Pakistan leather industry seeks cut in import duties on chemicals
Hamid Arshad Zahur, Central Chairman of the Pakistan Tanners Association (PTA), proposed to reduce customs duty from 20% to 16%, and Additional Customs Duties (ACD) from 4% to 2% across all chemical imports.
The development comes as Muslims around the world are to celebrate Eid-ul-Adha this week. In Pakistan, the first day of Eid will fall on Saturday, June 7.
According to Zahur, around 40% of Pakistan's total leather production is sourced through sacrifice of animals during Eid-ul-Adha.
Sharing statistics, PTA central chairman said tanners received around 0.7 million animal hides, including 4.5 million goats, 2.5 million cows, 0.5 million sheep, and 25,000 camels last year.
The total value of the collected hides was estimated at Rs10 billion, he said.
Zahur further stated that around 25% of the hides, worth approximately Rs4 billion, were spoiled due to 'mishandling and the failure to preserve them with salt in a timely manner'.
'Tanners have been urging both the federal and provincial governments to establish proper abattoirs to prevent the wastage of hides,' he said.
'The country lost hides worth Rs4 billion due to improper handling, which constitutes 40% of total local production.'
PTA central chairman emphasised that the government should establish centralised slaughterhouses for carrying out religious sacrifices similar to other Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Türkiye, Indonesia, and others.
In its budget proposals, PTA requested to keep the export sector under the original Fixed Tax Regime, but to increase the turnover tax from 1% to 1.5% to increase government revenue.
Eid-ul-Adha 2025: trade peaks at Asia's largest cattle market in Karachi
The leather sector is normally working at a 4-8% profit margin in general and hence a 1.5% turnover tax will actually be a net 25% tax on profit and in line with the Federal Board of Revenue's (FBR) revenue generation targets, according to the PTA.
Zahur urged not to bring the export sector under the final tax regime.
He opposed the proposal to apply sales tax at the import of raw materials under the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) in the next budget.
'This step by the FBR/Ministry of Finance will totally negate the basic principal of no duty, no drawback under which the EFS was originally developed,' he said.
'One wrong has been done last year by imposing sales tax on domestic sales under EFS and it will be a second wrong to impose sales tax on import of raw material under the EFS, going forward.
'This will lead to a cash flow crunch, defeat the very purpose of the EFS and be detrimental in increasing the exports any further,' PTA official said.
He urged the government to bring the EFS back to its original form as on June 30, 2024, whereby purchase of domestic and imported raw materials under EFS was exempt from any duties or taxes.
Meanwhile, PTA suggested to bring down the rate of sales tax down to 17% in the next budget from the current 18%. It also proposed minimum tax threshold for salaried individuals at Rs1.2million per annum.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Aurangzeb vows to close tax loopholes, boost investor confidence
Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb is interviewed during the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors' Meeting at the IMF and World Bank's 2024 annual Spring Meetings in Washington. PHOTO: REUTERS Listen to article Federal Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb on Wednesday pledged to close tax loopholes, enhance investor confidence, and maintain economic reforms, as he addressed the Rawalpindi Chamber of Commerce and Industry's Independence Day event. Aurangzeb said international institutions had welcomed Pakistan's reform measures, while recent Gallup surveys showed rising economic confidence. He noted a 60% growth in the stock exchange, an increase in new investors, and 250,000 new company registrations. Aurangzeb suggested the key policy rate could be cut further this year, citing falls in average and core inflation. Earlier in May, governor SBP, in a press conference along with other Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) members, announced a 100 bps cut, highlighting an improved inflation outlook and signs of moderate economic recovery. Beating the market expectations of a 0-50bps cut, the central bank reduced the policy rate by 100bps to 11% in a meeting," wrote Topline Securities. "We expect interest rates to come down to 10% by Dec 2025." Read: Policy rate slashed to 11% The minister said the government had finalised economic growth-focused agreements with the IMF, reached a favourable tariff deal with the United States, and was working on key accords with China. Panda bonds would be issued by year-end, and a benchmark for Sukuk bonds had been set, the finance czar. Aurangzeb further highlighted ongoing rightsising of 45 ministries, accelerated privatisation of state enterprises, and reductions in electricity tariffs, with further energy cost improvements expected. He assured that taxation reforms would not burden the salaried class and that the prime minister was personally overseeing FBR's transformation. Monthly meetings with chambers would be held to address business concerns. Read more: PM approves creation of digital ecosystem at FBR Calling for unity, Aurangzeb said the private sector must lead economic growth, with the government's role being to provide a favourable business climate.
Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Notification of TY25 return form sought: IRIS still facing technical glitches: ILA
ISLAMABAD: International Lawyers Association (ILA) has conveyed to the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) that the IRIS e-filing system continues to suffer from serious technical and functional issues, pointing towards immediate notification of final income tax return form for tax year 2025. In a presentation to FBR Chairman, the ILA has observed that the Federal Board of Revenue, through SRO 1212(1)/2025 dated July 8, 2025, published the draft Income Tax Return under Rule 34A of the Income Tax Rules, 2002, which requires final notification within thirty days. However, despite the lapse of this statutory period, the final return for Tax Year 2025 has not yet been issued. This delay is causing serious uncertainty and operational difficulties for taxpayers and tax practitioners, and is likely to impede timely compliance with the statutory deadline of September 30, 2025. To make matters worse, the IRIS e-filing system continues to suffer from serious technical and functional issues, including but not limited to Non-Adjustment of Tax Withheld under Section 235 in the Case of AOPs. In cases where the declared tax liability is fully met through tax withheld under Section 235 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the system correctly shows 'Nil' tax demand. However, upon submission, it issues a Inconsistent Treatment of Tax Withheld under Sections 148 and 154: While both regimes are deemed to discharge minimum tax liability under the amended provisions, the system allows editing of income for imports (Section 148) but does not allow such editing for exports (Section 154). This inconsistency creates confusion and unequal treatment among taxpayers operating under similar mechanisms. Non-Opening of Return Forms for Non-Resident Taxpayers: When 'Non-Resident' status is selected based on the duration of stay in Pakistan, the system fails to open the return form, and even the 'Review and Submission' option is disabled, effectively preventing non-residents from filing returns. The ILA pointed out that many users are unable to log in at all, and even when login is successful, the system responds extremely slowly or hangs midway, causing delays in filing and unnecessary mental distress to taxpayers and professionals alike. In addition to these substantive glitches, we are facing widespread technical issues: The IRIS portal frequently hangs or becomes extremely slow after login, and in many instances fails to log in at all. Pre-filled data from withholding statements is often incomplete or inaccurate, leading to mismatches. The system updates to return forms and schedules reflecting legal changes are delayed. Carry-forward losses and refunds are not properly reflected. Unjustified discrepancies in wealth statement reconciliations arise even in genuine cases. The helpdesk capacity is inadequate, causing prolonged delays in complaint resolution. Despite repeated representations by the legal and tax fraternity to the relevant PRAL and FBR officials, the problems remain unaddressed. The persistent malfunctioning of PRAL's software is now on the verge of paralyzing the return filing process, risking a serious loss to the national exchequer and further shaking public confidence in the country's tax administration. The FBR should immediately issue the final Income Tax Return for Tax Year 2025 in compliance with Rule 34A. The FBR should rectify the identified system glitches, ensuring proper tax adjustments and consistent treatment under relevant sections. The FBR should also resolve the non-resident filing block without delay. The department should strengthen IRIS server performance, especially during peak filing days. The FBR must ensure accurate and timely updates to pre-filled data. The FBR should also enhance taxpayer and professional support services for swift resolution of issues, ILA added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Public choice at work? The end of EFS?
SRO 1395(I)2025 is not the end of the EFS. It is certainly the end of the beginning of the end of the EFS. SRO 1395(I)25, July 29, 2025, excludes 'Raw cotton, yarns, and fabrics' from the purview of the EFS. Imported cottons, yarns, and fabrics will now be at par with local produce and attract a 'refundable' 18 percent GST. The Public Choice Theory provides a framework about how private, material, bureaucratic and even ideological interests, of bureaucrats, politicians etc., work their way into full-blown public policies resulting in stunting and killing public goods and policies-like the inevitable demise of the EFS. EFS, July 2021 was launched, recognizing that the domestic fiscal constraints must not burden exporters as they compete internationally with competitors with no such baggage. The EFS intended to immunize exporters from the chronically 'kadak', cash-deficient FBR's penchant for meeting its revenue requirements by illegally denying refunds to EFS registered exporters. EFS meant no pay-ins, no refunds. Exporters and few in Islamabad were happy. However, many in Islamabad had different thoughts. FBR, like all, would like to retain control over the refund pipeline. EFS had blown that 'Nordstream 2' of coveted refunds which FBR would tap during lean days when these funds could buy the Republic a day or more. Via denial and delay of refunds, FBR perhaps got away, when needed, by passing off the cash thus withheld as 'revenues' to the 'gullible' multilateral overlords who often took it with a soup ladle. The good FBR was thus doing a sacred work. There is, however, reportedly another cohort who had seen slammed shut doors and tunnels to the cavernous corrupt bowels of the 'refund industry', i.e., the bad FBR. Oddly such officers doing a sacred work saving the Republic are no different from accountants in 'kadak' corporates who routinely stretch payables to meet 'priority' financial commitments. There is, perhaps, no daylight between 'kadak' cadres in public and private worlds. Kudos, however, and now commiserations, to the Ministry of Commerce and the few good men at FBR who had enacted the EFS SRO in 2021whose unravelling is an education in itself. How do you dismantle a scheme which is wildly popular with exporters and the Ministry of Commerce? Public Choice offers a possible explanation. A few quarters after EFS' enactment, the press had suddenly started carrying stories of EFS frauds. Must not FBR be apprehending the fraudsters? Many exporters' associations approached FBR to work with them to make EFS more robust, but to no avail. The 'good' and the 'bad' FBRs were at least indifferent or positively upset with EFS. Here is one way this fraud might have happened. Those who imported 60s yarn under EFS, made a killing by illegally selling it locally, pocketing the unpaid GST and then exporting some 20s yarn-based product claiming it was a twisted/tripled 3×60s! Local 20s was purchased GST free, under EFS! Fraudsters made a killing. Industry wanted to plug the leakage, FBR instead blew the pipeline. It was in this backdrop, last year and literally out of the left field, FBR rendered local yarn purchases ineligible for EFS. If an EFS registered exporter wanted to purchase local cotton yarn, it had to pay GST while it could import the same product GST free! EFS fraud tales-many, even most could be true-set the stage with a sinister hum of expectations. A few rent-an-associations also played their quisling parts. Local yarn manufacturers cried at this obvious miscarriage of justice. Exclusion of local yarns from EFS created a genuinely aggrieved party who just wanted re-inclusion into EFS. They were dragged, stomped on, slapped around until the aggrieved confederates sued for peace and on July 29 were served the textile equivalent of the Treaty of Versailles. Now, many are happy at their own defeat. Imposition of GST on cotton yarns is not a victory for spinners and not for the value-added champions. All exporters are losers. All manufacturers are losers. It is like on account of few purse snatching incidents, the city police banned pillion riding. Spinners and a few more, in their desperation — they were hurting bad — were offered Hobson's choice. They had to take it. Today it is yarns and fabrics tomorrow it will be something else. The real losers, however, mostly textiles exporters, continue to congregate in a motley crew of cults and associations whose chaotic best has never been good enough. The unravelling of EFS is the latest epiphany of the 'Entrepreneurs as Chor' creed which the tax collectors, ageing accountants and highly paid bankers who enjoy a revolving door access to the top echelons continue to believe and mean. Still, EFS, has perhaps been the most notable success that the Ministry of Commerce had notched in its long history of lost battles with the FBR. In Islamabad, tomorrow always trumps the future. EFS is not the first pro-exports government initiative to go down. It is high time that FBR evolved into a learning organization, learning by doing, driven by data, in perpetual consultation with entrepreneurs whose competitiveness depends on lifesavers like EFS. FBR can then use data to 'Rank and Yank' exporter population. For now, it is curtains for EFS. Textile exports of USD 1.5b per month or so is our fate. On a good day, that is. This tactical victory for some in the textile value chain is a strategic rout for the entire textile value chain. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
