logo
Global Semiconductor Forum Highlights Democratic Cooperation to Strengthen Supply Chain Resilience

Global Semiconductor Forum Highlights Democratic Cooperation to Strengthen Supply Chain Resilience

Yahoo23-05-2025

Photo
TAIPEI, Taiwan, May 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- To address rising geopolitical risks and global supply chain shifts, the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) hosted the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain Partnership Forum in Taipei on May 23. In line with the government's initiative on semiconductor supply chain partnerships for global democracies, the forum explored supply chain security, global collaboration, and technological complementarity under the themes of Innovation, Security, Resilience, and Prosperity. The event brought together over 700 industry leaders and government officials, including representatives from foreign trade offices in Taiwan.
President Lai Ching-te stated that in the face of challenges such as dumping practices, global democracies must work together, leveraging their respective strengths to ensure a resilient semiconductor supply chain. Taiwan, he said, is ready to serve as a key pillar of technological development in the AI era. The government is promoting supportive policies, offering financial and tax incentives, and building data centers and supercomputers to advance industrial innovation.
Minister of Economic Affairs Jyh-Huei Kuo emphasized Taiwan's pivotal role in the global semiconductor ecosystem. The Ministry is encouraging global supply chain partners to invest, co-develop the value chain, and explore emerging markets. Taiwan, he noted, will also work with like-minded democracies to establish credible, self-regulating market mechanisms that safeguard trusted supply chains. The Ministry will further advance cross-border talent initiatives to link Taiwan's strong semiconductor workforce with the world and boost the competitiveness of democratic supply chain partners.
'Semiconductors are now a core strategic asset in global economic and technological competition, requiring deeply interdependent supply chains,' said ITRI President Edwin Liu. 'ITRI will focus on potential niche markets, drive key technology development, and strengthen global partnerships to enhance supply chain transparency, cybersecurity, and adaptability. We will work closely with partners worldwide—from materials and manufacturing to talent development—to explore innovation and 'blue ocean' opportunities. Our goal is to build an open, inclusive semiconductor ecosystem where all partners can create value and share in the success.'
'The United States and Taiwan share a long-standing, symbiotic relationship in the high-tech sector with semiconductors at its core,' said Jeremy Cornforth, Deputy Director at American Institute in Taiwan. He emphasized the growing two-way investment, joint efforts to strengthen supply chain resilience and technology security, and a shared commitment to building a strong and innovative global semiconductor ecosystem.
Kazuyuki Katayama, Chief Representative of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association, noted that a resilient semiconductor supply chain requires comprehensive global collaboration—drawing on Japan and Europe's materials and equipment, the U.S.'s design, and Taiwan's manufacturing—to ensure both business success and economic security.
Lutz Güllner, Head of the European Economic and Trade Office, emphasized that the EU is working closely with like-minded partners to strengthen resilient and secure semiconductor supply chains and to build robust AI infrastructure. Taiwan is a key and trusted partner in this endeavor. With TSMC's investment in Germany and growing cooperation between Foxconn and European firms in the semiconductor and space industries, the EU is committed to deepening its engagement with Taiwan.
Ruth Bradley-Jones, Representative at British Office Taipei, said, 'Collaboration is at the heart of advancing and securing semiconductor and AI supply chains. The UK will continue to forge partnerships, both in pursuit of advancing semiconductor and AI innovation, and in pursuit of the policy and regulatory frameworks that underpin resilient and diversified global supply chains.'
Matthijs van der Hoorn, Deputy Representative at the Netherlands Office Taipei, noted, 'The semiconductor industry is inherently global, and no country can address its challenges alone. As a key player in the global value chain, the Netherlands is committed to working with governments, businesses, and research institutions to jointly build a resilient, reliable, and sustainable chain.'
Akira Amari, Honorary Chair of Japan's Parliamentary Association for Semiconductor Strategy, stated that the Japan-Taiwan alliance should serve as a starting point for like-minded countries to jointly build a resilient semiconductor supply chain, from design to manufacturing, to mitigate economic security risks and ensure stable global industrial development.
The forum focused on Taiwan's strategies to enhance semiconductor supply chain resilience. The first panel emphasized the importance of alliances, markets, and talent, calling for deeper collaboration with like-minded countries, increased investment in Taiwan, and the development of derisking mechanisms and talent networks. The second panel explored challenges in advanced and mature process technologies as well as efforts to cultivate industry-ready talent at all educational levels. The third panel addressed the need for value-based alliances and the advancement of mid- to high-end process technologies amid supply chain restructuring and regionalization.
About ITRIIndustrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) is one of the world's leading technology R&D institutions aiming to innovate a better future for society. Founded in 1973, ITRI has played a vital role in transforming Taiwan's industries from labor-intensive into innovation-driven. To address market needs and global trends, it has launched its 2035 Technology Strategy and Roadmap that focuses on innovation development in Smart Living, Quality Health, Sustainable Environment, and Resilient Society.
Over the years, ITRI has been dedicated to incubating startups and spinoffs, including well-known names such as UMC and TSMC. In addition to its headquarters in Taiwan, ITRI has branch offices in the U.S., Germany, Japan, and Thailand in an effort to extend its R&D scope and promote international cooperation across the globe. For more information, please visit https://www.itri.org/eng.
Media ContactAnnie Wu Office of Marketing Communications, ITRI +886-3-591-8406 aiyunwu@itri.org.tw
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/62190032-b790-4b3b-b4b4-383571de08c2Sign in to access your portfolio

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2 High-Growth Stocks to Buy and Hold for Great Long-Term Potential
2 High-Growth Stocks to Buy and Hold for Great Long-Term Potential

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

2 High-Growth Stocks to Buy and Hold for Great Long-Term Potential

CoreWeave is a promising stock to use to profit from the growing investment in AI infrastructure services. Axon stock recently hit new highs as it continues to report growing demand for its public safety solutions. 10 stocks we like better than CoreWeave › Investing in fast-growing companies that still have a large opportunity ahead for their products can help you build wealth. Artificial intelligence (AI) and public safety are promising industries to look for investments in 2025. Here are two stocks to ride these megatrends. AI is expected to add trillions in value to the economy over the long term, but this first requires substantial investment in data centers specially designed to handle AI computing workloads. CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV) is a leader in offering AI infrastructure through the cloud for training models and other advanced workloads at scale. CoreWeave's revenue has exploded over the last year, growing from $189 million in Q1 2024 to $982 million in Q1 2025. Management expects 2025 revenue to be between $4.9 billion to $5.1 billion. For a long-term investor, CoreWeave is a unique stock with which to ride the growth of AI. It earns revenue through multiyear contracts or on-demand services, but most of its revenue is through committed contracts. This business model instills steady revenue and growing cash flows over time. The business is in the process of investing in technology to meet growing demand for its services. It reported a loss of $314 million last quarter. This mostly reflects the high upfront investment it's making in infrastructure, such as Nvidia's graphics processing units (GPUs), to offer its AI cloud platform to customers. However, CoreWeave is already showing the potential to be a very profitable business down the road. In Q1, its adjusted operating income increased 17% year over year to $163 million. But until it achieves higher margins, investors should expect the stock to be volatile. This is a world-class AI infrastructure provider that is trading at a price-to-sales multiple of 13 based on management's 2025 guidance. This is based on the company's current market cap (share price times shares outstanding) of $64 billion. Investors buying around this valuation can still expect to earn excellent returns over the next several years. Axon Enterprise (NASDAQ: AXON) (formerly Taser International) started over 30 years ago selling its Taser energy devices for law enforcement and self-defense. In recent years, the company has transformed into a services company with software solutions. This has grown its addressable market to an estimated $129 billion. Axon offers cloud-based evidence gathering software and body cameras, which has transformed the business from a device seller to a comprehensive solutions provider for public safety. Revenue from software and services grew 39% year over year to $263 million last quarter. Taser devices remain a key growth driver for the company. Since launching a few years ago, Taser 10 orders are growing twice as fast as the adoption of Taser 7. This indicates an expanding market for its products, which is a great sign for investors buying shares today. Axon's total revenue grew 31% year over year last quarter to $604 million. Axon is also benefiting from strong demand for Draft One, a service that uses AI to automatically fill out data entries and police reports. It saves hours of time from manual work, which has made it the fastest-growing software offering in Axon's history. Taser is potentially vulnerable to risks that investors should be aware of. It generates some revenue from government contracts, making it susceptible to spending cuts and higher compliance costs that could pressure its profit margin. It could also face public backlash and resistance from privacy concerns over its body camera products. But Axon's history shows that the need for enhanced public safety tools continues to grow. The stock surged to new highs following its first-quarter earnings report, which can be taken as a bullish signal on the company's future. Before you buy stock in CoreWeave, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and CoreWeave wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Ballard has positions in CoreWeave and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Axon Enterprise and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 High-Growth Stocks to Buy and Hold for Great Long-Term Potential was originally published by The Motley Fool

Feeling The Strain: A Real-World Guide To Leading In Polarized Times
Feeling The Strain: A Real-World Guide To Leading In Polarized Times

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Feeling The Strain: A Real-World Guide To Leading In Polarized Times

The referee stands in the middle of the rope of the tug-of-war If you're a manager today, you've probably felt it. One group pushes for change. Another cautions against it. You're expected to move fast and be careful. Lead boldly and listen closely. Protect what works while building what's next. That stretch you're feeling? It's not confusion. It's polarity. And it's baked into your job. You're not just holding workplace tensions. You're leading in a world defined by them—competing ideologies, global instability, and rising economic divides. The stakes are bigger than ever. So is the strain. On one side are the people who lean toward caution. They worry about risk. They want to hold the line until things feel safer. These are your Stabilizers. On the other side are those who lean into possibility. They think three steps ahead. They want to move, explore, expand. These are your Amplifiers. They're not enemies. But they are opposites. Their instincts pull in different directions. And you're in the middle. Feeling the rope tighten. Trying not to snap. Imagine a leadership meeting around a new AI rollout. The Amplifiers are already drawing up a roadmap. They see market edge, scale, intelligence. Then a Stabilizer speaks up: 'What if the training data is flawed? We're about to automate decisions we haven't even validated.' The room stiffens. The moment turns. It's not sabotage. It's stewardship. One side pushes for momentum. The other pulls for stability. Both are trying to help. And the friction is not a threat. It's the force that can shape something better. When that tension is visible and held (either not ignored or shut down), it leads to better outcomes. Amplifiers get grounded. Stabilizers get curious. And the team builds something neither could create alone. This isn't dysfunction. It's design. And it shows up everywhere. You're not managing one contradiction. You're holding many at once. You might even have your own preferences. But your role is not to choose a side. It's to hold the whole. According to Gallup, managers are more burned out than the people they lead. They work longer hours, face more interruptions, and navigate more emotional complexity. Nearly half say they deal with multiple, competing priorities every day. Even high-performing managers describe their work as reactive and fragmented. Almost a third report that job demands interfere with their personal life. This isn't just pressure. It's polarity overload. You're not failing. You're absorbing complexity the system doesn't know how to hold. A polarity isn't a problem to solve. It's a tension to manage — a concept introduced by Barry Johnson, who studied how leaders must navigate interdependent forces that are both necessary and enduring. These are not either-or choices. They are both-and dynamics that must be balanced over time. Stability brings structure, clarity, and risk management. But overused, it becomes inertia. Amplification brings speed, energy, and possibility. But left unchecked, it becomes chaos. Polarity is what keeps the system alive. And once you name it, you can lead it. If you've ever felt torn between team voices, now you know why. Both instincts matter. Both are incomplete alone. There's been a surge of interest in Both/And thinking as a way to move past binary decisions. At its best, it helps leaders widen their lens and hold complexity without collapsing into either-or debates. But in a multipolar world filled with contradictions, disruption, and high-stakes decisions, just saying Both/And is no longer enough. It risks becoming a conceptual shortcut. A way to simulate harmony without doing the harder work of tension-holding. A way to appease competing voices while avoiding discomfort. And a way to look thoughtful without being decisive. This is where Amplifiers and Stabilizers offer something more real—and more difficult. Each brings not just a perspective, but conviction. They don't arrive with neutral input. They arrive with stakes. What feels urgent to one feels reckless to the other. What feels responsible to one feels resistant to the other. So while Both/And can help name the polarity, it can't hold the pull. Amplifiers and Stabilizers aren't the problem. They're the gift. Each brings something essential. That's why Both/And thinking gained traction—it encouraged leaders to honor opposing instincts rather than silence one side. But the real work isn't just naming both. It's feeling the force between them. It's engaging with the discomfort. It's choosing—not to flatten the tension, but to lead through it. Change leadership is not about finding the easiest middle path. It's about staying with the mess. Not resolving every tension, but recognizing what each side is trying to protect—and what both might be missing. Diplomacy and negotiation will only take you so far. Eventually, leaders must engage with the tug itself. They must absorb the discomfort of multiple truths and still move toward strategy. This is not a rejection of Both/And. It's a refusal to stop at its surface. Let's go back to that AI rollout conversation. The Amplifiers are energized. Then a Stabilizer voices concerns. This is where a Both/And response might try to smooth it over: 'Let's honor both sides.' But honoring both sides isn't enough. Leading through the tension might sound like this: 'I'm hearing two things that matter. One is the momentum we don't want to lose. The other is a risk we can't afford to overlook. We're being pulled between two important truths. So before we move forward, let's break it down.' 'Let's articulate what edge we're chasing. What's the gain, by when? 'But let's not stop there —what assumptions are we making? Where's the data risk?' 'Let's time-box this. What's a pilot that gives us real motion, but still tests the foundation?' 'We're not resolving the tension—we're engaging with it. We'll reconvene next week with a scoped plan that reflects both ambition and caution.' That's not conceptual Both/And. That's leadership in polarity. Not smoothing, not splitting—but stretching. And it's the kind of leadership our world demands now. The future will not be led by those who explain complexity away. It will be shaped by those who can feel it fully and still lead forward. Don't just balance the tension. Learn from it. Frayed rope about to break concept for stress, problem, fragility or precarious business situation Decision-Making: Stabilizers want to pause. Amplifiers want to leap. Neither is wrong. Try this: Information Flow: Stabilizers protect accuracy. Amplifiers circulate ideas early to test energy. Try this: Coaching and Development: Stabilizers need certainty before they stretch. Amplifiers need stretch before they commit. Try this: Execution: Stabilizers want detailed plans. Amplifiers crave long-term vision. They're both right. They're just tuned to different frequencies. Try this: Change doesn't fail because people speak up. It fails when they stop trying. Friction isn't dysfunction. It's fuel. What looks like harmony is often disengagement. When people don't feel safe to disagree, they opt out. You don't have to eliminate the tension. You have to lead through it. If you feel pulled apart, that doesn't mean you're lost. It means you're in the middle of the work. Sometimes the Amplifiers will move first. Other times, the Stabilizers will steady the ground. That's not a failure to decide. That's wisdom in motion. The goal isn't to pick a side. The goal is to stay in the game. Tug of war isn't about dragging one side across the line. It's about noticing the tension, where it pulls, where it holds, and using that awareness to shape the path forward. You don't lead change by ending the tension. You lead by holding it well. Not by pulling harder, but by holding smarter. So hold the rope. Feel the strain. Let both sides speak. And ask yourself: What polarities are you holding right now, and how might you hold them better?

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says AI could replace interns — but there's still hope for Gen Z
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says AI could replace interns — but there's still hope for Gen Z

Tom's Guide

timean hour ago

  • Tom's Guide

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says AI could replace interns — but there's still hope for Gen Z

Entry-level jobs as we know them could soon be a thing of the past. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says AI can now effectively do the same work as junior-level employees, and its skillset is only expected to get even better in the coming months. He predicted that AI will eventually rival the skills of even an experienced engineer, all while being uniquely capable of operating continuously for days on end without breaks. 'Today [AI] is like an intern that can work for a couple of hours but at some point it'll be like an experienced software engineer that can work for a couple of days,' Altman told a panel this week alongside Snowflake CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy at Snowflake Summit 2025. Altman added that in the next year, we could see AI solving complex business problems autonomously. 'I would bet next year that in some limited cases, at least in some small ways, we start to see agents that can help us discover new knowledge, or can figure out solutions to business problems that are very non-trivial," he said. It's a bold prediction we've heard echoed by other tech CEOs like Nvidia's Jensen Huang, who warned that those who hesitate to embrace AI may find themselves at the unemployment office. 'You're not going to lose your job to an AI, but you're going to lose your job to someone who uses AI," he said at last month's Milken Institute conference. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Generative AI stands poised to make entry-level jobs obsolete at a time when Generation Z is solidifying its place in the workforce, but that hasn't stopped Gen Z from embracing the technology. A recent Resume survey found that while one in 10 workers reported using ChatGPT regularly, Gen Z workers were twice as likely to use the tool. The same study found that the vast majority of workers at any age see ChatGPT as a helpful tool. But over half of Gen Z workers considered it the equivalent of another co-worker or assistant, compared to 40% of millennials and 35% of older generations. Altman has broken down the generational differences in AI usage before: '[It's a] gross oversimplification, but like older people use ChatGPT as a Google replacement. Maybe people in their twenties and thirties use it as like a life advisor, and then, like people in college use it as an operating system,' he said at Sequoia Capital's AI Ascent event in May. Even as Gen Z embraces AI, some tech leaders have been sounding the alarm bells about the economic fallout of an AI-driven job market. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently told Axios that AI could wipe out half of all entry-level white collar jobs, causing unemployment to skyrocket by 10% to 20%. OpenAI owns ChatGPT, a revolutionary chatbot AI that, since its release in 2022, has quickly become one of the most advanced and widely used AI tools in the world. Powered by OpenAI's latest model, GPT-4o, ChatGPT can help you plan your weekend, write a term paper, or any number of other tasks. It supports everything from real-time speech interaction to multimodal content creation — and you can get many of its most powerful features for free. If you're curious, be sure to check out our guide on how to use ChatGPT, as well as these tips to get the most out of ChatGPT.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store