‘This is our Brexit': Danes are taking Trump's Greenland threat seriously
Many have dismissed Donald Trump's plans about buying Greenland as farcical and unworkable – but not the Danes.
The unprecedented threat has sparked fear in Denmark that this is their 'Brexit' moment.
Even if Mr Trump's designs on Greenland come to nothing, and the punitive tariffs he has threatened to impose on Denmark do not materialise, they are anxious that his comments have inflamed the territory's independence movement.
Lawmakers are scrambling to get the message through to Washington, fearing that their prime minister cannot stand up to the impetuous president.
Xavier Dutoit, a Dane who works for a European campaign group, came up with an outlandish scheme while listening to a 'loud American tourist' hold forth about Greenland at a bar in the Philippines.
'That American didn't seem to grasp how unhinged and absurd it was for any country's president – especially in a stable democracy that the USA claims to be – to offer or threaten to take over another sovereign country's territory,' Mr Dutoit told The Telegraph.
From that chance encounter came 'Denmarkification' – a plan to crowdfund $1 trillion for Denmark to purchase California from the US.
The negotiating team charged with buying the Golden State will be led by Denmark's finest, Mr Dutoit claimed: Lego executives, and the cast of the Scandi noir Borgen.
He readily admits that the scheme is ridiculous, but there is a serious point at the nub of it. He wants to show 'how absurd Trump's claims to Greenland really are' and demonstrate that the territory is not for sale.
'Denmarkification', it turns out, is popular in the US – or at least in California, where residents of the deep blue state seem to like the idea of jettisoning their Republican commander-in-chief in favour of a Scandinavian social democracy.
'Even though it was intended as a joke, the very idea of injecting some hygge, rule of law, facts-based politics and Danish pastries seems to appeal to a lot of Americans,' Mr Dutoit said.
He insisted there was a 'serious deal on the table' for Mr Trump. 'He stops his colonial extension, I stop my campaign and we all go back to playing legos.'
Mette Frederiksen, the Danish prime minister, had a fiery phone call with Mr Trump where she refused to contemplate the sale of Greenland, while the US president refused to be distracted by offers of more military exploitation and mineral exploitation.
'The Danes are now in crisis mode,' one source told the Financial Times, while another said Copenhagen was 'utterly freaked out by this'.
Some Danish politicians believe their prime minister's hands are tied by the need to maintain diplomatic relations with Mr Trump, and fear the Republican is not getting the message.
Aaja Chemnitz. a Danish MP, last month opted to release a joint statement with Lisa Murkowski, a Republican senator and frequent critic, warning that Greenland was an 'ally, not an asset'.
'Of course, a businessman turned president would be interested. But Greenland is not for sale,' they said, arguing that 'the future will be defined by partnership, not ownership'.
Anders Vistisen, a Danish MEP, delivered a blunter message in a brief speech to the European Parliament in January.
'F— off, Mr Trump,' he said, prompting a rebuke from the Parliament's vice-president.
Mr Vistisen, in an interview with The Telegraph, said that the reaction to Mr Trump's plan to take over Greenland among Denmark's political elite was a mix of confusion and paralysis.
The US, a close ally who has acted as a longstanding guarantor of its security and intelligence, suddenly appears to be embarking on a land grab.
Denmark has deferred to Washington on security matters since the Second World War, and suffered significant casualties when it participated in the US-led invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, Mr Vistisen said.
'There is a profound sense of betrayal… we have been very good allies to the Americans and been very accommodating to its needs,' he continued.
'I think many politicians really don't know what to do, how to deal with this. There doesn't seem to be that connection between the Danish political elite and the Republican party.'
Mr Vistisen believes Mr Trump wants to be the first commander-in-chief in decades to expand the US' territory – like Andrew Jackson, whose portrait was recently returned to the Oval Office.
Some Danes fear that Mr Trump, by questioning Denmark's legitimate claim to Greenland and driving a wedge into the Kingdom, will inflame its independence movement.
Hans Mortensen, a Danish journalist, compared the situation to Brexit, suggesting that the territory's elections in March would be dominated by calls for seceding from Denmark that could end in a permanent split.
'The demand for an indicative referendum in Greenland could very quickly become a central issue in the election campaign, and if that happens, it would appear that we are on a one-way street,' he wrote.
For Mr Vistisen, the depth of Denmark's relationship goes well beyond Brexit.
Britain only joined the EU, or EEC as it then was, in 1975, whereas the Vikings crossed to Greenland around AD 985.
More than a thousand years later, the Danes fear there is another invader on the horizon – except this time he's from the US.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business of Fashion
26 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
Surprise! Why Apparel Prices Are Actually Falling
A little over a month into President Donald Trump's new tariff regime, the verdict is in: Clothes are getting cheaper. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics on Wednesday reported that apparel prices fell 0.4 percent between April and May, and were down 0.9 percent from a year prior. Inflation overall was estimated at 2.4 percent, in line with expectations. The data likely reflects pain delayed rather than avoided. Many retailers stocked up before Trump announced a 10 percent tariff on all imports, as well as an additional 30 percent levy on Chinese goods. Inflation figures also don't account for hikes that were announced but have yet to kick in. E.l.f. Cosmetics, LVMH, Nike and many others have said they plan to raise prices this summer. But the downward trend speaks to another truth about fashion's approach to pricing: The tariffs came at a time when brands were already working overtime to convince reluctant shoppers to keep spending. Rather than pass along costs, many companies' instinct is to explore every other option first. Urban Outfitters, Gap and Abercrombie & Fitch fall in that camp, saying they'll hold off on increasing prices even as they warn of shrinking margins. And for brands that engaged in years of post-pandemic price hikes, discounting even in the face of tariffs is still the best way to win back customers. Many luxury labels fall in this category, though plenty of mass-market brands are more expensive than they used to be, too. 'Retailers don't want to scare consumers or the market and suggest they're [raising] prices,' said Sonia Lapinsky, partner at retail consultancy Alix Partners. 'They're refraining as much as possible, they're not talking as much as possible.' Fashion's Falling Prices Apparel prices fell month on month between April and May, and nearly 1 percent in May year on year. The rate of price increases began slowing in 2023, and then declining early this year. This doesn't account for the full impact of tariffs on retailers' margins, which won't be realised until late summer or fall. That is when prices could get 'wildly volatile,' because of brands' individual approaches to pricing in the face of rising costs, said Michael Prendergast, managing director of Alvarez & Marsal Consumer and Retail Group. Some brands will look at this moment as a time to sacrifice margin to gain market share. With expanded margins, thanks to years of rising prices, many retailers are well positioned to absorb the impact. For now brands are doing everything in their power to keep people shopping and drive traffic, said Lapinsky, including upping discounting throughout April and May. Beyond categories like footwear that are highly susceptible to tariffs, brands will get specific about where they raise prices — fashion items may have elasticity, but shoppers would see a more obvious change in basic pieces, for example. Likely, after years of experimenting, brands have learned where their limits are. Planning for the rest of the year is filled with extra risk. Raise prices too much, and kill demand; plan for lower demand and potentially end up with empty shelves. That conundrum will likely come to a head for retailers during back-to-school shopping season. 'We're likely going to have an inventory issue on one end or the other,' said Lapinsky. 'Either we've got inventory in the stores that had to be priced at a point that they can't clear, or retailers may have pulled back and just don't have what customers are looking for.' Mood-Swing Shopping As they make inventory and pricing decisions for the rest of the year, retailers are watching consumer sentiment closely to try to determine whether they'll have the appetite to spend — and to what degree. 'You have to be cautious of exactly what inventory you're taking in, given consumer sentiment and how much they're shopping,' said Jessica Ramírez, co-founder of research firm The Consumer Collective. 'If you're just churning inventory that isn't a priority on your consumers' list, you're not going to do very well.' After falling to its lowest point in years, consumer sentiment got a slight boost in May. Part of that may be thanks to a comparative settling of the news cycle from April, when Trump first announced, and then temporarily paused, levies. But even just the feeling of rising prices and uncertainty can put a damper on shoppers' moods. Plus, more generally, price inflation in other categories will have an impact on consumer appetite to spend on apparel. 'Food and gas prices affect discretionary income,' said Prendergast. 'Gas prices are coming down, that's the good news. The not great news is food continues to rise — that pinches the wallet.' Trouble is Brewing Elsewhere The picture of softened demand is clearer in China, the second biggest fashion market after the US. Earlier this month, China reported consumer prices overall — not just apparel — fell for a fourth consecutive month in May, raising concerns that deflation is here to stay. Meanwhile, wage shrinkage and property value slumps continue. It's already having an impact on fashion, reported Reuters: Amid raging price wars, stores are putting merchandise on steep discount — $30 for a Coach handbag at Super Zhuanzhuan, for example. US-based apparel companies operating in China will face more uncertainty in an already challenged market. Trouble abroad could even be felt back home. 'The more that's happening in the macro, the more concerned the consumer in America is going to be,' said Lapinsky. 'We don't see any end to that in the next few months.' Though, starting in March, China began ramping up fiscal stimulus. And much remains to be seen about how the Chinese consumer will react, said Ramírez. Fashion is still in a wait-and-see phase when it comes to price hikes and planning, but the moment of truth could be getting closer. 'Overall retailers are underplaying the effect of what tariffs and inflation are going to do to their sales and EBITDA,' said Prendergast. 'We're advising clients, take the next two years of your revenue and margin plans down, like, take them down and again, use this opportunity to cut costs internally.'


Forbes
26 minutes ago
- Forbes
Japan's Largest Companies 2025: Rare Interest Rate Hikes Lead To A Volatile Year
Toyota and other Japanese automakers have been hampered by Trump's tariffs. Getty Images Japan's stock market has been on a roller-coaster ride over the past 12 months. Its benchmark Nikkei index reached an all-time high in July 2024, driven by corporate governance reforms and robust company earnings, then crashed more than 25% in less than four weeks on a surprise interest rate hike by the Bank of Japan. Though the index rebounded shortly after, its gains were trimmed in early 2025 as U.S. President Donald Trump ignited his trade war. Japan has 180 companies on this year's Forbes Global 2000 ranking of the world's largest public corporations, down slightly from 182 in 2024, making it the third most-represented country after the U.S. and China. The list weighs market value, revenue, profit and assets equally, using the latest 12 months of data as of April 25. Toyota Motor, the highest-ranking Japanese company, is in a sector particularly hard hit by Trump's sweeping tariffs. The U.S. in early April imposed a 25% tax on foreign-made cars, followed in early May by the same levy on auto parts, a blow to Japan's mainstay industry and its export-led economy. The world's top-selling carmaker slipped three places to No. 14 after its stock tumbled 22% over the year. Though its revenues and profits in the year through December were roughly flat at $309 billion and $34 billion, respectively, Toyota warned that the tariffs would result in a $1.3 billion hit to operating profit in April and May. Some of Toyota Motor's peers suffered even steeper declines. Nissan Motor, long plagued by deteriorating financials, sank 366 spots to No. 707 after its profit in the 12 months through December plunged 76% to $702.6 million. After the cut-off date for the list, the automaker posted a $4.7 billion loss for the three months ended March. Nissan is struggling to restructure after merger talks with larger rival Honda Motor collapsed in February. The failed tie-up, together with the tariffs, relegated Honda to No. 117 from No. 91 as its stock fell 17% over the year. Mitsubishi Motors, whose biggest shareholder is Nissan, tumbled 379 places to No. 1,562 as its shares skidded almost 10%. Companies in the AI space were a bright spot. Billionaire Masayoshi Son's SoftBank investment powerhouse climbed 331 spots to No. 130 on a 425% surge in 12-month profit through December to $5.6 billion, driven partly by increases in the value of portfolio companies such as ByteDance, the Chinese parent of TikTok. SoftBank is ramping up its AI bet, with plans to invest up to $30 billion in U.S.-based ChatGPT maker OpenAI while also investing $100 billion to build AI infrastructure stateside as part of its Stargate Project joint venture with OpenAI and Oracle. The AI boom also lifted Advantest, the world's largest semiconductor testing equipment maker by market share and a supplier to AI-chip giant Nvidia. It scaled 509 places to No. 1,231 as its profit in the year through March more than doubled to $1.1 billion on a 52% surge in sales to $5.1 billion. Other notable climbers included companies in the defense industry. IHI Corp, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) and Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) were among the best performers on the Nikkei over the year as Japan ramped up military spending. IHI, an engineering company that makes everything from turbines for power plants to rocket systems for space travel, debuted on the Global 2000 at No. 1,349 after its stock skyrocketed 176%. A more than doubling in MHI stock elevated the company 75 spots to No. 372 while KHI vaulted 513 places to No. 1,331 on a 52% share increase.


E&E News
26 minutes ago
- E&E News
Wright, Burgum tout LNG deals with Japanese company
Leaders of the Trump administration's National Energy Dominance Council convened Wednesday to laud four deals between Japan's largest power generator and U.S. suppliers of liquefied natural gas. The agreements each involve JERA, which produces about 30 percent of Japan's electricity, and companies with LNG export projects in Texas and Louisiana. Through the new and pending deals, JERA plans to buy up to 5.5 million metric tons a year of the supercooled gas over 20 years. JERA is the 'single largest LNG buyer in the global market,' said Yukio Kani, the company's global CEO and chair, at the Department of Energy's James V. Forrestal Building. Advertisement There — before Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum — Kani praised the leadership of President Donald Trump and said the various agreements mark an 'even deeper commitment to the U.S. energy sector.' The Trump administration said the new deals are projected to support over 50,000 U.S. jobs and add more than $200 billion to U.S. gross domestic product — though not all of the deals are final.