logo
What the Israel-Iran conflict means for gas prices

What the Israel-Iran conflict means for gas prices

CNN16 hours ago

Israel's unprecedented attack on Iran raises the specter of sharply higher gasoline prices, just as the summer driving season heats up.
Up until now, pump prices had been low and stable. Relatively cheap gas prices have helped drive down inflation and offset consumer concerns about sky-high tariffs.
While gas prices tend to rise mildly during the warmer months as people begin their summer vacations, everything has changed since Israel's stunning strikes on Iran – an attack that Tehran has vowed to respond to. Analysts say the severity of that Iranian response, and whether it derails the flow of oil out of the Middle East, will help determine just how gasoline prices go.
Oil prices immediately spiked as the market braced for a wider conflict, one that endangers the region's critical energy supplies. US crude spiked as much as 14% overnight, before pulling back.
As of midday on Friday, crude was up 6%, on track for its biggest one-day increase since April 2023. For the week, oil has surged by about 12%, the most since October 2022 when OPEC sharply cut oil production.
'We're still at the tip of this situation, but Iran calling the strikes a declaration of war doesn't bode well for the flow of oil,' said Patrick De Haan, vice president of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, a fuel tracking platform.
De Haan told CNN that gasoline prices are likely to drift higher over the next few weeks, increasing by about 10 to 25 cents per gallon. The national average for regular gas stood at just $3.13 a gallon on Friday, according to AAA. That's down from $3.16 a month ago and well below the year-ago level of $3.46.
But pump prices are likely to move significantly higher in the coming days because of the increase in crude prices.
'I expect gas prices will jump, but not back to record highs,' De Haan said. 'But the risk is that we see Middle East incidents move beyond borders. Will the violence spread? Will the flow of oil be impacted?'
Russia's invasion of Ukraine sent oil and gasoline prices skyrocketing in early 2022, eventually driving up gas prices to a record of $5.02 a gallon.
Thankfully, energy prices enter this crisis at relatively low levels.
There remains significant uncertainty over just how high gasoline and oil will go because Iran's response is unclear.
Analysts warn that if Iran dramatically escalates the situation by attacking regional energy infrastructure or US military personnel, prices could spike much higher.
'Oil has already spiked… and its ultimate landing point will likely hinge on whether Iran revives the 2019 playbook and targets tankers, pipelines, and key energy facilities across the region,' Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, wrote in a note to clients on Friday.
The big fear is that Iran retaliates by targeting the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow body of water separating the Persian Gulf from global oceans, and the most critical oil chokepoint on the planet. Iran has in the past threatened to do just that.
'In the unlikely scenario of Iran disrupting flows through the Strait of Hormuz, we could see a significant supply shock with oil prices rising sharply,' Jorge León, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy, wrote in a report on Friday.
That's because about 21 million barrels of oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz per day, accounting for about one-fifth of the world's daily consumption, according to the US Energy Information Administration.
But Rystad Energy said that if Iran opts for a more 'limited' response that only focuses on Israeli military sites, the oil market reaction could remain 'contained and temporary.' And that in turn would limit how much gasoline prices increase.
Any effort to disrupt shipping through the Strait of Hormuz would also have to contend with the US Navy, which is positioned nearby in part due to such a threat.
Croft, a former CIA analyst, said it would be 'extremely difficult for Iran to close the strait for an extended period given the presence of the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain.'
Still, Croft noted that Iran could attack tankers and mine the waterway to disrupt traffic.
Goldman Sachs estimates that oil prices could blow past $100 a barrel if there is an 'extended disruption' to the Strait of Hormuz, because such an unlikely event could prevent core OPEC producers, like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, from ramping up production.
However, Goldman Sachs views a disruption to the Strait of Hormuz as 'much less likely' and on Friday only slightly increased its summertime oil price forecast.
'We still assume no disruptions to oil supply in the Middle East,' Goldman Sachs strategists led by Daan Struyven, co-lead of the bank's commodity research team, wrote in a report to clients.
But if oil prices continue spiking, several steps could be taken to help supply meet demand.
One option is that Saudi Arabia and other OPEC nations could accelerate recent production increases that began earlier this year.
'If oil is caught in the cross-fire,' RBC's Croft said, 'we anticipate that President Trump will seek OPEC spare barrels to try to keep a lid on prices and shield US consumers from the economic impact of the Middle East conflict.'
Goldman Sachs assumes that if Iranian oil exports plunge by 1.76 million barrels per day during the conflict, core OPEC+ production would make up half of the Iranian shortfall. In that scenario, Goldman Sachs estimates that Brent crude would climb above $90 a barrel before declining back to between $60 and $70 next year.
Another option: The United States and other major oil consumers could release emergency oil stockpiles, as they did in 2022. Former President Joe Biden aggressively drained the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to prevent gas prices from spiking even higher after Russia invaded Ukraine.
'We're ready to act if needed,' Fatih Birol, executive director of the International Energy Agency, said in a post earlier on Friday.
Birol said the IEA, which is an intergovernmental organization that coordinates the use of member states' oil reserves, is 'actively monitoring' the situation and noted that the group's oil security system has more than 1.2 billion barrels of emergency oil stockpiles.
OPEC, which represents oil producing countries, strongly pushed back at those comments on Friday.
In a statement on X, OPEC's secretary general argued that the IEA statement 'raises false alarms and projects a sense of market fear through repeating the unnecessary need to potentially use oil emergency stocks.'
Still, releasing emergency oil is an option that Trump could at least hint at to cool off energy prices if the situation in the Middle East escalates.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran retaliates after Israeli strikes target its nuclear program and military
Iran retaliates after Israeli strikes target its nuclear program and military

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Iran retaliates after Israeli strikes target its nuclear program and military

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Iran launched retaliatory missile and drone strikes on Israel into Saturday morning, killing at least three people and wounding dozens, after a series of blistering Israeli attacks on the heart of Iran's nuclear program and its armed forces. Israel's assault used warplanes — as well as drones smuggled into the country in advance, according to officials — to assault key facilities and kill top generals and scientists. Iran's U.N. ambassador said 78 people were killed and more than 320 wounded in the attacks. Israel asserted the barrage was necessary before Iran got any closer to building a nuclear weapon, although experts and the U.S. government have assessed that Tehran was not actively working on such a weapon before the strikes. Iran retaliated by launching waves of drones and ballistic missiles at Israel, where explosions lit the night skies over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv and shook the buildings below. The Israeli military urged civilians, already rattled by 20 months of war sparked by Hamas' Oct. 7 attack, to head to shelter for hours. Strikes could derail nuclear talks Israel's strikes also put further talks between the United States and Iran over a nuclear accord into doubt before they were set to meet Sunday in Oman. Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman called further nuclear talks with the United States 'meaningless' after Israeli strikes on the country, state television said. 'The U.S. did a job that made the talks become meaningless,' Esmail Baghaei was quoted as saying. He added that Israel had passed all Iran's red lines by committing a 'criminal act' through its strikes. However, he stopped short of saying the talks were cancelled. The Mizan news agency, which is run by Iran's judiciary, quoted him as saying: 'It is still not clear what we decide about Sunday's talks.' Iranian missiles strike Israel Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a recorded message Friday: 'We will not allow them to escape safely from this great crime they committed.' Iran launched waves of missiles at Israel late Friday and early Saturday. Iranians awoke Saturday to state television airing repeated clips of strikes on Israel, as well as videos of people cheering and handing out sweets. Israel's military said more drones were intercepted near the Dead Sea early Saturday. A hospital in Tel Aviv treated seven people wounded in the second Iranian barrage; all but one of them had light injuries. Israel's Fire and Rescue Services said they were wounded when a projectile hit a building in the city. A spokesperson for Beilinson Hospital said one woman was killed. Hours later, an Iranian missile struck near homes in the central Israeli city of Rishon Lezion, killing two more people and wounding 19, according to Israel's paramedic service Magen David Adom. Israel's Fire and Rescue service said four homes were severely damaged. Meanwhile, the sound of explosions and Iranian air defense systems firing at targets echoed across central Tehran shortly after midnight on Saturday. An Associated Press journalist could hear air raid sirens near their home. Iran's semiofficial Tasnim news agency reported a fire at Tehran's Mehrabad International Airport. A video posted on X showed a column of smoke and flames rising from what the outlet said was the airport. The Israeli military said it carried out overnight strikes on dozens of targets, including air defenses, 'in the area of Tehran.' Israel's paramedic services said 34 people were wounded in the barrage on the Tel Aviv area, including a woman who was critically injured after being trapped under rubble. In Ramat Gan, east of Tel Aviv, an AP journalist saw burned-out cars and at least three damaged houses, including one where the front was nearly entirely torn away. U.S. ground-based air defense systems in the region were helping to shoot down Iranian missiles, said a U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the measures. Strikes raise fears of all-out war Israel's ongoing airstrikes and Iran's retaliation raised concerns about all-out war between the countries and propelled the region, already on edge , into even greater upheaval. Countries in the region condemned Israel's attack, while leaders around the globe called for immediate deescalation from both sides. Israel had long threatened such a strike, and successive American administrations sought to prevent it, fearing it would ignite a wider conflict across the Middle East and possibly be ineffective at destroying Iran's dispersed and hardened nuclear program. But a confluence of developments triggered by Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack — plus the reelection of U.S. President Donald Trump — created the conditions that allowed Israel to finally follow through on its threats. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the U.S. was informed in advance of the attack. On Thursday, Iran was censured by the U.N.'s atomic watchdog for not complying with obligations meant to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon. The crossfire between Israel and Iran disrupted East-West travel through the Mideast, a key global aviation route, but Jordan's state-run Petra news agent said the country would reopen its airspace to civilian aircraft at 7:30 a.m. Saturday, signaling it believes there is no immediate danger. Above-ground section of Natanz facility destroyed Among the key sites Israel attacked was Iran's main nuclear enrichment facility in Natanz, where black smoke could be seen rising into the air. It also appeared to strike a second, smaller nuclear enrichment facility in Fordo, about 100 kilometers (60 miles) southeast of Tehran, according to an Iranian news outlet close to the government that reported hearing explosions nearby. Israel said it also struck a nuclear research facility in Isfahan, and said it destroyed dozens of radar installations and surface-to-air missile launchers in western Iran. Iran confirmed the strike at Isfahan. U.N. nuclear chief Rafael Grossi told the Security Council that the above-ground section of the Natanz facility was destroyed. The main centrifuge facility underground did not appear to have been hit, but the loss of power could have damaged the infrastructure there, he said. Netanyahu said the attack had been months in the making and was planned for April before being postponed. Israel's Mossad spy agency positioned explosive drones and precision weapons inside Iran ahead of time, and used them to target Iranian air defenses and missile launchers near Tehran, according to two security officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. It was not possible to independently corroborate those claims. Over the past year, Israel has been targeting Iran's air defenses, hitting a radar system for a Russian-made air defense battery in April 2024 and surface-to-air missile sites and missile manufacturing facilities in October. The first wave of strikes gave Israel 'significant freedom of movement' in Iran's skies, clearing the way for further attacks, according to an Israeli military official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss details of the attack with the media. The official said Israel is prepared for an operation that could last up to two weeks, but that there was no firm timeline. Among those killed were three of Iran's top military leaders: one who oversaw the entire armed forces, Gen. Mohammad Bagheri; one who led the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard , Gen. Hossein Salami; and the head of the Guard's ballistic missile program, Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh. Trump urged Iran on Friday to reach a deal with the U.S. on its nuclear program, warning on his Truth Social platform that Israel's attacks 'will only get worse.' 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left,' he wrote. ___ Lidman and Frankel reported from Jerusalem. Associated Press reporter Natalie Melzer contributed from Nahariya, Israel and Nasser Karimi from Tehran. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

‘Look at history': the economic threat if Israel-Iran conflict escalates
‘Look at history': the economic threat if Israel-Iran conflict escalates

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘Look at history': the economic threat if Israel-Iran conflict escalates

The assassination of the head of Iran's armed forces has raised fears of another wave of rising crude oil jumped by as much as 13pc to more than $78 a barrel on Friday morning after Israel killed military chief Mohammad Bagheri and conducted a 'pre-emptive strike' against the regime's nuclear jump was the biggest increase since the early days of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, with Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, vowing that the battle will continue for as long as it takes. 'We can't leave these threats for the next generation. If we don't act now, there won't be a next generation,' Netanyahu said on Friday. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, is likely to be watching the conflict closely as higher oil prices are felt well beyond the petrol forecourts. Experts warn that if the conflict continues, a fresh wave of tax rises in the autumn are now all but inevitable. Iran is the third-largest oil producer within the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) cartel, behind only Saudi Arabia and Iraq, with output of 3m barrels per day accounting for 3pc of global supply. Callum Macpherson, at Investec, a banking group, notes that concerns about the impact of conflict in the Middle East on oil prices are not new. After all, the assassination of Hezbollah's veteran leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah by Israel last October led to a similar spike in oil prices, before concerns eased back and prices fell again. But Macpherson says things may be different this time. 'The market is concerned by comments from Netanyahu that suggest there could be a more protracted campaign than has been the case before,' he notes, adding that Iran is still a big contributor to global supply. 'If Iranian supply were to be significantly disrupted, that could have a big impact on oil prices.' While this is unlikely on its own, the big concern if the conflict escalates is Tehran's ability to block the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping route in the Middle East. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, warned on Friday that Israel 'should expect severe punishment' for the 20pc of global supply is shipped through the narrow strait. Macpherson says if Hormuz was blocked, prices would surge. He added: 'Let's look at history. When Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine, there were fears over Russian oil supply that sent Brent up to around $140 a barrel. This is an example of an historic precedent of the market's reaction to the potential for a severe supply disruption.' David Oxley, at Capital Economics, says traders remain nervous about what comes next, with any big escalation likely to trigger a surge in prices. 'We're into a world where traders are pricing in the potential for major disruption,' he says. 'And as we've seen in instances like this you could easily get $20, $30, $40 added to the price very quickly.' Macpherson says the implications could be far and wide. 'This doesn't just impact oil markets, but gas markets too,' he says, noting that a significant amount of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Qatar is also shipped through the narrow strait at the edge of the Persian Gulf. Britain buys some of its gas from Qatar, although its purchases of LNG have fallen dramatically from recent highs. 'That feeds through directly into the inflation basket, through the cost of heating,' says Macpherson. 'And if gas prices go up, there is upward pressure on electricity too. If the situation is prolonged, this could feed through to the cost of manufactured goods, wherever they come from in the world leading to broader implications for inflation.' The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that a 10pc rise in oil prices adds 0.4 percentage points to global inflation and drag down growth by 0.15pc. Consumers will start noticing price rises in the coming days and weeks as they fill up their cars. Oxley, at Capital Economics, estimates that every $10 increase in oil adds 7p at the petrol pump, taking money out of people's pockets. There are also implications for the cost of borrowing. While policymakers at the Bank of England tend to look through one-off price spikes, the prospect of higher-for-longer inflation will be hard to ignore. Traders slightly reduced their bets of two more rate cuts this year to 3.75pc as news of the killing of Bagheri broke. But some fear that the impact of higher oil prices could even force Threadneedle Street to reverse course. Gervais Williams, of Premier Miton, an investment manager, told the BBC: 'It is likely that interest rate cuts will be less, or possibly even interest rate rises to come.' He warns that 'a lot of economic uncertainty ... will lead to a government shortfall, unfortunately, versus their spending review recently. I think that will lead to potentially ... additional UK tax rises later this year'. The combination of weak growth and higher borrowing costs is toxic for the public finances. Analysis cited by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) of 20 years of data from 1984 suggests that a 10pc rise in oil price reduces UK output by around 0.5pc, although the UK is now far less reliant on oil and gas than it was in the past as the economy pivots towards services. In 2010, the OBR said a permanent 20pc rise in the real oil price would reduce GDP by around half a percent. Lower growth means less money to fund the spending boost for the NHS that Reeves lauded this week. Higher oil prices also makes it more likely that she will have to maintain fuel duty cuts for another year at a cost of £3bn. She has to fund that by cutting spending or taxing something else. JP Morgan and Capital Economics both believe that higher borrowing costs and a weaker economy will force Reeves to raise taxes by more than £20bn in the autumn. Simon French, chief economist at Panmure Liberum, argues that there may be a silver lining for a Chancellor looking for political cover for another tax raid. 'A sustained rise in oil prices will raise inflation in the second half of the year making it harder for the Bank of England to cut rates,' says French. 'But for the Treasury the challenges are more nuanced. Any hit to growth will make the fiscal challenges more acute, albeit politically it becomes easier to blame external conditions for tough fiscal choices in the autumn.' Of course, there are factors pulling in the opposite direction, including a decision by Opec in March to pump more than 2m barrels of oil back into the market over the next 18 months. Oxley at Capital Economics says this should provide some relief, with faster supply increases in May and June suggesting 'more supply is likely to be forthcoming' in the coming months. However, he warns the outlook remains bleak. 'To the extent to which oil prices remain elevated, this adds to inflationary pressures and headwinds for the economy,' adds Oxley. 'That's the last thing Reeves wants. She was hoping that growth could help the fiscal situation look better. But any volatility or uncertainty will be the opposite of that. 'But at least she is by no means alone. The world depends on oil. So this isn't necessarily just a problem for Rachel Reeves.' That is likely to offer little comfort for a Chancellor already under fire for her political choices, or the households who will bear the brunt of what looks like another inevitable tax raid. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store