logo
South Africa Rebukes US Over ‘Deeply Flawed' Human Rights Report

South Africa Rebukes US Over ‘Deeply Flawed' Human Rights Report

Bloomberg2 days ago
South Africa's government slammed a report published by US President Donald Trump's administration that said the human-rights situation in the African nation 'significantly worsened' last year.
The review published by the State Department late on Tuesday echoed some of Trump's criticisms of the country, including Pretoria's adoption of a land-expropriation policy. It also raised concern about alleged extra-judicial killings and repression of racial minorities.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DOE Announces 11 Selections for New Nuclear Reactor Pilot Program
DOE Announces 11 Selections for New Nuclear Reactor Pilot Program

Epoch Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Epoch Times

DOE Announces 11 Selections for New Nuclear Reactor Pilot Program

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has identified 11 projects that will receive federal support in advancing 'first mover' nuclear energy technologies under the Energy Reactor Pilot Program authorized by President Donald Trump in May. 'President Trump's Reactor Pilot Program is a call to action,' DOE Deputy Secretary James Danly said in an Aug. 12 announcement. 'These companies aim to all safely achieve 'criticality' by Independence Day [July 4, 2026], and DOE will do everything we can to support their efforts.'

The great talkathon: Could SA's National Dialogue risk becoming just more noise?
The great talkathon: Could SA's National Dialogue risk becoming just more noise?

News24

time30 minutes ago

  • News24

The great talkathon: Could SA's National Dialogue risk becoming just more noise?

EDITORIAL: The great talkathon: Could SA's National Dialogue risk becoming just more noise? South Africans are not afraid to speak out about the challenges facing their country. The airwaves are filled with concerned voices, or citizens choose the route of protest action. They've also had opportunities to attend imbizos or engage with the National Council of Provinces' initiative, Taking Parliament to the People. While South Africans are eager to participate in initiatives aimed at addressing the country's issues, trust in public institutions – a cornerstone of any functioning democracy – is steadily declining. This erosion of trust is exacerbated by the recurring pattern of countless inquiries being launched, their reports left to gather dust, with little to no action taken, despite recommendations being made that politicians face prosecution. A pressing question is whether the much-anticipated National Dialogue will turn out to be another costly tick-box exercise, yielding no tangible results. Many share this fear. In this week's edition of Friday Briefing, we explore both sides of the debate on whether a National Dialogue is the appropriate step forward for the country. Independent analyst Ebrahim Fakir argues against the concept, stating that while a National Dialogue may create a sense of unity and optimism, it fails to address the deeper issues of state capacity, policy incoherence, and lack of political will. National Dialogue co-convenor Tinyiko Maluleke offers another perspective, telling in-depth writer Muhammad Hussain that he believes it is a credible process and that its credibility can only increase. We also have input from Cosatu general secretary, Solly Phetoe, and reflect on the views of Maluleke, Nombiniso Gasa and Bheki Ntshalintshali, who are all members of the Eminent Persons Group. You can read these full submissions below. Dialogue, distraction or deception? Ordinarily, one should never silence or dissuade anyone from talking in a democracy, unless they are propagating violence or promoting hate. But there are instances in which it is wise to ask people to stop talking, especially if talking is a distraction and a waste of time and money, writes Ebrahim Fakir. Read the the rest of the article here. Q&A with Tinyiko Maluleke | 'We are the guarantors of the National Dialogue's credibility' Professor Tinyiko Maluleke, who is the co-chair together with Roelf Meyer of the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) for the National Dialogue, responds to concerns about the dialogue's implementation challenges and explains the group's role in ensuring credibility. Read the rest of the article here. SA's triple crisis: Can National Dialogue fix jobs, graft and division? With 72% youth unemployment tearing the country apart and fake news fueling racial hatred, President Cyril Ramaphosa's National Dialogue is South Africa's last chance to force government, business, and citizens into a brutal reckoning with decades of failed promises, writes Solly Phetoe. Read the rest of the article here. GCIS Why the National Dialogue is still credible - EPG As the reputations of many of the EPG are on line, the group has this week defended the process to the hilt - which is its mandate. We ask some of the eminent persons when will risking your reputation be too much, especially with major warning signs of a credibility and legitimacy crisis. Read the rest of the article here. Show Comments ()

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store