logo
Albo keeps mum on big China question

Albo keeps mum on big China question

Perth Now5 hours ago

Anthony Albanese says Australia will 'continue to play an important role in the Pacific' but has stopped short of committing to Taiwan's defence.
The US earlier this month warned China was looking to move on the democratically self-governed island by 2027.
Aside from torching the decades-long status quo, such a move would deal a major blow to global supply of semiconductors – crucial components in modern tech – and massively disrupt vital trade routes.
The Prime Minister was on Monday (AEST) quizzed on how Australia would respond to an escalation in the Indo-Pacific ahead of his meeting with Donald Trump at the G7 summit in Canada this week.
Mr Albanese said Australia was committed to 'peace and security in the region'. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Australia will 'play an important role in the Pacific' but has stopped short of committing to Taiwan's defence. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
'That's what we want and Australia is a trusted partner to promote peace and security in our region,' he told reporters in Calgary.
'We have been so forever. If you look at the role that Australia has played, we'll continue to play an important role in the Pacific.'
Mr Albanese pointed to his stop in Fiji as 'a reminder of the fact that Australia is a trusted partner in the Pacific'.
'What that does is to add to security in our region,' he said.
'That is our job. That is what we do and we all want to see that advanced.'
The Trump administration has been calling on Canberra to hike defence spending in response to China – a call the Albanese government has firmly pushed back on.
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth earlier this month warned Beijing posed an 'imminent' threat.
'Let me be clear, any attempt by Communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world,' Mr Hegseth told the Shangri La Dialogue.
'There's no reason to sugar-coat it. The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent.
'We hope not but certainly could be.'
He raised Australia's defence spending in a one-on-one with Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the conference, saying it 'should' be 3.5 per cent of GDP.
In a read out, the US Embassy said the two senior officials 'discussed aligning investment to the security environment in the Indo-Pacific, accelerating US force posture initiatives in Australia, advancing defence industrial base co-operation, and creating supply chain resilience'.
'On defence spending, Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP as soon as possible,' the embassy said.
Australia's closest allies, including the UK, have committed to dramatically ramping up defence to at least 3 per cent, making the Albanese government a clear outlier.
Mr Marles, who also serves as defence minister, again pushed back against Washington's request on Monday.
He insisted Australia has been 'spending more on defence' under Labor.
'We have engaged in the last couple of years in the biggest peacetime increase in defence spending in Australia's history,' Mr Marles told the ABC.
'And that has been a function of the very complex strategic landscape that we face.
'In many ways, the threatening strategic landscape that we face.'
He repeated Mr Albanese's lines that Labor would 'assess our strategic landscape, what are our needs, what's our national interest and then resource it'.
'I mean what we inherited obviously was a defence establishment which wasn't in great shape from the Coalition,' Mr Marles said.
'What we've given to it is strategic clarity.
'We have reprioritised tens of billions of dollars of expenditure but what we've also done is increased spending on defence in order to resource our needs, and we'll continue the process of assessing that and where there is a need resourcing it.'
Labor has committed tens of billions more to defence since coming to power, but much of the funds are tied up in long-term projects, such as AUKUS.
The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) report warned late last month Australia must boost its immediate readiness to go to war or risk having a 'paper ADF'.
ASPI said that while Labor was spending on longer-term projects it was not pumping nearly enough cash into keeping Australia combat-ready in the near term.
The report, authored by former Home Affairs deputy secretary Marc Ablong, called for 'defence funding to be increased to reflect the reality of the threats facing Australia'.
It said that while the Albanese government 'claims to have made a 'generational investment in Australia's defence', that investment has been put off for another generation', pointing out that the bulk of the billions pledged by Labor would not kick in until after 2029.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Albanese meeting may decide future of US security ties: Peta Credlin
Trump-Albanese meeting may decide future of US security ties: Peta Credlin

Sky News AU

time13 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Trump-Albanese meeting may decide future of US security ties: Peta Credlin

Sky News host Peta Credlin discusses the upcoming meeting between Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and US President Donald Trump, warning that Australia's security partnership with the US is 'at stake'. 'It's not over-dramatising things to say that it's not just the AUKUS nuclear deal which will be potentially at stake, but the entire US security partnership, our ANZUS foundation, that's at the heart of our defence and foreign policy and has been for seven decades,' Ms Credlin said. 'It's true our defence spending will glacially move up to 2.3 per cent of GDP in a decade's time … but that spending, the 2.3, is way, way too low. 'Whatever soothing words might emerge from the encounter between Trump and Albanese … it's hard to imagine the President not reiterating the 3.5 per cent demand, with his typical emphasis.'

Super funds are not a piggy bank for Labor's pet projects
Super funds are not a piggy bank for Labor's pet projects

AU Financial Review

timean hour ago

  • AU Financial Review

Super funds are not a piggy bank for Labor's pet projects

The Australian Financial Review has been a consistent critic of the Albanese government's predilection to use the nation's $4.2 trillion compulsory retirement savings system as a vehicle to deliver on its policy ambitions. In his first term, Treasurer Jim Chalmers conscripted both the superannuation industry and Australia's A$307 billion Future Fund to prioritise national interest investments in residential housing, renewable energy and infrastructure projects. It marked the first time a federal government had prescribed specific asset classes for superannuation funds to consider.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store