BMC orders to stop ‘unauthorised' repair works at 170-year-old heritage synagogue in Mumbai's Byculla
The BMC has told The Indian Express, that they have sought a report from the trustees as the civic officials have not granted any permission to carry out the work in the heritage structure.
'The trustees of the synagogue were carrying out repair works and we have issued them a stop work notice. We did not receive any application from them seeking NOC before going ahead with the repair works. For the time being, they have been asked to submit a report to us by providing the plans of repair works, and all the documents that are with them. After we go through the documents, the next course of action will be decided by us,' an official said.
Located in the densely populated Byculla that houses a substantial population of the members from the Baghdadi Jew community, the synagogue symbolizes their diverse heritage and features distinctive architecture, including a blue facade, large frontal columns, and towering clock tower.
The synagogue's interiors also feature bright blue paints, fluorescent lights, and a double-height sanctuary with a gallery.
The Synagogue is a grade 2B heritage structure and the state government's law states that the managers of these properties will have to acquire a consent letter from the BMC before carrying out repair works in any of these structures.
The repair works started last week and the issue was promptly highlighted by restaurateur Moshe Shek.
'I received messages from our community members from abroad who asked me to check the issue. They had received photos and videos of the building being demolished and had shared the same with me. Following this, I visited the Synagogue on May 18 and was shocked to see that the entire structure was largely pulled down,' Shek told The Indian Express.
He said that at present, the columns and pillars of the property stands completely damaged with the main-staircases being entirely removed.
'I asked one of the workers who was present there about who is executing the work, but the worker ran away. Later the trustees came, they manhandled me and stopped me from taking any photographs and videos,' he added.
Shek said that the next day he wrote a letter to Mumbai's municipal commissioner and visited the local civic ward office to lodge a complaint. He also filed a complaint at the police station about the trustees manhandling him, following which the authorities prompted into action with BMC issuing a 'stop-work' notice.
'I had grown up in this locality and all my ceremonies had happened in this synagogue. Therefore, it is absolutely appalling to see the structure being pulled out in such an unprofessional manner without informing the community members,' Shek said.
Meanwhile, Solomon Sopher, chairperson of the Sir Jacob Sassoon Charity Trust that manages the Synagogue, refuted the allegations saying that they have carried out only the basic waterproofing works so as to make it ready for restoration work.
'The structure was not at all razed in the manner like how the complainant has described. The synagogue is 170 years old. Keeping in mind the old age and heritage value of the property a decision was made for restoring the project. We were awaiting the necessary permission from the authorities and decided to do some basic waterproofing work to prevent seepage during the rains since monsoon is just 10 days away. At the same time we were hopeful that the permissions would arrive, following which the planned work would be taken up accordingly,' Sopher told The Indian Express.
Speaking to the Indian Express, Samajwadi Party MLA and former corporator from Byculla Rais Shaikh said, 'This event needs to be scrutinised by the highest of the civic administration level. Earlier also I had received complaints that the Synagogue was being leased out for social events like marriage due to which the sewer lines were getting choked due to improper usage. These things need to be looked into thoroughly by the administration,'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Bombay HC questions right of Jain organisations to seek closure of slaughterhouse for entire Paryushan Parv
The Bombay High Court on Tuesday questioned the right of organisations representing the Jain community to seek closure of slaughterhouses for the entire period of nearly 10 days of Paryushan, a prominent Jain festival. The court said there was no legislative mandate in law for such an order. The HC also issued notice to the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) and the state government, seeking their response to pleas seeking closure of slaughterhouses for the entire festival. The court also said that it cannot stay the present BMC decision. A division bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep V Marne was hearing Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed by Sheth Bherulalji Kanaiyalalji Kothari Religious Trust and Sheth Motishaw Lalbaug Jain Charities and two other organisations. The petitioners had relied on the Supreme Court judgement of March 2008 in Hinsa Virodhak Sangh vs Mirzapur Moti Kuresh Jamat pertaining to Ahmedabad (Gujarat) that upheld the decision of Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation to close down slaughterhouses during Jain festival. Advocate Abhinav Chandrachud argued that the BMC, in its August 14 decision, did not consider that the Mumbai city has more Jain population than Ahmedabad. He submitted that BMC's order was exactly a 'copy-paste' version of last year's decision and it 'exhibits lack of application of mind and has been passed by taking into account the material which is not relevant for the purposes of the decision'. The petitioners also referred to Article 51A (g) of the Constitution related to fundamental duty of citizens to have compassion for living creatures and argued the civic bodies should considered the same. The HC remarked that it could not direct the authority to close slaughterhouses for the entire Paryushan Parv as there was 'no legislative mandate' in law. The judges orally remarked, 'You (petitioners) are seeking a mandamus of 10-day closure. For that there has to be a mandate in law. You must have a right which could be enforced by court of law. Where does the law say that slaughter houses must be closed for 10 days? No stay can be granted (on BMC decision) because you are seeking writ of mandamus. Except for pointing out an error in BMC order , you have not made out a case for issuing mandamus.' The HC emphasised that the SC verdict was on a decision made by Ahmedabad civic body and not one imposed by judicial order of the court. The bench orally remarked, 'You (petitioners) will appreciate the difficulty (of the HC). In SC judgement, Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation had taken a decision (of closure), which was upheld by the court. But in this case, there is no legislative mandate, no rule, no law that they must close (for all 10 days). Where is that obligation? You understand the distinction.' Senior advocate Prasad Dhakephalkar for another petitioner argued that the BMC had taken a decision despite there being a large number of vegetarian population in the city. He remarked it was easier 'to appeal and convince Mughal emperor Akbar' to prohibit slaughter in Gujarat (in his times as mentioned in SC verdict) but it was difficult to convince the BMC and state government. The HC allowed petitioners to amend the pleas to challenge BMC's August 14 order and posted the hearing after two weeks.
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
Convince Mumbai civic body: High Court on Jain community's slaughterhouse ban plea
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday instructed a section of the Jain community, who sought a week-long ban on slaughterhouses in Mumbai during Paryushan Parva, to convince the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, Live Law reported. The BMC on August 14 ordered a two-day ban on slaughterhouses during the festival as demanded by the community.A division bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne also questioned if the community had any statutory right to seek such a ban during the entire Paryushan Parva, which will be celebrated from August festival promotes inner purification, fasting, austerity, and the cultivation of virtues, among others. "If it is left to us and people will listen to us we will ask everyone to be vegetarian. But the order needs to be within the four corners of law. We respect your sentiments but you need to convince the BMC," the bench to this, Senior Advocate Prasad Dhakephalkar, appearing for the Jain community, argued that it was easier to convince Emperor Akbar to close down the slaughterhouses than the BMC or the Maharashtra government."The community could easily persuade Emperor Akbar, who ordered the closure of slaughterhouses in Gujarat then. But it is really difficult to convince the Maharashtra Government and the BMC," Dhakephalkar argued."The civic body wrongly considered the total population of Mumbai. They must have considered the population of Jains in comparison only to non-vegetarians. They even counted vegetarians against the Jains. In fact, there is also Shravan going on in Maharashtra, so half the non-vegetarians aren't eating non-veg," he added to solidify the validity of the community's demand, while quoting the BMC commissioner's observations that the population of Jains in Mumbai was "too low".Advocate Abhinav Chandrachud, also appearing for the Jain community, cited Ahmedabad, saying the city has banned slaughterhouses for the entire duration of the the court seemed not convinced by the counsel of the community, stressing that they should rather convince the BMC. The also asked the Jains if there was a law in place which legitimised such a demand."The Ahmedabad case, there was a challenge which went up to the Supreme Court. But there has not been any legal right as such. No legally enforceable right has been created that they must close. There are no statutory provisions or even laws on this aspect. There is fundamental duty regarding compassion for animals etc. We understand that. But you tell us which law says that they must close it for all the 10 days. You must have a right which can be enforced through a court of law," the court court, nevertheless, issued a notice to the civic agency and the state government seeking their response to the plea, while assuring the petitioners that it would decide the issue for the next matter has been adjourned for two weeks.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
No HC relief for Jain community seeking closure of slaughter houses during 10-day festival
Bombay high court (File Photo) MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Wednesday refused to grant any relief to Jain community members seeking closure of slaughter houses in the city for 10 days during their Paryushan Parv festival. A bench of chief justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne said it respects the community's sentiments but questioned from where it derives the right to ask for slaughter houses to be kept shut for 10 days. The petitions had challenged an August 14 order passed by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) Commissioner allowing closure of slaughter houses only for two days. The civic body chief had reasoned that the population of the Jain community in the city was low. Paryushan Parv will be observed from August 20 to 27 by the Digambar community, and from August 21 to 28 by the Shwetambar community. The high court, while refusing to grant any relief, said no case was made out by the petitioners. "We respect your sentiments. But tell us from where do you derive the right to ask for slaughter houses to be closed for 10 days," the court asked. The court was informed by the BMC that at present the government has notified 16 days in the year during which slaughter houses would remain shut. The court said the petitions would have to be heard and issued notice to the BMC and state government and posted the matter for hearing after two weeks. The pleas had claimed that the Paryushan Parv festival highlights the significance of Ahimsa (non-violence) and hence slaughter during this sacred time would be detrimental to the cause of Jainism. The court was informed by the civic body that slaughter houses would be closed for two days - August 24 and 27. The same cannot be extended as the city's Deonar slaughter house does not cater only to Mumbai, but also to the entire Mumbai Metropolitan Region. Senior counsel Prasad Dhakephalkar, appearing for one of the petitioners, said in a lighter vein that it was easier for the Jain community to convince emperor Akbar to keep the slaughter houses closed during Paryushan. "Emperor Akbar had banned slaughter in Ahmedabad for six months. It was easy to convince emperor Akbar, but not the state government and the corporation," Dhakephalkar said.
