Iranian Foreign Minister launches book on negotiation skills in Muscat before talks with US
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi signed copies of his new book, The Power of Negotiation, in Muscat on Friday, a day before his country's nuclear talks with the US resumed.
The event was attended by Omani Foreign Minister Badr Al Busaidi, who received a copy of The Power of Negotiation from the author, the Oman News Agency reported.
The book explores the nature of negotiations, types of political negotiation, traits of the negotiator personality plus skills and requirements of getting the job done, publicists said.
Born in 1962, Mr Araghchi has held several diplomatic posts, including ambassador to Finland and Japan, and served as Iran's chief nuclear negotiator during the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) talks.
He was appointed Foreign Minister in 2024 under President Masoud Pezeshkian.
Iran's diplomats have for generations prided themselves on their negotiation skills, often quoting their success in securing the 2015 nuclear deal.
The JCPOA negotiations, which involved the US, Europe, Russia and China, were held to be a major diplomatic achievement for Tehran before President Donald Trump withdrew from the agreement in 2018.
Mr Araghchi 's appearance at the Muscat International Book Fair came as Iran and the US, represented by Mr Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff, prepared for a round of expert-level talks. Negotiators are aiming to establish a framework to limit Iran's nuclear activities while easing sanctions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Iranian press review: Conservative media demand rejection of US proposal
Critics say US proposal not worth answering The new US proposal for a nuclear deal with Iran has drawn sharp criticism from Iranian conservative media, with some urging Iranian diplomats to halt the negotiations. The Jame Jam daily, run by the country's only state broadcaster, last Tuesday dedicated all of its main content to the issue. Its main front-page story addressed Iran's foreign minister directly, with the headline: 'Mr Araghchi! America's new damn nonsense is not worth a response.' It read: 'America's history of making excessive demands and the topics they have raised show that Washington's proposal does not deserve a reply.' The article was in response to recent remarks by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said Iran would soon issue a written response to the US proposal. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Jame Jam also criticised the Massoud Pezeshkian administration's handling of talks with the US. In a column by conservative media analyst Sepehr Khalaji, the daily urged the government to 'learn a lesson' from previous negotiations that had failed to produce results. Another conservative analyst, Morad Anadi, contrasted the international pressure on Iran's nuclear programme with the silence surrounding Israel's. 'In this unfair system, which is called nuclear apartheid, the Zionist regime has more than 200 nuclear warheads, is not a member of the NPT, and has never allowed inspections of its nuclear sites,' he said. Rare unity as politicians slam cleric arrested in Saudi Arabia The arrest of Gholamreza Ghasemian, an extremist Iranian cleric, in Saudi Arabia has sparked rare unity in Iranian domestic politics, with all political factions, including from principlists and reformists, condemning the controversial figure. Ghasemian, who in recent years had gained strong support from conservative and hard-line groups in Iran, criticised Saudi Arabia's rulers in a video he posted online while in the country for the Hajj pilgrimage. What is stopping Israel from bombing Iran's nuclear sites? Read More » Following his arrest and deportation by Saudi authorities, the conservative Iranian daily Quds criticised his remarks, writing: 'An incident like this, at a time when the Iranian diplomatic team is rebuilding regional relations, creates a negative impact. It also sows division in the Islamic world; exactly what the United States and the Zionist regime want.' The reformist newspaper Arman Melli welcomed the principlists' condemnation of Ghasemian, calling it a sign of the government's efforts to avoid extremist policies. Abdolreza Davari, a reformist political activist, wrote in an opinion piece for Arman Melli, titled: 'The political climate in the Islamic Republic is changing." He wrote: 'Radical behaviour and speech no longer have a place at the highest levels of governance. A clear example of this shift is the cold response from both the government and public opinion to Qasemian's recent remarks in Medina.' Jalal Rashidi Kochi, a former member of the Iranian parliament, also posted on X: 'Mr Ghasemian, you are not serving religion or the revolution. You are deliberately causing harm to the country, the people, and the establishment. This action is not courage, and it is not stupidity. It is treason.' IRGC criticised for 'hell' attraction in northern city The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has come under fire for building a 'hell' attraction in the northern city of Fuman, based on Shia Islamic beliefs. After facing backlash, the IRGC announced plans to build a 'paradise' site as well, a move that has only added to the criticism. In a video shared on social media, visitors are shown walking across a metal bridge suspended just above real flames. In the background, actors perform scenes meant to represent torture in hell, including flogging. Ayatollah Seyyed Mohammad Ali Ayazi, a renowned religious scholar, strongly reacted to the project. 'People are already suffering from economic hardship, poverty, poor management, electricity and gas shortages, water issues, and many other problems,' he said. 'Why would you want to add to their suffering?' Political activist Abdolreza Davari also criticised the project, pointing to the country's winter gas shortages. He estimated the gas consumption of the attraction: 'If the Fuman hell uses 150 burners for four hours a day, and each burner uses 20 cubic metres of gas per hour, then it burns 12,000 cubic meters of gas every day. That is equal to the daily gas use of 480 homes in winter and costs about $2,400 per day.' China planes-for-oil deal sparks outcry The arrival of two used Airbus A330 planes from China to Iran has triggered criticism over the exploitative nature of the economic deals between the two countries. Saudi Arabian and Omani officials propose nuclear facilities for Iran on Gulf island: Report Read More » Local media reported that the planes were sold at nearly four times their actual value, raising concerns about exploitation under international sanctions. The story was first reported by the Iranian Labour News Agency (ILNA), which claimed that "the Chinese sold $30m worth of planes for $116m". According to ILNA, Haokun Energy, a Chinese company, took advantage of Iran's limited access to global oil markets and banking systems, caused by international sanctions. The planes were reportedly delivered in exchange for Iranian oil. This is not the first time Chinese companies have been accused of benefiting from US sanctions against Iran. However, it is one of the highest sums publicly mentioned in this context. ILNA also highlighted other issues related to Haokun Energy, noting that the company still owes substantial amounts of money to Iran. Under the previous government, the Chinese company signed a $2.5bn development project for Imam Khomeini Airport, again in exchange for Iranian oil. Experts at the time said the project's fees were extremely high. * Iranian press review is a digest of news reports not independently verified as accurate by Middle East Eye.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Iran operated three secret nuclear sites until early 2000s, UN watchdog says
Iran had at least three undeclared nuclear sites until the early 2000s, but refuses to provide 'credible answers" about its activities there, the UN's nuclear watchdog said on Monday. The three sites, Varamin, Marivan and Turquzabad, were accessed by inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency in 2019 and 2020. Uranium particles were detected at the sites. But the agency's efforts to obtain an explanation have gone unanswered, said the IAEA director general Rafael Grossi. 'Unfortunately, Iran has repeatedly either not answered, or not provided, technically credible answers to the agency's questions,' he said at the quarterly board meeting on Monday. This included high-level meetings and consultations, he added. Mr Grossi last week met Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Cairo, along with Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty. The lack of answers has meant the IAEA could not conclude that Iran's nuclear programme is "entirely peaceful", as Tehran has long claimed, Mr Grossi said. He accused Tehran of seeking to 'sanitise the locations', which he said has impeded the agency's work. Details of the three sites were revealed in the IAEA's quarterly report, which was widely leaked last week. It found that Iran had an estimated 400kg of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent as of May 17, marking an increase of more than 133kg since the last report in February. Uranium needs to be enriched to about 90 per cent to develop nuclear weapons. The amount of material is enough to produce 10 weapons if refined to that level. "The agency's comprehensive assessment of what took place, based on our technical evaluation of all available safeguards-relevant information, has led us to conclude that these three locations, and other possible related locations, were part of an undeclared structured nuclear programme carried out by Iran until the early 2000s and that some activities used undeclared nuclear material," Mr Grossi said. He suggested the nuclear material produced at the sites was 'still outside of safeguards'. The announcement comes as Iran holds indirect negotiations with the US over its nuclear programme. Mr Grossi said he supported the negotiations and called for a diplomatic solution that would include arrangements for the IAEA to properly verify Iran's stockpile of nuclear material. 'I will continue to support and encourage the US and Iran to spare no effort and exercise wisdom and political courage to bring this to a successful conclusion,' he added. 'The effect of a stabilised situation in Iran with regards to its nuclear programme will be immediate and bring the Middle East one big step closer to peace and prosperity."
The National
3 days ago
- The National
Iran warns European nations over move to censure it for nuclear 'non-compliance'
Iran 's Foreign Minister warned the UK, France and Germany on Friday against backing a resolution censuring Tehran at a meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency next week, saying such a move would be a "strategic mistake". "Instead of engaging in good faith, the E3 is opting for malign action against Iran at the IAEA Board of Governors," Abbas Araghchi said in a post on X. "Mark my words as Europe ponders another major strategic mistake: Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights." Mr Araghchi's warning comes as the three European nations prepare to join the United States in backing a draft resolution to censure Iran at next week's board meeting, a diplomatic source told AFP. The resolution would accuse Iran of failing to meet its obligations as a signatory of the Nuclear No-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and carries the threat of referral to the UN Security Council if Tehran "does not show goodwill", the source added. The move follows a quarterly report from the IAEA last week which cited a "general lack of co-operation" from Iran and raised concerns over undeclared nuclear material. The UN's nuclear watchdog also expressed 'serious concern' that Iran had stepped up its enrichment of uranium to near weapons-grade level in recent months. The report said Iran had an estimated 408.6 kilograms of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent as of May 17, up by 133.8kg since the last report in February. According to the IAEA, Iran is the only non-nuclear weapon state to enrich uranium to 60 per cent, which is close to the roughly 90 per cent level needed for atomic weapons. Iran has repeatedly denied that it is seeking to develop nuclear weapons. Tehran rejected the report as politically motivated and based on "forged documents" that it said had been provided by its arch foe Israel. In his post on X, Mr Araghchi said that despite "years of good co-operation with the IAEA – resulting in a resolution which shut down malign claims of a 'possible military dimension' (PMD) to Iran's peaceful nuclear programme – my country is once again accused of 'non-compliance'." "Falsely accusing Iran of violating safeguards – based on shoddy and politicised reporting – is clearly designed to produce a crisis," he said. The pressure on Iran comes as it holds indirect talks with the US, mediated by Oman, to reach an agreement that would see Tehran accept curbs on its nuclear activity in return for the lifting of economic sanctions imposed by Washington. The two sides have held five rounds of talks since April 12 but are at odds over the issue of uranium enrichment, which produces fuel for nuclear reactors or, at higher levels of purity, material for nuclear warheads. Iran's leaders say that it has the right to enrich uranium under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and that the issue is "non-negotiable", while President Donald Trump insists that US will not allow enrichment to continue on Iranian soil. Tehran and Washington are seeking a new agreement to replace a 2015 deal with major powers which Mr Trump unilaterally abandoned during his first term in 2018. The agreement quickly unravelled as Mr Trump reimposed sweeping sanctions on Iran, leading Tehran to begin breaching commitments it made under the pact including a 3.67 per cent cap on the level of its uranium enrichment. Britain, France and Germany, which were all party to the 2015 deal, are now considering whether to trigger a "snapback" of UN sanctions under its dispute resolution mechanism – an option that expires on the deal's 10th anniversary in October.
