Man convicted over Koran-burning in London says ruling is assault on free speech
The 50-year-old had argued his criticism was of Islam in general rather than its followers, but District Judge John McGarva said he could not accept this, finding that Coskun's actions were 'highly provocative' and that he was 'motivated at least in part by a hatred of Muslims'.
Coskun was convicted at Westminster Magistrates' Court of a religiously aggravated public order offence of using disorderly behaviour 'within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress', motivated by 'hostility towards members of a religious group, namely followers of Islam', contrary to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and section five of the Public Order Act 1986.
Turkey-born Coskun, who is half-Kurdish and half-Armenian, travelled from his home in the Midlands to carry out the act in Rutland Gardens, Knightsbridge, on February 13 and in court argued he had protested peacefully and burning the Koran amounted to freedom of expression.
His legal fees are being paid by the National Secular Society (NSS) and the Free Speech Union (FSU), both of which criticised the ruling and said they intend to appeal 'and keep on appealing it until it's overturned'.
In a statement issued through the FSU, Coskun said: 'This decision is an assault on free speech and will deter others from exercising their democratic rights to peaceful protest and freedom of expression.
'As an activist, I will continue to campaign against the threat of Islam.
'Christian blasphemy laws were repealed in this country more than 15 years ago and it cannot be right to prosecute someone for blaspheming against Islam. Would I have been prosecuted if I'd set fire to a copy of the bible outside Westminster Abbey? I doubt it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Team USA sprinter Fred Kerley is suspended under anti-doping rules in latest shameful moment for Olympian
US sprinter and Olympic silver medalist Fred Kerley has been suspended for a violation of anti-doping procedures, the Athletics Integrity Unit announced Tuesday. The provisional suspension cites Kerley's 'whereabouts failures' without going into further details. Typically, whereabouts failures result from an athlete neglecting to meeting testing obligations, which can include a range of procedural issues from failing to provide up-to-date location information to missed tests. Kerley, 30, indicated that the alleged violations relate to missed tests – an accusation he rejects, according to a statement from his attorneys at the Law Offices of Howard L. Jacobs. 'Fred Kerley has already notified the AIU that he intends to contest the allegation that he has violated the anti-doping rules related to whereabouts failures,' the statement begins. Kerley's representatives say the two-time Olympic medalist 'strongly believes that one of [or] more of his alleged missed tests should be set aside either because he was not negligent or because the Doping Control Officer did not do what was reasonable under the circumstances to locate him at his designated location.' The statement concluded by explaining Kerley will 'not comment further at this time out of respect for the process,' adding that he 'looks forward to presenting his case to the appointed hearing panel. 'You can try to break me in the storm, but all you´re doing is giving me a better story at the finish line,' Kerley later posted on X. However, Kerley has since released his own statement on Instagram insisting he does not use performance-enhancing drugs and the allegations against him relate to missed tests. 'Let's discuss the facts: I have never used performance enhancing drugs,' he wrote online. 'My provisional suspension is over "whereabouts" allegations, which means missed testing appointments, not a failed drug test. 'We're challenging these claims, as at least one alleged missed test should not count,' he continued. 'I will fight for my name and my legacy. I've faced storms before and come out stronger. This will be no different!' Kerley's provisional suspension is temporary and a final decision will be made at a future hearing. A San Antonio native, Kerley won silver in the 100 meters at the 2020 Olympics and bronze in the same event last summer in Paris. He was also a member of Team USA's 4X100 relay team that won gold at the 2022 World Championships. Kerley announced his conversion to Islam in July: 'They tried to break me, Allah rebuilt me' But Kerley's success on the track has been followed by a tumultuous 2025 that included an arrest on a battery charge in May for allegedly striking hurdler Alaysha Johnson with a closed fist. Johnson was left with a bloody nose, according to a Fort Lauderdale police report. At the time, Kerley's attorney Richard Cooper told reporting media that his client has a 'target on his back,' which he blamed on jealous competitors. 'We ask the public not to rush to judgment as the exculpatory facts eventually come to light,' Cooper said. 'Fred looks forward to getting back to competing and away from distractions as his legal team works to resolve these accusations.' Months earlier, Kerley was accused of punching a Miami Beach police officer before being tasered, and in 2024, his wife accused him of domestic battery, according to court records. Kerley's attorneys have insisted he is also innocent of those charges. This summer has been particularly eventful for Kerley, who announced last month he planned on skipping the 2025 USA Outdoor Track and Field Championships because he was 'taking some time out to get back on track.' He also announced his conversion to Islam.
New Statesman
5 hours ago
- New Statesman
Mothin Ali: 'There's a lot of racism on the left'
Leeds councillor Mothin Ali is set to run for deputy leader of the Green Party. Photograph by Craig Gent, courtesy of Mothin Ali Within weeks of being elected as a Green Party councillor in May 2024, Mothin Ali was criticised for saying Allahu Akhbar ('God is great') in his victory speech, faced down rioters and was targeted by far-right disinformation. It was a very public and literal baptism of fire for the accountant and permaculture gardener who knows that in his garden he can be alone and away from online and offline hassle. Now he wants to become deputy leader of the Green Party. Ali and I speak via Zoom straight after his councillor surgery at the Compton Community Centre in Harehills, West Yorkshire. He seemed weighed down by some of the problems he had heard about, but quickly became energised when talking about the issues. 'Housing's the biggest problem,' he said. Among the people who have been to see him this morning are a family of five living in a two-bed home. It's a common problem, along with disrepair and the long wait for social housing. 'It's just unbelievable,' he said. Ali, 43, represents Gipton and Harehills, a working-class, racially mixed community in the north-east of Leeds. It's where he grew up and first stood as a 'paper' candidate (without a chance of being elected) in 2022. It took Ali two years to turn a meagre 22 per cent of the vote into 52 per cent and a majority of 750 votes driven by a grassroots campaign. 'One thing I think that's missing is that connection between the grassroots activists and the leaders,' Ali said. What he wants for the Greens is to connect their local strength to a 'presence on a national scale in the mainstream media'. He contrasts his party's action-orientated approach to Reform, which is, 'getting the votes from media hype'. 'Inner-city areas feel let down, but for a long time it's been the Labour Party who've had free rein over these areas. And no one's really challenged them,' he said. He dismisses any idea that British people are apathetic: 'People are disenfranchised,' he observed. Ali has recently come under scrutiny for deciding not to sign any internal pledges from the party's various interest groups, particularly the LGBTIQA+ Greens. His reasoning was, firstly, that politicians regularly sign and break these types of pledge so they are not an effective way to effect change and, secondly, that pledges can subvert the party's member-led policy process. This stance prompted criticism and praise from inside and outside the party, much of which incorrectly assumed that he was unsupportive of LGBT rights when he is on the record expressing support for these communities. Amid the discussion online, Adnan Hussain, independent MP for Blackburn asked on X, 'Is there space on the left to create a broad enough church to allow Muslims an authentic space, just as it does all other minority groups?' Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe 'First and foremost, I've got to say I'm an unapologetic Muslim. I make no apology for who I am,' Ali said when I asked him if there is a place for practising Muslims in progressive spaces. 'A lot of our [Islamic] mindset, a lot of our thinking is predominantly left wing. It's predominantly socialist based,' he responded, 'we've got a lot of natural home here. 'But, just as the racists exist on the right, they exist on the left – and that's a conversation that's very rarely had.' Ali said that one prominent Green Party member described him of being 'sinister' while another said it was right to be 'suspicious' of Muslims. These are, frankly, not uncommon attitudes in British society, but Ali highlights how the Green Party does not yet have an anti-racism policy – something that he and others hope to change at the Party's autumn conference. 'There's a lot of that [racism] that goes on in left-wing spheres that, because it's done with a level of politeness and a level of niceness, it's not that visceral hate that you get on the right,' he said. At a protest outside a hotel housing asylum seekers in Leeds earlier this month, Ali encountered some of that visceral hate when was challenged on camera by far-right activists. It's a compelling watch as he calmly engages with the 'auditor' and puts across his points defending asylum seekers, migrants and refugees. 'Someone was actually swearing at me while I was having the conversation,' he remembered. 'I think it's important to be empathetic,' Ali said. 'They're looking for answers, looking for hope as well. And what they've found or what they've been fed is a narrative where immigrants are to blame or Muslims are to blame.' Ali believes the far right can be countered through dialogue. 'We've got to create a safe space where people can discuss things,' he said. 'So people can have robust discussions. They don't have to agree on everything. We can't all think the same.' In the aftermath of the riots in his ward last year, sparked by the removal into foster care of four Roma children, Ali organised a series of meetings to help the different communities hear and understand each other and the challenges they had. 'We created a space where there was understanding, where we're going to have some positives out of it,' he said. It's an approach Ali has used recently to gather opinion on the more quotidian local issue of roadworks, but reflects his belief that people have to be more directly involved in the decisions that affect them. His other method to bridge divides is doing the practical work of community activism. Ali recounts knocking on the door of a man who swiftly dismissed him, using the P-word for good measure. Instead of walking away, Ali pressed for the reasons why this person was so unhappy. 'His problem was fly-tipping and some anti-social behaviour,' Ali explained. The councillor got the fly-tipping cleared and went back to see him, but he was 'still very angry'. Months went by and Ali went back for another chat to see how things were going. This time the conversation was more 'civilised', Ali recalled. After election day the man told Ali that he had voted for him. 'That's how we change hearts and minds,' Ali said. [See also: Visions of an English civil war] Related
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Spanish town ordered to scrap religious festivals ban mainly impacting Muslims
Spain's central government has ordered officials in a Spanish town to scrap a ban on religious gatherings in public sports centres, describing it as a 'discriminatory' measure that breaches the right to religious freedom as it will mainly impact Muslims. 'There can be no half-measures when it comes to intolerance,' Ángel Víctor Torres, the minister for territorial policy, wrote on social media on Monday. Rightwing opposition parties, he added, 'cannot decide who has freedom of worship and who does not'. Last week, it emerged that the conservative-led council in Jumilla, a town of about 27,000 residents in the region of Murcia, had backed the ban. As its Muslim residents had for years used the facilities to come together to mark Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha, the motion was widely seen as targeting the town's estimated 1,500 Muslims. The proposal was initially put forward by the far-right Vox party, which called for an outright ban on public celebrations such as Eid al-Adha. Vox's hardline motion was watered down and subsequently backed by the People's party (PP), which removed the explicit reference to Eid al-Adha and instead stipulated that municipal sports facilities could no longer be used for 'cultural, social or religious activities foreign to the city council'. Vox had demanded the measure in exchange for backing the budget put forward by the town's PP mayor. As the far right celebrated what it described as the 'first measure' to ban Islamic festivals in Spain's public spaces, the outcry was swift. The head of a prominent Muslim association in Spain described the ban as 'institutionalised Islamophobia', while the country's migration minister called it 'shameful'. In Jumilla, the PP defended the motion, arguing that it did not single out any religion or belief and highlighted that 72 nationalities coexisted in the town without any issue. The local mayor, Seve González, told El País the council was aiming to 'promote cultural campaigns' that defended 'our identity' and protected the 'values and religious expressions of our country'. In Madrid, the Socialist-led central government seized on the measure, portraying the PP as beholden to the far right, forcing the party to compromise with Vox while also drifting further to the right in order to compete for votes. Spain's migration minister, Elma Saiz, said those who paid the price would be citizens who had spent decades peacefully living in Jumilla and had helped to sustain a local economy centred on vineyards and crops such as olives and almonds. She told the broadcaster Antena 3: 'Foreigners make up 20% of those who contribute to social security in Jumilla. These towns would collapse without them.' Saiz brushed off the claim that the ban was aimed at protecting Spanish identity, citing the country's history as a Muslim stronghold. 'To me, that seems utterly ignorant,' she said. 'It overlooks that we would not be the country we are today if we could not appreciate the contribution of Muslim culture to our language, our works of art, advances in architecture and civil engineering.' Among the chorus of voices c ondemning the ban was the Catholic church, which described it as a form of discrimination that was incompatible with the right to religious freedom, while the Federation of Jewish Communities of Spain told news agency Europa Press that the measure was a 'serious democratic setback'. The leader of Vox, Santiago Abascal, said he was 'perplexed' by the stance of the Catholic church. Speaking to a far-right YouTube channel, he suggested the church's view could be linked to its reliance on public funding or to clergy abuse scandals that he claimed have 'absolutely muzzled' it. On Monday, a central government representative said the council in Jumilla had a month to formally respond to Madrid's request. If it failed to respond, the central government would explore what other legal options are available, the spokesperson added. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion The measure came weeks after unrest gripped Torre-Pacheco, about 60 miles (100km) from Jumilla, with baton-wielding groups taking to the streets to 'hunt' people with foreign origins after an assault on an older person. In the lead-up to the unrest, after the pensioner told local media he believed his attacker had been of north African origin, racist messaging on social media rocketed by 1,500%, according to tracking by the central government. The events in Jumilla and Torre-Pacheco hinted at how the far right had started down a path that put all of Spain in danger, said Mounir Benjelloun Andaloussi Azhari, the president of the Spanish Federation of Islamic Religious Entities. 'The goal of all this – let's not forget – is so that the far right can win votes,' he told the news site 'And if they need to criminalise an entire population to do so, if they have to generate hatred, if they have to lie and make coexistence impossible, if they have to say this is an 'invasion' they will do it.' He had lived in Spain for 30 years, but said it was the first time he – along with many others – had felt persecuted: 'All for a handful of votes. At the expense of citizens' fear, at the expense of Spain's image around the world, and at the expense of betraying those who once proposed a stable model for Spain that guaranteed a series of rights that they now want to do away with.'
