athlete development programs.
While global sports ecosystems evolved rapidly between 1986 and 2000, they remained tepid in India. Sports is a 'State' subject in the Constitution and though the Union government had earmarked it a modest budget, the involvement of society and markets were minimal. Policies remained weak, and implementation inconsistent. India's economy too remained sluggish through the 1980s. However, 1991 marked a turning point, with the emergence of liberalisation. This economic shift coincided with cultural changes. Cable television, global exposure, and a rising middle class brought greater visibility and aspiration for sports. A Draft NSP in 1997 recognised this, proposing that States focus on broadbasing, while the Union concentrated on elite excellence. But it never went beyond the draft stage.
How has sports evolved post-2000?
In 2000, India created a dedicated Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports (MYAS). A revised National Sports Policy was launched in 2001, setting clearer goals for mass participation and international excellence. This period also saw sports feature in the Union Budget, albeit with a small allocation. India's Olympic medal tally remained modest, with Rajyavardhan Rathore's silver (2004), Abhinav Bindra's gold (2008) and bronzes in boxing from Vijender Singh (2008) and Mary Kom (2012).
In 2011, the National Sports Development Code (NSDC) was introduced, aiming to regulate and professionalise National Sports Federations (NSFs). It addressed governance, anti-doping, age fraud, betting, gender issues etc. but as always, implementation remained the hurdle.
However, several impactful schemes were launched over the years — TOPS (Target Olympic Podium Scheme 2014) provided elite athletes with coaching, nutrition, and infrastructure support; Khelo India (2017) conducted youth talent identification across schools and universities; and the Fit India Movement (2019) promoted physical activity and fitness as a public health priority.
Can India host the Olympics?
India's intent to host the 2036 Olympics has ignited momentum. In 2024, the government released both the Draft National Sports Policy and the Draft National Sports Governance Bill for public feedback. Whether these make it to law remains to be seen. The good news is that yesterday the NSP 2025 was announced, unveiled as ' Khelo Bharat Niti- 2025', reinforcing India's 2036 Olympic bid.
Similarly, measures that have been deliberated for a while, like the Draft National Code for Good Governance in Sports, 2017 should be given the go-ahead. India had the ignominious distinction of topping the latest global doping list released by WADA. It's about time for all stakeholders to move beyond self-interest and enforce reforms for the larger good of Indian sport. We must now prioritise scientific coaching, physical literacy, and sports in education. Lasting change demands sustained action. Building a 'sporting nation' doesn't happen overnight. With Khelo Bharat Niti 2025, we have a golden opportunity to fast-track India's long-term sporting ambitions. The question is, are we game?
Malathi Renati is Head of Policy School at the Takshashila Institution.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China's Pork Obsession Hurts Global Badminton  First Sports With Rupha Ramani
China's Pork Obsession Hurts Global Badminton  First Sports With Rupha Ramani

First Post

time14 minutes ago

  • First Post

China's Pork Obsession Hurts Global Badminton First Sports With Rupha Ramani

China's Pork Obsession Hurts Global Badminton | First Sports With Rupha Ramani | N18G China is a badminton superpower, but its obsession with pork might just be crippling the sport it once dominated. Rupha Ramani breaks down how China's massive pork consumption, which accounts for over 60% of its meat intake, is indirectly causing a global shortage of duck and goose farming, crucial birds whose feathers are used to make shuttlecocks. As pork prices drop, fewer farmers are raising ducks and geese, driving up the cost of shuttlecocks dramatically. And countries like France, where badminton is booming post-Paris Olympics, are starting to feel the heat. With 90% of duck and goose feather production based in Asia (mostly China), and climate change compounding the issue, could China's dietary preferences be the unexpected villain in badminton's growth story? See More

'Would have stayed quiet for Gukesh as well': Magnus Carlsen fires another shot at world champion
'Would have stayed quiet for Gukesh as well': Magnus Carlsen fires another shot at world champion

First Post

time14 minutes ago

  • First Post

'Would have stayed quiet for Gukesh as well': Magnus Carlsen fires another shot at world champion

Magnus Carlsen won the first-ever chess event at Esports World Cup, defeating Alireza Firouzja in the final. Meanwhile, the World No. 1 took another jibe at Gukesh while playing a fun game on social media. read more World No. 1 Magnus Carlsen has won the first-ever Chess Esports World Cup, defeating Alireza Firouzja by winning the final three games in the Grand Final. Carlsen not only walked away with the $250,000 prize money, but also helped Team Liquid take a lead in the overall team championship. In the third-place match, GM Hikaru Nakamura beat GM Arjun Erigaisi 3.5-2.5 in a thrilling contest. While Carlsen's win was a big moment, his rivalry with Indian Grandmaster D Gukesh is what's grabbing headlines again. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD At the Esports World Cup, Carlsen took another dig at world champion Gukesh during a fun challenge. He was asked to stay silent until he heard the name of a player better than him. He didn't react to names like Bobby Fischer, but finally spoke when Garry Kasparov was mentioned. Carlsen's jibe at Gukesh Later, when the clip was shared on Instagram, Carlsen commented, 'Would have stayed quiet for Gukesh as well.' The comment was clearly a jibe at Gukesh and has sparked reactions online. This isn't the first time things have heated up between the two. Earlier this year at Norway Chess, Gukesh beat Carlsen in one of the rounds. The loss frustrated Carlsen so much that he slammed the table, and the video quickly went viral. Although Gukesh had beaten Carlsen in that round, the five-time world champion had the last laugh by winning the title. Carlsen later said Gukesh still isn't at his level and also called him a 'weaker opponent' before the start of the SuperUnited Rapid and Blitz tournament. Gukesh defeated Carlsen once again and finished on top in the rapid section of the tournament. However, Carlsen bounced back brilliantly to claim the main title in the end. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Carlsen has once again shown why he is considered the best in the world by winning the inaugural chess event at the Esports World Cup.

'You can't talk like that...': Kumar Dharmasena calls KL Rahul for a post match meeting due to...
'You can't talk like that...': Kumar Dharmasena calls KL Rahul for a post match meeting due to...

India.com

time14 minutes ago

  • India.com

'You can't talk like that...': Kumar Dharmasena calls KL Rahul for a post match meeting due to...

KL Rahul and Kumar Dharmasena Tensions remained high, and intensified in the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy clash between India and England. On Day 2 of the fifth and final Test at The Oval, Joe Root and Prasidh Krishna had a fiery exchange. The former England skipper was visibly upset after the Indian pacer had a few words for him, prompting Root to confront Prasidh following a boundary. The situation escalated enough for on-field umpires Ahsan Raza and Kumar Dharmasena to step in and speak to both players. KL Rahul questioned Dharmasena after the umpire backed Joe Root KL Rahul questioned Dharmasena whether the official just wanted to see the Indian team bat and bowl without showing any on-field aggression. However, Dharmasena backed Joe Root, and said that the bowler shouldn't get that close and exchange words. KL Rahul supported his teammate Prasidh. However, the chat ended when Dharmasena criticized Rahul for his tone, saying there would be 'discussion' about it once the match ended. 🔥"You want us to just bat, bowl & go home?"🔥KL Rahul BLASTS at umpire Dharmasena in fiery defence of Prasidh Krishna! 😤⚡Tension hits the roof as Rahul says, "What do you want us to do, keep quiet?" 🗣️💥 Captain steps up. Drama unfolds. Cricket gets REAL! 🏏🔥#KLRahul… — Nihar Ranjan (@Niharra98749805) August 1, 2025 India lead by 52 runs at stumps on Day 2 Talking about the ongoing Oval Test, India made a solid comeback after Zak Crawley and Ben Duckett gave England a strong start with a 92-run opening stand. Mohammed Siraj used his experience to grab four wickets, while Prasidh Krishna also picked up four as India bowled England out for 245, giving the hosts a narrow 23-run lead. At the end of Day 2, India stood at 75/2, leading by 52 runs, with Yashasvi Jaiswal unbeaten on 51 and Akash Deep on 4. Earlier in the match, England won the toss and opted to bowl first. They dismissed India for 224 in the first innings, with Gus Atkinson taking five wickets.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store