Vape bans: Slippery slope for legal governance
The court found that state authorities had overstepped their powers by refusing to renew licences issued under federal law, thereby infringing on the rights of a legally licensed business and violating the Federal Constitution.
This landmark ruling is more than just a win for the gaming industry; it underscores a critical principle: state governments cannot override federal law at will.
Yet just months later, we are seeing the same pattern emerge again, this time with the vape industry.
Kedah has announced it will no longer renew licences for vape-related businesses, with the goal of a complete ban by 2026. Other states such as Pahang, Terengganu and Perlis are following suit.
This trend raises urgent questions about the balance of power in our federal system. What started with gaming licences is now extending to vape.
Tomorrow, will it be food and beverages? Or wellness and lifestyle services?
If states are allowed to selectively shut down federally regulated sectors, Malaysia risks descending into legal fragmentation, where trade and commerce depend more on local politics than national law.
Act 852: A necessary legal anchor
Rather than allowing states to adopt unilateral bans, the federal government must focus on fully enforcing Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 (Act 852) across the country.
Act 852 was passed after years of consultation and debate. It represents a balanced and structured approach to regulating smoking and vaping products, protecting youth, ensuring product safety, and reducing public health risks while allowing regulated access to adults.
Its successful enforcement is not just a health issue; it is a legal imperative. If states are allowed to disregard it through political or moralistic motivations, the Act's legitimacy will be compromised.
From a legal standpoint, only a consistent, centralised framework can ensure that public health regulations are enforced uniformly, fairly, and in accordance with constitutional principles.
Legal uncertainty hurts rule of law, public confidence
One of the hallmarks of a sound legal system is predictability. Businesses, consumers, and civil society should be able to rely on a stable set of laws and policies.
When that stability is undermined by states choosing to selectively ban certain industries, it weakens the rule of law and opens the door for selective enforcement, politicisation of trade, and judicial overload from legal disputes.
This also affects the very communities the bans claim to protect. Instead of driving behaviour change, bans often push products into illicit channels, where there is no age restriction, no safety oversight, and no taxation.
This undermines the public health objectives of Act 852 and increases enforcement burdens.
The way forward: Uphold the law, not politicise it
The lesson from the Sports Toto ruling is clear: state governments do not have the authority to override federal laws with blanket bans. Vape should not be the next legal battleground.
The federal government must assert the supremacy of laws passed by Parliament and ensure that public health policies are governed by national interest, not fragmented by state agendas.
Act 852 provides the legal tools to regulate the vape industry effectively. What's needed now is not more bans but better enforcement.
Malaysia must decide whether it wants to be governed by clear laws or discretionary bans. The answer will determine whether our legal system continues to uphold constitutional order or gives way to a patchwork of conflicting state policies.
The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
17 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Appeals court orders return of Port Dickson land after fraudulent sale
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has affirmed a High Court decision to return a parcel of land in Port Dickson to its rightful owner, after it was transferred through a series of fraudulent transactions. A three-judge panel led by Datuk S. Nantha Balan ruled that both Top ATC Industries Sdn Bhd and businessman Lee Kok Chian had failed to prove they were bona fide (genuine) purchasers of the land, which had been fraudulently transferred by an imposter posing as the registered trustee. The appellate court also upheld the High Court's order for the land to be re-registered in the name of its rightful owner, Cheok Lam Chuan, who filed the suit after discovering the illicit transfer in 2018. On Jan 21, 2016, the subject land was fraudulently "transferred" to Fu Zhi Mao Group Sdn Bhd before the latter entered a Sale and Purchase Agreement with Top ATC Industries on Feb 24, the same year. On March 29, 2016, (barely 6 days after the transfer of the land), Top ATC Industries entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement with Lee. The transfer of the subject land took place on Nov 1, 2016. "Apart from the sinister conclusions that are to be derived from the suspicious timing of the transaction between Fu Zhi Mao Group and Top ATC Industries, there is the added fact that the latter had failed to prove that it had made any payment to the former. "Lee ought to have suspected that the previous transaction could be fraudulent due to the short timeline of sale of the land. "He should have undertaken the ordinary precautions and investigations as a reasonable and prudent purchaser. "However, Lee deliberately shut his eyes to the obvious and refrained from checking or making further inquiries about the earlier land transfer," he said in his ground of judgment yesterday. The court also upheld the lower court's finding that neither Top ATC Industries nor Lee had acted in good faith in their dealings over the land transaction. The court also held that the Negri Sembilan Registrar of Titles and Director of Lands and Mines were negligent for failing to detect or prevent the fraudulent registration. The appellate court affirmed all the lower court's orders, including: -Cancelling the registration of the land in Lee's name and restoring it to Cheok. -The award of RM100,000 in aggravated damages against Top ATC and Lee. -An order for both parties to pay RM50,000 each in legal costs to Cheok. -A cost order of RM10,000 against the two land officers.
New Straits Times
17 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Sosma reform: Suhakam seeks bail rights, shorter detention, and transparency
KUALA LUMPUR: The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) has outlined five core reforms it hopes will emerge from ongoing stakeholder consultations on the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma). The commission is also asking the government to release draft amendments before they are tabled in Parliament. Secretary-general Altaf Deviyati said the commission's longstanding concerns include extended detention without judicial oversight, restricted access to bail, limited access to legal counsel during initial detention, and broad discretionary powers granted to enforcement agencies. "We believe these provisions not only challenge Malaysia's international obligations but are also inconsistent with the Federal Constitution," she told the New Straits Times. Among Suhakam's proposals is the reinstatement of judicial discretion in granting bail, particularly for non-violent and non-terrorism-related offences. The commission also calls for the maximum initial detention period to be shortened from the current 28 days, which it views as excessive. Altaf said access to legal counsel must be guaranteed from the point of arrest, and that the right to a prompt and public hearing should be assured. "Currently, detainees are waiting far too long just to get their first hearing," she added. Finally, Suhakam recommends narrowing Sosma's application to truly exceptional and well-defined national security threats. "Ordinary criminal offences should be addressed under existing laws," Altaf said. Its secretary-general said that Suhakam has been participating in engagement sessions through the Parliamentary Special Select Committee since November last year. "Public consultation is essential in any democratic law-making process," Altaf said, adding that transparency will ensure a more balanced approach between national security and fundamental liberties. Altaf said that the commission acknowledges Malaysia's security needs but maintains that amendments must address ongoing and potential human rights violations. Beyond legislative changes, Suhakam also advocates for systemic reforms to prevent abuse under Sosma and similar laws. These include strengthening internal and external oversight, creating an independent complaints mechanism, and improving judicial training and awareness of human rights standards. "We also need greater transparency in how laws like Sosma are enforced, including the regular publication of arrest data," Altaf said. She added that Malaysia should ratify international human rights treaties such as the United Nations Convention Against Torture (UNCAT) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) to reinforce protections against arbitrary detention and mistreatment.
The Sun
18 hours ago
- The Sun
Ex-MMM executive loses bid to review insider trading conviction
PUTRAJAYA: Former Malaysian Merchant Marine Bhd (MMM) executive deputy chairman Datuk Ramesh Rajaratnam has failed in his attempt to review a Court of Appeal decision reinstating his insider trading conviction. A three-judge panel dismissed his application, clearing the way for his appeal to proceed at the Kuala Lumpur High Court on Aug 20. Ramesh, 61, was convicted in 2019 for trading 5 million MMM shares in 2010 while possessing inside information about a credit rating downgrade. The Sessions Court sentenced him to five years in jail and a RM3 million fine, with an additional three years if unpaid. Justice Datuk Che Mohd Ruzima Ghazali stated Ramesh did not meet the threshold for a review, noting no breach of natural justice in the earlier ruling. 'The applicant was not without an alternative remedy,' he said, adding Ramesh could still challenge the conviction in the High Court. Initially, Ramesh was acquitted by the High Court in 2021, which found the Sessions Court's judgment merely echoed prosecution arguments. However, the Securities Commission (SC) appealed, leading the Court of Appeal in May 2024 to order a fresh High Court hearing. The SC had withdrawn appeals on two related charges involving 5.2 million shares traded in February 2010, linked to MMM's PN17 status. Ramesh remains on bail under previous terms, including a RM200,000 bond and passport surrender. - Bernama
