Didcot Power Station probe reaching 'latter stages', police say
The investigation into the deaths of four men following the collapse at Didcot Power Station is moving "towards the latter stages", police have said.On 23 February 2016 part of the old boiler house at the Didcot A plant collapsed, killing Ken Cresswell, John Shaw, Michael Collings and Christopher Huxtable.Demolition News editor Mark Anthony said it was "a national disgrace" that nine years on their families were still waiting for answers.Thames Valley Police said its joined investigation with the Health and Safety Executive "continues to make meaningful progress".
The force said it was "actively investigating" offences of corporate manslaughter, gross negligence manslaughter and Health and Safety at Work Act offences.
It took more than six months for the men's bodies to be recovered and family members of the victims previously said they were finding waiting for the investigation to conclude "really hard".Last year, Mr Anthony started a petition calling for a pubic enquiry into the time it has taken."Unfortunately, it is not without precedent," he said, comparing it to the investigations into Hillsborough and Grenfell. "There's been no pressure from The Home Office or the Home Secretary to make the police at Thames Valley... get everything resolved any quicker."
"To date, the investigation team has collated and analysed over 6,500 exhibits, 90,000 images, and 230,000 digital media artefacts," Deputy Chief Constable Ben Snuggs said."Over 180 hours of video recorded witness and suspect interviews have been conducted, in addition to the 2,812 statements taken."He said while "a specific timeframe" for its conclusion could not be specified, they were "confident that we are moving towards the latter stages" of enquiries."Our officers continue to provide regular updates to the families on the investigation progress, as well as to the Crown Prosecution Service."
Mr Anthony said: "The entire demolition world is looking to the UK, Thames Valley Police and the Health and Safety Executive for some answers, so that they can send in men and women to work safely."And nine years later, we still can't do that."Olly Glover, the newly elected MP for Didcot and Wantage, said he was "putting pressure" on the police to make progress."But also the investigation does need to be allowed to conclude in a way that gets all of the evidence to the surface," he said.Site owner RWE Power said "Our thoughts remain with the families of the four men who died in this tragic incident. "We continue to cooperate fully with Thames Valley Police."The Home Office said it would not comment while the investigation was ongoing.
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Press and Journal
5 hours ago
- Press and Journal
Demolition firm fined for safety failures after worker badly hurt
A demolition firm has been fined after its worker suffered serious injury – the second such time it has happened. Sylwester Zdunczyk was working for Cove-based Lawrie Demolition, removing metal sheets from a warehouse roof, when he fell 18ft and landed on a concrete floor. The 44-year-old was taken to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary and suffered broken ribs and a broken pelvis. It took him six months to regain fitness, although he is permanently impaired. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found his employer broke safety rules. Lawrie Demolition has now admitted an offence at Aberdeen Sheriff Court and has been sentenced. But it is not the first time the firm has breached safety rules. In 2009, Valentin Taljanov was working for the company at Aberdeen Harbour when he was seriously injured by falling cast iron guttering. The worker broke his right arm, seven ribs, and a vertebra. He also punctured a lung and cut his head. On that occasion, Lawrie Demolition was fined £40,000 after admitting breaching a safety regulation. During the latest hearing, which took place earlier this week, Aberdeen Sheriff Court heard how Lawrie Demolition was contracted to knock down two industrial units at Baker Hughes' former Woodside Road base in Bridge of Don in 2023. Demolishing the north building was easy, the court heard, as it had a simple, modern design. But things were trickier with the south building, as there was asbestos in the roof. It meant a five-man team had to unbolt metal sheets from the roof, move them a short distance and then lower them through a hole in the skylight. Before work began, Lawrie Demolition was supposed to put a robust safety plan in place to ensure workers did not fall. Their idea was to put up crowd barriers around the skylight, secured with plastic ties – but the barriers were not properly fixed to the roof structure. On May 25 2023, the team had removed four of the metal sheets without issue. But the court heard there was 'a heated discussion' between the workers about the method of removing the sheets. They then changed the method, which led to Mr Zdunczyk walking backwards during removal. The court heard how, as he moved the fifth metal sheet, Mr Zdunczyk lost his balance and collided with one of the crowd barriers, which then moved out of place. This created a gap – and Mr Zdunczyk plunged 18ft through it down to the floor, suffering severe injury and permanent impairment. Depute fiscal David Glancy told the court: 'Mr Zdunczyk's colleagues gave him first aid and alerted the emergency services. 'He was taken by ambulance to ARI with fractured ribs and a fractured pelvis. 'Mr Zdunczyk was unable to work for six months. 'Before this incident, he loved to play football, run and swim and can no longer pursue any of those activities. 'He has returned to work, but can no longer work from height.' In the wake of the incident, Lawrie Demolition paused all work and brought in a subcontractor to finish the job using enhanced safety techniques. The HSE investigation questioned why Lawrie Demolition had chosen not to fix the crash barriers to the roof structure or install safety netting. 'The failure to provide step-by-step guidance was significant. There was a failure to ensure the work was properly planned and supervised,' said Mr Glancy. Lawrie Demolition pleaded guilty to one offence of failing to plan and supervise work to ensure safety at height Defence solicitor Mark Donaldson told the court Lawrie Demolition was part of an industry association that required it to adhere to safety audits each year. He added: 'This was a very unusual situation. 'The company was aware that the work was physically demanding and regularly rotated staff. 'On this site was an extremely experienced team with over a decade of experience each. 'Consideration was given to the use of safety harnesses, but a decision was taken not to use them in case they became entangled. 'The crowd barriers should have been directly secured to the roof.' Mr Donaldson added that Lawrie Demolition had boosted working-at-height training for staff since the incident and had learned lessons from it. Because the accused in this case is a company, the only punishment available is a fine. First, sheriffs must consider that company's annual turnover to determine what the size of the company is. The bigger the company, the higher the fine. Lawrie Demolition's turnover of £1.7m a year means it is classed as a 'micro' company. Second, sheriffs check what the law says is a fair amount to fine the company for a particular offence. This gives them a 'starting point' figure. The sheriff can then add or subtract amounts from it if there are any aggravating or mitigating features of the offence. In this case, the sheriff decided that the fact that Lawrie Demolition had breached safety rules previously was an aggravating factor. The firm can then get a discount for pleading guilty and sparing a trial. In this case, Sheriff Ian Wallace decided on a fine of £37,500. And then a 7.5% victim surcharge – in this case £2,812. That makes a total of £40,312. The money is retained for use within the overall Scottish administration. Lawrie Demolition did not respond to requests for comment.
Metro
04-06-2025
- Metro
Is Ruby leaving Emmerdale, does she go to prison and is Anthony still alive?
Ruby Miligan's (Beth Cordingly) fate hangs in the balance in Emmerdale after she reported herself to the police for Anthony's (Nicholas Day) murder. Anthony, as viewers know, was killed by daughter Ruby, who had been sexually abused him when she was a teenager. With assistance from Aaron Dingle (Danny Miller), John Sugden (Oliver Farnworth) and husband Caleb (William Ash), the murder was covered up, with John disposing of the abuser's remains. But with a corpse having been recovered from the lake, Ruby assumed it was her father's, with John having failed to tell her where exactly he buried him. In a bid to protect her loved ones, Ruby decided to hand herself in, telling the police that she killed Anthony. Viewers have been left worried about the character, fearing that she will go to prison and thus exit Emmerdale. But will this prove to be the case? We have answers. Spoilers for Wednesday's (June 4) edition of the ITV soap follow. No, Ruby is not leaving Emmerdale and nor does she go to prison. The matriarch is questioned by the police for her role in Anthony's death but things take a turn when detectives confirm that the body isn't actually that of her abusive father's. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Fearing that she's turned herself in for no reason, Ruby is horrified but her solicitor concocts a plan, insisting that she make out like she's suffered a breakdown in the wake of her abuse ordeal. Joe Tate (Ned Porteous), meanwhile, learns of Ruby's plight and, feeling indebted to Caleb over the theft of his kidney, he decides to intervene, paying off a contact in Spain to masquerade as Anthony so that the police are able to rule out any foul play. Ruby is therefore very much in the clear and thus returns home to Mill Cottage where she reunited with her loved ones. The happiness will be short-lived, however, as upcoming scenes will see the body identified as Nate Robinson (Jurell Carter). As far as we know, Ruby's dad Anthony is dead, hence why Joe was needed to get his contacts to claim to be the abuser. The character was last seen in January via a flashback sequence, which confirmed that Ruby was the one to murder him. More Trending Aaron, who attacked him previously, thought that he'd killed Anthony and thus John decided to help him get rid of the body and cover up the evidence. As for where Anthony's body is, well that remains a mystery! View More » Emmerdale airs weeknights at 7:30pm on ITV1 or stream from 7:30am on ITVX. If you've got a soap or TV story, video or pictures get in touch by emailing us soaps@ – we'd love to hear from you. Join the community by leaving a comment below and stay updated on all things soaps on our homepage. MORE: Who is the body in the lake of Emmerdale? MORE: 20 Emmerdale pictures reveals child in danger as John gets questioned over Nate MORE: Emmerdale pulled from ITV schedules amid huge death story
BBC News
04-06-2025
- BBC News
Death of RAF corporal investigated by MoD and Lincolnshire Police
The Ministry of Defence is investigating the death of an RAF dog handler alongside the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and Rebecca Hudson, 32, from Stourport, died on 23 Police said it attended an incident on 18 May at an RAF site in Kirkby Lane, Tattershall Thorpe, in which a 32-year-old woman suffered "serious injuries" following "a collision" with a was airlifted to hospital but died five days later. The East Midlands Ambulance Service said after receiving a call at 15:23 on 18 May it sent a paramedic, a LIVES emergency responder and an ambulance. The air ambulance also attended. "One patient was taken to Queen's Medical Centre in Nottingham via air ambulance," it RAF police dog training facility is located on Kirkby Lane. The HSE said it would be investigating the incident "alongside the relevant authorities".A spokesperson for the Ministry of Defence said it was supporting the coroner's office with its inquiries."As investigations are ongoing, we cannot comment further at this stage and ask the media and public to avoid speculation as this could cause additional distress to Cpl Hudson's family, friends and colleagues," they added. 'Sorely missed' In a statement, the RAF described Cpl Hudson as "devoted to her dogs and her teammates" and said she would be "sorely missed".Gp Capt Samantha Bunn, provost marshal and commander air security force, said: "The tragic loss of Cpl Bec Hudson has been profoundly felt by every single member of the RAF Police. "Her absence will be felt for many years to come, not just by the dogs she dedicated so much time to, but the whole of the RAF Police."Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
