Hold polls to local bodies within three months: Telangana HC to government, SEC
Telangana High Court on Wednesday (June 25, 2025) directed the State government to conduct elections to local bodies within three months. Justice T. Madhavi Devi, pronouncing verdict in a batch of writ petitions filed by former sarpanches of six different village panchayats of the State, instructed the government to prepare the lists of voters and reservations for different categories like women and Backward Classes within a month from the date of receiving the judgement copy.
The judge also directed the State Election Commission (SEC) to convene the polls to local bodies within two months of receiving all the details pertaining to voters list and reservations.
The six sarpanches, whose terms expired towards the end of 2024, moved the High Court by way of writ petitions seeking a direction to hold elections to the village panchayats (rural local bodies) since their terms ended.
They contended that government appointed special officers in the place of sarpanches to perform duties relating to administrative and financial duties as their terms expired. This appointment of special officers was against the provisions of Panchayat Raj Act, they argued. They wanted the High Court either to extend their term or conduct the elections to local bodies immediately.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Muslim leaders meet Ajit Pawar over loudspeakers at mosques
Muslim leaders met with Maharashtra's Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar to voice concerns over the removal of loudspeakers from mosques. They alleged that police action was prompted by BJP leader Kirit Somaiya's demands, despite mosques adhering to permissible decibel limits set by the High Court. Pawar emphasized adherence to decibel limits and tasked the police to act on violations. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A group of Muslim leaders on Wednesday met Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar , complaining that police were removing loudspeakers from mosques in the state. NCP leader Nawab Malik told PTI that he, along with former AIMIM MLA Warris Pathan, his party legislator and daughter Sana Malik, Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Asim Azmi and others, called on team told the deputy CM that BJP leader Kirit Somaiya has been demanding the removal of loudspeakers from mosques, and police have started taking action on his said the public should follow permissible decibel limits set by the Bombay High Court , and the police should act if they are Muslim leaders said that police are removing loudspeakers despite mosques sticking to the decibel limits decided by the whose party is a partner of the BJP and Shiv Sena in the ruling Mahayuti alliance, said the permissible level for loudspeakers is 55 dB during the daytime and 45 dB at night. No loudspeakers are allowed between 10 pm and 6 am, he April, Somaiya had led a protest in Mumbai's Mulund area to press for the demand for the removal of illegal loudspeakers from certain mosques, saying they contributed to noise pollution.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Kerala High Court slams state for not enacting law to ban black magic, sorcery
The Kerala High Court expressed dissatisfaction with the state government's stance of not proceeding with the legislation to ban black magic, sorcery and other inhuman practices. The state told the High Court that it has decided not to pass such a law, and this decision was taken by the state cabinet— which means it is a policy its position, the government maintained that the court cannot issue a writ of mandamus compelling the enactment of such a law, as this falls within the domain of executive court's observation came during the hearing of a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Kerala Yukthi Vadhi Sangham, seeking the enactment of a specific law against black magic and sorcery — The Kerala Prevention of Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill, 2019. This Bill was originally recommended by a commission headed by Justice K.T. government also told the court it had decided not to implement the recommendations of the commission led by former Supreme Court judge Justice KT Thomas in 2019. The proposed legislation sought to ban all practices that result in bodily division bench, comprising Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji, however, asked the government to propose alternative measures to curb the spread of black magic and sorcery if it holds a similar view on the affidavit does not mention that the State has endorsed such practices and does not wish to eradicate the same,' the court noted, while questioning the state on its course of action regarding the bench remarked that taking such a stance when illegal practices continue to be carried out amounts to an implicit endorsement of those activities. It reiterated that while the legislature has the authority to decide on whether to frame laws, the High Court cannot issue a directive mandating such a move. Nevertheless, the court directed the government to file a detailed affidavit within three Yukthi Vadhi Sangham is an organisation that leads campaigns against black magic and other similar practices. The organisation had sought the enactment of 'The Kerala Prevention of Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill 2019'.The matter will be heard again on July 15.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Kerala
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
'God Knows Who Is Still Languishing In Jails': Supreme Court Raps UP Police
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday reprimanded Uttar Pradesh Police for failing to ensure that persons granted bail by a court of law, including itself, were not promptly released. The top court directed PC Meena, the Director-General (Personnel) of UP Police to conduct a statewide video conference with officers to ensure the court's orders on bail are not countered by 'vested interest' masquerading as 'nit-picking' of the instructions to release someone. The top court also directed the UP government to pay Rs 5 lakh as compensation to a man it had granted bail on May 27 but was not released till an irate court intervened Tuesday. Suspecting 'vested interests' in keeping the man jailed, the Supreme Court also ordered a judicial inquiry by the Principal District and Sessions Judge of Ghaziabad. Officers found to be at fault will be fined Rs 5 lakh, the court warned. Reports of the inquiry and confirming compliance are expected by Friday, the court said. Expressing serious concern over people being forcibly jailed in UP despite court orders for their release, the bench of Justice KV Vishwanathan and Justice NK Singh hauled up the state's police force for denying individuals their fundamental right to liberty. "Nit-picking of court orders to deny bail amounts to a serious dereliction of duty," the Supreme Court warned state officials. Mr Meena and other senior officers had been summoned as the Supreme Court heard a petition by a man called Aftab, who was denied release from Ghaizabad Jail despite securing bail. He told the top court he had been detained for 28 days, a delay the authorities claimed before the court was due to a 'clerical error' in sections of the bail and release orders. The court, though, batted away the claim, saying personal liberty could not be denied by 'useless technicalities and irrelevant errors', and asked the police to not repeat such mistakes. "God knows how many persons are languishing in UP jails like this... Sensitise your officers by Friday... via video conference... to ensure no person enlarged by a court should be in jail..." The bench also warned the police of further action if the 'vested interests' are revealed. Mr Meena assured the court he would conduct the VC immediately, and told the court there are as many as 90,000 people in jails across the state, as of June 24. Earlier, senior counsel Garima Prasad, appearing for the state government, told the court 'certain apprehensions' about a bail order, and the resulting delay, were not deliberate. In the Aftab case, he pointed out, the police sent the order back to a lower court, on the same day the Supreme Court ordered his release, for a clarification. The delay, therefore, was from the lower court, he declared. But Justice Vishwanathan was unimpressed. Warning that he would increase the compensation ordered to Rs 10 lakh, he asked, "Is 'sub section not mentioned' a valid ground to be taken by officers manning our prisons?" The bench pointed out the fact the authorities knew what the 'error' with the subsection was, but still failed to release Aftab for nearly a month.
