
Alix Popham: 'I can't remember most rugby games I played in'
Popham described sub-concussive hits as any contact "when your brain rattles around inside against your skull on every hit", including hits to the body as well as to the head.Popham is one of two former rugby professionals diagnosed with early onset dementia who are calling on the sport's governing bodies to end their legal fight with ex-players in the courts.More than 560 former players are suing the sport's governing bodies for the impact of head collisions during their career.Popham said that he had jerseys on the wall and medals to show from big games, "but memories, vivid memories of the scoreline, the weather, the stadium, I've got no recollection of that".Popham said he could not recall meeting Nelson Mandela before one game in South Africa in 2003 after suffering a traumatic brain injury and ending up in hospital.He said: "I've got no recollection of being in that stadium or being in that game and, unfortunately, most of my career is the same."
'Two or three week bans really isn't enough'
Popham is the founder of the Head for Change charity, whose aim is to support those who suffer from sports-related brain injuries.The Six Nations tournament returns this weekend and a new 20-minute red card punishment is being trialled during the tournament, where a player is removed from the game but the team returns to its full complement once that period is over. But Dr Willie Stewart, a world-leading expert on brain injury, told Newsnight the new rule "places the spectacle of the game ahead of player's brains".He said he did not think sending a player off for 20 minutes was sufficient punishment for a potentially dangerous tackle which could cause brain damage. Popham called for a six-to-eight week punishment for a red card "so you learn and you don't make that same mistake"."These players are getting two or three week bans which really isn't enough to make them change their habits and, to me, that just shows player welfare isn't their number one priority," he added.
Popham, who played in two World Cups for Wales, told Newsnight his initial symptoms of early onset dementia included "losing my temper over, really, nothing" and being unable to recall "important conversations" with his wife shortly after. He also suffered from severe headaches and would lose his train of thought in conversations.Mel Popham said she and her husband had to take the difficult decision not to try for a second baby when he received his diagnosis."That was really hard, particularly hard for me, trying to be strong for Al at the time and my stepdaughters and Darcy and the wider family and that was a really difficult personal decision," said Mel.
'It was really frightening'
Reflecting on Popham's diagnosis, Mel said: "We had everything going for us. We'd recently got married, had Darcy, living in a house we loved and our world was just changing. "It was really frightening."The couple said they wanted action rather than "empty words" when it came to player welfare.Reflecting on the impact of injuries sustained during his career, Popham said: "I wish I knew then what I know now because when you were seeing stars you wouldn't carry on."You would take yourself off. You would be honest to the coaches, the physios."Former Wales rugby international Ian Buckett died from dementia last year at the age of 56.He was found to have had a condition called chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) which is linked with repeated blows to the head but can only be diagnosed after death. Researchers from a number of academic institutions includes Oxford Brookes University said they had found "conclusive evidence" that repetitive head impacts cause CTE.
Former England World Cup winner Chris Simpson-Daniel was diagnosed with early onset dementia at the age of 43 in 2022.Simpson-Daniel told Newsnight he had attempted to take his own life on two occasions.The dad-of-six said he "started falling apart", with bouts of depression and memory loss and "suicidal tendencies that would just whack you out of nowhere".
'Player welfare is our number one priority'
World Rugby told the BBC that player welfare was their number one priority, with the 20-minute red card punishment being implemented as a trial.It asked anyone with concerns to send them evidence as to why they believe it is not safe.A World Rugby spokesperson said that if the trial were proven to have negative player welfare consequences then they would have no hesitation in halting it and they had done so with other trials in the past.In a joint statement regarding the legal action, World Rugby, the RFU and WRU said: "Whilst ongoing legal actions prevents us from engaging directly, we are always saddened to hear Alix, Mel and Chris's stories. "Player welfare has long been World Rugby's number one priority."It added its medical protocols had always followed scientific consensus. "We are always continuing to evolve and adapt the game, to make it as safe to play as possible," it added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Man Utd transfer boost with injury to former flop, 32, set to spark £40m Rasmus Hojlund bidding war
RASMUS HOJLUND has attracted huge interest from Napoli after former Manchester United striker Romelu Lukaku was ruled out for three months. The reigning Serie A champions have asked about a loan deal for the Denmark striker, who is admired by manager Antonio Conte. 4 Manchester United flop Rasmus Hojlund has attracted interest from Napoli Credit: Andrew J. Clark/ISI Photos/ISI 4 Napoli are eyeing Hojlund after ex-Man Utd ace Romelu Lukaku was ruled out for three months Credit: Image4 Lukaku got injured during Napoli's pre-season friendly against Olympiacos Credit:It comes hours after fellow Italian side AC Milan officially confirmed their interest in Hojlund, 22, who is open to a move and has been on Fulham's radar. Hojlund was left out of the matchday squad for United's 1-0 home defeat by Arsenal in their season opener on Sunday. It is understood boss Ruben Amorim took the decision amid intense speculation over the striker's future. Benjamin Sesko, who came on as a substitute, is expected to be Amorim's first choice in the position following his recent arrival from RB Leipzig, with Matheus Cunha ideally one of the two No10s in Amorim's system. United are believed to be asking for £40million for the Dane, but they could entertain a loan under the right conditions. Napoli are now considering making a move for Hojlund after Lukaku, 32, limped off the pitch during a pre-season friendly against Olympiacos last week. Ex-Old Trafford flop Lukaku is expected to be sidelined for three months after tearing a muscle in his thigh. Napoli released a statement on Monday, which read: "Following the injury, Romelu Lukaku underwent tests at Pineta Grande Hospital, which revealed a high-grade injury to the rectus femoris muscle in his left thigh. CASINO SPECIAL - BEST CASINO BONUSES FROM £10 DEPOSITS "The Napoli player has already begun rehabilitation and will also undergo surgical consultation." Should Hojlund be brought in to fill Lukaku's place, he'll reunite with former United teammate Scott McTominay, who turned his career around in Italy after signing for £25m. McTominay, 28, has excelled since joining the Naples outfit last summer, winning the Serie A Player of the Year award and a Ballon d'Or nod. Napoli can offer Hojlund European football that the Red Devils can't, with Conte's men competing in the Champions League for a second straight season. Hojlund, who joined for £72m two years ago, was United's main striker last season but scored just 10 goals in 52 games. His debut campaign brought 16 goals after his move from Italian side Atalanta. Teenager Chido Obi, 17, featured for the first team last season although it is unlikely he would be regarded as a regular starter, with his involvement likely to come from the bench. Meanwhile, Jadon Sancho has turned down Roma's £20m offer to United, with the winger set to explore other options.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
James McAtee pictured signing for Nottingham Forest with disgraced ex-agent jailed for nine years
Nottingham Forest paid Manchester City £30million to land promising England under-21s midfielder James McAtee who is represented by football agency YMU Management Limited James McAtee has been pictured signing for Nottingham Forest - with a disgraced unlicensed 'agent'. Forest sporting director Ross Wilson posted the picture on his own Instagram account with the £30m new boy alongside former agent Peter Morrison. Morrison was convicted of death by dangerous driving and jailed for seven years - increased to nine on appeal - after killing a traffic officer and leaving another paralysed in a car crash on the M6 in February 2016. A court heard how he sent 25 What'sApp messages during 23 miles, the last 96 seconds before the crash, and drove at an average speed of 81 mph, when the suggested speed limit was 50 mph. Wilson posted the picture along with three other photos on Saturday with the caption: 'A busy Saturday in Nottingham! Warm welcome to James McAtee and Omari Hutchinson.' The post, which was addressed City Ground, Nottingham Forest, is believed to have been deleted within an hour. It heralded the club's double signing of McAtee and ex-Ipswich star Hutchinson. Football Association rules prevent Morrison from being an agent and he is therefore no longer on their latest list of licensed intermediaries. Wilson posted a picture of McAtee, himself and Morrison in what looks like the standard signing-on photo which traditionally shows the player, club representative and the agent who did the deal. Morrison works for agency YMU Management Limited and is listed as their director of football even though he is not recognised by the FA as an agent. Forest have insisted that YMU's Mick McGuire's name is on all the paperwork and no rules have been broken. England Under-21 star McAtee is regarded as one of the country's best prospects and is listed on the company website as a star sporting client. They also have the likes of TV stars Ant and Dec, Davina McCall and Graham Norton as showbiz clients under their umbrella. Mirror


Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
One cut or two, Welsh rugby's biggest decision yet could save or break the game
One cut or two, Welsh rugby's biggest decision yet could save or break the game The next couple of months in Welsh rugby will be explosive as the WRU decides whether it will cut from four teams to three or two Welsh rugby is set to cut to either three or two teams going forward (Image: Huw Evans Picture Agency Ltd) Normally this would be the time of year when journalists begin previewing the upcoming season. Articles taking in-depth look at the make-up of the squads of all four professional clubs - Cardiff, Dragons, Ospreys and Scarlets - would be commonplace, along with the best new signings of the summer. But this hasn't been your run-of-the-mill summer and this is very much the calm before the storm with the Welsh Rugby Union set to enact radical change. By the end of the month the WRU will have entered formal consultation with a number of key stakeholders in order to create a radical new structure of the professional game. While we won't know exactly what the new set-up will look like until October - and potentially even longer until the public are told what teams will be cut or merged - we are highly likely to find out imminently what the WRU views as the optimal structure. According to well-placed sources in the upper echelons of the Welsh game the direction of travel is hurtling towards a reduction from four to two professional clubs. But is this the right way to go? What are the pros and cons of such a radical change? Article continues below With regards going down to two teams, the first argument which is often put forward by disgruntled fans on social media is the following: how many Six Nations titles have Scotland and Italy won with only two teams? The answer is of course zero and it is a fair question to ask, but Wales would arguably be starting from a stronger base than Scotland. Sign up to Inside Welsh rugby on Substack to get exclusive news stories and insight from behind the scenes in Welsh rugby. If we are being brutally honest, there is currently only enough top-class talent in Wales to service two strong teams. Some may favour a 2+1 model whereby you have two very well-funded sides while keeping alive a third as a development team. There's merit in such an arrangement, but it's anti-competitive and would devalue any competition they play in. A reduction to two would undoubtedly concentrate talent which should in turn create a greater competition for contracts and starting places. WRU chief executive Abi Tierney and newly appointment Dave Reddin (Image: Huw Evans Picture Agency Ltd) It's a very similar argument to the one put forward in 2003 when former WRU CEO David Moffett reduced the number of professional teams to five and finally four the following season. Competition for places drives standards upwards and favours an elitist approach. A reduction to two teams is also far more likely to lead to playing budgets in the region of £8m-£9m which is needed to consistently compete in the latter stages of competitions and potentially win silverware in the future. That is exactly what this radical new structure needs to achieve; a level of rugby and success which is far greater than the players are currently exposed to. Wales' top talent and rising stars need to be in far stronger environments and become used to winning big games. When Jamie Roberts, Justin Tipuric, Leigh Halfpenny and Sam Warburton came through the ranks they had to compete with the likes of Casey Laulala, Marty Holah, Xavier Rush and Maama Molitika for a place in the side. At the time at least a couple of the Welsh teams were consistently competing in the latter stages of the old Heineken Cup every season, while Cardiff won the Challenge Cup with a famous victory over a star-studded Toulon side in Marseille. This in turn has a positive knock-on effect on the performances of the national side. Join WalesOnline Rugby's WhatsApp Channel here to get the breaking news sent straight to your phone for free But of course there would certainly be a number of unintended consequences if the WRU did want to go down to two sides. The first serious issue is the very real prospect of alienating a large percentage of Welsh rugby fans in a similar way to what happened when the Celtic Warriors ceased to exist back in 2004. If the Scarlets went you'd be hard pressed to persuade people west of the Loughor to support a team based in Swansea - and vice- versa. The WRU are stuck between a rock and a hard place, but because of the abysmal form of the men's national team over the past couple of years and the constant struggles to remain competitive at regional level they have no choice but to make significant changes. If they did reduce to two teams and those teams began competing for silverware on a regular basis, would that not attract support back? Children, in particular, are attracted to success and big-name players. Those against a reduction in teams might also query whether a reduction to two sides is too extreme in that it will cut off too many playing opportunities. This is another valid question to ask and Scottish rugby powerbrokers have long explored the possibility of adding a third side. If Wales does reduce to two sides it needs to invest heavily in Super Rygbi Cymru or an A league. What is put in place underneath the professional game is just as important a question as the number of teams. Critics might also point to a reduction of TV income, while there would be significantly fewer Welsh derbies which attract the biggest crowds. Another fair point, but that should be compensated by better performance/success in other games leading to higher crowds and improved commercial opportunities. The competition is also vitally important. Get the latest breaking Welsh rugby news stories sent straight to your inbox with our FREE daily newsletter. Sign up here. It is very difficult to see supporters truly getting behind a two-team model in the United Rugby Championship, but an Anglo-Welsh league would be a different matter altogether. The other key point the WRU needs to address is what the two remaining teams would look like; if they merge two sides to create a new entity then there is a very real danger of alienating four sets of fans. Is it actually less painful to cut two sides outright rather than create two new entities? This is a key question they will need to answer. The next few months are bound to be extremely painful and uncomfortable for all involved in Welsh rugby, with people's livelihoods on the line. Article continues below But the dam has finally burst and the WRU faces an insurmountable task in putting a structure in place which can usher in a new prosperous era for rugby in Wales. On the one hand it is a golden opportunity to enact positive change but get it wrong and Welsh rugby will be beyond saving.