Appeals board rejects Bartra €30m apartment scheme for Old Navan Rd
It is now the second failed attempt by Bartra to secure planning permission to redevelop the site.
Bartra Property (Castleknock) Ltd was planning to construct a five storey 56 apartment scheme on the site at Brady's Public House, Old Navan Rd, Dublin 15.
The refusal upholds a decision by Fingal Co Council to refuse planning permission after 75 objections were lodged against the proposal.
One of those to object was Castleknock resident, Barry O'Lone who in 2023 turned down a €100,000 offer from Bartra to withdraw a High Court challenge against a 210 bedspace co-living scheme for the same site opposite his family home.
The co-living scheme did not proceed and in May of last year, Bartra Property (Castleknock) Ltd lodged plans for the apartment scheme for the site.
As part of his objection, Mr O'Lone repeated the allegation that he was previously offered €100,000 by Bartra in April 2023 to withdraw the High Court judicial review against the co-living scheme.
In its refusal to the 56 unit scheme, the appeals board concluded that having regard to its height, massing, bulk and design and its lack of a direct relationship with the public open space located immediately to the north-east of the subject site, the proposed development fails to integrate with the established character of the area.
The appeals board stated that as a result the scheme would be contrary to the Fingal County Development Plan 2023-2029, which requires that new development adds quality by integrating high quality design and ensuring good quality accessible public realms, by ensuring development contributes to a positive sense of place, local distinctiveness and character.
The appeals board also refused planning permission as the absence of adequate on-site car parking provision would result in substandard residential amenity for future occupants of the development, would be likely to lead to overspill parking in the vicinity of the subject site and would be likely to result in congestion and obstruction of road users, which would endanger public safety by reason of traffic hazard.
In the Bartra appeal lodged, Thornton O'Connor Town Planning stated that there are not many better sites in the city that have the capacity for increased height and density.
The planning consultants stated that the height, scale and massing of the proposal was very similar to the building already permitted on the site.
Director of the planning consultancy, Patricia Thornton stated that the scheme cannot be considered to be overbearing, over-scaled or to cause material overlooking.
Ms Thornton also argued that the scheme has been carefully crafted to the highest architectural standards and that the issue of the provision of on-street parking can be overcome by on-street parking controls.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
38 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Louth funfair standoff ends up in High Court – ‘It would ruin my business'
Council gave licence for 3-day event in Blackrock The fate of a Co Louth funfair which is a part of Blackrock village's traditional August 15th celebrations was set to be determined in the High Court on Tuesday. Louth County Council had granted a three-day licence for the funfair, run by local businessman Killian Allen, and when he signalled his determination to run the popular event for nine days, they indicated that they would issue legal proceedings.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Judge warns litigants to undergo ‘reality check' before suing
A High Court judge said litigants should undergo a 'reality check' before proceeding with claims where lawyers end up the 'only winners'. Mr Justice Michael Twomey encouraged potential litigants to engage in mediation, rather than litigation, because it 'offers a crucial opportunity' for 'reality checking' claims before they reach court. The judge made the remarks when throwing out a multimillion euro claim brought by V Media and First Click Marketing Operations Managament Limited against Techads Media Ltd. He also rejected Techads's €1.5 million counterclaim. He said the case, which involved estimated legal fees of more than €1 million, 'would have benefited from mediation/reality checking'. READ MORE 'Litigation should be the option of last resort, rather than first resort, when it comes to resolving disputes,' he said. Techads was based in the Dublin City University Alpha Campus but now 'exists solely for the purposes of this litigation', the judge said in a recently published written judgment. V Media, with a registered address in Montenegro, and First Click, incorporated in the Abu Dhabi Free Zone, sought about $2.5 million (€2.1 million) from Techads for alleged unpaid invoices from 2022. However, Techads claimed it was not obliged to pay because, it said, V Media and First Click agents breached the terms of their respective digital marketing agreements. Between 2018 and 2021, Techads went from having sales of €5.86 million to €119.81 million, the judge said. However, in mid-2022 its business 'disappeared almost overnight, when it was blacklisted by its two main clients' – Ask Media Group LLC and CBS Interactive, Inc – which are not a party to the case, he said. Mr Justice Twomey said Techads's business 'involved sourcing website traffic and then driving that web traffic' to its clients' websites via marketing agents such as V Media and First Click. Ask and CBS 'terminated their agreements with Techads in mid-2022 because of the 'unusual' nature of the web traffic provided to them' on behalf of Techads via agents. The judge said website owners do not want to 'pay for robots clicking on their sites or indeed individuals clicking on their sites who have no likelihood of spending money'. Techads brought a counterclaim, suing V Media and First Click for $1.8 million (€1.5 million) for amounts allegedly clawed back by Ask and CBS from Techads. The case was listed for an eight-day hearing commencing on June 24th, with costs estimated by the parties as likely to exceed €1 million. However, the court found 'neither the plaintiffs, nor the defendant, are entitled to any award'. 'As a result, the only winners in this case are the lawyers,' said Mr Justice Twomey. 'Human nature is such that persons who undertake litigation, like any other task, will often seek to be as successful as possible, which often means portraying the damage that they have suffered, or the amounts they have lost, at their absolute height,' the judge wrote. 'However, the downside of such an approach is that litigants can end up 'believing in their own publicity', as they repeat and provide evidence for their claims, and so reinforce their own belief in their claims.' Mr Justice Twomey said 'the problem' with this approach is that it 'can reduce the likelihood of a settlement, particularly if the first 'reality check' of the claims and counterclaims occurs when it is too late, as appears to have happened in this case'.
Irish Examiner
4 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Danone fails to appeal Yoplait's High Court injunction in low fat yoghurt row
A row over low fat yoghurt between two multimillion global companies has come before the Irish courts. In the latest round, the Court of Appeal has upheld an injunction granted three months ago to Yoplait Ireland Ltd and ordered that the Irish subsidiary of Danone be restrained from passing off certain Skyr products on the Irish market as those of Yoplait pending the determination of the proceedings. Yoplait Ireland Ltd is suing Nutricia Ireland Ltd, the Irish subsidiary of Danone, over allegedly "passing off" the product. At issue are certain Skyr yoghurts which are made using a traditional Icelandic recipe and are low in fat and high in protein. Yoplait has previously claimed that the "get up", or packaging, of the Danone Skyr "Icelandic style" yoghurt is so similar to the Yoplait "Skyr" product that consumers are likely to be confused when shopping. It claims Danone is piggybacking on the goodwill it has built up to sell its product and is allegedly engaging in an unfair competitive tactic in doing so. Nutricia Ireland had appealed a decision by the High Court last May granting the injunction restraining Danone. Court of Appeal ruling Giving the judgement of the Court of Appeal, Ms Justice Niamh Hyland said she rejected the appeal of Danone and upheld the High Court decision to grant an injunction to Yoplait, but in modified terms. 'I am conscious that Danone is being denied entry to a market, that on its case it is fully entitled to enter. If it transpires that it is correct, competition will have been stifled,' the judge said. She said in the circumstances there was an obligation upon Yoplait to expedite the trial of the action and to make an application to the judge in charge of the Commercial Court list on the matter. Ms Justice Hyland said Danone had failed to establish material error in the High Court judge's conclusion that the relevant customer was one shopping in Ireland for Skyr yoghurt rather than one shopping for white strained yoghurts, as Danone contended. The judge further rejected Danone's argument that the trial judge erred in only considering the position on the parties on the Irish market and not their activities in other markets and she also rejected Danone's argument that Yoplait delayed in bringing the proceedings. However, Ms Justice Hyland ruled that the injunction order by the High Court which restrained Danone not just from passing off the goods, the subject of the proceedings, but from placing on the market confusingly similar Skyr products was 'likely to bring about an injustice'. The judge upheld Danone's appeal in that regard and modified the order to restrain Danone from passing off their Skyr products as those of Yoplait's Skyr's products, pending the hearing of the case. Case background Setting out the background to the case, Ms Justice Hyland said Yoplait Ireland had launched its Skyr product in September 2022 which it sold in packaging featuring a blue and white colour scheme with mountain imagery. She said last year Yoplait updated its it logo packaging but retained the overall get up. Yoplait, she said, asserts that its Skyr products are the leading offering in the Irish market with over 430,000 of the 850g pots sold last year. Nutricia Ireland, she said, first launched Skyr products - including yoghurt with blue and white packaging - in France in 2018 with redesigned packaging introduced to Belgium and Italy last year and an intention to launch into the Irish market in May of this year. Yoplait wrote to Danone last March stating that Danone's Skyr products were confusingly similar to their own and seeking undertaking from Danone not to launch the products in Ireland. Danone declined to provide such undertaking and disputed the claim of passing off and asserted that its packaging is consistent with its established branding and trademark.
