Pakistan fears jihadist militants may thrive on border if...: What Asim Munir told Donald Trump
In a meeting with US President Donald Trump this week, Pakistan's army chief Asim Munir reportedly raised concerns that separatist and jihadist militants on the Pakistan-Iran border could take advantage of any collapse of authority in Iran.
Notably, anti-Iranian and anti-Pakistan outfits operate on both sides of the 560-mile (900km) long border, Reuters reported.
Israeli officials have repeatedly indicated that they are seeking to destabilise the Iranian government or see it toppled.
As well as worrying about chaos spilling over from Iran, Pakistan is concerned about the precedent set by Israel of attacking the nuclear installations of another country. Nuclear-armed rivals Pakistan and India fought a four-day conflict in May.
Following a Wednesday lunch at the White House with Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, Trump said: 'They're not happy about anything', referring to Pakistan's views on the Israel-Iran conflict.
Pakistan's military said on Thursday that the two had discussed Iran,'with both leaders emphasizing the importance of resolution of the conflict'.
Pakistan has condemned Israel's attack on Iran as a violation of international law.
'This is for us a very serious issue what is happening in our brotherly country of Iran,' Shafqat Ali Khan, spokesman for Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said on Thursday. 'It imperils the entire regional security structures, it impacts us deeply.'
Some of the militant groups on the border have welcomed the upheaval.
Jaish al-Adl (JaA), an Iranian jihadist group formed from ethnic Baluch and Sunni Muslim minorities and which operates from Pakistan, said Israel's conflict with Iran was a great opportunity.
'Jaish al-Adl extends the hand of brotherhood and friendship to all the people of Iran and calls on all people, especially the people of Baluchistan, as well as the armed forces, to join the ranks of the Resistance,' the group said in a statement on June 13.
Conversely, Pakistan fears that separatist militants from its own Baluch minority, which are based in Iran, will also seek to step up attacks.
"There's a fear of ungoverned spaces, which would be fertile ground for terrorist groups," said Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani ambassador to Washington.
Pakistan has unstable borders with Taliban-run Afghanistan and arch-rival India. It does not want to add another volatile frontier on its long border with Iran.
The Iran-Pakistan border region is populated with ethnic Baluch, a minority in both countries who have long complained about discrimination and launched separatist movements. On Pakistan's side, the region is a province called Balochistan and in Iran it is Sistan-Baluchistan.
Until Israel's bombing of Iran, Tehran was closer to Pakistan's arch-rival India. Pakistan and Iran had even traded air strikes last year, accusing each other of harboring Baluch militants. But the attack on Iran has upended alliances, as India has not condemned Israel's bombing campaign.
China has also said that it is deeply concerned about the security situation in Balochistan, with the area being a focus of Beijing's multi-billion dollar infrastructure investment program in Pakistan, centred on the new Chinese-run port of Gwadar. Baluch militant groups in Pakistan have previously targeted Chinese personnel and projects.
On Iranian side of the border, Tehran has at different times accused Pakistan, Gulf nations, Israel and the United States of backing the anti-Iran Baluch groups.
Simbal Khan, an analyst based in Islamabad, said the different Baluch groups could morph into a 'greater Baluchistan' movement which seeks to carve out a new nation from the Baluch areas of Pakistan and Iran.
'They're all going to fight together if this blows up,' said Khan.
(With inputs from Reuters)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SoftBank pitches $ 1 trillion US AI hub to Taiwan Semiconductor Co, Trump administration
Fires erupted in Beer Sheva, Israel, amid escalating conflict with Iran, now in its second week. Israeli airstrikes aim to thwart Iran's nuclear ambitions, while Iran retaliates with missile strikes. Both sides have suffered casualties, and European officials are seeking diplomatic solutions. Tensions rise as the U.S. considers its involvement, with President Trump set to make a decision soon.
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran-Israel conflict: Donald Trump's caution on joining Israel airstrikes rooted in fears of creating 'another Libya'
President Donald Trump's recent hesitation to authorise military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities is rooted in a deep-seated concern: the risk of plunging Iran into chaos reminiscent of Libya's collapse after the 2011 NATO intervention. As per a New York Post report citing multiple administration insiders, Trump has repeatedly cited the North African nation's descent into anarchy as a cautionary tale, shaping his approach to the escalating crisis with Iran. The Libya precedent: A decade of anarchy Libya's trajectory after the fall of Muammar Gaddafi stands as a stark warning in Trump's mind, as per the report. In 2011, following a NATO-led bombing campaign—supported by the United States—the long-standing dictator was overthrown. Rather than ushering in stability, Gaddafi's ouster triggered a prolonged period of civil war, political fragmentation, and violence. The country has since splintered into rival governments and militias, with no unified authority and ongoing conflict between factions based in Tripoli and the east. Trump's frequent references to Libya are twofold, sources said: first, the chaos that ensued after Gaddafi's removal; second, the way the intervention complicated future negotiations with other adversarial states, such as North Korea and Iran. "He doesn't want it to turn into Libya," one insider said, underscoring Trump's reluctance to repeat what he sees as a costly and destabilising precedent. A two-week breather In the wake of Israel's recent preemptive airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump has opted to delay any US involvement for up to two weeks. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the president's wait-and-see approach, citing the "substantial chance of negotiations" with Iran that may or may not materialize in the near future. Iran's foreign minister is expected to meet with European counterparts in Geneva, while Trump's special envoy continues backchannel communications. The administration's posture is one of cautious patience, with Trump reportedly weighing input from advisors, international leaders, and the American public. Limited strikes, not regime change As per the New York Post report, sources close to the administration indicate that Trump's preferred military option, if any, would be tightly focused: limited airstrikes targeting Iran's nuclear facilities at Fordow and Natanz using 30,000-pound "bunker buster" bombs —munitions that Israel's air force cannot deliver. The goal would be to neutralise Iran's nuclear capabilities without toppling Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei or triggering a broader conflict. 'Libya was a much more extended kind of bombing commitment, and it ended up being regime change,' one source noted, contrasting it with Trump's current thinking. 'If the regime falls [in Iran], then it's not on Trump, because that's not the goal of his very limited strike'. The president's reluctance to pursue regime change is also informed by the fear that a successor to Khamenei could be even more dangerous, and by a desire not to get entangled in the question of who governs Iran—a stance that resonates with his political base. Trump's caution is further shaped by the broader regional context. The Middle East is littered with examples—Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen—where US interventions have led to protracted instability and civil war.
News18
15 minutes ago
- News18
India Begins Evacuation Process Of Citizens From Israel, Embassy Coordinating For Visas, Transit
Last Updated: India has launched the evacuation of its nationals from Israel, and is coordinating logistics, while registration and visa processes are underway. The Indian Embassy in Israel has begun the process for the evacuation of Indian citizens from the country, amid its ongoing conflict with Iran. According to the details, the Indian Embassy in Tel Aviv is coordinating border crossings, operational timings, and the process to obtain visas. Meanwhile, the registration process for those to be evacuated has already begun. It was also known that the visas for those to be evacuated were also demanded by the authorities in Jordan, to facilitate exit from the borders of the country. Further, electronic visas have also been applied for, however, the further process may face delays because of the weekend closures at government offices. The Ministry of External Affairs on Thursday said the Indian embassy in Tel Aviv would be making arrangements for the evacuation of the Indians. 'All Indian nationals are requested to register themselves with the Embassy of India in Tel Aviv at ( if not already registered," it said. The MEA said that India has decided to evacuate its nationals from Israel who wish to leave in view of the unfolding security situation in that country over the ongoing conflict with Iran. New Delhi's decision to evacuate its citizens came hours after an Iranian missile struck a hospital in the Beersheba area of Israel. 'In view of the recent developments between Israel and Iran, the government of India has decided to evacuate from Israel those Indian nationals who wish to leave," the MEA said. 'Their travel from Israel to India will be facilitated through the land borders and thereafter by air to India," it said. The Indian Embassy in Tel Aviv reiterated its earlier advisories urging all Indian citizens in Israel to remain vigilant and strictly follow the safety guidelines issued by Israeli authorities. 'The embassy (in Israel) remains continuously in touch with the community with a view to extending all feasible assistance," it said. On Wednesday, India announced launching 'Operation Sindhu' to evacuate its nationals from Iran after the Persian Gulf nation's conflict with Israel showed no sign of letting up. 'The government of India accords the highest priority to the safety and security of Indian nationals abroad," the MEA said. It said the government will continue to monitor the situation closely. First Published: June 20, 2025, 12:15 IST
