US Senate passes stablecoin bill in win for crypto, Trump
[WASHINGTON] The US Senate on Tuesday (Jun 17) passed a bill to create a regulatory framework for US-dollar-pegged cryptocurrency tokens known as stablecoins, in a watershed moment for the digital asset industry.
The bill, dubbed the Genius Act, received bipartisan support, with several Democrats joining most Republicans to back the proposed federal rules. It passed 68-30. The House of Representatives, which is controlled by Republicans, needs to pass its version of the bill before it heads to US President Donald Trump's desk for approval.
'It is a major milestone,' said Andrew Olmem, a managing partner at law firm Mayer Brown and the former deputy director of the National Economic Council during Trump's first term.
'It establishes, for the first time, a regulatory regime for stablecoins, a rapidly developing financial product and industry.'
Stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a constant value, usually a 1:1 US dollar peg, are commonly used by crypto traders to move funds between tokens. Their use has grown rapidly in recent years, and proponents say that they could be used to send payments instantly.
If signed into law, the stablecoin bill would require tokens to be backed by liquid assets – such as US dollars and short-term Treasury bills – and for issuers to publicly disclose the composition of their reserves on a monthly basis.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The crypto industry has long pushed for lawmakers to pass legislation creating rules for digital assets, arguing that a clear framework could enable stablecoins to become more widely used. The sector spent more than US$119 million backing pro-crypto congressional candidates in last year's elections and had tried to paint the issue as bipartisan.
The House of Representatives passed a stablecoin bill last year but the Senate – in which Democrats held the majority at the time – did not take that bill up, and it died.
Trump has sought to broadly overhaul US cryptocurrency policies after courting cash from the industry during his presidential campaign.
Bo Hines, who leads Trump's Council of Advisers on Digital Assets, has said the White House wants a stablecoin bill passed before August.
Tensions on Capitol Hill over Trump's various crypto ventures at one point threatened to derail the digital asset sector's hope of legislation this year as Democrats have grown increasingly frustrated with Trump and his family members promoting their personal crypto projects.
'In advancing these bills, lawmakers forfeited their opportunity to confront Trump's crypto grift – the largest, most flagrant corruption in presidential history,' said Bartlett Naylor, financial policy advocate for Public Citizen, a consumer rights advocacy group.
Trump's crypto ventures include a meme coin called $TRUMP, launched in January, and a business called World Liberty Financial, a crypto company owned partly by the president.
The White House has said there are no conflicts of interest present for Trump and that his assets are in a trust managed by his children.
Other Democrats expressed concern that the bill would not prevent big tech companies from issuing their own private stablecoins, and argued that legislation needed stronger anti-money laundering protections and prohibitions on foreign stablecoin issuers.
'A bill that turbocharges the stablecoin market, while facilitating the president's corruption and undermining national security, financial stability, and consumer protection is worse than no bill at all,' said Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat, in remarks on the Senate floor in May.
The bill could face further changes in the House of Representatives. In a statement, the Conference of State Bank Supervisors called for 'critical changes' to mitigate financial stability risks.
'CSBS remains concerned with the dramatic and unsupported expansion of the authority of uninsured banks to conduct money transmission or custody activities nationwide without the approval or oversight of host state supervisors,' said Brandon Milhorn, president and CEO of the Conference of State Bank Supervisors. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
27 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Made in Vietnam: Hanoi cracks down on fake goods as US tariffs loom
As Vietnam tries to head off US President Donald Trump's threatened 46 per cent tariff, it has launched a crackdown on fake products. PHOTO: AFP Made in Vietnam: Hanoi cracks down on fake goods as US tariffs loom - Since the United States accused Vietnam of being a hub for counterfeit goods, Ms Tran Le Chi has found it increasingly hard to track down her favourite fake Chanel T-shirts, Gucci sunglasses and Louis Vuitton handbags. As Vietnam's government tries to head off US President Donald Trump's threatened 46 per cent tariff, it has launched a crackdown on fake products – in part to show responsiveness to US concerns. Now there are streets filled with shuttered shops in Hanoi and rows of closed stalls at Saigon Square shopping mall, a major clothing market in Ho Chi Minh City. Ms Chi – a betting agent for an illegal game known as lo-de, where punters predict the last two lotto numbers of the standard daily draw – said she had never paid more than US$40 (S$51.50) per 'designer' item. 'Only the super-rich people can afford the real ones,' she added. 'They're not for people like us.' Communist-run Vietnam is a manufacturing powerhouse that produces clothing and footwear for international brands, with the US its No. 1 export market in the first five months of 2025. But it also has a thriving market for counterfeit goods. In a report published by the US Trade Representative in January, Saigon Square shopping mall was flagged as a major market for the sale of fake luxury items including handbags, wallets, jewellery and watches. The report noted government efforts to stamp out the trade, but said 'low penalties have had little deterrent effect' and 'counterfeit products remain rampant'. Shop owner Hoa, a pseudonym to protect her identity, said almost all of the fake Nike, Lacoste and North Face products she sells in her shop in Hanoi's old quarter are from China – but tagged with a 'Made in Vietnam' label to make them seem authentic. She insists that all her customers know what they're getting. 'My clients are those who cannot afford authentic products,' Ms Hoa said. 'I've never cheated anyone.' Hanoi and Washington are in the thick of trade talks, with Vietnam doing everything it can to avoid the crushing 46 per cent tariff that could come into force in early July. Vietnam's Trade Ministry ordered the authorities in April to tighten control over the origin of goods after the Trump administration accused the country of facilitating Chinese exports to the US and allowing Beijing to get around tariffs. The Public Security Ministry also said there would be a three-month-long crackdown – until mid-August – on counterfeit goods. Mr Nguyen Thanh Nam, deputy head of the Agency for Domestic Market Surveillance and Development, said last week that in the first five months of 2025, more than 7,000 cases of counterfeit products worth more than US$8 million had been discovered. He added that 1,000 fake Rolex watches had been seized from Saigon Square shopping mall. Mounds of vitamins, cosmetics and sweets – seemingly also counterfeits – have appeared at waste grounds outside cities including Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City and Danang, while fake electronics including Marshall speakers and smartwatches have been confiscated. Police have not specified the origin of the goods, but Vietnam was South-east Asia's biggest buyer of Chinese products in 2024, with a bill of US$161.9 billion. Dr Nguyen Khac Giang, visiting fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore, said that although there were other aims of the drive, including improving Vietnam's business environment and formalising the retail sector, 'the campaign plays a role in Vietnam's strategy to appease the US'. 'The effort partly reflects Vietnam's intent to show responsiveness to US concerns,' he said. But for Ms Hoa, her livelihood is on the line. Her shop has been closed for almost two weeks and she has no idea how to restart the business. 'I have sold these sorts of clothes for a decade and experienced no problem at all. Now they crack down on us, it's hard to figure out how I continue,' she said. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
AsiaOne
35 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
Trump administration disbands group focused on pressuring Russia, sources say, World News
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration shelved in recent weeks an inter-agency working group it had set up to formulate strategies for pressuring Russia into speeding up peace talks with Ukraine, according to three US officials. The effort, which was established earlier in the spring, lost steam in May as it became increasingly clear to participants that US President Donald Trump was not interested in adopting a more confrontational stance toward Moscow, said the officials. Despite pledging during his campaign to end the war in Ukraine on the first day of his presidency, Trump in recent months has grown increasingly frustrated that his push has yielded no breakthroughs. He has begun saying that the United States may abandon its efforts to broker peace altogether. In light of that threat, the working group's task seemed increasingly irrelevant, added those officials, who requested anonymity to describe sensitive internal discussions. "It lost steam toward the end because the president wasn't there. Instead of doing more, maybe he wanted to do less," one of the officials said. The death of the working group, the existence of which has not been previously reported, is likely to deepen European allies' concerns over Trump's at-times conciliatory tone toward Russia and his reluctance to express full-throated support for Ukraine ahead of a pivotal summit of Nato allies later this month. On the first day of a meeting of Group of Seven leaders in Canada on Monday, the Republican president said removing Russia from the former Group of Eight over a decade ago had been a mistake. The final blow for the working group came roughly three weeks ago, when most members of the White House National Security Council — including the entire team dealing directly with the Ukraine war — were dismissed as part of a broad purge, according to the three officials. The effort was set up and coordinated by high-ranking NSC staffers, the officials said, though it included participants from the State Department, Treasury Department, the Pentagon and intelligence community. Among those working on the effort was Andrew Peek, the top NSC official for Europe and Russia, who was removed in May. It is unclear precisely who gave the order to discontinue the effort, but the officials suggested the depth of the NSC cuts made its continuation largely untenable. Since the effort's dissolution, Trump's broader peacemaking efforts, which had been a central element of his campaign pitch, have hit a challenging stretch. Despite some successes — such as a US-brokered ceasefire between India and Pakistan — Trump has made little tangible progress in achieving a ceasefire in Gaza and the risk of a full-blown regional war in the Middle East has risen rapidly with the Israel-Iran conflict. The dissolution of the group also follows a March suspension of work by some US national security agencies on a coordinated effort to counter Russian sabotage and disinformation operations, Reuters reported at the time. Nevertheless, Trump could choose to adopt a firmer stance toward Russia regardless of the fate of the working group, which was set up to develop options for the president "if he wanted to get tougher on Russia," one of the officials said. Some Trump allies, including Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, have publicly advocated for an expansive new round of sanctions directed at Russia, citing Moscow's effective rejection of US ceasefire proposals and the Kremlin's continual attacks on civilian targets as proof of Putin's recalcitrance. Trump has said he is considering such measures, but he has also regularly faulted both sides for the ongoing hostilities. The White House did not respond to a request for comment, nor did the Treasury Department, the State Department or the Pentagon. [[nid:719195]] The Ukrainian and Russian embassies in Washington also did not respond to requests for comment. 'Deep frustration' The working group was formed in March or April at a time when some close Trump advisers were growing increasingly sceptical of the Kremlin's willingness to reach a deal, while Trump's rhetoric suggested he might be interested in modifying his accommodating stance toward Putin. In an interview with NBC News in late March, he said he was "very angry" and "pissed off" at the Russian leader for raising questions about the legitimacy of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. NSC spokesman James Hewitt said in an April 1 statement to Reuters that there was a "deep frustration with the Russian government over negotiations." Among the topics discussed within the working group was how the US could incentivise or pressure former Soviet states, as well as other Eastern European and Asian nations, to limit the flow of goods and energy into and out of Russia, said the officials. It is unclear if Trump was aware of the working group's formation or subsequent dissolution. The NSC removals left few high-ranking people on the Russia file, complicating the prospects for any robust inter-agency debate on the topic. While reluctant to discuss the details of the options drawn up by the group due to the sensitive nature of the work, US officials said the group was still brainstorming ideas when it was dissolved. The group's work was unrelated to the Russia sanctions package in the US Senate. Ideas ranged from tailored economic deals designed to peel some countries out of Russia's geopolitical orbit to covert special operations efforts, the officials said. One official mentioned the possibility of creating an incentive structure to push Kazakhstan to more vigorously crack down on sanctions evasion. The country, like other post-Soviet states, has been used by traders to bypass some Western-imposed import restrictions on Russia since Moscow's expanded invasion began in 2022. The Kazakhstani embassy in Washington did not respond to a request for comment. [[nid:718992]]
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Who is Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader?
As Iran's supreme leader, Mr Ayatollah Ali Khamenei sits above all other branches of government. PHOTO: AFP BEIRUT – As the conflict between Israel and Iran has intensified, one central character has remained out of the public eye: Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's reclusive supreme leader. President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel have raised the possibility of targeting Mr Khamenei, who has led Iran for more than three decades. In an interview with ABC News on June 16, Mr Netanyahu said of a potential strike on Iran's supreme leader, 'It's not going to escalate the conflict; it's going to end the conflict.' A day later, Mr Trump on June 17 wrote on social media that 'we know exactly where' the ayatollah is. But he added that 'we are not going to take him out (kill!), at least for now.' He added, 'Our patience is growing thin.' Here is a closer look at Mr Khamenei, his rise to power and his role in the deepening confrontation with Israel. From revolutionary aide to supreme leader Born in 1939 into a religious family of modest means in Mashhad, a pilgrimage city in eastern Iran, Mr Khamenei came of age in the years leading up to the 1979 revolution that overthrew the shah. He was imprisoned repeatedly by the security services of US-backed autocrat Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, and he rose through the ranks of the religious opposition as a close ally of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who led the revolution and founded the Islamic Republic of Iran. Mr Khamenei quickly emerged as one of the most trusted lieutenants in the new Iranian regime, and he was president for much of the 1980s. When Mr Khomeini died in 1989, Mr Khamenei, by that time an ayatollah himself, was elevated to Iran's supreme leader. He set about consolidating control of the country's political, military and security apparatus and cracking down on dissent to shore up his position as the ultimate decision-maker. Absolute power under Iran's theocratic system Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei listens to the national anthem as Air Force officers salute during their meeting in Tehran on Feb 7. PHOTO: REUTERS As Iran's supreme leader, Mr Khamenei sits above all other branches of government. He appoints the heads of the judiciary, state media and key security agencies, and he holds final authority over who can run for president. Mr Khamenei also controls foreign and military policy, overseeing the Revolutionary Guard, which defends Iran's Islamic system and sits apart from the rest of the military, and the powerful Quds Force, which directs Iran's foreign operations across the Middle East. His authority extends to the nuclear program, placing him at the center of Iran's escalating confrontation with Israel. An architect of Iran's regional strategy For decades, Mr Khamenei has been at the heart of Iran's hard-line foreign policy, positioning the country as a counterweight to American, Israeli and Saudi influence across the Middle East. Under his leadership, Iran has trained, armed and funded a network of proxy forces stretching from Lebanon to Yemen, allowing Tehran to project power and confront its rivals without provoking a war on Iranian soil. A demonstrator holds a picture of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei at Enghelab (Revolution) Square in Tehran on June 14. PHOTO: AFP But that strategy unraveled June 13 when Israel launched its largest-ever attack against Iran, targeting military and nuclear sites and killing an array of senior officials. Israel said the military campaign was an effort to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Iranian officials have publicly said that their country's nuclear program is intended for civilian uses only and have denied that it is building a bomb; Mr Khamenei issued a religious ruling, or fatwa, in 2003 declaring nuclear weapons forbidden under Islam. But Israel and Western governments have long accused Tehran of seeking the capability to build a bomb if it so chooses. Under guard and under threat Mr Khamenei's movements are tightly controlled, and his whereabouts rarely disclosed. His personal security is overseen by an elite Revolutionary Guard unit that reports directly to his office, according to analysts. He was reportedly moved last week to a secret location where he could remain in contact with the military. That follows similar reports last year, when the ayatollah was also moved to a safe location a day after the assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, who led the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah and was a longtime ally. In recent days, Israel has killed a number of senior officials in Iran, including the country's top military commanders and nuclear scientists. But a direct attack on Mr Khamenei himself would represent an extraordinary escalation of the current conflict. Such a move could have unpredictable and far-reaching consequences across the Middle East. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
