Di abandoned community wey still dey live wit wetin remain of di Nigeria-Biafra war
Like oda young boys for di community, e no sabi how war take enta Foriku, but one tin wey pain am na wetin e and im papa and mama go through during di period of di war.
Di sounds of bullets, di presence of sojas and di constant need of food by di pipo, na one of di memorable experience of Odukoya wen di war dey go on.
Howeva, dis na ova 54 years afta di Nigeria-Biafra war bin happun and end, but Foriku neva recova finish as tins wey still remain from di war don destroy dia farmlands according to di residents.
Foriku-Boridele dey located near di Ore, present day Ondo state southwest Nigeria, and na one of di battleground during di Nigeria-Biafra war wey also dey known as di civil war.
BBC Pidgin enta di town to see wetin di sojas leave behind, di pain of di residents of Foriku as dem live wit wetin remain from di Nigeria civil war and wetin di war cost dem till now.
Di civil war bin start for January 1967 between di military forces of di Nigerian govment and di Biafra sojas. Di fight na sake of request wey Biafra say dem wan get dia own territory and stand alone but di Nigerian govment no gree.
Dat war wey happun between 1967 to 1970, millions of pipo wey include sojas and civilians, many of dose wey be women and children bin die.
"E get one man wey get one leg, e run come our community to tell us say war don reach Ore. By dat Saturday, di road don full wey pipo dey carry food so dem fit run comot," Odukoya recall how e witness wen di war enta dia community.
"We run comot but dem tell us say di war don end. E no reach one week wey we return wen anoda war begin again and we begin see sojas dey march by di roadside. Around 2 o clock for night na im di battle start."
Odukoya don become di head of Foriku community and di trauma of di war experience still dey fresh for im mind.
Foriku get abandoned war equipments wey di sojas leave behind afta di war, several residents wey we speak to tell BBC Pidgin say di war really destroy dia land.
Some explain say wen dem cut bush and wan burn am, different tins go dey explode sake of say some of di chemicals wey dem use during di war dat time still dey ground.
'Different tins go dey explode'
Johnson Danjuma na one of di resident for Foriku community, im papa settle for di community plenti years ago as a farmer.
E bin hope say di farmland go yield and dey fertile like how im papa tell am many years ago, but since afta di war, e say dia farmlands don destroy and di fear of bullets neva comot for dia minds.
Ova 54 years afta di war, Danjuma sleep and wake near di armoured tank left behind by di sojas. E dey always remind am of how e and im family bin struggle during di war, even though im bin dey veri small dat time.
"My papa carry us go hide for one place. We just dey bush, no be wia papa dey di children dey. Biafra sojas dey, Nigerian sojas dey.
Danjuma say some pregnant women born pikin for bush during dat time of war, and e no pray to experience dat kain war again.
Meanwhile, Gbenga Adeyemi wey be di youth leader for Foriku community say afta di war, plenti of dia youths bin die sake of say dem drink water wey di chemical wey dem use during di war don enta.
"According to history wey I hear, some of our youths here, during di time wey di war end, dem drink di water and dem die prematurely becos of di chemical. Our land don spoil, di land no good again and dem no rememba us," Gbenga tok.
'Na fear our pikin take dey go school'
Foriku community dey live witout any social infrastructures and di aftermath dey impact di children, as dem travel long distance to get education.
As we waka di community, no visible site of drinkable water, no health facility and no school.
Elizabeth Iwam wey grow up for di community bin narrate to us how she dey trek long distance to go school. She say she go school reach form 3 bifor she drop comot.
Now, di chidlren for Foriku travel as far as Ore, a neighbouring town wit about 11km distance to access education. Coupled wit dat is the fear of di war wey once invade dia community.
"Since wen di war don finish, we dey suffer for here, no school, no evritin, notin wey dem do for here, especially dat education."
"Wen I dey small, wey di war don happun finish, na fear we dey take go school, na di same fear our pikin dey take go school".
Elizabeth wit oda women for di community dey hope say one day, dem fit get help to access basic social amenities like oda communities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
UN rejects plans by Sudan's paramilitary group for a rival government amid civil war
The U.N. Security Council on Wednesday rejected plans by Sudan's paramilitary group to establish a rival government in areas it controls, warning that the move threatens the country's territorial integrity and risks further exacerbating the ongoing civil war. The strongly worded statement by the U.N.'s most powerful body 'unequivocally reaffirmed' its unwavering commitment to Sudan's sovereignty, independence and unity. Any steps to undermine these principles 'threaten not only the future of Sudan but also the peace and stability of the broader region,' the statement said. The 15-member council said the announcement by the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces also risks 'fragmenting the country and worsening an already dire humanitarian situation.' Sudan plunged into conflict in mid-April 2023, when long-simmering tensions between its military and paramilitary leaders broke out in the capital, Khartoum, and spread to other regions, including western Darfur. Some 40,000 people have been killed, nearly 13 million displaced and many pushed to the brink of famine, U.N. agencies say. The RSF and their allies announced in late June that they had formed a parallel government in areas the group controls, mainly in the vast Darfur region where allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity are being investigated. The deputy prosecutor of the International Criminal Court said last month that the tribunal believes war crimes and crimes against humanity are taking place in Darfur, where the RSF controls all regional capitals except el-Fasher in North Darfur. The Security Council reiterated that its priority is a resumption of talks by both parties to reach a lasting ceasefire and create conditions for a political resolution of the war, starting with a civilian-led transition that leads to a democratically elected national government. Council members recalled their resolution adopted last year demanding that the RSF lift its siege of el-Fasher, 'where famine and extreme food insecurity conditions are at risk of spreading.' They expressed 'grave concern' at reports of a renewed RSF offensive on the besieged city. U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said Wednesday that a year ago, famine was declared in the Zamzam displacement camp in North Darfur. The risk of famine has since spread to 17 areas in Darfur and the Kordofan region, which is adjacent to North Darfur and west of Khartoum, he said. The U.N. World Food Program is calling for access to el-Fasher to deliver aid to people facing starvation, Dujarric said. 'As a coping mechanism, some residents of the area are reportedly surviving on animal fodder and food waste,' Dujarric said. WFP is providing digital cash to about 250,000 people in el-Fasher to buy dwindling food left in markets, he said, but escalating hunger makes it imperative to scale up assistance now. Sudan's foreign ministry accused the United Arab Emirates last month of sending Colombian mercenaries to fight alongside the RSF, saying the government has 'irrefutable evidence' that fighters from Colombia and some neighboring countries were sponsored and financed by Emirati authorities. The UAE's foreign affairs ministry said the government 'categorically rejects' the allegations and denies involvement in the war by backing armed groups. Without naming any countries, the Security Council urged all nations 'to refrain from external interference which seeks to foment conflict and instability' and to support peace efforts. The Security Council also condemned recent attacks in Kordofan that caused a high number of civilian casualties.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Sudan's hidden horror: inside the 15 August Guardian Weekly
While the wars raging in Ukraine and Gaza have dominated global news agendas for months turning into years, relatively little attention has been paid to the ongoing civil war in Sudan – which for many western media outlets remains out of sight and largely out of mind. This can't be said of the Guardian's Mark Townsend, who has reported tirelessly on the effects of the war between the Arab-led Rapid Support Forces and Sudanese military since it broke out in April 2023. It's a conflict that has been characterised by repeated atrocities, forcing millions from their homes and causing the world's largest humanitarian crisis. In April this year, just as a British-led conference was being held in London to explore how to end the war, one such atrocity was unfolding in Zamzam refugee camp in North Darfur. Details were at first sketchy, but only now – thanks to the piecing together of intelligence reports and witness testimony – can it be revealed what happened during the attack on the camp by RSF forces and why it was not stopped. As Mark's remarkable account reveals, the 72-hour rampage in April may have taken the lives of more than 1,500 civilians in one of the most notorious war crimes of Sudan's catastrophic conflict. Get the Guardian Weekly delivered to your home address The big story | The ruins of Gaza, as seen from aboveGuardian international correspondent Lorenzo Tondo joins a Jordanian military airdrop for a rare chance to observe a landscape devastated by Israel's offensive. With photography by Alessio Mamo Science | The truth about sunscreenToo much exposure to the sun has traditionally been seen as a danger. Now claims that sunscreen is toxic flood the internet. Our science editor, Ian Sample, weighs up the evidence Interview | Demis Hassabis, the cautious AI optimistThe head of Google's DeepMind tells Steve Rose how artificial intelligence could usher in an era of 'incredible productivity' and 'radical abundance'. But who will it benefit? Opinion | The world is in flames. But I've found some hope amid the gloomColumnist Jonathan Freedland makes a moral case for escapism, as a means of retaining the ability to see the world – and the people – around us Culture | The films that capture a nation's soulWhat single film best represents a nation? Twelve writers choose the one work they believe most captures their home's culture and cinema – from a bold cricket musical to a nine-hour documentary, gritty crime dramas to frothy tales of revenge The relationship between British pubs and food has always been an odd one. Traditionally they offered little more than a curled-up cheese sandwich – or more often nothing at all. Then in the 1990s, gastropubs arrived and changed the game. Nowadays, big chains dominate pub kitchens with microwaves and disappointing fare once again. Steve Rose bemoans the current state of British pub food, but offers grounds for hope. Anthony Naughton, assistant editor Sylvia Arthur's interviews with women across west Africa who'd beaten an average life expectancy of 59 was wise and life-affirming. I heartily agree with this pearl from eightysomething Isatou Jarju: 'Men are just a hindrance. They are the very definition of driving backwards.' Isobel Montgomery, deputy editor Audio | The Trump-Putin summit – podcast Video | 'I'm retired, and I'm not scared': hundreds arrested at Palestine Action protest Gallery | Fish, teapots and a pineapple! Ghana's most stylish coffins We'd love to hear your thoughts on the magazine: for submissions to our letters page, please email For anything else, it's Facebook Instagram Get the Guardian Weekly magazine delivered to your home address
The Independent
11 hours ago
- The Independent
The murder capital of the US and a former mayor on crack: DC's history of crime problems
President Donald Trump described Washington D.C. as a city riddled with 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam, squalor and worse,' setting the scene to place the nation's capital under federal control. Trump is throwing the full weight of his administration behind the deployment of around 800 National Guard troops to crack down on 'out of control' crime. But the president's depiction of Washington, D.C. as a violent, crime-ridden cesspit is nothing new and harks back to the 1800s, when it was described as a 'contemptible hamlet' by an architect who had lofty plans for the city before the Civil War. Later, in 1968, Richard Nixon said that D.C. was 'fast becoming the crime capital of the world,' and promised to turn it into 'an example of respect for law and freedom from fear.' And in the late 1980s and 1990s, D.C. claimed the title of 'murder capital' of the U.S. as homicide rates hit record rates during a drug crisis. At the same time, the city was presided over by a mayor who was arrested for smoking crack cocaine. A similar rhetoric is now being pushed by Trump despite the city's declining crime rate. But crime researchers say D.C. still has a serious problem. 'Although crime is declining, Washington is still far more dangerous than the capital of the United States should be,' Charles Fain Lehman, a fellow at the Manhattan Institute, wrote in the Atlantic. Here, The Independent looks back at a city and its crime. 1800s: 'A contemptible hamlet' In 1791, French-American architect Pierre L'Enfant was appointed by George Washington to design the place that would later become Washington, D.C. L'Enfant had a grand vision for the Federal City, consisting of picturesque gardens, grand avenues and impressive mansions. By the early 1800s, he was disappointed by the reality and complained the city was a 'contemptible hamlet,' the historian and author J.D. Dickey wrote in his 2014 book Empire of Mud: The Secret History of Washington, D.C. 'Where he saw grand avenues for strolling, there were dirty lanes and broken pavements,' Dickey wrote. 'Where he saw smart theaters, churches, banks, and salons, there were squalid alleys, gambling halls, and bordellos catering to criminals and johns.' The culture of violence seen in recent decades has evolved out of the 19th century, the author said. 'Washington D.C. was an incredibly violent place, especially during its pre-Civil War and Civil War era, and up through the Gilded Age as well,' Dickey said on The Takeaway podcast. 'One reason it was so incredibly violent was because of the lack of police presence. You had a handful of constables who were expected to patrol beats that were miles long. Crime routinely broke out, mob violence, and all other aspects of bad and criminal behavior, as well as socially-accepted violence.' At the same time, the slave trade was booming in the capital. 'The legacy of slavery is a deep and disturbing one, and it's one that's really hard to get away from when you plunge into the history of the city,' Dickey added. After the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861, Congress established the Metropolitan Police Department in a bid to tackle the ensuing disorder. 'It was a time of constant danger in the Nation's Capital,' according to the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police Memorial and Museum. 'With the beginning of the Civil War, an army was billeted in the city, government employees were increased by ten-fold, and hordes of unsavory elements descended upon the District's few square miles.' 1950–1970s: 'A utopia for criminals' and Nixon declares D.C. 'crime capital of the US' During President Dwight Eisenhower's first term, there were several consecutive years where the city experienced a decline in reported crime, though the authors of a controversial 1951 book declared D.C. 'a cesspool of iniquity and a Utopia for criminals.' Reported crime had dropped by nearly 20 percent over three years from 1954 to 1957, a 1978 Justice Department report noted. But a spate of violent offenses toward the end of the decade targeting public officials heightened public alarm. 'In August 1959 there was the mugging of the widow of former Deputy Defense Secretary Donald Quarles, the brandishing of a knife at Congressman Diggs, the murder of an Air Force sergeant, and a gang beating of a police officer,' the report said. 'These events mobilized renewed official concern and action.' In 1968, in the wake of the assassination of Dr Martin Luther King Jr in Memphis and the subsequent riots that ignited across the country, Richard Nixon declared D.C. one of the 'crime capitals of the nation.' As anger rippled through the city, 13 people died in the violence and more than 900 businesses were destroyed. Police and firefighters became overwhelmed and federal troops moved in. 'The disorders and the crime and the violence that are now commonplace in Washington are more than a national disgrace,' Nixon said on the campaign trail, citing a 67 percent increase in the homicide rate between July 1967 and July 1968. Conservative lawmakers have for generations used denigrating language to describe the condition of major American cities and called for greater law enforcement, often in response to changing demographics in those cities driven by non-white populations relocating in search of work or safety from racial discrimination and state violence, the Associated Press noted. 1980s – late 1990s: A decade of 'unbelievable violence' Washington, D.C. was in the grip of a drug crisis from the late 1980s into the late 1990s as a crack cocaine epidemic, fueling gang violence, took hold. 'The city was going through a terrible time,' Ruben Castaneda, a former reporter at The Washington Post, told the BBC in 2014. 'Through the late 80s to mid-to-late 90s there were just unbelievable levels of violence behind crack cocaine, and fights over drug turfs, witness killings and retaliatory killings.' The annual homicide rate hit over 400 by 1989 as the city was once again branded the 'murder capital' of the U.S. Its image wasn't helped by the arrest of the city's scandal-plagued Mayor Marion Barry in 1991, who was caught on camera smoking crack cocaine in a sting operation. Despite serving a six-month prison sentence for cocaine possession in 1991, he remarkably reclaimed the job in 1995. Barry, who died in November 2014, wrote in his autobiography that back then he was fueled by a 'mix of power, attraction, alcohol, sex and drugs.' Despite his 'tumultuous' life, as former President Barack Obama put it, Barry was praised for advancing civil rights while he was in office. Meanwhile, by 1991, the city set a grim new record of 482 recorded murders, which was the worst murder rate in 20 years. 2000s – today: A declining crime rate but fears remain The levels of violence seen in the 80s and 90s are down a significant amount today. Lehman noted that a 2005 strategy targeting the people and places that drive violence, implemented by the Metropolitan Police Department and the federal government, saw homicide rates drop. 'The success of 2005's initiative shows that the administration does not need to preempt the District in order to bring crime down,' Lehman wrote in the Atlantic. In 2012, D.C. recorded an 'astoundingly low' 88 murders, which has ticked up again in the last 10 years, crime data analyst Jeff Asher, co-founder of the firm AH Datalytics, wrote in a Substack post. 'Murders in DC peaked in 2023, began falling in 2024, and have been steadily falling through July 2025,' Asher wrote. 'The bottom line is that violent crime in DC is currently declining and the city's reported violent crime rate is more or less as low now as it has been since the 1960s,' Asher added, with a disclaimer that not all crimes are reported to police. 'The city's official violent crime rate in 2024 was the second lowest that has been reported since 1966.' What is undeniable is the growing public concern over safety in D.C. A poll by The Washington Post conducted last year found that 65 percent of D.C. residents said crime is an 'extremely serious' or a 'very serious' problem, up from 56 percent in 2023. 'The city has a real problem,' Lehman said. 'Someone needs to be responsible for fixing it.'
