Iowa House advances bills aimed against CO2 pipelines
Three bills sponsored by state Rep. Charley Thomson, who has been a vocal opponent of carbon sequestration pipelines in Iowa, advanced from House subcommittee hearings Thursday.
The bills dealt with eminent domain, permit length for a pipeline carrying liquefied carbon dioxide and the office of the consumer advocate. Each bill received unanimous approval.
The legislation was part of a slew of bills introduced last week aimed at the Iowa Utilities Commission, eminent domain and the Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline project.
Thomson said House File 239 is an attempt to 'fix' some of the problems caused by the government realignment bill passed in 2023, which moved the Office of the Consumer Advocate from an independent office to a division under the attorney general's office.
The consumer advocate, as its name implies, advocates for members of the public in utility cases, like the Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline project.
Jess Mazour, who spoke on behalf of the Iowa Chapter of the Sierra Club in favor of the bill, said prior to the restructuring of the office, the consumer advocate would file notices that it had reviewed the documents submitted by Summit in its permit application, and it would request further documentation from the company.
Mazour said since the restructure of the office, the consumer advocate has been 'almost absent' from the process.
'If we don't have a consumer advocate that is active in the process and helping the landowners, then we have no one doing that,' Mazour said. 'Then we have to rely on members of the public or groups like Sierra Club to make sure that people know their rights and that this process is fair.'
The former consumer advocate left the office after the restructure and said it made the office subject to political persuasion.
Under the new bill, the consumer advocate would be appointed by the governor, instead of the attorney general, would give regular reports to the secretary of agriculture, auditor of the state and state treasurer and head the Office of the Consumer Advocate which would once again be independent.
While much of the conversation on the bill centered on the advocate's role in the Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline permit, Rep. Lindsay James, D-Dubuque, said increased oversight from the OCA also would be helpful to protect Iowans in mobile homes from private equity firms who are 'price gouging.'
House File 242 would allow Iowa landowners to seek declaratory judgment, or a legally binding explanation of their rights, from a district court if their property were subject to an eminent domain claim in an application before the Iowa Utilities Commission.
Opponents of the bill said it would lengthen the time and the cost of pipeline projects in the state.
Jake Highfill spoke on behalf of the American Petroleum Institute in opposition to the bill, which he said would impact not just carbon sequestration pipelines, but natural gas and oil pipelines as well.
'We would like to ask to make sure we're not including everybody as we move forward,' Highfill said to the subcommittee.
Proponents, including the Sierra Club Iowa chapter, landowners and the American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa said the bill would help to correct the 'shoddy track record, regarding due process' by the IUC.
'At present, due process simply doesn't exist for these landowners,' Pete McRoberts said on behalf of ACLU of Iowa.
Mazour with Sierra Club requested the final section of the bill be amended to allow the bond for an appeal of an IUC decision to be removed, instead of the bond from a declaratory statement, as the bill currently reads.
A spokesperson for Summit Carbon Solutions said in a statement the regulators in Iowa, North Dakota and Minnesota have 'affirmed the project's safety, economic advantages, and importance for energy independence' with their approval of the projects.
'We have signed easements with more than 1,200 Iowa landowners and have adjusted the route based on feedback from stakeholders and regulatory agencies,' the statement said. 'These actions ensure the project responds to concerns, secures the future of ethanol, and opens pathways to low-carbon markets.'
The Iowa Utilities Commission granted Summit Carbon Solutions the use of eminent domain for its carbon sequestration pipeline project that would run through Iowa, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota and Minnesota. Per the permit, construction on the project may not begin until the company has secured a permit in South Dakota, which is still pending.
'Regulatory certainty is crucial for maintaining Iowa's competitive edge in business, fostering long-term opportunities for farmers, ethanol producers, and rural communities,' the statement from Summit said in response to the advancement of the bills.
House File 238 also advanced unanimously and would limit permits to liquified carbon dioxide pipelines to 25 years and prohibit the IUC from renewing those permits.
Nate Hohnstein opposed the bill on behalf of the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, noting that pipelines were the safest method of transportation for liquified carbon dioxide.
Supporters of the bill said they wish it went further and restricted the use of eminent domain on agricultural land.
Each of the House files have matching bills introduced and assigned to subcommittees in the Senate, Senate File 229, SF 226, and SF 225.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
4 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
GOP Congresswoman Slammed For 'Ridiculous' Tip
Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (Iowa) is defending herself amid social media backlash, as the Republican lawmaker left what some users are calling a 'ridiculous' tip at a restaurant — in an attempt to celebrate the GOP's ' no tax on tips ' deduction passed earlier this year. 'Made a pit stop in Iowa County for lunch at Sun Down Bar and Grill,' Miller-Meeks wrote Monday on X, formerly Twitter. 'I got to celebrate No Tax on Tips with our wonderful server, she's thrilled about this provision and excited to keep more of what she earns!' An accompanying image of her receipt showed Miller-Meeks had a $7 order of corn nuggets and a $10 Philly cheesesteak sandwich, which came to a total of $18.19, after adding local sales tax. The photo showed Miller-Meeks left $21 and small change on her table. The pictured receipt notably confirmed that a 20% tip on the total bill would amount to $3.40. The congresswoman, whose post received nearly 10 million views and landed more than 2,000 comments, has since responded to the reactions with a statement from a spokesperson — which slammed Democrats and noted that she paid acceptable gratuity. 'The Congresswoman left a 20% tip, and unlike Democrats, she did not vote to increase taxes on hardworking Iowans,' Miller-Meeks' communications director Anthony Fakhoury told CBS 2 Iowa in a statement Tuesday. ''No Tax on Tips' means more money in the pockets of servers, not the IRS.' While the backlash exclusively centered on what critics called the 'stingy' gratuity Miller-Meeks paid, the 'no tax on tips' deduction itself has been criticized for its limitations ever since President Donald Trump signed it into law as part of the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' earlier this year. Trump hailed the measure as a triumph, fulfilling his campaign vow of ending taxes on tips. In reality, it merely provides a tax deduction on up to $25,000 of tip income — and only applies to federal income tax — meaning workers still have to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes on tips. Social media users ultimately weren't concerned with those details Monday, with many aghast that Miller-Meeks tried to champion her party by tipping 'only' $3 on her lunch.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pipeline opponents ask utilities regulators to discard Summit permits
The Iowa Utilities Commission listened to public comments at its monthly public meeting Wednesday from landowners opposed to a carbon sequestration pipeline. (Photo by Cami Koons/Iowa Capital Dispatch) The Iowa Utilities Commission on Wednesday held its first monthly public commission meeting since August 2023, and heard public comment from landowners opposed to the Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline. IUC decided to resume regular public meetings shortly after Gov. Kim Reynolds vetoed a bill that would have restricted the use of eminent domain for hazardous liquid pipelines. In her veto, Reynolds also called for greater transparency in the commission through increased attendance at hearings and informational meetings. The commission has held meetings and public hearings scheduled for specific docket items, many of which move into closed session. Commission Chair Sarah Martz said at the top of Wednesday's meeting that input from the public, governor and stakeholders showed there was a need to bring the public meetings back. 'Part of this is the desire of the commission to be more transparent and have a more open decision-making process,' Martz said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Martz said the commission additionally has plans to hold more of its deliberations and other meetings in a public format. She said more details will be released in the coming weeks. While the majority of public comment focused on the Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline, for which the IUC granted a conditional permit in 2024, the pipeline was only on the agenda for an update to a lawsuit. More than 100 landowners sued the commission over its decision to grant Summit a permit. According to a staff attorney for IUC, final briefs for all parties in the case are due later this week and oral arguments for the case will likely be set for sometime in the fall. Landowners in attendance, donned in their signature red shirts, thanked the commission for allowing them the public space to voice their concerns. Commissioners, per the meeting rules, did not respond to public comments. Landowners brought up continued worries about devalued land, water use, safety and daily disruption from the pipeline project and asked the commissioners to dismiss the project's phase two permit application and to review the permit issued for phase one. Colleen Tucker, a landowner from Mitchell County, said the repeated and loud outcry from Iowans shows an 'overwhelming mandate' that they do not want the project. 'I wonder how you can defend and justify the fact that Summit is given a permit to desecrate our land,' Tucker said. 'We are ordinary citizens, and we are here because we love our land, our state and our country.' Jess Mazour, the conservation program coordinator with the Iowa chapter of the Sierra Club and an organizer with the landowners, reminded commissioners of the 'immense power' they had to impact 'other people's lives' and 'their legacies.' Mazour held up print outs of the Exhibit H documents that show the status of easements secured along Summit's phase two route. This route would connect to additional ethanol plants along the pipeline and represent an increase of more than 300 miles of pipeline. Shelby and Story counties to pursue U.S. Supreme Court action on local pipeline ordinance case A spokesperson for the Iowa Utilities Commission said Exhibit H files are required documents from the IUC that show where a company does not have a voluntary easement and is requesting eminent domain. Mazour noted in many counties, per these exhibits, voluntary easements had not been secured along the route, which she said shows 'a failing project.' The IUC spokesperson noted it is 'very common' for a company to file Exhibit H documents and later submit withdrawals of the exhibits as it obtains more voluntary easements through negotiation. 'The filing of Exhibit H in no way confers a right to use eminent domain,' the spokesperson said in an email. Landowners also suggested the IUC revoke or reevaluate the permit for phase one of the project because Summit has been unable to secure a permit through South Dakota. Per the IUC, in order to begin construction on the project, Summit had to secure permits in North Dakota and South Dakota. Permits have been approved in North Dakota, but are tied up in litigation. South Dakota regulators have denied permit applications from the company twice, and enacted a bill this spring that restricts CO2 pipelines from using eminent domain. The company has received a permit to cross through Minnesota. One landowner said the setbacks in the Dakotas mean the project is a 'pipeline to nowhere.' 'We all have these Iowa values that we were brought up with, working hard, integrity, taking care of others,' Mazour said to commissioners. 'Remember that the decision that you three have is going to shape the lives of 1000s of Iowans, and it can be for the better, or it can be for the worse. Summit Carbon Solutions did not respond to a request for comment. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republican Bragging About Tipping Scolded for Tiny Tip
Iowa congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks has gone viral for sharing a photo of her tiny tip on a meal, while praising the impact of Trump's new No Tax on Tips legislation. The 69-year-old Republican shared a photo from a Monday meal at Iowa's Sundown Bar and Grill in an X post on Tuesday, which has had over 6 million views. 'I got to celebrate No Tax on Tips with our wonderful server, she's thrilled about this provision and excited to keep more of what she earns!,' Miller-Meeks wrote. The photos include not only her lunch of a Philly steak sandwich and corn nuggets, but her receipt, which appears to show the congresswoman tipping $3 and small change on an $18 bill. A 20-percent tip on the bill would have been $3.40. She had also hand-written, 'No tax on tips!' on the bill. Comments on Miller-Meeks' post debated whether $3 for the server was an appropriate tip for the meal, especially considering the wage of a member of Congress, which totals $174,000. A spokesperson for her office, Anthony Fakhoury, told Iowa's News Now that Miller-Meeks tipped more than $3. 'The Congresswoman left a 20% tip, and unlike Democrats, she did not vote to increase taxes on hardworking Iowans. No Tax on Tips means more money in the pockets of servers, not the IRS,' Fakhoury said. The Daily Beast has contacted Miller-Meeks' office and the Sundown Bar and grill for further comment. The venue's website states, 'Our staff is always friendly, and our beer is always cold. You'll enjoy great food and great company at the Sundown Bar and Grill.' Miller-Meeks had stopped for lunch during a "Made in America" manufacturing tour, where she visited Iowa manufacturers promoting their American-made production. She said Trump's bill had offered workforce training, tax breaks and incentives for investment. 'One of the criticisms of the reconciliation bill was that it would not spur economic growth. And what I hear when I visit businesses large and small is exactly the opposite,' Miller-Meeks said on Tuesday. Congress passed Trump's No Tax on Tips provision last month, as part of his One Big Beautiful Bill. It aims to put more cash in the pockets of workers, who will be able to deduct $25,000 in tips each year from their taxable income. Tips will be federally taxed beyond that figure. Critics of the provision state that low-wage workers already may pay minimal income tax, so the exemption could favor those who earn higher tips. The viral post comes as Democratic candidate Christina Bohannan, who was only beaten by within 1,000 votes last year, has claimed she will try for a third time to beat Miller-Meeks in the 2026 midterms, where Democrats are focused on Iowa to take control of the House. She accused Miller-Meeks of putting 'partisan politics over Iowans.' Last month, Bohannan said 'From cutting Medicaid, to siding with DOGE's devastating cuts to Social Security, to enabling unelected, unaccountable billionaires like Elon Musk-Miller-Meeks has forgotten about us,' Bohannan said. 'It's time someone put Iowa first.'
