Gender critical campaigners demand action from government on toilet access
Sex Matters, which intervened in the For Women Scotland case against which went to the Supreme Court, are threatening a lawsuit against Scottish ministers – with the latest letter demanding action by a deadline of next Wednesday.
The Supreme Court's ruling in April said the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex.
Sex Matters say the government must make a statement that all single-sex facilities on its estate must be interpreted as meaning biological sex.
Ministers, including John Swinney, say they accept the judgment and have convened a working group to review their policies, as well as having discussions with the Equalities and Human Rights Commission.
The campaign group, led by Maya Forstater, sent its first letter before action in June and another was sent to Scottish Government officials on Wednesday.
The latest letter gives the government seven days to respond and says: 'To the extent that the Scottish Government does not immediately stop the unlawful practices set out in this letter we may decide to commence proceedings without further warning.'
It notes there are 1,016 toilets across the government's core estate, in a mixture of unisex and separate-sex facilities.
The letter calls on the government to make a statement that 'all facilities designated as male or female within the Scottish Government estate are to be interpreted as meaning biological sex, and that gender-neutral options are widely available'.
A Scottish Government's official responded to Sex Matters' previous letter, saying they accept the Supreme Court ruling.
The letter, dated June 27, said: 'We are now taking action to implement the ruling.
'This includes the establishment of a short life working group to review existing policies, guidance and legislation which may be impacted by the judgment.
'The work of this group is under way and covers all relevant portfolios across government.
'This work is enabling us towards a state of readiness to take all necessary steps to implement the ruling.'
The government has been approached for further comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
21 hours ago
- New York Times
These Comics Got Caught Up in Politics. Now, They're Getting Personal.
People don't normally go to comedy shows for political enlightenment. They want escapism — to be, literally, diverted. But these are not normal times, and several noteworthy comedy acts at this year's Edinburgh Festival Fringe are engaging effectively with political themes. The challenge is to not come across as a fanatic — or worse, a bore. Comics are gracefully avoiding these pitfalls by foregrounding personal narratives over polemic, and letting the audience join the dots. It's been a month since President Trump threatened to strip Rosie O'Donnell of her U.S. citizenship, but he features only fleetingly in her new show, 'Common Knowledge.' The first reference to 'the orange menace' occurs roughly 30 minutes into this hourlong monologue, which unpacks O'Donnell's decision to emigrate from New York to Dublin for the sake of her autistic and nonbinary child, Clay. There are some fun fish-out-of-water antics as O'Donnell acclimatizes to Irish social mores. She misinterprets her pharmacist's friendliness as romantic interest, and asks her out. (The pharmacist is straight, and married.) The show ends on an uplifting note as O'Donnell recalls going on an Irish talk show to discuss autism and coming home to find an autistic local boy on her doorstep, asking to be friends. This is cozy, life-affirming stuff; against a backdrop of simmering culture wars, O'Donnell's compassionate embrace of difference feels implicitly political. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Sturgeon making Salmond claims because he cannot defend himself, niece says
Alex Salmond's niece has criticised Nicola Sturgeon's decision to write about her late uncle, saying she had only done so 'because he's not here to defend himself'. Christina Hendry said if the former first minister and Alba Party leader was alive today he would have defended himself 'with every fibre of his being'. Ms Sturgeon made several claims about her predecessor in her memoir Frankly, which was published last week. She accused Mr Salmond of creating conspiracy theories over sexual harassment allegations and said he did not read the independence white paper before the referendum in 2014. Ms Sturgeon also said Mr Salmond 'wanted to destroy me' and would have rather seen the SNP fail than succeed without him. Appearing on the BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme, Ms Hendry criticised Ms Sturgeon. She said: 'The way I see it is if my uncle was here today, these things would not be being said. 'I believe they are being said because he's not here to defend himself, as he would have done with every fibre of his being.' Asked what she thought had motivated Ms Sturgeon to make the claims now, Ms Hendry said: 'I'm unsure. I think there's been a few people questioning that. 'But I think the timing of these things being said – there's been a number of years where they've not been said, that these things could have been said, and the timing of it now, where she's released the book and is looking to publicise that. 'I think many people have thought that could be the case.' In her book, Ms Sturgeon said Mr Salmond had never produced a 'shred of evidence' that he was a victim of a conspiracy, adding that he admitted to her the substance of one of the complaints against him. A judicial review into the Scottish Government's handling of complaints against Mr Salmond found the investigation was tainted by apparent bias while a court cleared him of all charges. Ms Hendry said: 'The bottom line is he was cleared in the highest court in Scotland and I think I'm unsure as to why it's being brought up. 'I do think there were people conspiring against him, and I think there's the truth will still come out. 'There are things to still come out in the public, and I think there are many people who should be thinking about their actions.' Ms Hendry added that her family was united in pursuing legal action against the Scottish Government over its botched harassment probe. In December, she announced she would run to be an MSP in one of Mr Salmond's former seats. Ms Hendry said she would contest the Banffshire and Buchan Coast seat for Alba that her uncle had planned to campaign in before his death in North Macedonia in October.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Labour needs to ‘pick things up' after ‘tough' first year in power, Khan says
Labour needs to 'really pick things up' after a 'tough' first year in government, Sir Sadiq Khan has insisted. The London Mayor said Labour supporters would be 'delusional' if they did not recognise the difficulties the party had had since winning power in July 2024. After taking Labour into power at Downing Street for the first time since 2010, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has seen his party's popularity slump in the polls, amid criticism over issues such as welfare reforms. 'It's been a tough first year,' Sir Sadiq conceded. Speaking at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, he insisted that Labour supporters 'need to have the humility to recognise' that 'otherwise we are being delusional'. The London Mayor, who was one of the most powerful Labour politicians until Sir Keir became Prime Minister, added: 'Those people that say it has been a great first year… I think they are letting the party down. 'It hasn't been a great first year. There have been great things that have happened in this first year, around the rights for renters, around the rights for workers, around energy security, and I could go on. 'But as first years go, it has not been a great first year.' However, he said the 'good news' is his party has 'got another four years to make sure we turn this around'. The London Mayor – who is a Liverpool FC supporter – said if Labour was in a football match, they would be 'two-nil down' But continuing his analogy, he said that only 15 or 20 minutes of the match had gone, with minutes still to play and to 'win this game'. He said: 'It is really important now we really pick things up because I think we are two-nil down. 'But the great news is we have turned it round before, we have won games before where we're two nil down, we can do it again.' His comments came as he said that many people who backed the party last year had 'lent us their vote'. Sir Sadiq said: 'They didn't sprint toward Labour at the ballot box, they lent us their vote, gave us the benefit of the doubt.' After over a decade out of power at Westminster, he also said that the party had 'lost the memory of running things'. Sir Sadiq said: 'It has taken some time for the Labour Party, the Labour Government, to understand how the machinery of government works.' But he added: 'There are some really, really good people in the cabinet, there is a good back office team as well. So I have got confidence we will turn it round.' He added: 'With Keir and the team we've got in Number 10, and across Whitehall, Westminster, we've got a great team. 'They are not performing to the level I know they can perform at. I'm not being critical of them, I think they themselves would admit they can do much more. 'So I am hoping the next three, four years you will really see the best of this government.'
