US moves to ban Cambodia's Huione over alleged money laundering
By Tom Wilson
(Reuters) -The U.S. Treasury plans to ban Cambodian financial firm Huione Group from the U.S. financial system, deeming it of "primary money laundering concern" over its alleged role in laundering illicit funds from cyber heists and online scams.
The Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) said on Thursday that it had proposed severing Huione's access to the U.S. financial system by outlawing U.S. firms from opening or maintaining correspondent banking accounts for or on behalf of Huione.
The proposal now enters a 30-day consultation period.
Phnom Penh-based Huione Group is the "marketplace of choice for malicious cyber actors" such as North Korea and criminal syndicates who have stolen billions of dollars from Americans, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement.
Huione Group did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent on Friday on the FinCEN proposal.
FinCEN said that Huione Group laundered at least $4 billion worth of illicit funds between August 2021 and January 2025, including at least $37 million in crypto from cyber heists by North Korea and $36 million of crypto from so-called "pig butchering" scams, where individuals contacted online are defrauded.
FinCEN's proposal cited a Reuters story published last year that found that Huione Pay, a unit of Huione Group, received crypto worth over $150,000 between June 2023 and February 2024 from a digital wallet used by North Korean hacking outfit Lazarus.
Huione Pay told Reuters in response to its 2024 story that it had not known it "received funds indirectly" from hacks by Lazarus, adding that the digital wallet that sent the funds was not under its management.
Crypto transfers allow North Korea to circumvent international sanctions, the United Nations has previously said, offering a route to buying banned goods and services.
North Korea's mission to the United Nations in Geneva did not pick up calls from Reuters. The mission previously told Reuters that reporting on Lazarus was "all speculation and misinformation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House aide calls Los Angeles anti-ICE protests an 'insurrection'
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senior White House aide Stephen Miller on Saturday condemned protests in downtown Los Angeles against federal immigration raids as an "insurrection" against the United States. Helmeted police in riot gear engaged in a tense confrontation with protesters on Friday night after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents conducted enforcement operations in the city and arrested at least 44 people on immigration violations. "An insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States," Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, wrote on X. Miller, an immigration hardliner, was responding to video footage on X showing a large number of people protesting in downtown Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) said it had not made any arrests related to the demonstration. FBI deputy director Dan Bongino posted on X that they were reviewing evidence from the protests. "We are working with the U.S. Attorney's Office to ensure the perpetrators are brought to justice," Bongino said. "The Right to assemble and protest does not include a license to attack law enforcement officers, or to impede and obstruct our lawful immigration operations." President Donald Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people in the country illegally and lock down the U.S.-Mexico border, with the White House setting a goal for ICE to arrest at least 3,000 migrants per day. But the sweeping immigration crackdown has also included people legally residing in the country, including some with permanent residence, and has led to legal challenges. Television news footage earlier on Friday showed caravans of unmarked military-style vehicles and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. "Forty-four people (were arrested) on immigration charges," Yasmeen Pitts O'Keefe, a spokesperson for Homeland Security Investigations told Reuters on Saturday. The LAPD did not take part in the immigration enforcement. It was deployed to quell civil unrest after crowds protesting the deportation raids spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the walls of a federal court building and gathered outside a nearby jail where some of the detainees were reportedly being held. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass in a statement condemned the immigration raids. "I am deeply angered by what has taken place," Bass said. "These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. We will not stand for this." (Reporting By Lucia Mutikani; editing by Diane Craft)
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court allows DOGE staffers to access Social Security data
June 7 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court is allowing members of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency to access personal Social Security Administration data. On Friday, the Court's six conservatives granted an emergency application filed by the Trump administration to lift an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maryland. Opposing the injunction were the three liberal justices: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. There are 69 million retirees, disabled workers, dependents and survivors who receive Social Security benefits, representing 28.75% of the U.S. population. In a separate two-page order issued Friday, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration for now to shield DOGE from freedom of information requests seeking thousands of pages of material. This vote also was 6-3 with no written dissenting opinions. In the two-page unsigned order on access, the court said: "We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work." The conservatives are Chief Justice John Roberts, and Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Three of them were nominated by President Donald Trump during his first term. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander, appointed by President Barack Obama, had ruled that DOGE staffers had no need to access the specific data. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Virginia, declined to block Hollander's decision. The lawsuit was filed by progressive group Democracy Forward on behalf of two unions, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the American Federation of Teachers, as well as the Alliance for Retired Americans. They alleged broader access to personal information would violate a federal law, the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act. "This is a sad day for our democracy and a scary day for millions of people," the groups said in a statement. "This ruling will enable President Trump and DOGE's affiliates to steal Americans' private and personal data. Elon Musk may have left Washington, D.C., but his impact continues to harm millions of people. We will continue to use every legal tool at our disposal to keep unelected bureaucrats from misusing the public's most sensitive data as this case moves forward." Social Security Works posted on X: "No one in history -- no commissioner, no president, no one -- has ever had the access that these DOGE minions have." White House spokesperson Liz Huston after the ruling told NBC News that "the Supreme Court allowing the Trump Administration to carry out commonsense efforts to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse and modernize government information systems is a huge victory for the rule of law." Brown Jackson wrote a nine-page dissenting opinion that the "Government fails to substantiate its stay request by showing that it or the public will suffer irreparable harm absent this Court's intervention. In essence, the 'urgency' underlying the government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes." She concluded her dissent by writing: "The Court opts instead to relieve the Government of the standard obligations, jettisoning careful judicial decisionmaking and creates grave privacy risks for millions of Americans in the process." Kathleen Romig, who worked as a senior adviser at the agency during the Biden administration, told CNN that Americans should be concerned about how DOGE has handled highly sensitive data so far. She said the personal data runs "from cradle to grave." "While the appeals court considers whether DOGE is violating the law, its operatives will have 'God-level' access to Social Security numbers, earnings records, bank routing numbers, mental and reproductive health records and much more," Romig, who now is director of Social Security and disability policy at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. When Trump became president again on Jan. 20, he signed an executive order establishing DOGE with the goal of "modernizing Federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity." Nearly a dozen DOGE members have been installed at the agency, according to court filings. In all, there are about 90 DOGE workers. DOGE, which was run by billionaire Elon Musk until he left the White House one week ago, wants to modernize systems and detect waste and fraud at the agency. "These teams have a business need to access the data at their assigned agency and subject the government's records to much-needed scrutiny," Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in the court motion. The data includes Social Security numbers, date and place of birth, gender, addresses, marital and parental status, parents' names, lifetime earnings, bank account information, immigration and work authorization status, health conditions for disability benefits and use of Medicare. SSA also has data-sharing agreements with the IRS and the Department of Health and Human Services. The plaintiffs wrote: "The agency is obligated by the Privacy Act and its own regulations, practices, and procedures to keep that information secure -- and not to share it beyond the circle of those who truly need it." Social Security Administration Commissioner Frank Bisignano, who was sworn in to the post on May 7, said in a statement: that"The Supreme Court's ruling is a major victory for American taxpayers. The Social Security Administration will continue driving forward modernization efforts, streamlining government systems, and ensuring improved service and outcomes for our beneficiaries." On May 23, Roberts temporarily put lower court decisions on hold while the Supreme Court considered what next steps to take. Musk called Social Security "the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time" during an interview with Joe Rogan on Feb. 28. The Social Security system, which started in 1935, transfers current workers' payroll tax payments to people who are already retired. The payroll tax is a mandatory tax paid by employees and employers. The total current tax rate is 12.4%. There is a separate 2.9% tax for Medicare.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's the Minimum Net Worth To Be Considered the Top 1% in Your 60s
Ever wonder how your nest egg stacks up as you near retirement? If you're in your 60s and curious about what it takes to break into the elusive top 1%, you're not alone. According to the Federal Reserve, the median net worth for Americans in their late 60s and early 70s is $266,400. That's much, much lower than what the elite are working with. Read More: Find Out: 'People often assume that a few million dollars in savings places them at the summit of the wealth ladder, yet the numbers tell a different story once you compare yourself with the true top one percent,' said Andrew Gosselin, CPA, personal finance expert, and senior contributor at Save My Cent. Whether you're just getting serious about wealth-building or already eyeing early retirement, here's what you need to know about the net worth benchmarks that define the financial elite in your age group. 'To be in the top 1% wealth bracket in your 60s, you're typically looking at a net worth north of $11 million in the U.S., though this varies depending on the state you live in,' said Michael Foguth, founder of Foguth Financial Group. 'But here's the thing, chasing that number alone won't guarantee peace of mind.' Gosselin agreed, noting that a person in their sixties usually needs between eleven and thirteen million dollars to break into that elite club in the United States. The threshold climbs because assets must cover not only daily living but also medical costs, longer life spans, and rising prices that quietly shrink the buying power of every dollar. 'A nest egg that looked enormous twenty years ago can feel average when groceries, travel, and housing have each ratcheted up in cost,' Gosselin explained. Discover Next: Inside that eleven to thirteen million target, Gosselin said the balance sheet of a typical one-percenter in their sixties often starts with a primary home valued near a million dollars. Add a rental property or two that contribute both appreciation and steady cash flow and you edge closer to the mark. Retirement accounts such as a 401(k) or IRA frequently carry another million or more because long stretches of tax-advantaged growth compound quietly in the background. 'A diversified mix of stocks, bonds, and alternative holdings like private equity fills in several hundred thousand more and guards against relying on a single asset class,' said Gosselin. Moreover, cash reserves of at least one hundred thousand remain essential for unplanned events, allowing other investments to keep working without forced sales when markets dip. Gosselin explained that a net worth of about one million dollars can secure top one percent status worldwide, though that figure varies greatly from one country to another. Residents of Monaco, for example, may still need well over twelve million to stand out, while families in emerging economies reach the same percentile with much less. Location, therefore, plays a pivotal role in how far each dollar stretches and how exclusive a wealth bracket is. But according to Foguth, what matters at that stage in life is how well your money supports your lifestyle. 'Are your retirement goals covered? Do you have a plan for healthcare and legacy giving?' He's worked with clients who aren't in the top 1%, but said they sleep better at night than some who are, simply because they've got a solid financial plan in place. 'Wealth is relative, and in your 60s, the goal should be financial freedom, not just financial flex,' said Foguth. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 4 Affordable Car Brands You Won't Regret Buying in 2025 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks This article originally appeared on Here's the Minimum Net Worth To Be Considered the Top 1% in Your 60s
