Reactions to Canada's election results
Here are some reactions to the results:
PRIME MINISTER MARK CARNEY
"Our old relationship with the United States, a relationship based on steadily increasing integration, is over," Carney said in a victory speech in Ottawa. "The system of open global trade anchored by the United States, a system that Canada has relied on since the Second World War, a system that, while not perfect, has helped deliver prosperity for our country for decades, is over."
CONSERVATIVE LEADER PIERRE POILIEVRE
"Canadians have opted for a razor-thin minority government, a virtual tie in the vote, so I would like to congratulate Prime Minister Carney on leading this minority government."
LIBERAL TRANSPORT MINISTER CHRYSTIA FREELAND
"I think it's important for us to have a little bit of perspective when we look at this result. And for me, I look back to as recently as December, when everyone was writing the Liberal Party off. People were even talking about whether we would retain official party status in the next election. And so tonight, when it is clear that we are going to form the government, from my perspective, that is an outstanding result."
JAGMEET SINGH, LEADER OF CANADA'S NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY
"This night is a disappointing night for New Democrats," Singh said in a speech in which he announced he was stepping down as leader of his left-leaning party.
FORMER U.S. PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN
"I congratulate Prime Minister Mark Carney and the Liberal Party on their success in Canada's election. I'm confident Mark will be a strong leader for the fundamental values and interests Canadians and Americans share."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
15 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Nicola Sturgeon admits she 'lost the dressing room' on Isla Bryson
The former first minister called Bryson 'a biological male' during an interview with ITV to promote her new memoir Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Nicola Sturgeon has admitted she 'lost the dressing room' when she refused to say whether double rapist Isla Bryson was a man or a woman. In an interview with ITV News to mark the publication of her new memoir, the former first minister called Bryson 'a biological male' and admitted she should have been 'much more straightforward' on the issue. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She said 'all sense of rationality' had been lost in the furious gender debate, adding: 'I'm partly responsible for that.' Nicola Sturgeon speaking to ITV to mark the release of her new memoir, Frankly | ITV Ms Sturgeon said rapists should 'probably' lose their right to choose their own gender. But critics branded her comments 'drivel' and said she had failed to apologise. The passing of the gender recognition reforms, which would have made it easier for trans people to legally change their gender, marked one of the most controversial periods in Ms Sturgeon's political career. The legislation passed with cross-party support in December 2022, but was later blocked by the former Conservative government in Westminster. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Not long afterwards Bryson – who was born Adam Graham – was sent to a women's only jail after being convicted of raping two women, before being transferred to a male prison. Ms Sturgeon repeatedly refused to say whether Bryson was a man or a woman during this period, instead simply saying: "That individual is a rapist.' In her new memoir, which is titled Frankly, she admitted: 'There haven't been many times in my career when my communication skills deserted me as utterly as they did in the face of this controversy. Maybe my confidence had been damaged more than I realised by the intensity of the vitriol flung at me. Or maybe I was just losing my touch. Whatever the reason, when confronted with the question 'Is Isla Bryson a woman?' I was like a rabbit caught in the headlights.' Ms Sturgeon wrote that saying yes to the question would 'enrage people and inflame the situation', but saying no 'would allow the opponents of the new self-identification law to say that they had been right all along about the impact on women-only spaces - which, in my view, they absolutely hadn't been'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She added: 'Moreover, it seemed obvious to me - media frenzy aside - that the gender question was not the relevant issue in this context. What mattered was that Isla Bryson was a rapist. Identifying as a woman did not confer any automatic right to be accommodated in a female prison. 'Any convicted trans woman considered a risk to female inmates would be sent to a man's prison, as in fact Isla Bryson quickly was. This all seemed very rational. The problem was that, in a febrile atmosphere, I was unable to communicate it in a way that cut any ice. 'Because I failed to answer 'yes', plain and simple, to the basic question, I seemed weak and evasive. Worst of all, I sounded like I didn't have the courage to stand behind the logical conclusion of the self-identification system we had just legislated for. In football parlance, I lost the dressing room.' Speaking to ITV, Ms Sturgeon was asked if she would say now whether Bryson is a man. 'Isla Bryson identified as a woman,' the former first minister said. 'I think what I would say now is anybody who commits the most heinous male crime against women probably forfeits the right to be the gender of their choice.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, she went on to say this latter comment 'probably was not the best phrase to use'. Asked why she did not simply say Bryson is a biological male, Ms Sturgeon said that 'they are a biological male' but added the issue 'gets back into the self-ID thing'. The former first minister continued: 'I should have been much more straightforward, I wasn't, but that's because of the debate. We'd lost all sense of rationality in this debate. I'm partly responsible for that.' Ms Sturgeon said: 'Anything I say about Isla Bryson, in the wider world will immediately be taken and transferred to every trans person. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'And if I sometimes still seem as if I'm struggling with how to define Isla Bryson, it's not out of any concern for Isla Bryson, it's out of concern for how that then affects the wider trans community, and that is difficult.' In the same interview, Ms Sturgeon admitted she did not 'engage as much as I should on some of the concerns that might then be triggered' by her gender reforms. She added: 'At the point I knew it was becoming, or felt it becoming, as polarized I should have said, 'Right, okay, let's pause, let's take a step back'. 'I fervently believe that the rights of women and the interests of trans people are not irreconcilable at all. I should have taken a step back and said, 'How do we achieve this?'' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay said: 'Frankly, Nicola Sturgeon must be delusional if she thinks the women of Scotland will swallow this drivel. 'She arrogantly ignored all warnings that gender self-ID would be a gift to male predators like Isla Bryson. And she ordered her SNP MSPs to vote down my attempts to block rapists and other sex criminals from being able to legally change their gender by self-declaration. 'Her absurd ideological belief in self-ID collapses with her belated mealy-mouthed admission that this rapist is a man, but she still can't bring herself to say sorry for all the pain and misery she has caused. 'Let's not forget that if it was not for Alister Jack's common-sense decision to block Sturgeon's dangerous law, every rapist in Scotland would be able to declare themselves as women with the full support of the state.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Sturgeon's memoir also touches on the t-shirt worn by JK Rowling, which branded the former first minister a 'destroyer of women's rights'.
Reuters
43 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK and Canada say peace must not be imposed on Ukraine
LONDON, Aug 11 (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney agreed that peace in Ukraine must be built with Kyiv and not imposed upon it, a Downing Street spokesperson said on Monday. The two leaders welcomed continued international diplomacy, led by U.S. President Donald Trump, "to bring peace and agreed that this must be built with Ukraine - not imposed upon it. "Both leaders underscored that Ukraine's future must be one of freedom, sovereignty, and self-determination," the spokesperson said. The statement came as Trump is due to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday in Alaska.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Reform UK's rise reveals how out of touch Keir Starmer and John Swinney really are
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It is a strange form of criticism to brand some parties dismissively as 'populist'. Political parties operating in a democratic landscape need to be popular or they will not get elected. Why would any political party or leader of a party want to be branded as 'elitist' or 'condescending'? Being unpopular is what became of the old Liberal party. When it was replaced by the Labour party, did that make its leaders – Keir Hardy, Arthur Henderson and Ramsay MacDonald – populists? In time, they became popular and Labour eventually formed governments, so what's changed? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad One thing that has certainly changed is how the established parties are very similar. Of course they and their die-hard supporters will seek to argue they are very different, but it is becoming increasingly obvious to many people that, since the arrival of Edinburgh's own Anthony Blair, there really has not been a great deal of difference in many of the policies or laws that have become embedded in modern Britain. Keir Starmer jokes with John Swinney and Welsh First Minister Eluned Morgan at a meeting in Edinburgh last year (Picture: Andy Buchanan/WPA pool) | Getty Images The 'Uniparty' Indeed it is easier to find policies that started with one party in government and have been followed through by the party replacing it. This has led to Labour and the Conservatives being branded as the 'Uniparty' – a term which in most respects should include the Liberal Democrats too (who were in power with the Conservatives between 2010-15). An example of this phenomenon is the treatment of Northern Ireland by successive Conservative governments since the Brexit vote of 2016. Theresa May started by conceding the Northern Ireland Backstop because the European Union threatened the imposition of a border with the Republic of Ireland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This was changed by Boris Johnson's government to become the Northern Ireland Protocol, and although early economic data showed that it was resulting in trade displacement, and although article 16 of that Protocol allowed for it to be suspended in such circumstances, Rishi Sunak gave up on standing up to the EU and instead doubled down on the concessions with his Windsor Framework. In typical Uniparty style, Labour cheered on this process just as it did with other bilateral policies like ending non-dom tax status and raising taxes to dangerously harmful levels where revenues would begin to fall. This week under Labour, the second of two physical border posts opened in Belfast, the first already completed in Larne. These border posts are to inspect GB goods going into Northern Ireland. Even in the 'Green Lane', such goods are treated like exports to a foreign country, requiring an export number, customs paperwork with a compulsory percentage pulled-over for physical checks. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So, despite our governments telling us repeatedly that all the backstops, protocols and frameworks would prevent a hard border, our political elite – of all mainstream parties – have agreed to a concrete-and-steel border within and between our country. Surely, as only the EU wanted a border, it should have been the EU that built one where its jurisdiction started, not inside the UK. Time and again, we are deceived by governments doing the opposite of what they say they will do as if we might not notice. Sturgeon should have abandoned gender self-ID Another example of the detachment of our elite political class came from the former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon who has said she should have paused her legislation on self-ID. No Nicola, you should not have paused it, you should have abandoned it and instead sought to enshrine the rights of women – as defined by their sex – so, unequivocally, they would have safe spaces they could call their own. No ifs, buts, maybes or pauses, just a recognition that the public was not supportive of her ideologically driven policy. You might call Sturgeon's approach an elite, condescending, arrogant position – I'm with the populists who campaigned long and hard to protect a women's right to a private safe space. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The pursuit of Sturgeon's policy by her replacement, Humza Yousaf, was just as undemocratic as hers, and the Janus-faced approach of John Swinney in facing one way and then another rather than firmly enforcing the Supreme Court decision condemns him too. The populist approach would have been for him to withdraw the Scottish Government's legal defence, but in true patronising style the SNP establishment new better. UK control of policies Back to Brexit and last week we found that an academic poll which asked where decisions that affect people's lives should be made revealed our main established parties are still trying to pull the wool over our eyes. Carried out by YouGov for Queen Mary University London, it found that Labour, Conservative and even Liberal Democrat and Green voters gave majority support for all 20 areas of policy on taxes, trade, quality standards, border controls etcetera being decided upon by the UK Government alone. Of those 20, 17 had an overall majority for 'the UK alone', while for three it was the largest of the three options. And yet we are told by the Labour government we badly need an EU reset (contrary to the data on trade). Keir Starmer's reset will bring EU laws (present and future) with price increases – and even business taxes that will drive the cost of energy up – yet here we go again with Labour and the Liberal Democrats pushing for a 'reset' and the new Conservative leadership showing little enthusiasm for repudiating it. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Again, I'm with the populists. There is nothing wrong in having cordial relationships with one's neighbours but there is no need to concede our hard-won sovereignty to make decisions for ourselves. We should trust the people. Our political parties in Westminster, Holyrood, the Senedd and Stormont need to recognise that popular policies should be reflected in democratic choices. Only then will they challenge Reform UK – which is doing better than all of them because it seeks to listen and speak up for those who feel nobody is listening to them.
