
Trump wants to sell America to China – but will they buy?
On Wednesday, a jubilant Donald Trump declared that his trade deal with Beijing would 'open up China to American Trade', delivering 'a great WIN for both countries!!!'
Yet even as the US president trumpets victory, a chorus of Western companies has been warning that the spoils may be underwhelming.
Cosmetics company Estee Lauder is grappling with 'retail softness, reflecting subdued consumer sentiment' in China. Drinks giant Diageo, which makes Guinness and Johnnie Walker, said 'consumers remain cautious and the macroeconomic recovery is taking longer than expected'.
Unilever, the consumer goods giant behind Dove soap and Ben & Jerry's ice cream, told its shareholders that 'market growth in China remained subdued'. Burberry reported waning sales there, while KFC and Pizza Hut-owner Yum China said sales in the first quarter were flat.
When Starbucks this week slashed the price of its tea lattes and Frappuccinos in China by almost one fifth, it was only the latest sign that trouble was brewing in China for big Western businesses.
Trump wants Chinese consumers to buy more American goods, rebalancing what he sees as the lopsided trading relationship between the two countries. But the middle kingdom's economy is in a prolonged funk, reeling from a property crisis and a long hangover from harsh Covid restrictions.
With lingering US tariffs of up to 55pc taking a chunk out of China's exports, recovery in the world's second-largest economy depends on the willingness of Chinese consumers to open their wallets and start spending.
But unless companies cut prices, or the government steps in to boost demand, cautious Chinese consumers are at best spending selectively. Unlike China's gleaming motorways, the road to an economic rebound looks slow and uncertain – meaning Trump may well be disappointed.
Ending the US president's anti-China crusade depends on the Chinese consumer taking out their wallets. It's the 'excess savings' of China's households, coupled with the excess spending of the American government and consumers, that lie at the heart of the pair's unbalanced economic relationship.
In layman's terms, Chinese families save, while Americans buy – meaning China exports to the US far more than it imports.
'China has a singular opportunity to stabilise its economy by shifting away from excess production towards greater consumption,' Scott Bessent, the US treasury secretary, said on Wednesday.
So far, there is little sign of the balance shifting. In a recent survey by McKinsey, Chinese households said they were not planning to increase how much they spend as a share of their income. (McKinsey saw this as progress; in the 2024 version of the survey, households had actually been planning to reduce consumption.)
The survey found that rural dwellers were slightly more enthusiastic about shopping than their urban counterparts. That's unsurprising: it's in the cities where the scars of the property crisis, which began with the collapse of the developer Evergrande in 2021, are most acute.
'Property prices have fallen by around 20pc since the onset of the property crisis,' says Leah Fahy, a China analyst at Capital Economics. 'That has been a massive hit to household wealth and really dampened propensity to spend, and confidence as well.'
'And then more recently, you add all this tension around the trade war, what's going to happen with US tariffs. Even if the actual hit from that hasn't been massive yet.'
Justin Koh, a Shanghai-based director at consultancy AlixPartners, says: 'When I first came to China about 15 years ago, there used to be an idea that everything would only go in one direction – up. People just thought sales would double every year.
'Now, the consumer companies we're working with are more pragmatic about growth. They're also very pragmatic about opening and closing stores, about what works and what doesn't work in the market.'
Officially, China's economy is holding up, growing at 5.4pc in the first quarter from a year earlier. But the threat of a trade war looms over a country that still relies heavily on manufacturing.
Exports to the US slumped by almost 35pc in April from a year earlier and China is struggling with deflation. Consumer prices dipped 0.1pc, the fourth consecutive month of decline, led by food and fuel.
A survey by the EU Chamber of Commerce in China found that 83pc of food and beverage companies felt their business environment in the country was deteriorating.
Many consumers seem to be looking for bargains, waiting for price decreases, or keeping their yuan in the bank or under the bed.
Beijing has been encouraging people to spend, pushing them to buy more white goods by backing a trade-in scheme. It seems to have worked: according to the Xinhua news agency, it spurred 175bn renminbi (£18bn) of transactions this year, and 39pc year–on-year sales growth in April.
But that would only be a drop in the ocean of what is required. It might stack a percentage point or two on to GDP growth, but Capital Economics reckons consumption might need to expand by 4pc to offset the hit from falling exports.
Fahy says the government seems reluctant to wheel out the fiscal artillery needed to deliver this.
'You get a lot of lip service to the importance of supporting consumption, supporting demand, but they're really hesitant to expand things like social security measures, pension payments, welfare benefits – the things that are most needed to boost households' willingness to spend really and lower the savings rate,' she says.
Worryingly for Trump, even if there is an upturn in consumer spending, Chinese may not choose to buy American products.
'There was probably more bargain hunting back in 2022, 2023 – confidence was lower, there was a very clear dip,' says Koh.
'I think this bargain-hunting helped consumers understand other [non-Western] brands a little bit better – they realised that, 'Hey, there might not be that much of a difference there.''
Chinese business news site Caixin says there has been an increase in promotions for 'repatriated foreign trade products' – items originally made to sell overseas that are now being sold at home. This includes marketing campaigns and exhibitions at supermarkets, department stores and shopping malls.
Local brands are also gaining ground. Koh's 10-year-old daughter is wild for the Labubu dolls made by Chinese start-up Pop Mart, for example.
'They're the latest craze. If consumer confidence was at an all-time low, we'd likely be seeing less people buying them – less of that type of consumer behaviour,' he says.
'It's a sign of a more discerning consumer, and a consumer that's expressing his or her consumer confidence in different ways.'
The ball is now in Beijing's court: the government needs to do more if it wants a consumer-led kickstart for the economy, and a fix for the US-China trade imbalances. Without action, Trump's 'great WIN' may turn into a disappointing loss.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Tesla upgrades its Model S and X cars in US, raises prices by $5,000
June 13 (Reuters) - Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab said on Thursday it upgraded its Model S and Model X cars in the U.S. and raised their prices by $5,000, according to the electric vehicle maker's post on X and its website. Prices were hiked for all configurations of the two models by $5,000, Tesla's website showed. The all-wheel drive version of Model X costs $89,990, while its plaid variant is priced at $104,990. The model S all-wheel drive now costs $84,990 and its plaid variant is $99,990.


Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
In-N-Out of chicken searches for a $1.5 billion buyer as sales spike 9%
A popular fried chicken chain is exploring the idea of selling its business following last year's 9 percent spike in chicken sales across US restaurants. Bojangles, one of the most iconic brands in the Carolinas, is working with investment bankers to potentially sell itself for over $1.5 billion, about three times what it sold for in a 2019 buyout. Private equity firms and other restaurant operators are expected to be interested if Bojangles is up for sale, according to The Wall Street Journal. As of now, the chicken chain has not confirmed whether it will go on the market. The 48-year-old business has rapidly expanded since opening its first restaurant in North Carolina in 1977. Known for its Cajun-spiced chicken and homemade buttermilk biscuits, it now has over 800 restaurants worldwide. Bojangles recently opened its first location in Las Vegas and is set to open several restaurants on the West Coast later this year. These openings, along with the chicken chain sales growth, are factors in why Bojangles is one of the nation's fastest-growing quick-service chicken chains. R.J. Hottovy, head of analytical research at explained why he believes chicken chains like Bojangles have achieved such success. 'Chicken concepts have outperformed the broader quick-service restaurant category the past several years, primarily due to the product's versatility and how easily it adapts to different flavors and dietary needs,' he said. 'This adaptability has enabled a number of brands to stand out by offering a wide range of customizable spice levels, sauces, and sides that appeal to a broader customer base.' Retail expert Neil Saunders, of GlobalData, explained why chicken chains are standing out from the rest of the restaurant industry in the current market. 'The restaurant sector has generally been under pressure in terms of generating growth,' he told 'However, chicken chains have been performing far better than average which is why investors are interested in them. 'Bojangles has been growing, which supports a high valuation, but it also has potential for further expansion which is baked into the purchase price,' he continued. 'Any buyer would want to ramp up store openings and geographical expansion as part of a playbook to recoup their investment.' Bojangles is exploring the idea of putting the chain on the market for $1.5 billion The 48-year-old business has rapidly expanded since opening its first restaurant in North Carolina in 1977 'Bojangles has been growing, which supports a high valuation, but it also has potential for further expansion which is baked into the purchase price,' Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData, told The last time Bojangles explored a sales opportunity was in 2018, three years after it became public. Durational Capital Management and TJC confirmed a $593.7 million acquisition deal in 2018, which was finalized in 2019. Once the agreement became official, Bojangles became private. 'Bojangles is an iconic brand with an authentic Southern heritage and a deeply loyal following,' Eric Sobotka, managing partner at Durational Capital Management, said at the time. 'We have admired the brand and its high quality and craveable food for years, and we look forward to partnering closely with the employees and franchisees to drive its future growth and continued success.' The chain went on to initiate an expansion strategy, which featured menu additions and a new restaurant design concept. Bojangles is not slowing down its expansion and is looking to enter markets with strong unit economics and operational support. Some of these markets include New Jersey, New York, Colorado, and Missouri. Bojangles plans were revealed shortly after Dave's Hot Chicken agreed to sell to Roark Capital for about $1 billion. The private equity firm had already made headlines in 2023 after acquiring the Subway sandwich chain for $9.6 billion. Jersey Mike's was acquired by Blackstone private equity firm for $8 billion last year, which was finalized last January.


The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Michael Johnson explains why he cancelled Grand Slam Track meet in LA
Michael Johnson has spoken out after cancelling the Los Angeles leg of his new Grand Slam Track competition, describing the drastic move as a 'business decision' to preserve the future of the league. Johnson held a meeting over Zoom on Thursday to inform athletes and their representatives that the LA event – the fourth and final leg of the season scheduled for 28-29 June – had been pulled, bringing the campaign to a sudden end. The Independent understands that Grand Slam Track's deal with host UCLA had become financially unviable, with estimated losses of more than $2m had the event gone ahead. A new sponsor is set to be announced next week ahead of the 2026 season, and organisers felt avoiding losses was crucial to help secure that investment and ensure the long-term future of the competition. The US legend said in a statement: 'The decision to conclude the inaugural Grand Slam Track season is not taken lightly, but one rooted in a belief that we have successfully achieved the objectives we set out to in this pilot season, and the importance of looking towards 2026 and beyond. 'We launched with a bold vision to reimagine professional track racing and we could not be more excited about what we have accomplished so far, delivering amazing races to a rabid fan base. As we've said all along, we were going to have learnings, make adjustments, and continue to improve. Sometimes we have to make moves that aren't comfortable, but what's most important is the future and sustainability of the league. The global economic landscape has shifted dramatically in the past year, and this business decision has been made to ensure our long-term stability as the world's premier track league. Our attention is now on 2026, with our eyes set on continuing to deliver the best-in-class storytelling, content, and competition that we have become known for in our debut year.' Organisers remain confident that Grand Slam Track will continue in 2026, with LA set to be on the circuit, and have stressed the positives of what they insist has been a relatively successful 'pilot' year. Before the opening event in Kingston, Jamaica, Johnson's co-founder Steve Gera told The Independent that they were 'maniacally focused on having the youngest fanbase of any sports league in the world in the next five years'. The star-studded list of athletes – which included US stars Kenny Bednarek, Gabrielle Thomas and Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone as well as British names including Josh Kerr and Dina Asher-Smith – competed in two linked events, such as 100m and 200m sprints, with results combined to calculate the winners in each category. Prize money for winners stood at $100,000, with $50,000 for runners-up and $10,000 for eighth place. The competition was billed as a much-needed shot in the arm for athletics, although the decision to include only track events and omit field disciplines was met with criticism. 'I am going to save what I think I can save,' Johnson explained. 'I think I can save track, I don't think I can save track and field.' But ticket sales have been slow and sponsorship and broadcast revenues have not met lofty expectations. The Times reports that organisers will save around £2.2m in prize money and travel expenses by cancelling the Los Angeles event. Some of the action has played out in half-empty stadiums, although the third event in Philadelphia was more popular, with close to 30,000 tickets sold over two days after the action was compressed from the three days of events held in Kingston and Miami. A disappointing crowd in Jamaica prompted organisers to review their locations for 2026, with a variety of other markets being considered, including European cities. Gera told The Independent in March: 'We had discussions with a couple of different cities across the UK [but] that was a decision that we made to just focus on tightly packaging our run of shows [in the Americas] in year one. But we're really excited to get the product into Europe in the not too distant future.' Johnson added: 'We are in conversations with potential host cities - many of whom have already thrown their names in the hat - to build out an exciting calendar of events for our fans across the globe. We are committed to calling Los Angeles home, and look forward to hosting a Slam in LA as part of the 2026 season.'