US bank regulator tells Congress it suffered 'major' hack that exposed sensitive information
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which regulates and supervises national banks, on Tuesday said it notified Congress of a February hack that it called a "major information security incident."
The breach was first disclosed in February when it learned of "unusual interactions between a system administrative account in its office automation environment and OCC user mailboxes," an OCC news release states.
According to Bloomberg, the hackers had access to more than 150,000 emails after breaching the system in June 2023.
"The confidentiality and integrity of the OCC's information security systems are paramount to fulfilling its mission," said Acting Comptroller of the Currency Rodney Hood.
Malware Exposes 3.9 Billion Passwords In Huge Cybersecurity Threat
The OCC first learned of the incident on Feb. 11. Compromised administrative accounts were shut off the next day.
Read On The Fox News App
"The OCC discovered that the unauthorized access to a number of its executives' and employees' emails included highly sensitive information relating to the financial condition of federally regulated financial institutions used in its examinations and supervisory oversight processes," the agency said.
The OCC said it has reached out to third-party cybersecurity experts to conduct a review of IT security protocols to prevent future attacks.
STAY PROTECTED & INFORMED! GET SECURITY ALERTS & EXPERT TECH TIPS — SIGN UP FOR KURT'S 'THE CYBERGUY REPORT' NOW
"I have taken immediate steps to determine the full extent of the breach and to remedy the long-held organizational and structural deficiencies that contributed to this incident," Hood said. "There will be full accountability for the vulnerabilities identified and any missed internal findings that led to the unauthorized access."
Throughout its review, the OCC has coordinated with the Treasury Department to share information about its findings.Original article source: US bank regulator tells Congress it suffered 'major' hack that exposed sensitive information
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Big Beautiful Bill' Falters as Musk Ramps up Bid to ‘Kill' It
Elon Musk attends President Donald Trump's address to a joint session of Congress in the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on March 4, 2025. Credit - Saul Loeb—AFP via Getty Images President Donald Trump's sprawling tax-and-spending proposal—touted as the centerpiece of his second-term agenda—is facing intensifying resistance in the Senate, as fresh concerns about its impact on the deficit and a ramped-up campaign by Elon Musk to torpedo the entire package threaten to derail the legislation's fragile path to passage. At the center of the turmoil on Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is a sobering new assessment from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which reported Wednesday that the bill would add $2.4 trillion to federal deficits over the next decade while stripping health coverage from nearly 11 million Americans, largely through deep Medicaid cuts and the imposition of new work requirements. That analysis sparked alarm among some Senate Republicans, several of whom are demanding substantial changes. 'I think Congress is sort of like a bad behaving teenager when it comes to spending,' Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, one of the Republicans threatening to vote against the bill, told TIME on Wednesday. 'If you had a teenager that you were giving $100 a week and they wasted all of it on gambling or on booze, would you give them $200?' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and other prominent Republicans tried to dismiss the CBO's projections by arguing its analysis was flawed or biased. But fiscal hawks in the Senate remained dug in, buoyed by former Trump advisor Elon Musk, who extended his all-out offensive against the bill. A day after using his vast social media reach to brand the bill a 'disgusting abomination,' he posted more than two dozen messages on X on Wednesday attacking the legislation, as well as urging his followers to call Congress and 'KILL the BILL.' Musk's ire appears especially focused on how the bill's expansion of the deficit would erase the cost-cutting he hoped to accomplish with the Department of Government Efficiency, which he led under the Trump Administration. He has also expressed concerns with provisions in the House-passed bill that would terminate clean energy tax credits and electric vehicle subsidies established under the Inflation Reduction Act. Tesla Energy, Musk's solar and battery company, has warned that ending those credits 'would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid.' The sharp reversal has blindsided some Republicans, who were counting on Musk's tacit support. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has spearheaded the bill's passage, tried to stem the fallout by reaching out to Musk directly. 'I hope he comes around,' Johnson said Wednesday, though he added that Musk has not returned his call. Inside the Senate, Johnson's broader strategy—pushing through House priorities quickly and with minimal changes—is beginning to unravel. Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota acknowledged that significant changes to the bill are now unavoidable. 'We'll make some modifications to it, strengthen and improve it,' Thune said Tuesday. 'But at the end of the day, the math is simple—51 in the Senate, 218 in the House. That's what we're working toward.' One potential modification Thune has expressed interest in is scaling back the $40,000 state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap in the House version of the bill, an increase from the current $10,000 cap that House Republicans from high-tax states secured as a concession. But not all Republicans agree with the additional spending: 'There really isn't a single Republican senator who cares much about the SALT issue,' Thune told reporters as he departed a meeting with Trump and Senate Republicans on Wednesday evening, saying that they discussed ways to dial that money back. It's a move that could alienate House Republicans from New York and New Jersey, who say their support is contingent on the SALT provision. "Let's be clear — no SALT, no deal," New York Republican Mike Lawler said Wednesday in a post on X. Additionally, the bill's sweeping changes to Medicaid, such as imposing new work requirements, are a sticking point. Republican Senators Josh Hawley of Missouri and Jim Justice of West Virginia have raised red flags over a provision that would eliminate provider taxes—mechanisms that states use to fund Medicaid—which they argue could shutter rural hospitals. Hawley is also opposed to a so-called 'sick tax' in the bill, which would impose new charges on low-income patients for medical visits. Other Republican Senators, including Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, may also put up roadblocks over potential cuts to Medicaid. Trump has personally intervened, holding calls with Sens. Hawley, Paul, and Scott. But there is little evidence he has swayed skeptics. Paul, a libertarian-leaning lawmaker who has vocally pushed back on many Trump Administration policies, told TIME that he plans to vote against the bill over its provision to raise the debt ceiling by trillions of dollars. 'Congress has been acting irresponsibly for decades,' he said. 'We spend $2 trillion more than to come in. They should have a very narrow leash. The only debt ceiling they get should be very, very narrow in time and very, very small in amount. And the more we vote on the debt ceiling, the better. I'd vote on it every three months.' Trump, meanwhile, renewed his calls on Wednesday for scrapping the debt ceiling altogether. The growing litany of disputes has created a daunting legislative gauntlet for Trump's signature bill. Senate committees are now beginning to draft their own version, starting with less controversial sections and leaving the most divisive elements—Medicaid, energy, taxes—for later. Should the Senate approve any amended version, it must still clear the House once again—no small task given the narrow margins and the emboldened dissent among House Republicans. The stakes are high not just for Trump, but for Republicans heading into a contentious midterm season. Failure to extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts would translate into a tax increase for many Americans. Trump's legislation would also boost spending on defense and border security, while reducing spending on Medicaid and food stamps. Write to Nik Popli at


USA Today
34 minutes ago
- USA Today
New Article from Kugler Vision Reveals the True Cost of LASIK in Omaha and Why It May Save Patients Thousands
For individuals in Omaha considering LASIK, the conversation often begins and ends with price. But according to a new article from Kugler Vision, a leading provider of advanced vision correction procedures in Nebraska, the upfront cost of LASIK is only part of the story. The real comparison lies in understanding how LASIK stacks up against the lifetime financial burden of glasses and contact lenses—a burden that, for many, quietly adds up to tens of thousands of dollars over the years. Published by Lance Kugler, MD, 'The True Cost of LASIK in Omaha' challenges the common assumption that laser eye surgery is financially out of reach. The article reveals that the cost of LASIK in Omaha is driven by technology, the surgeon's experience, and the clinic itself. Kugler Vision stands out by offering clear, upfront pricing with no hidden fees following a consultation—something that sets them apart in a market where price transparency is not always guaranteed. Each patient receives a personalized estimate following a comprehensive EyeAnalysis consultation, where the clinical team evaluates vision goals, eye health, and candidacy for modern LASIK or one of six other advanced vision correction procedures. While the initial sticker price may give some patients pause, the article emphasizes that the long-term savings of LASIK can be significant. A person who wears two-week disposable contact lenses typically spends around $1,345 per year on lenses, solution, and related supplies. Over 25 years, that cost balloons to more than $33,000—and that's before factoring in inflation. Eyeglasses aren't much better, with regular updates to frames and prescriptions adding to the financial load. In contrast, LASIK is a one-time procedure with a high satisfaction rate and the potential to eliminate dependency on corrective lenses altogether. Many patients find that the money they save after LASIK can be redirected toward other priorities—family vacations, home purchases, or savings for the future. The article also outlines how LASIK has become more financially accessible than ever before. Kugler Vision offers financing options through trusted healthcare payment partners, making it possible for patients to break the total cost into manageable monthly installments. Qualified applicants can take advantage of up to two years of interest-free financing or opt for longer-term plans with low monthly payments. This flexibility makes it easier for individuals to pursue vision correction without delaying care due to financial barriers. For those exploring ways to reduce the upfront cost further, the article suggests using funds from a Flexible Spending Account (FSA) or Health Savings Account (HSA). Additionally, patients who receive tax refunds are encouraged to consider investing that money in a procedure that can offer long-term savings and freedom from glasses or contacts. In some cases, LASIK may also qualify as a tax-deductible medical expense, depending on how an individual itemizes deductions. Kugler Vision advises patients to speak with a tax professional to explore this potential benefit. Kugler Vision's commitment to patient-centered care extends beyond cost transparency. The article emphasizes that value is not just about price—it's also about the quality of care, technology used, and overall patient experience. Led by Dr. Lance Kugler, the Omaha team utilizes advanced diagnostic and surgical equipment to provide customized LASIK treatment plans tailored to each patient's needs. Their approach includes thorough pre-operative assessments, top-tier surgical precision, and attentive post-operative care, which collectively contribute to high satisfaction rates and consistently excellent outcomes. In a field where some clinics advertise unusually low LASIK prices, Kugler Vision urges patients to proceed with caution. Lower price tags may sometimes reflect older technology, less experienced surgeons, or inadequate follow-up care—all of which can affect both safety and results. Kugler Vision's article reinforces that the true cost of LASIK should be evaluated in terms of value, not just price. Choosing a provider based solely on the lowest quote may carry unintended risks that compromise long-term satisfaction and visual outcomes. Patients interested in learning more about the financial side of LASIK or exploring their eligibility are encouraged to schedule a consultation at Kugler Vision. The article makes it clear that affordability is not a barrier when the right information, resources, and support systems are in place. In today's economy, where every dollar counts, understanding the long-term impact of vision correction costs has never been more important. To read 'The True Cost of LASIK in Omaha' or to access Kugler Vision's LASIK affordability calculator, visit For interview requests, additional information, or expert commentary on the economics of laser vision correction, members of the media are invited to contact the Kugler Vision team directly.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Emboldened and out of government, Elon Musk emerges as a problem for the Trump White House
WASHINGTON — Just days after he left his powerful position as one of Donald Trump's closest advisers, Elon Musk is orchestrating a pressure campaign to sink the mammoth tax and spending package that is the centerpiece of the president's policy agenda. Musk used X, his social media site, on Wednesday to implore Americans to call Congress and urge it to 'kill' the bill that Trump hails as 'big' and 'beautiful.' He also urged lawmakers to rewrite the bill from scratch, putting him squarely at odds with Trump, who had invited him into Cabinet meetings and empowered him to dismantle whole agencies and shrink the government workforce. The bill, which has already passed the House, faces an uncertain fate in the Senate, where just four Republican defections would spell defeat. It doesn't sit well with Trump world that Musk is the messenger. Trump is considering when and how to respond to Musk's gambit, a White House official said. He was 'caught off guard' but "not entirely surprised" by Musk's opposition, a senior official said. Trump had sent Musk off in style, giving him a golden key and staging a goodbye ceremony in the Oval Office that the media covered live. 'The president wanted to be a nice guy,' the senior official said. Musk's posts come a day after his surprising break with Trump over the bill's merits. On Tuesday, he called the measure a 'disgusting abomination,' warning that it would push the nation deeper into debt. Having elevated Musk and made him a prized sidekick, Trump may discover that the world's richest man is a potential nemesis beyond his control. A White House official downplayed the notion of a falling-out with Musk. 'Everyone here in a senior role understands who Elon Musk is, understands how he acts, understands how he plays,' the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'There's been no surprise when it comes to Elon Musk, because he's been such a friend to the administration. 'And we all know this is coming from a place of business and is not personal.' But people in Trump's orbit were angry that Musk skewered the bill. They were particularly outraged by his not-so-veiled warning that Republicans who vote for it could lose their jobs come November 2026, a person familiar with the matter said. That assertion came after Musk said late last month that he would do 'a lot less' political spending going forward. A Republican lawmaker, in a private text chain with colleagues, wrote sarcastically of Musk: 'Team Player.' Trump is normally quick to clap back at those who publicly oppose his interests. When Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., objected Tuesday on CNBC that the bill would inflate the national debt, Trump swiftly denounced him. 'The people of Kentucky can't stand him,' Trump posted on Truth Social. In the case of Musk, Trump so far has been silent. The disparate treatment may be rooted in cold political reality. Paul doesn't have a national following, while Musk, with his capacity to influence the midterm elections, is someone Trump may not wish to antagonize. Musk spent more than $250 million to boost Trump last year and is free to pour money into a midterm campaign season in which control of Congress is up for grabs. If Democrats seize the majority, they could saddle Trump with serial investigations and perhaps impeachment proceedings in the back half of his term. Republican lawmakers, too, trod carefully Wednesday when they were asked about Musk's evisceration of Trump's key legislative priority. Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana quipped: 'Well, let me say this about Elon. I wish he wouldn't sugarcoat stuff.' 'I think he's really smart,' Kennedy added. 'I think he's entitled to his opinion. He's frustrated. I think he believes, in my judgment correctly, that we're quickly becoming debt slaves.' Still, Musk's apostasy shows the inherent risks in Trump's executive style. As a centibillionaire, Musk never fit neatly in the Trump administration's chain of command. He squabbled with at least two Cabinet secretaries and found that his private interests clashed at times with Trump's policy goals. Trump's bill would curtail the electric vehicle and residential solar tax credits that are important to Musk's Tesla car and clean energy divisions. The measure would also impose a new annual $250 fee on EV drivers. Musk spoke to Trump personally about extending the electric vehicle credit, a person familiar with the matter said. He also pressed some senior lawmakers on Capitol Hill in recent weeks — before his recent X posts — including House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to keep tax credits in the bill that would incentivize electric vehicle purchases, two people familiar with the conversations said. The tax credits had been eliminated to get the most conservative House members on board as part of the delicate negotiations to ensure the bill's passage. 'Abruptly ending the energy tax credits would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid — we urge the senate to enact legislation with a sensible wind down' of the credits, Tesla Energy posted on X on May 28, the day Musk officially left his government role. In opposing the bill, Musk has amplified a point that the more fiscally conservative Republicans also find troubling: The measure would greatly add to America's whopping debt. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office holds that the House-passed version of the bill would inflate the debt by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Paul, the senator from Kentucky, wrote Tuesday that he wants trillions in new debt 'removed' from the measure and that four of his colleagues 'feel this way.' An open question is the degree to which Americans care what Musk thinks. His public approval rating was underwater amid his association with the Department of Government Efficiency and the drastic cuts that left many government workers suddenly unemployed. An NBC News poll in March found that 51% of registered voters held negative views of Musk, with only 39% viewing him positively. Lawmakers seeking campaign donations may be solicitous of Musk and the news media may treat him with outsize interest because of the role Trump gave him, but can he shape public opinion on controversial legislation? Newt Gingrich, the Republican former House speaker, suggested the answer is no. 'I haven't seen any' public constituency for Musk, Gingrich told NBC News. 'If you can find one, call me.' 'I'm a big admirer of his as an entrepreneur, but he never understood the political business, and he doesn't now,' he added. That having been said, 'I'm sure no one on the Trump team thinks it's helpful,' Gingrich added. Democrats are delighted by Musk's dissent and the rift it exposes inside GOP ranks. 'Musk is right about this,' Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., told NBC News. 'He's been wrong about a whole lot of other things.' This article was originally published on