Labor commits to national packaging rules, as Planet Ark collapses
The packaging and consumer goods industry has abandoned its long-held antipathy to government regulation, and has been calling for a mandatory scheme to ensure national consistency and that the costs are fairly shared. In February, the federal Environment Department published the results of a government consultation that showed a clear majority of respondents supported Commonwealth regulation of packaging.
In August last year, co-regulator APCO announced plans to slug businesses hundreds of millions of dollars by 2027 to reduce packaging.
Planet Ark's financial statements to the charity regulator are more than a year overdue. The 2022 report, the most recent available, listed revenue of $3.08 million and expenses of $3.79 million. Goods and services, such as corporate sponsorships, partnerships and consulting accounted for more than 85 per cent of income.
The organisation is involved in a number of voluntary product stewardship schemes, including Batteries 4 Planet Ark, Cartridges 4 Planet Ark and Mobile Muster. It was awarded $940,000 from the National Product Stewardship Investment Fund under the former Coalition government to set up PODcycle to recycle aluminium and plastic coffee pods, but so far it has a pilot program in only five retailers and two cafes in NSW and Victoria.
Recycling industry insiders, who requested anonymity to speak freely, said many corporations were delaying investing in new schemes while awaiting details from the federal government and APCO.
Jeff Angel, director of the Boomerang Alliance, said Planet Ark was too close to industry.
'What they did by creating those schemes, and they would get money from industry for that … is they would give credibility or legitimacy to those weak schemes,' Angel said.
'Voluntary schemes always fail to make a significant impact, so it was on the verge of greenwashing because industry used it to oppose much stronger regulatory schemes.'
Angel said the emerging support for regulation in the packaging industry was a shift in approach, given it took 13 years of advocacy to get container deposit schemes up and running.
When asked what gap it would leave if Planet Ark closed its doors, Angel said: 'Not much'.
Loading
However, Louise Hyland, chief executive of the Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association, said Planet Ark was a 'leading environmental organisation' that had helped educate Australians and promote recycling, and she hoped the restructure would allow it to survive. A partnership meant that Planet Ark promoted Mobile Muster, but the program was run independently and would continue regardless, she said.
Dee, a co-founder of Planet Ark who was part of the organisation from 1992 to 2007, severed ties in 2012 over the organisation's partnership with the timber industry.
He said he had spoken to administrators and set up a meeting for next week to understand the financial problems and whether he could be involved in restructuring.
Loading
'How do we bring Planet Ark back to what it used to be ... it really drove the agenda on a whole range of environmental topics and created real change,' Dee said.
Dee agreed it needed to be mandatory for manufacturers to fund recycling.
'We're not getting results that warrant a continuation of the voluntary approach,' he said. 'It's not working.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Courier-Mail
5 hours ago
- Courier-Mail
Revealed: The hidden cost of Australia's ute tax breaks compared to EVs
Don't miss out on the headlines from Motoring. Followed categories will be added to My News. OPINION: We've all seen the headlines: electric vehicle (EV) tax breaks are costing taxpayers billions. According to Government modelling, the Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) exemption for EVs, alongside other related perks, is forecast to cost Australians $23.4 billion by 2036. That's a staggering figure, especially when you consider this policy only began in July 2022. As the Productivity Commission highlighted in its second report, the cost of the EV FBT exemption has blown out from an initial forecast of $55 million per year to a staggering $560 million, leading to calls to scrap it. But have you ever wondered about the figures for subsidising big, diesel and fuel-chugging utes over the past decade? Well, that number doesn't exist. RELATED: What Albo's new road tax means for you 2025 Ford Ranger Wildtrak PHEV. Picture: Supplied While policymakers and commentators are lining up to slam EV incentives as 'inefficient' or 'costly', Australia's longstanding love affair with utes is being ignored. HUGE COST OF UTES IGNORED These vehicles, which make up four of the top five best-selling models in the country, are quietly driving away with generous tax perks – and Aussies are paying for it. Under Australia's tax system, commercial vehicles, such as dual-cab utes, can claim a Fringe Benefit Tax exemption, provided they're used 'primarily' for work. But the rules are so vague, that many use utes for personal reasons, which is allowed as long as it's 'minor, infrequent, and irregular'. In reality, many of these utes aren't ferrying tradies and tools. They're doing school drop-off, towing jet skis, and sitting in suburban streets. According to the Australian Institute, there are 1.5 times more utes on the road than there are actual tradies, which suggests a lot of people are claiming a tax break for a 'tool of trade' that's really just a big, comfy family car. MORE: New ute to spark price war Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers during Prime Minister Anthony Albanese opening remarks at The Economic Reform Roundtable at Parliament House in Canberra. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman It's not just FBT, utes also avoid the Luxury Car Tax, even if they cost well over six figures, because technically, they're not 'passenger vehicles'. So you can buy a RAM 1500 and avoid paying LCT, while someone buying a more efficient EV might get slugged. In 2023, high-end American-style utes alone cost Australians over $250 million in foregone revenue from the Luxury Car Tax, according to a report by the Australia Institute. That figure doesn't even count the tax revenue lost from the FBT exemption. Australia Institute research director Rod Campbell said Australia is subsidising 'big, dumb utes by hundreds of millions of dollars each year'. 'These vehicles are damaging roads, reducing safety and increasing emissions, yet they are given a massive tax break,' he said. I'm not ignoring the $23 billion figure attached to EV tax breaks, including FBT exemptions, import tariff relief, and other incentives but these tax breaks are designed to make EV ownership more accessible and affordable, particularly through novated leasing. MORE: Chinese brand moves into Holden's home A driver charging his car at an EV charging station in Caringbah. Picture: Jonathan Ng According to the National Automotive Leasing and Salary Packaging Association, more than 100,000 Australians have taken up an EV novated lease since mid-2022. These policies are critical to making EVs accessible, especially as the upfront costs are a little higher than petrol and diesel equivalents. These EV tax breaks are part of a broader push by the Federal Government to reach net zero by 2050, with transport making up 20 per cent of national emissions. HALF-PREGNANT APPROACH But the Productivity Commission's report now recommends scrapping the EV FBT exemption, arguing it's too costly and now 'duplicative' with the New Vehicle Efficiency Standards (NVES). Sure … the (NVES) will encourage automakers to import cleaner cars into the market, but that's only half the battle. If consumers aren't incentivised to buy them, nothing changes. You need both; one brings supply, the other brings demand. BYD electric cars for export waiting to be loaded onto a ship at a port in Yantai, in eastern China's Shandong province. (Photo by AFP) / China OUT As the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) noted, without continued consumer support, the 'continuation of current customer buying preferences will inevitably lead to the accrual of substantial penalties.' Automakers can't just absorb these costs; they will likely have to raise prices on popular models, reduce their availability, or exit the market altogether. Countries that have successfully transitioned to high EV adoption rates such as Norway, have almost always used both strong efficiency standards and generous consumer incentives. Relying solely on one or the other often leads to slower progress. So if we're serious about being fair and decarbonising the transport sector, then shouldn't we be looking at everything? Including utes. So why are we ignoring the ute loophole? Is it because it's politically uncomfortable? Talking about utes means comforting one of Australia's most beloved vehicle segments. Tradies vote and Aussies rely on them. If the Federal Government decides to pull EV tax breaks now, while leaving the ute loophole wide open, that's like turning off a light in a room and calling it a major win for energy efficiency. We need better policy and smarter decisions. Originally published as EV cuts loom while Aussies pay for ute tax
Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Business veteran Maurice Newman tears into Treasurer Jim Chalmers' economic agenda, labels it 'Chinese-style socialism'
Treasurer Jim Chalmers' promotion of 'Chinese-style socialism under the banner 'stakeholder capitalism'' has come under fire by an Australian business veteran during Sky News' Real Economic Round Table. Nationals Senator Matt Canavan invited an array of leaders for a roundtable to discuss Australia's flailing productivity and energy woes. It took place as Mr Chalmers convenes Labor's private productivity summit in Canberra with an array of business, union and policy figures. Among the atendees of the Real Economic Round Table was Maurice Newman, an Australian business veteran who has served in a range of public roles including chair of the ASX, the ABC and the Prime Minister's Business Advisory Council. He tore into the Treasurer's large-spending agenda. 'Australians wait for someone to expose the emperors who have no clothes. Sadly, Treasurer Jim Chalmers is one such emperor,' Mr Newman said. 'Dr Chalmers promotes Chinese-style socialism under the banner 'stakeholder capitalism'. 'His mastery of spin uses the title 'humanising capital', but the philosophy is the same.' Mr Newman attacked the Treasurer over an essay he penned in 2023, where Mr Chalmers slammed neoliberalism and called on business to co-invest with government. 'Dr. Chalmers believes that businesses should be judged on their corporate social responsibility, not just financial metrics,' the business veteran said. 'He advocates 'the transformation of the welfare state into a managerial utopia with the government in collaboration with superannuation funds acting as benevolent resource allocators through which autocratic technocratic elites will manage all aspects of society'. 'What could possibly go wrong?' Labor's economic outlook was similarly ripped in to by former Productivity Commissioner Gary Banks who said the Albanese government's 'productivity agenda is mainly a spending more agenda'. He pointed to large spending on the NDIS, renewable energy and manufacturing subsidies as detriments to productivity and living standards. 'The diversion of resources to the public sector has been a major contributor to the decline in productivity growth in Australia,' Mr Banks said. 'Most parts of the public sector not only have lower productivity but they have inherently slower productivity growth. 'This reflects not just the greater labour intensity of the services concerned but weaker incentives to use resources in a cost-effective way and to pursue cost reducing innovations.' Alongside the criticisms of Labor's economic agenda, the experts at the Sky News roundtable also laid out four actions the government needs to take to restore productivity in the economy. These were scrapping bracket creep, cutting government spending by four per cent, curbing new NDIS entrants and ditching net-zero emissions targets.
Sky News AU
8 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Set up for permanent disability': Health Minister Mark Butler promises to cut National Disability Insurance Scheme growth as autism surge fuels sustainability fears
Health Minister Mark Butler has promised to rein in the ballooning cost of the National Disability Insurance Scheme, warning its 'social licence' is under strain after figures revealed more than 70 per cent of new participants joined due to autism diagnoses. Health Minister Mark Butler has warned that the National Disability Insurance Scheme must be returned to its 'original purpose' and that its spending growth must be cut. Mr Butler affirmed the NDIS growth rate needs to be lower than the eight per cent target, after it previously grew by more than 20 per cent between 2020 and 2024. The NDIS was originally expected to peak at 4 per cent annual growth when the scheme was launched in 2013. However, since then, the NDIS has exploded, with new figures revealing more than 70 per cent of new participants have entered the scheme with an autism diagnosis. Speaking at the National Press Club, Mr Butler revealed that he did not believe children with 'moderate levels of developmental delay' should be on the scheme. 'The NDIS has grown incredibly fast and created new markets which have… sometimes distorted other parts of the health and social care ecosystem,' he said. 'Children with mild to moderate levels of developmental delay and autism should not, in my view, be on a scheme set up for permanent disability.' Mr Butler promised to revise the system and work towards whittling down its growth rate, in order to make the program more sustainable. 'After we achieve our current target set for next year, a further wave of reform will be needed to get growth down further to a more sustainable position,' he said. 'Growth should reflect unit price inflation plus growth in population. In nominal terms, that would hover around 4 per cent or 5 per cent. 'On top of that, we should allow an inflator that reflects the ageing of participants in the scheme, which might add up to another 1 per cent, taking us to around 5 per cent.' — Grattan Institute (@GrattanInst) June 29, 2025 Amid the ballooning cost of the NDIS – $52 billion in 2025, compared to $51 billion for national defence – Mr Butler warned its public support has come under pressure. 'Social licence is also particularly important to such a scheme. And right now, although that licence is still strong, I do worry that it's coming under pressure,' he said. 'Recent research by Talbot Mills found that 7 in 10 Australians do agree the NDIS plays a vital role in improving the lives of (disabled people). 'But 7 in 10 also agreed the NDIS has grown too large and is struggling with inefficiencies and dodgy providers. Fully 6 in 10 Australians agreed the NDIS is broken.' According to new data, 56,000 of the 78,600 people who signed up to the NDIS in the 12 months to June 2025 listed autism as their primary diagnosis. That figure accounted for 71 per cent of all new entrants, more than ten times higher than the next most common reason: developmental delay (5,553). The new figures bring the total number of NDIS participants with autism to 295,000, or nearly 40 per cent of the 749,000 people on the scheme. According to the Grattan Institute, 44 per cent of recipients are children diagnosed with autism or developmental conditions. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has previously expressed his concern at the ballooning costs, saying he was 'not happy' with the state of the NDIS. 'We've been trying to … make the system more sustainable. It had been allowed to just drift over the three terms of the former government,' Mr Albanese said in July. 'The vision of the NDIS is a great one. It's one we should be really proud of as Australians. 'But we need to make sure that it is made more sustainable... The vision of the NDIS wasn't that those sort of numbers (of children) go on the system.' He also noted that 'massive rorts' in the system had inflated costs and pledged to continue a crackdown on fraudulent providers.
