Spooked by US tariffs, retailers look for growth in Europe
LONDON (Reuters) -Growing numbers of retailers and consumer brands are shifting their focus to Europe and other markets from the United States, as they expect U.S. tariffs to spark price hikes that will drive American consumer demand down.
European online fashion retailer Zalando, which sells logistics and software services to other retailers, said on Tuesday it was in talks with prospective new clients looking to expand in the European market.
"We see brands and retailers really having a larger focus on Europe as a way to also generate additional demand if it gets more difficult to do this in the U.S.," Zalando co-CEO David Schroeder said.
U.S. President Donald Trump's administration has slapped a blanket 10% tariff on all imports into the country, and 145% tariffs on goods made in China.
German clothing brand Hugo Boss has rerouted China-manufactured products to other markets instead of the U.S., and said there was a "notable deterioration" in U.S. consumer spending in the first quarter due to growing uncertainty over the economy.
"We are currently taking a rather cautious stance regarding consumer behavior in the U.S.," its CEO Daniel Grieder said on Tuesday as the company reported lower revenues compared to last year.
The reaction highlights the impact of Trump's tariffs on the flow of consumer products around the globe, forcing companies to shake up long-established patterns of manufacturing and sales.
Key will be how U.S. consumers react to price increases as a result of tariffs.
Barbie maker Mattel on Monday pulled its annual guidance, saying there was too much uncertainty over consumer spending, and that tariffs would force it to raise prices in the U.S.
For its card game UNO, Mattel said it was shipping more China-manufactured games internationally to avoid U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods, while increasing production of UNO in India to serve U.S. customers.
The CEO of Italian fashion group OTB, which owns brands including Diesel, Jil Sander and Maison Margiela, said on Monday it would have to increase its prices in the U.S. by 8-9% to offset the impact of tariffs.
While European brands previously proudly advertised their sales to U.S. consumers, world leaders in spending on clothes and shoes, they have pivoted to trying to reassure investors they are not overly exposed.
The U.S. accounts for around 20% of German sportswear brand Adidas' business, CEO Bjorn Gulden said last week in a results call, adding that "for 80% of our business these tariffs have no impact".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China Emissions Fall While Chemicals Emerge as New Hotspot
(Bloomberg) -- A surge of renewable power led to declining emissions in China over the first half of the year even as a growing chemicals sector becomes a major new source of heat-trapping gases, according to new research. Carbon dioxide emissions from the world's largest polluter fell 1% on an annual basis from January through June, according to a report from the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air. The power sector led the decline, with steel and cement also contributing to the drop. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Record additions of new wind turbines and solar panels meant generation from those two sources alone outpaced the growth in electricity demand, allowing thermal power plants to burn less coal and reduce emissions for the sector by about 3%, CREA lead analyst Lauri Myllyvirta said in the report. The first five months of this year saw a surge in renewable capacity, before a June 1 rule change expected to lower profits at wind and solar farms. Even with installations slowing after that went into effect, the resulting boost in clean energy should be enough to drive down power sector emissions into next year, Myllyvirta said. A prolonged slump in the property sector helped reduce output and emissions from the cement and steel sectors. The drop in steel emissions could have been larger, but mills tend to shut down costlier-but-more-efficient electric arc furnaces before cheaper coal-based production, Myllyvirta said. The overall decline was partly offset by a surge in emissions from the chemicals sector, particularly plants that convert coal into synthetic liquid and gas fuels, as well as building blocks for plastics. Coal use in the sector as a fuel and feedstock rose 20% in the first six months of the year, on top of a 10% increase last year. Coal-based chemical processes are more polluting than ones using traditional petroleum-based feedstocks. The sector emitted 690 million tons of CO2 last year, about 410 million to 440 million tons more than would have been released at traditional chemical plants, according to the report. On the Wire China's flows of rare-earth magnets to the US continued to recover in July — with volumes rising 76% month-on-month — after Beijing agreed to normalize exports as part of its trade truce with Washington. India and China have agreed to explore demarcating their disputed border, a key move toward resolving decades-old territorial disputes as the neighbors look to recalibrate ties against the backdrop of strained India-US relations. China said that it will show off new weapons at a military parade next month, potentially giving rivals like the US a first chance to see what hardware the Asian nation is ready to field. This Week's Diary (All times Beijing) Thursday, Aug. 21 CSIA's weekly solar wafer price assessment EARNINGS: Sinopec, Eve Energy, China Resources Power, Shandong Steel Friday, Aug. 22 China's weekly iron ore port stockpiles Sinopec earnings press conference in HK, 14:30 Shanghai exchange weekly commodities inventory, ~15:30 EARNINGS: Goldwind, JA Solar, Trina, Ganfeng Lithium, China Coal, CMOC Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Beijing turns against Nvidia's AI chip after ‘insulting' Lutnick remarks
Beijing's move to restrict sales of Nvidia's China-specific artificial intelligence processor was prompted by remarks from US commerce Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
44 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP senator: US stake in Intel would be ‘step toward socialism'
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), a libertarian-minded Republican, criticized the Trump administration's push to acquire a stake in U.S. chipmaker Intel, suggesting the move would be a 'step toward socialism.' 'If socialism is government owning the means of production, wouldn't the government owning part of Intel be a step toward socialism?' Paul said on Wednesday in a post on the social platform X. 'Terrible idea,' he added, linking to a news story about the latest effort. The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10 percent stake in the company, which would make the U.S. government one of Intel's largest shareholders. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Tuesday that the money for the stake would come from previously allocated Biden-era funding. Media reports have suggested that the stake would be in exchange for converting grants pledged to Intel under the CHIPS and Science Act. 'The president figures out that we should get, America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' 'I mean, that is exactly Donald Trump's perspective, which is, why are we giving a company worth $100 billion this kind of money?' he continued. 'What is in it for the American taxpayer? And the answer Donald Trump has is we should get an equity stake for our money.' Paul has long pushed for the federal government to play a smaller role in the daily lives of Americans and the U.S. economy. He voted against Trump's legacy-defining policy bill, citing concerns about increased spending and the national debt.
