Pope Leo XIV signals continuity on fighting abuse with new head of child protection board
Verny, 59, replaces American Cardinal Sean O'Malley , the retired archbishop of Boston. O'Malley was the founding president of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, an advisory group Pope Francis established in 2014 to advise the church on the best practices to fight abuse and protect children.
As the abuse scandal spread globally during Francis's 12-year pontificate, the commission initially lost influence and its crowning recommendation − the creation of a tribunal to judge bishops who covered up for predator priests − went nowhere. After many years of reform and new members, it has become a place where victims can go to be heard and bishops can get advice on crafting guidelines to fight abuse.
Verny, who is currently the bishop of Chambery, France, has been a member of the commission since 2022 and heads the child protection council of the bishops conference in France, where the church has been rocked by revelations of decades and abuse by priests and bishops. He was among commission members who met with Leo last month.
The bishop has been responsible for doing an annual audit of the French church's centers for receiving victims, an initiative that was started after a devastating 2021 report into the French scandal estimated that 330,000 children in France had been sexually abused over the past 70 years by church personnel.
Cardinal O'Malley praised the appointment, saying Verny has developed in-depth experience helping victims and working with law enforcement and civil authorities to ensure accountability "for the serious failures of the church in France." In a statement, O'Malley also praised Leo for continuing to consider the commission a priority. "The Holy Father's words and deeds in these early months of his pontificate assure the world that the Church will not grow complacent in her efforts to as best possible ensure the protection of children, vulnerable adults and all people in our communities," he said.
Verny, for his part, praised O'Malley's leadership as courageous and having served as "a moral compass" for the church, a reference to O'Malley's occasional statements of outrage when even Francis bungled an abuse case. "I am committed, together with the members and personnel, to building on that legacy," Verny said in a statement.
The American-born pope made the appointment the day before heading for a six-week vacation at the papal summer retreat South of Rome.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
Putin's choice of a long war in Ukraine
It was a powerful symbol. Just after speaking for two hours on Tuesday, July 1, with Emmanuel Macron – his first phone conversation with the French president in three years – Vladimir Putin then met in person with Yevgeny Pervyshov, governor of the oblast of Tambov, a small region 400 kilometers from Moscow. Pervyshov is one of the "heroes" of the invasion of Ukraine. As a reward for his military commitment, the former mayor and modest local MP, who volunteered to go to the front, was promoted to governor in November 2024. Since then, Pervyshov has been celebrated as a symbol: a figure of the new elite, decorated and honored, elevated after fighting. Although Putin had just repeated to Macron his argument about fighting the return of Nazism in Europe, the Russian president was able to show, through Pervyshov, that war and victory remain his priorities. The conversation with the French president − viewed with mockery in Russia as a weak European − went unnoticed in the country. By contrast, the meeting with the governor, upheld as a model, received wide coverage on television.
LeMonde
10 hours ago
- LeMonde
Iran's shameful hostage diplomacy
Since their arrest in Iran on May 7, 2022, more than three years ago, Cécile Kohler, 40, and Jacques Paris, 72, have been granted only five visits from representatives of the French embassy, each one obtained through fierce negotiation with the Iranian authorities. The most recent visit, on Tuesday, July 1, confirmed that they were alive, two weeks after the Israeli army bombed Evin prison, where the pair were being held. The first visit did not take place until 200 days after their arrest. At times, there were as many as 11 months between visits. These meetings are typically brief – about 10 minutes – and are held in the presence of French-speaking guards. All these restrictions of consular rights, which prompted France to file a case against Iran at the International Court of Justice, are unacceptable in themselves. Diplomats who met with the two teachers, arrested the day before they were due to leave Tehran at the end of a 10-day sightseeing trip during the Easter holidays, witnessed their distress, caused by extremely harsh detention conditions that French authorities have equated with torture. Imprisoned separately and kept in isolation, they have been denied access to reading and writing materials. Their communication with the outside world has been limited and made unpredictable. Paris has been left unable to properly see after losing his glasses, which he has been unable to replace. In October 2022, both were forced to make videotaped "confessions" in which they claimed they had sought to "prepare the overthrow of the Iranian regime" on behalf of the French intelligence services. Dark machinations In recent days, Kohler and Paris have been accused of espionage on behalf of Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, as well as of conspiracy and corruption. As far-fetched as the first set of charges, these new accusations are even more serious, as they carry the death penalty. They are part of an intensified crackdown by the embattled dictatorship and a hunt for Israeli agents following the strikes carried out by Israel and the US against Iranian nuclear facilities starting June 13. After the bombing of Evin prison, the two French citizens were transferred to other detention sites, and their whereabouts are currently unknown. Kohler and Paris are, of course, innocent. The teachers have nothing to do with the dark machinations that the Iranian regime claims to involve them in to fuel its hatred of the West; they do not belong in prison. Like some 20 other Europeans or dual nationals who are imprisoned, and like the six other French hostages whom Paris has managed to free one at a time through extremely difficult negotiations since 2020, they are being used as pawns by Tehran to put pressure on their governments – a vile and grim oxymoron known as hostage diplomacy. On July 3, President Emmanuel Macron threatened Iran with "retaliatory measures" if the charges against Kohler and Paris were upheld. The Europeans notably have the option of reimposing international sanctions that were eased after the 2015 agreement on Iran's nuclear program. The extreme tensions surrounding this topic will not make matters easier, but securing the release of Kohler and Paris must remain a priority.
Euronews
12 hours ago
- Euronews
Iran alone in crises: Where were Russia, China in their time of need?
When Russia sought assistance from China, North Korea and Iran amid its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, some Western officials expressed concern about the formation of a new axis against Western countries. But none of these countries came to Iran's aid during the Iran-Israel war or when American forces attacked Iran's nuclear facilities. China and Russia, the most powerful countries in the axis, have only expressed verbal condemnation of Washington's actions but stopped short of providing any financial, material or military assistance to Tehran. Alexander Gaboyev, Director of the Carnegie Centre for Russian and Eurasian Affairs, told the New York Times: 'Each of these countries is completely pacifist and they don't want to get involved in each other's wars. Unlike the US and its allies, these countries do not necessarily have the same structures, values and institutional links with each other." The four countries have authoritarian regimes and are hostile to the United States, which has always tried to undermine them and question their legitimacy. They also have some strategic ties with each other which seek to circumvent US-led economic sanctions by advancing trade and exchanging weapons technology. Michael Kimge, a professor of history at The Catholic University of America and a former US State Department official, also believes that 'there is probably little coordination between China, North Korea, Iran and Russia, so that they share views and have conversations around the centre of dissatisfaction with the United States, but not very meaningful coordination with each other.' Among those countries, only Russia and North Korea have a mutual defence pact. In addition to sending weapons to Russia, North Korea has deployed more than 14,000 troops to fight alongside Russian forces in their more than three-year long military offensive in Ukraine. Moscow and Pyongyang's relationship is rooted in a shared communist past and anti-American war on the Korean peninsula from 1950 to 1953. China under Mao Zedong's rule was also present then. This same historical background also explains the close ties between China and Russia. The two countries' leaders have maintained a personal bond over the years, with their governments announcing 'unimpeded cooperation' only weeks before the Kremlin launched its offensive on Ukraine in February 2022. China, of course, still shows itself adhering to some of the international values that Washington promoted during the pre-Trump era, and accordingly has refused to send major arms aid to Russia during the war. However, according to US officials, China has played a role in rebuilding Russia's defence industries and remains one of the largest customers of Russian oil. Russia and Iran have never had such a relationship. One of the reasons could be religious differences. Iran has a theocracy that is viewed with doubt by the other three secular and socialist governments of Russia, China and North Korea. Moscow and Beijing view the spread of Islamic fundamentalism with concern. Chinese President Xi Jinping has taken draconian measures against Muslims in the country, cracking down on some Islamic rites among Uighur and Kazakh ethnicities. Sergei radchenko, a cold war historian at Johns Hopkins University, also told the New York Times: 'there is no common value but statements about a multipolar world order between them, and at the same time, there are so many contrasts between them that Putin has pointed to and said that his relations with Iran's neighbours, including Israel and Arab countries, are more important than the friendship between Russia and Iran.' 'Putin is a cynical, opportunistic actor who thinks only of his strategic interests, and he will do so if he needs to sacrifice Iran. And of course, that feeling is reciprocated in Tehran as well," he added. China was also a mere observer during the Iran-Israel military confrontation. Jinping said all sides 'should work to reduce tension'. The Chinese leader strongly condemned US President Donald Trump's strikes on Iran and accused the Washington of violating the UN Charter. But like Russia, Beijing didn't help Iran either. Though China sometimes takes an official stance toward conflicts in the region, it often tries to appear neutral in order to safeguard its interests. The country has for years expanded ties with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, Iran's two regional rivals of whom they've clashed with for years. A broad regional war would jeopardize China's oil imports from those countries, so Beijing is seeking to calm the conflict, not inflame it. China's goal to play a neutral mediating role in the Middle East became apparent in March 2023, when it played a role in a diplomatic agreement between Iran and Saudi Arabia. China also used that opportunity to strengthen its ties with Syria, Iran's ally in the region. Enrico Fardella, a professor at the University of Naples Lorentale who formerly taught at Peking University, believes that now that Iran has been weakened by the war with Israel and the fall of Syria's longtime President Bashar al-Assad, Beijing is cautiously and carefully assessing the situation to see which governments, political groups or militias find the upper hand, or fill a vacuum in the region. Yun Soon, a researcher on Chinese foreign policy at the Stimson Research Institute in Washington, believes the term 'pivot' to describe the relationship between China, Russia, Iran and North Korea remains valid. Although these countries do not have a common defence pact, they share a common view of anti-America, anti-West, and anti-liberal democracy. 'The alliance, even without mutual defence, remains an alliance,' he noted. "That they do not fight for each other does not mean that their cooperation is insignificant. China has provided Iran with nuclear and missile technology, financed Russia's war and kept North Korea alive". But Yun Soon noted that Beijing's support for Iran is limited and Chinese officials do not trust Iran's religious leadership. They see Iran as a country 'too simplistic, opportunistic, hesitant and unstable in foreign relations.' He also added that Chinese officials are aware Iran, like North Korea, is an isolated country and needs China under any circumstances even if their relations sometimes suffer ups and downs.
