logo
Trump's DC public safety sweep results in 23 arrests including murder suspect on opening day

Trump's DC public safety sweep results in 23 arrests including murder suspect on opening day

Fox News2 days ago
On the first day of President Donald Trump's crime crackdown in Washington, D.C., federal and local authorities arrested 23 people, including suspects wanted for murder, gun offenses and other crimes.
FBI Director Kash Patel, who endorsed Trump's plans to take over the Metropolitan Police Department and tackle crime in the nation's capital, provided an update on the efforts in a post on X Tuesday evening.
"On the first big push of FBI supporting @POTUS @realDonaldTrump initiative to make DC safe again, FBI reported 10 arrests with partners," the director wrote.
He said the 10 arrests included one for a search warrant on a prior murder charge.
The other arrests involved unlawful possession of firearms, outstanding warrants for driving under the influence, and one arrest for violating a restraining order.
"These are just a few examples — we are just getting started. Federal partners joined local police and arrested 23 in total," Patel wrote. "When you let good cops be cops they can clean up our streets and do it fast. More to come. Your nation's Capital WILL be safe again."
On Monday, Trump said he would federalize the police department and place it under the authority of U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi in an effort to address crime. He also said he was activating approximately 800 National Guard troops to "reestablish law, order and public safety" in the capital.
Democrats and local officials criticized the Trump administration for taking over law enforcement efforts in DC, saying the move is part of a power grab.
Washington D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser called the move "unsettling and unprecedented."
The District of Columbia Home Rule Act allows Trump to place the city's police department under federal control for up to 30 days. Bowser noted that granting D.C. statehood, an issue local officials have repeatedly advocated for, could have prevented the takeover.
"If people are concerned about the president being able to move the National Guard into our city, the time to do that would have been when the Congress had a bill that it could have given control of the D.C. National Guard to D.C.," she said. "So, there are things that, when a city is not a state, and not fully autonomous, and doesn't have senators, that the federal government can do."
Still, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro told reporters during a press conference on Tuesday afternoon that she wanted to get a sense of what was happening in D.C. and asked for the number of teens who have been shot and killed by gunfire.
She shared a poster with several victims who were shot in 2024, all under the age of 20, noting that 29 individuals were shot and killed in the district, some as young as 3-years-old. Pirro also showed a poster of those under the age of 20 who were shot and killed in 2025, which totaled 16 victims.
"What this makes clear to me is that there is a whole community that is suffering because of the violent crime in this district, and anyone who wants to tell me that crime is down and that we don't need an emergency focus on crimes of violence, all they need to do is take a look at this and talk to the loved ones and the family members of these individuals who were shot and killed under the age of 20," Pirro said.
"I don't know how many of these cases have been solved, but what I can tell you is, again, it's guns on the streets. It's individuals who are not concerned about accountability, who don't have any reason to fear law enforcement," she continued. "I am here today to tell you that on behalf of all of these victims, all of these families, that they're going to be accountable, that we are going to make a difference, and that we are going to make sure that law enforcement is focused on these innocent, now silent victims of crime in the district."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's Golden Dome Still Shrouded in Mystery, Even for Its Builders
Trump's Golden Dome Still Shrouded in Mystery, Even for Its Builders

Bloomberg

timea few seconds ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump's Golden Dome Still Shrouded in Mystery, Even for Its Builders

The companies expected to create President Donald Trump's ' Golden Dome for America ' know the objective: to protect the US from missiles and airborne threats. They know it means billions of dollars' worth of contracts. But they don't know much about what, exactly, they are expected to do — and at an event last week, the government officials who might tell them weren't even allowed to mention the project by name.

Trump's debanking order could create headaches for banks, sources say
Trump's debanking order could create headaches for banks, sources say

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's debanking order could create headaches for banks, sources say

By Nupur Anand, Pete Schroeder and Saeed Azhar NEW YORK (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order requiring banks not to discriminate against clients on political or religious grounds could create uncertainty and administrative headaches for the industry, sources said. Trump signed an executive order on Thursday directing the Treasury Department and bank regulators to ensure lenders do not have policies in place that deny services to customers based on political or religious beliefs, a practice known as "debanking." Any wrongdoing uncovered could result in fines, disciplinary measures, and even referrals to the Justice Department. The order came days after Trump accused JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America last week of debanking him, and alleged that lenders discriminate against conservatives. Large banks have denied rejecting clients on political grounds, and instead blamed unclear rules for some of the account closures. Banks have earlier said that certain decisions to close accounts were based on rules around reputational risk, a criterion that has been banned by Trump's order. The order also gave regulators about 180 days to conduct their review. While some lenders welcomed the order for its potential to streamline processes, they also expressed concerns about how onerous it could be to comply with the order. The scope and zeal with which regulators carry out Trump's directions are still unclear and causing some trepidation, experts and industry officials said. "There are words in the executive order which can be open to interpretation," said Matt Bisanz, a partner at Mayer Brown. "We will have to see what meaning the regulators attach to it, and what is the scope of the activities that they focus on." "It's not even clear if there will be regulations or just guidance, which will be enforced through the bank exam process or will be handled in a quiet, non-public manner," Bisanz added. Trump's criticism echoed longstanding debanking complaints from Republicans, who have accused Wall Street banks of "woke capitalism," in denying services to gunmakers, fossil-fuel companies and others perceived to be aligned with the political right. "Fair access to financial services is a fundamental principle of the U.S. banking system," said Jonathan Gould, the Comptroller of the Currency, in a statement in response to the new order. "It is unacceptable for banks to discriminate against any customer on the basis of political or religious beliefs or lawful business activities." The OCC, which oversees national banks, is currently reviewing banks for improper policies and will take remedial actions "as appropriate." Spokespeople for the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation declined to comment on how they plan to implement the order. Industry executives say there are many questions about the executive order that may only be clarified if regulators publish rules on debanking, said three sources who declined to be identified because the discussions are private. It is too early to tell how onerous it will be to comply with the order given the lack of details so far, another industry source said. Banks could also face myriad challenges if they are forced to review and potentially renew client relationships over debanking, said Stephen Gannon, partner at Davis Wright Tremaine. Reinstating or modifying arrangements, as the order suggests, would require banks to analyze large volumes of data on client activities and products, he said. Regulators are unlikely to hand out penalties for any historic account closures, but they could be asked to disclose reasons for past debanking, two sources said. Now that the order has been announced, banks could face regulatory penalties if debanking guidelines are not properly implemented, said Ed Mills, an analyst at Raymond James, a financial services firm. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store