Love Island USA Season 7 Is Being Ruined by ‘Sisterhood'
Peacock
In this op-ed, associate editor Aiyana Ishmael argues that the efforts of the Love Island season 7 cast to recreate the commercial success of the PPG trio from season 6 is negatively impacting the natural chemistry of the Islanders and detracting from the experiences of those in and outside of the villa.
During Love Island USA season 6, audiences were sold a unicorn: stars Serena Page, Leah Kateb, and JaNa Craig forged a genuine friendship while out in Fiji searching for love, a bond not often seen during the epic throes of reality dating television.
Gone were the days of women cattily fighting over men for six weeks. We welcomed in a new era of sisterhood, one slightly more bonded than anyone had ever seen on the reality franchise's seasons past. That undeniable love and support for each other — and their instantly iconic moniker, PPG — made fans of the series invest in anything these three girls were hypothetically selling.
Serena had roughly 2,000 followers on Instagram when the show first premiered last June, and she left the villa with over half a million, which has now turned into over 4 million followers across Instagram and TikTok, a spinoff series on Peacock, and representation from one of the largest media agencies in the country. To say that the power of sisterhood transformed the personal lives of PPG is a gross understatement.
So it was only a matter of time that Love Island USA season 7 producers, contestants, and fans alike would be searching for a way to catch lightning in a bottle once more. Only it seems that we've all quickly forgotten that a successful friendship takes time and work — not just twelve episodes.
Likely due to PPG's success, it feels as though each of season 7's female contestants are overly conscious of the fact that they're being perceived by millions of at-home viewers, and desperately aware that the reality show — and 'sisterhood' — could be an avenue out of corporate purgatory and into influencer freedom, similar to what we saw with Serena, Leah, and JaNa.
We saw these forced attempts straight out of the gate: during episode 2 of the newest season, Huda Mustafa referred to Olandria Carthen and Chelley Bissainthe as her 'sisters,' noting that she was so excited for this 'sisterhood' to grow over the next few weeks. Her sentiments held the same weight as teary-eyed Alabama freshmen 'running home' to their new sorority houses, claiming they've felt the sisterhood from the moment they stepped into their first day of rush. There's a power dynamic they're refusing to address — and a (obviously lacking) suspension of disbelief required of the viewers.
Forming friendships quickly through shared trauma and confined spaces is very common; this concept of deep, profound friendship found amongst a television cast wouldn't be so jarring if we weren't being force-fed the word every few minutes by cast members who only met a few days prior.
Bombshell Amaya Espinal arrived at the villa ready to try her luck at the abysmal group of Love Island men. She decided to kiss Jeremiah Brown — who was coupled up with Huda in the first few episodes — which led to Huda calling Amaya a b*tch, claiming that she could not trust the newcomer because 'she should know' what she and Jeremiah had going on. (Amaya had arrived on the island roughly an hour before Huda's claims and had no prior knowledge of their relationship.)
In an attempt to build allegiance with the original group of girls, (Chelley, Olandria, Belle-a Walker, and Cierra Ortega) Huda 'welcomed' Cierra into the sisterhood, sharing that she was a mother — a personal fact she'd just told Jeremiah, which is why she was feeling frustrated with Amaya's choices.
Weaponizing sisterhood to separate the girls from Amaya is not friendship. It's as if this season's cast read the SparkNotes of last season's success without really contextualizing what it means to uphold friendship against the real enemy — the men in the house constantly gaslighting them.
A week later, during episode 12, we see Charlie Georgiou pull Amaya for a chat to explore a potential connection — after his partner Hannah Fields was making out with bombshell Pepe Garcia. Amaya claimed that Charlie was moving off of impulse, but more importantly that Hannah is one of her 'closest sisters' and that would be her 'biggest betrayal right now' — the 'right now" being the end of week two in the villa.
Charlie earnestly shares that while he may be moving off of emotion in response to Hannah, he deserves to explore multiple connections. Amaya tearfully reiterates that she's 'too close to Hannah' to do that to her. Moments later, in a confessional, Amaya shares that she could potentially be sent home because she hasn't formed any other connections. She adds that maybe 'if the story was different,' she'd consider Charlie, but she didn't want to change her 'moral compass.'
Based on the too-quick formation of this 'girl squad,' it's evident that the contestants are trying to take a shortcut to loyalty island when nothing's been earned yet. It's almost as if they've all forgotten the primary reason why they're on Love Island — and it has everything to do with PPG.
PPG's success last year was a gradual climb. As each new week passed we saw through subtle and grand gestures how their sisterhood became infallible. It wasn't on day one and it surely wasn't finalized by day twelve. Lest we forget the small fights between JaNa and Leah over the indiscernible Connor Newsum, something fans still bring up in shock when they see that the two are still friends after the villa? JaNa and Leah made mistakes when it came to how they handled exploring a connection with the same man, but they resolved their issues through honest communication. Small tiffs are bound to happen throughout the six-week social experiment that is Love Island, but acting as if women you've just met owe you more than the men you're actively pursuing isn't how you form a sisterhood.
After season 7 episode 12's fallout, it is painstakingly clear that forming a 'sisterhood,' especially one that operates with dogmatic loyalty, has actually become more harmful than helpful for all the girls in the house. As the women carefully walk on eggshells to soothe Huda's deteriorating emotional state, we're watching in real time how poorly-built, forced closeness is disrupting everyone's villa experience.
The friendships they're forcing onto each other — that are rightfully valued in the outside world — are magnified to an uncomfortable dimension in season 7. The contestants are taking the best parts of PPG, Liv and Kaylor, and even the Casa Amor girls, and perverting it into something else.
I'd much rather watch a show filled with morally gray, self-aware women open to the idea of building real connections with the other women on the show, all while following the main mission of Love Island: pilfering romance and affection from a large assortment of people at the same time.
Further, on a show where there are only five to six women in play at a time, trying to form an overarching group sisterhood isn't realistic. PPG was a trio and Liv and Kaylor were a duo — this idea that all the season 7 women should have undying allegiance to each other defeats the purpose of dating multiple people. Toes are bound to get stepped on, and not everyone can be in your corner all summer long.
More times than not, a friend to all is a friend to none. Sisterhood comes with time and real bonding, not forced cliques. Just because you repeatedly say it, doesn't always make it true. No one wants to be the girl who cried sisterhood.
Originally Appeared on Teen Vogue
Want more great Culture stories from Teen Vogue? Check these out:
Underneath Chappell Roan's Hannah Montana Wig? A Pop Star for the Ages
Is Your New Favorite Song Real or AI?
Bridgerton Showrunner Clarifies Benedict's Sexuality & Talks Francesca's Queer Plot Twist
The Borders of Country Music Are Finally Crumbling
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
Did Jordon Hudson subtly rip Bill Belichick's ex on Instagram?
Jordon Hudson has been staying mostly out of the spotlight as of late after she was thrust under it thanks to the now-infamous CBS interview of boyfriend Bill Belichick she interrupted. Even with reports of a possible engagement and Belichick continuing to do interviews in which he's deflecting any question about her, there hasn't been much, save for her ripping Pablo Torre for his reporting about her. But then there was an Instagram post sending a tribute to friend Miss Massachusetts Melissa Sapini. The long caption was all about their experience at a pageant, but it had this passage in it: I know you will keep shining, metamorphosing and taking up space; even when others threaten you and insist that you don't belong, e.g. the 'Nantucket Socialites'… Now: that could be nothing. Or, as some publications are noting, it could be a shot across the bow at Belichick's ex-girlfriend. Let's explain: Who is Bill Belichick's ex-girlfriend? That would be Linda Holliday, who he spent years with and snapped all kinds of photos with. Why would Jordon Hudson be ripping on Linda Holliday? Let's go back to May, with this report from People: According to an insider source, Bill Belichick's girlfriend Jordon Hudson had an extremely tense run-in with his ex Linda Holliday at a Nantucket party last December, and Hudson's night ended when she was asked to leave the event. The recent Miss Maine USA contestant, 24, and Holliday — who dated Belichick, 73, for 16 years — reportedly encountered each other on Dec. 6 at the local Dreamland Stroll Party, which was DJed by Holliday's daughters, Ashley and Kat Hess. A source tells PEOPLE that Hudson and Holliday engaged in a "verbal incident" waged with harsh words. 'Nantucket Socialites' in quotes from Hudson's post tells me that might be the indication she's throwing some serious shade at Belichick's ex.


Newsweek
33 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Princess Kate's Reaction to Anti-Monarchy Protesters Goes Viral
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Princess Kate waving as her royal carriage passed anti-monarchy protesters went viral on TikTok. Demonstrators at major royal events have become a regular feature of King Charles III's reign and Trooping the Colour, his birthday parade, was no exception on Saturday, June 14. Cameras captured the moment the carriage carrying Kate and her children, Princess Charlotte, Prince George and Prince Louis passed by protesters from Republic, which campaigns to replace the monarchy with a democratically elected head of state. Princess Kate and Princess Charlotte [R] are seen during their royal carriage procession at Trooping the Colour, on June 14, 2025, which saw protests by anti-Monarchy campaigners [L]. Princess Kate and Princess Charlotte [R] are seen during their royal carriage procession at Trooping the Colour, on June 14, 2025, which saw protests by anti-Monarchy campaigners [L].andWhy It Matters A clip of the royal carriage procession and "Not My King" protesters went viral on TikTok in subsequent days after it was liked 67,000 times and viewed 677,000 times. Protests were not generally a feature of Queen Elizabeth II's reign but have been a big part of Republic's campaign strategy since succession, posing a challenge for the royals about how to deal with it. In the days after the queen died in September 2022, police arrested protesters, creating a major public debate about freedom of speech in Britain. However, as the years have passed, the royals have looked more comfortable simply accepting the protests as a routine part of royal life. What to Know The TikTok video begins with footage of the "Not My King" protesters camped out behind crowd control barriers on the route of the royal carriage procession for Trooping on Saturday. It then goes on to show Kate waving alongside Princess Charlotte as the demonstration can be seen in the background. Graham Smith, chief executive of Republic, told Newsweek: "The protest went very well. The whole point is that we keep on improving on previous years and that's definitely what we did. We were very visible and got some really great shots." He said some royal supporters had tried to boo the protesters but sounded in the process like they were booing the royals. "We're not worried too much about the royalists," he continued. "Some of them were getting a little bit over excited. The royals are very, very aware of us and I think that they can hear us and see us. Sometimes they look a bit irritated that we're there but that's the nature of it." Smith said they still have tensions with the police over conditions put on their protests, including about the height of their banners and concerns that they could spook the royal horses, which he felt were unfounded. What People Are Saying One reply to the TikTok video read: "I'd rather a royal family than a president. They are the only tradition I feel like the UK has left. "I'd rather my tax went to the working Royals doing their humanitarian deeds than people on benefits for life offering nothing to society." Another person wrote, "I don't understand the hate🥺🥺" while a third wrote: "Well what did they expect? The Queen died so he had to take over anyway, what do they think they'll accomplish by protesting? King Charles is King whether you like it or not!" Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on X, formerly Twitter, at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek's The Royals Facebook page. Do you have a question about King Charles III and Queen Camilla, Prince William and Princess Kate, Meghan and Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@ We'd love to hear from you.


Buzz Feed
an hour ago
- Buzz Feed
Kim Kardashian Roasted For ChatGPT Conversation
People are seriously side-eyeing Kim Kardashian after she shared a screenshot of her ChatGPT conversation to her Instagram story on Wednesday. For those who don't know, ChatGPT is an app where users can speak with a chatbot that is generated by AI. Therefore, the chatbot is nothing more than a robot, which uses artificial intelligence to learn how each individual user wants to communicate with it and adapts its style accordingly. And this is why so many were left baffled by Kim's screenshot, which revealed that she speaks to the chatbot as though it is a human. Unfortunately for us, Kim only posted what appears to be the end of her and ChatGPT's conversation, with the first message in the grab reading from Kim: 'Thanks for taking accountability. That's huge in my book.' 'I really appreciate you saying that,' the chatbot replied. 'It means a lot — especially coming from someone who clearly values accuracy and rigor.'I'll keep raising my game to meet your standards,' the bot went on. 'If there's ever any doubt or if you want a deeper dive on anything, I'm here for it.''Thanks dude,' Kim wrote back, to which ChatGPT said: 'Anytime — you got it, dude😎 Let's crush the next one.'Kim posted the grab without further comment, but did add the '🥹' emoji, suggesting that she was genuinely touched by this exchange. But the people of the internet failed to see the same sentiment, and the screengrab quickly went viral on X as people shared their confused reactions to the conversation. Addressing Kim's first message in the chat, one person wrote: '……. this is the dumbest thing I've ever fucking seen? how did a language software take accountability??''What does a robot have to take accountability for?' one more asked. 'what's with people and developing an emotional connection with chatgpt do they not realize that it's fucking weird,' somebody else tweeted, with another echoing: 'is she really this lonely?''was she arguing with a fucking robot?' somebody else inquired, while another popular response pointed out the extreme environmental damage all forms of AI causes, reading: 'The temperature of the Earth just rose 1 degree for this….' Another X user simply concluded: 'Having convos with ChatGPT or AI in general is so embarrassing.' Kim's post actually came just one day after Time reported on a recent study from researchers at MIT's Media Lab, which found that ChatGPT may be 'eroding critical thinking skills.' The study split 54 subjects aged between 18 and 39 into three groups and asked them to write several SAT essays with either ChatGPT, Google, or nothing at was then used to record the writers' brain activity, and they found that of the three groups, ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and 'consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels.'The study was conducted over several months, and found that ChatGPT users got lazier with each essay, and many resorted to just copy and pasting by the end of the study. What do you make of Kim's ChatGPT conversation? Let me know in the comments below!