Stratford pool closed for a second day following water ‘fouling'
The Stratford Lions Pool won't reopen on Wednesday.
It was shut down on Tuesday for what the city called a 'fouling.'
'Yes, 'fouling' is a fancy way of saying that somebody pooped in the pool,' they wrote in a social media post. 'So, why don't we just scoop it out and reopen the pool right away?'
The city said they need to follow provincial guidelines, which dictate how they have to treat the water following these kinds of incidents.
'We're also working with Huron Perth Public Health to ensure the pool is properly disinfected and safe for swimmers,' they wrote. 'In short, the process takes time, and we want to get it right.'
The city did not say when the Stratford Lions Pool could reopen, only that it would happen as soon as possible.
'We would like to take this opportunity to remind parents and caregivers of the importance of swim diapers for young children,' the post continued. 'And please use your best judgement on visiting the pool if you or your child are experiencing gastrointestinal issues.'
Swimmers looking for a place to cool off can stop by the Anne Hathaway Park Splash Pad or the Stratford Rotary Complex.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
12 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Is two drinks a week really the new limit?
Ask a Doctor is a series of physician-authored columns offering insights and advice on common health topics. It is not a substitute for seeking medical care. Each summer, many of my conversations with patients take a seasonal shift to include discussions about sunscreen, travel vaccines, staying hydrated and – more often than you'd expect – alcohol. Since Canada's Guidance on Alcohol and Health was released in 2023 by the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction (CCSA), many of my patients have come in with questions: 'Is two drinks per week really the new limit?' 'Why the change?' 'What does this mean for me?' I, too, had these questions, not just as a doctor, but as a person thinking about my own habits and the health of those I care about. After reviewing the guidelines and understanding the reasons behind them, here is what I share with my patients. When should I see a doctor for sunburn? What are the signs of heat illness? The updated guidance reflects the evidence Canada's Guidance on Alcohol and Health doesn't tell people what to do. It offers a clearer understanding of alcohol-related risks, based on worldwide evidence reviews. The evidence shows that even small amounts of alcohol carry health risks, including seven types of cancer, heart disease, liver damage, mental health effects and disrupted sleep. Alcohol is now classified by the World Health Organization as a Group 1 carcinogen, putting it in the same category as tobacco and asbestos. The CCSA says the more alcohol you drink on a weekly basis, the greater the risk and that: This guidance isn't meant to alarm, but to inform responsible decision-making. Just as our understanding of the health impacts of second-hand smoke and processed meat has evolved, so too has our understanding of alcohol. Reducing intake, even a little, matters For many people, reducing alcohol intake to one to two drinks per week feels like a major change. I always remind my patients: This isn't all-or-nothing. The guidance outlines a continuum of risk. Even moving from seven drinks a week to three or four can improve energy, sleep and long-term health. Yes, you can unwind from work without having a drink. Here's how Alcohol affects our sleep, mood and metabolism A common myth is that alcohol helps with sleep. While it might help you fall asleep faster, it disrupts deep restorative sleep and can leave many people more tired the next day. It can also worsen mental health issues such as anxiety, affect weight (especially abdominal weight gain) and contribute to brain fog. These are health concerns I hear about daily in clinic, often without people realizing alcohol might be playing a role. Alcohol and perimenopause don't mix well One group that often feels the effects of alcohol more intensely are those in perimenopause. As hormone levels fluctuate, alcohol can make symptoms worse and can amplify hot flashes, sleep disruption and increase anxiety and fatigue. For many of my patients in midlife, even small amounts of alcohol can hit differently than when they were younger. As a perimenopausal woman myself, I have noticed that I'm more sensitive to previously well tolerated amounts of alcohol and its effect on my sleep, so I've shifted my intake as a result. Simple strategies can help I encourage patients to try small shifts in their consumption habits, including: Five ready-made, non-alcoholic drinks to enjoy for a refreshing summer Curiosity is powerful, and so is support Our evolving understanding of the health impacts of alcohol offers an opportunity to pause and reflect: How often do I drink, and how do I feel when I drink? How do I feel when I don't? Not everyone who drinks at higher levels has alcohol use disorder, but high-risk drinking increases the likelihood of developing it. If someone wants to explore their relationship with alcohol, I remind them that this is a health issue, not a moral one. Support is available, whether that's through your family doctor, counselling, or provincial and community-based resources. Other helpful resources include the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction. Whether your health goal is better sleep, more energy or lowering long-term risks, the updated guidance is an opportunity to check in and make decisions that are in line with those goals. Dr. Sheila Wijayasinghe is a menopause-certified family physician practising at St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto and the medical director of primary care outreach at Women's College Hospital. She is also the resident health expert on CTV's The Social and co-host of The Doc Talk Podcast.
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Amy Hamm: B.C. judge goes to great lengths to protect hospital that fired unvaccinated doctor
Article content Earlier this month, the B.C. Supreme Court refused to overturn the decision of British Columbia's Hospital Appeal Board that resulted in Dr. Theresa Szezepaniak being suspended, and effectively fired, for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine. Article content Szezepaniak argued that she should not have been disciplined for refusing to follow Provincial Health Officer Bonnie Henry's October 2021 public health order (PHO), which required all doctors and nurses working in hospitals to be vaccinated. Article content Article content Article content Szezepaniak told the court that her being disciplined left a 'black mark' on her reputation and violated her Charter right to life, liberty and security of the person, which, she argued, 'includes the right to earn an income to support oneself and family.' Article content Article content Judge Steven Wilson (a Liberal appointee) disagreed. Wilson dismissed the case and concluded that the Charter doesn't apply, at all, to the circumstances. Article content Earlier this year, B.C. saw another court case, this one directly challenging the vaccine mandate, dismissed as 'moot' at the B.C. Court of Appeal. The case became 'moot,' according to the court, after Henry rescinded her mandatory vaccination order. As such, a case that had the potential to create a precedent on freedom from governmental medical coercion was stopped dead in its tracks. Article content It would appear as though the judiciary is bending over backwards in order to excuse the draconian public health orders that were issued during the pandemic. The Szezepaniak case fundamentally boiled down to whether the punitive actions taken by the hospital were subject to the Charter of Rights. Article content Article content Most reasonable Canadians would surely agree that given that the Charter applies to the actions of the provincial government, the consequences of an order issued by the province's chief public health officer and implemented by a government-funded public hospital would also be subject to it. Article content Article content But Wilson ruled that, 'The decision to require all health-care workers including physicians to be vaccinated in order to practice in hospitals was made by the public health officer by way of the PHO. However, the decision regarding how to discipline the hospital medical staff for their breach of the PHO was not subject to governmental control under the Hospital Act, as the responsibility for adopting disciplinary measures for governmental policies rests with the IHA Board.' Article content Judge Wilson drove this point home when he wrote: 'This case is not about whether the petitioner could be compelled to be vaccinated. Rather, the focus is on the consequences that flow from her decision to decline the vaccine.' Article content The court has decided that losing one's job and reputation is no big deal — not the sort of thing that is consequential enough to admit the glaring truth: British Columbians were coerced into taking a vaccine in order to prevent unacceptable and catastrophic consequences in their lives, but those who refused also faced unacceptable consequences for which no one is willing to take responsibility. Article content Eleven days after Henry issued her PHO on mandatory COVID vaccinations, Szezepaniak, according to her appeal board decision, sent a letter requesting an exemption be made for her on the basis that the order was a violation of her Charter rights. Her letter 'also included numerous requests for information related to disclosure of scientific evidence regarding the vaccines and how Charter requirements were being met,' according to the decision. Article content Article content Szezepaniak's exemption was denied, and she received no answers to her inquiries. All told, her vaccine refusal forced her to sell her home, move her family, take a job considered (in medicine) a demotion and to disclose to all future employers that she was disciplined and suspended. Article content Judge Wilson decided that Szezepaniak's hospital was not acting as a direct agent of the government when it disciplined her — a legal technicality that absolved all parties from considering whether her Charter rights had been violated (though Wilson listed reasons he believes a Charter violation didn't occur, regardless). Article content Article content Article content
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Cohesys Announces First-in-Human Use of Investigational BoneTape™ in Craniofacial Fracture Repair
Article content TORONTO — Cohesys Inc., a Toronto-based medical device developer of resorbable fixation technologies, today announced that the first participants have undergone treatment with BoneTape™, an investigational device designed for the fixation of non-load-bearing craniofacial fractures. The procedures were completed as planned and mark the first clinical use of this drill- and screw-free fixation system. Article content 'Reaching this milestone is significant for Cohesys as we evaluate BoneTape's potential to offer a simpler, patient-friendly approach to fracture repair,' said Dr. Michael Floros, CEO of Cohesys. 'The data from this study will inform our regulatory strategy and commercialization pathway.' Article content 'This marks an exciting step forward for the study, and it's a privilege to be part of an effort exploring new techniques in facial-fracture treatment,' said Dr. Jeffrey A. Fialkov, MD, MSc, FRCSC, Head of the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Associate Professor in the Department of Surgery at the University of Toronto, and Principal Investigator for the study. 'BoneTape's hardware-free approach is intended to simplify surgery and may improve the recovery experience for patients.' Article content Device- and procedure-related risks—including infection, non-union, and re-operation—will be actively monitored throughout the study's follow-up period. Article content Dr. Janaina Bortolatto, VP, Clinical Operations for Cohesys noted, 'The completion of these first cases with BoneTape reflects the dedication of our team and our clinical partners. We are focused on gathering the clinical data needed to evaluate BoneTape for potential future use.' Article content BoneTape is applied with a handheld applicator that affixes the resorbable fixation device to bone surfaces without drilling or screws. The study will determine whether this design performs as intended, potentially sparing patients from device-related complications and the need for hardware-removal procedures. Article content Cohesys Inc. develops advanced resorbable fixation solutions aimed at simplifying surgery and improving bone healing. BoneTape, the company's primary technology, is currently under clinical investigation. For more information, visit Article content . BoneTape™ is a trademark of Cohesys Inc. Article content Regulatory Status Article content Article content Article content
