12 year old faces legal reckoning after tragic joyride ends in fatality
A 14-year-old pedestrian tragically lost his life in Brakpan after being struck by a Mazda allegedly driven by a 12-year-old boy.
A 12-year-old boy is in police custody after a fatal joyride ended in the death of 14-year-old Malcolm Booysens, sending shockwaves through the local community and raising difficult legal and ethical questions about how the justice system should handle such a young offender.
The incident took place over the weekend in a residential area near the boy's home. According to police reports, the 12-year-old managed to access the keys to a family vehicle and took it for an unauthorised drive.
During the reckless outing, he reportedly lost control of the vehicle and struck Booysens, who was walking nearby. The impact killed the 14-year-old at the scene.
Witnesses described a chaotic and heartbreaking scene.
'We just heard a loud crash and people screaming. When we got there, the boy was lying motionless,' said one resident.
'He was just a child. They both are.'
Authorities have confirmed that the driver is being held at a juvenile detention facility while investigations continue. Police have not yet released the identity of the accused due to his age, but the case is expected to proceed through the juvenile justice system. A preliminary court appearance is scheduled for later this week.
Legal experts say the case poses a complex challenge. While the death of Booysens demands accountability, the legal system must also consider the age and psychological development of the accused.
South African law allows for children under the age of 14 to be held criminally liable if it can be proven that they understood the consequences of their actions at the time of the offence.
'This is a tragic and sensitive case.
''On one hand, a young life has been lost. On the other hand, we are dealing with a child who likely didn't fully grasp the danger or responsibility that comes with driving a car,' said legal analyst Amanda Fortuin.
'Ultimately, the court will have to weigh justice for the victim's family with the potential for rehabilitation of the accused.'Community members have responded with a mixture of grief, anger, and confusion. Some have called for stricter controls around car access and greater parental responsibility, while others are urging compassion for the 12-year-old and a focus on restorative justice.
'The community is mourning. It's hard to make sense of this kind of loss,' said Reverend Sipho Madonsela, a local pastor who has been supporting both families. 'We must find a path forward that honours Malcolm's life without permanently destroying another.'
The case has also reignited debates about youth crime, parental supervision, and the capacity of the justice system to address juvenile offences without deepening cycles of trauma and incarceration. For now, both families remain in anguish.
Malcolm Booysens' funeral is expected to take place later this week, with friends, family, and classmates preparing to say goodbye to a teenager whose life was cut tragically short.
As the legal process unfolds, the nation watches closely, grappling with the difficult reality that justice is not always clear-cut, especially when children are involved on both sides of a tragedy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Loaded for Bear: African Parks has disgracefully sent more SA rhinos to repressive Rwanda
Much of Africa's wildlife lies within the borders of states with questionable governance or human rights records. But some lines can be drawn in the sand. The Kigali regime stands out for the sheer scale of its repression and the regional instability it has unleashed. Many conservation groups in Africa have a human rights problem. Pointedly, they often stand accused of being more concerned about the plight of Africa's animals than that of its people. This perception has been further entrenched by African Parks' announcement this week that it has just translocated another 70 white rhinos from South Africa to Rwanda – a sinister state that has been credibly linked to the killing of dissidents on South African soil. When African Parks, a Johannesburg-based NGO, announced in 2021 that it had relocated 30 white rhinos to Rwanda's Akagera National Park, I criticised it at the time in this publication, noting that those rhinos would be safer than the country's dissidents. That observation still holds and, if anything, Rwanda under the autocratic rule of Paul Kagame has become even more of a pariah state with its documented support for the M23 rebels in neighbouring DRC. The diabolical nature of the Rwandan regime under Kagame has been clinically dissected in veteran journalist Michela Wrong's troubling 2021 book, Do Not Disturb: The Story of a Political Murder and an African Regime Gone Bad. 'Do Not Disturb' was the sign placed on the room door at the posh Sandton Hotel where Patrick Karegeya, once Rwanda's head of external intelligence, was found murdered more than a decade ago. But what's the murder of a dissident or two or three – or a dozen for that matter – between friends? African Parks sees no issue with shaking hands with the devil if it advances its conservation agenda – which is disturbing. 'In 2021, African Parks moved 30 southern white rhinos to Akagera National Park. This initial population has increased to 41 animals today. Building on this success, the additional 70 animals will now play a crucial role in ensuring the presence of meta-populations across the continent, presenting opportunities for future range expansion,' African Parks said. It's all about the animals! It's like African Parks is living in a bubble, completely disconnected from the odious nature of the state it has chosen as a conservation partner. But that's perhaps not surprising, given the NGO's track record elsewhere in Africa. Last month it acknowledged that some of its eco-rangers had committed human rights abuses against the Baka community in Odzala-Kokoua National Park, Republic of Congo, based on the findings of an independent investigation it had commissioned to probe the allegations. 'African Parks acknowledges that, in some incidents, human rights abuses have occurred, and we deeply regret the pain and suffering caused to the victims. There is no place for any form of abuse in the name of conservation,' it said. There may be 'no place' for this kind of abuse 'in the name of conservation'. But if the state you have chosen to host a rhino conservation project is a serial human rights abuser, there is nothing to see here, folks. The rhinos will be fine! What will grab the headlines is that this is the largest translocation of its kind. African Parks has also been involved in a previous megafauna translocation which was billed as the 'largest of its kind'. In July 2022, 263 elephants were moved from Liwonde National Park in southern Malawi to Kasungu National Park, which borders Zambia along a frontier which has no fence. African Parks has since distanced itself from this project, but it certainly claimed some of the credit at the time. As I reported from the Zambian side of the park in 2024, this misconceived translocation has transformed the landscape into one of fear and loathing for the poor rural people who live there. Human-wildlife conflict is raging there, with a mounting death toll among both people and elephants. The big critters that have just been moved to Rwanda come from the 2,000-strong herd that African Parks bought in 2023 from rhino tycoon John Hume. Largely because of the efforts of the private sector, South Africa has enough rhinos for 'rewilding' efforts elsewhere, which broadly aim to restore wildlife populations to former ranges. Rwanda, by the way, is not a former white rhino range state. It is indeed the case that much of Africa's wildlife lies within the borders of states with questionable governance or human rights records. I recently covered first-hand the translocation of South African cheetahs to Mozambique, where last year's elections were hotly disputed, sparking nationwide protests. And let's face it, the ruling Frelimo party has followed other African liberation movements down the well-trodden path of corruption and misrule. But some lines can be drawn in the sand. Mountain gorillas, for example, are only found in Rwanda and neighbouring Uganda and the DRC, and so conservation efforts for this species need to be focused in those countries, regardless of the governments in power. That is not the case with white rhinos. There are plenty of other African countries where they can be translocated to and protected. The Kigali government stands out for the sheer scale of its repression and the regional instability it has unleashed. And Kagame has an instinctive understanding of what is important to the West. The rhino project comes with the prestige he craves, adding another layer of legitimacy to his regime – which does keep the streets of Kigali clean. Kagame got 99% of the vote in Rwanda's 2024 elections and unlike in Mozambique, no one was going to raise an eyebrow about that result, let alone lead a protest in the streets.
The South African
8 hours ago
- The South African
Influencer facing animal charges after mocking SPCA's dog rescue
The influencer whose TikTok video featured an emaciated dog is facing animal cruelty charges from the SPCA. Johannesburg content creator Sasha Tshiamo is accused of mocking the NGO's plight to rescue the animal, who has been affectionately nicknamed 'Bobby.' This week, a starving Bobby was rescued and removed from her home by investigators after South Africans – and the SPCA – were moved by her shocking living conditions. She is now on the path to recovery. According to reports, influencer Sasha Tshiamo has been accused of mocking the dog featured in her viral TikTok video. The content creator also made light of a national search and reward for the dog's location. Under her posts, Sasha laughed off comments calling for 'Justice for Bobby.' She also reposted a skit from another content creator who was amused by the viral incident. 'Now, she will be facing charges in terms of the Animal Protection Act, while Bobby walked out victorious against her cruelty,' the SPCA told the media. In a follow-up TikTok video, Sasha claimed that Bobby is not her dog, and 'not my responsibility'. She also claimed that social media users had 'done me dirty' in their criticism of her. The dog's owners will also face animal cruelty charges. @ ♬ original sound – ayeecannytmalume While TikTok claims that the dog did not belong to her and was hence not her 'responsibility,' others have claimed that this is a poor excuse. @tashiri_g: 'This is not a defence, it's a deflection from the fact that you did not care to help or report her abuse'. @myrnalouw: 'How can you dance while a dog is starving in the background…sies!' @duckduckgoose: 'It doesn't have to be your dog in order for you to show human decency and kindness '. @ I'm not the owner please. ♬ original sound – It can't be Sasha Meanwhile, the SPCA shared the heartbreaking story of Bobby's rescue. In a social media post, a member of the Special Projects Unit was able to remove Bobby from her home. The post read: 'She is the most lovable dog, handing out kisses to everyone since the moment she arrived! Forced to eat plastic to survive, Bobby was found severely malnourished, suffering from fly strike, and covered in ticks and fleas'. View this post on Instagram A post shared by NSPCA (@ The good news is that Bobby is now in safe hands and will be well-fed. The SPCA continued: 'She's on a long road to recovery, but once healthy, she'll be sterilised and available to the loving and caring home she deserves'. DO YOU BELIEVE THE CONTENT CREATOR DESERVED TO FACE ANIMAL CRUELTY CHARGES? Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 .
The South African
11 hours ago
- The South African
North West pastor sentenced to 15 years in jail for armed robbery
A local pastor, Petrus Phuthego Gasengake, was sentenced to 15 years in prison after being convicted of a violent robbery at the home of a female congregant in Ramosadi Village near Mmabatho in the North West. The Molopo Regional Court handed down the sentence after Gasengake, 48, was found guilty of robbery with aggravating circumstances. According to an NPA media statement, the incident took place on 4 April 2021, when Gasengake visited the home of a woman from his church. Upon arriving, he ignored two other people in the house and headed straight for the victim's bedroom. An argument soon escalated, during which Gasengake attacked the woman, choking her and threatening her with a knife. He stole R4,000 in cash, her bank cards, and the keys to her car. He then fled the scene using the stolen vehicle. After the robbery, Gasengake drove to his home in Lichtenburg, where he stabbed his wife without any provocation. He then fled the area, prompting police to open cases of robbery and attempted murder. Two days later, on 6 April Gasengake was arresteed in Vryburg after the stolen vehicle was traced. The victim positively identified him during a police lineup. Gasengake was also previously convicted in November 2022 for the attempted murder of his wife, for which he received a 10-year sentence. This latest robbery conviction adds to his growing list of criminal offenses. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
