Protesters slam war profiteering, Israel at French air fair
The long-planned protest at the Paris Air Show outside the French capital also comes as Israel's war with Iran drags on into a ninth day, with Tehran threatening to hit back in force at Israel's offensive against its arch-rival.
The presence of Israeli defence firms at the show has already become a bone of contention, with the French government on Monday sealing off the booths of five Israeli firms on the grounds that they were displaying offensive weapons that could be used in Gaza.
"Their wars, their profits, our deaths, stop the genocide in Palestine," read the banner at the head of the march, which organisers claimed drew more than 4,000 protesters.
"As we speak, people are dying and our governments are not doing anything to stop it," Nora, 29, told AFP at the protest.
Draped in a Palestinian flag, the project leader in the pharmaceutical industry said that she felt "rage" at the footage coming out of Gaza, including that of "mothers kissing their dead children" in the besieged Palestinian territory.
Police have arrested seven people aiming to disrupt the trade fair, the Paris public prosecutor office said, with officers discovering a helium canister and nearly 200 balloons during the searches.
Six of the arrests were made on Friday and the other on Saturday, the prosecutor's office added.
Drawing some 100,000 visitors a day, the Paris Air Show at the Le Bourget airfield, nine kilometres (five miles) to the north of the capital, is usually dominated by displays of the aerospace industry's latest cutting-edge planes.
Advertisement
But Monday's shuttering of the stands of Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), Rafael, UVision and Elbit, as well as Aeronautics, which make drones and guided bombs and missiles, sparked a row with Israel.
Israel's President Isaac Herzog branded Paris's closure of the Israeli firms' booths "outrageous", comparing it to "creating an Israeli ghetto".
It came days after Israel, claiming Iran was on the verge of obtaining a nuclear bomb, launched a surprise barrage on June 13 which killed top Iranian commanders and nuclear scientists.
Tehran immediately hit back with a flurry of missiles, with the two countries trading wave after wave of devastating strikes since.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
24 minutes ago
- Euronews
Nuclear watchdog calls for crisis meeting over US attacks on Iran
The International Atomic Energy Agency has called for a crisis meeting at its Vienna headquarters after the US bombings on Iran's nuclear sites, the agency has signalled in a post on X. Director General of IAEA Rafael Grossi has cancelled a trip to Brussels on Monday, where he had planned to take part in a meeting of the EU's foreign ministers. Instead he will remain in Vienna where the IAEA's Board of Governors will now meet for extraordinary talks on the situation. Overnight, US planes bombed several Iranian nuclear sites, including Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow. Iran's National Nuclear Safety System Centre said in a statement that no radioactive releases had been detected after the bombings. 'There is no danger to the residents living around the aforementioned sites,' the statement said. The IAEA confirmed in a post on X that no increase in off-site radiation levels has been reported. Costa alarmed by developments Shortly after the bombings, EU Council president Antonio Costa posted a statement on X where he highlighted nuclear safety. "I call on all parties to show restraint and respect for international law and nuclear safety," Costa said. Meanwhile, in the wake of the US attacks Iran now has the legal right to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Head of the Foreign Relations Committee in the Iranian Parliament, Abbas Golroo told Tasnim News Agency, a semi-official outlet in Iran associated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The treaty aims to limit the spread of nuclear weapons.
France 24
31 minutes ago
- France 24
Is Donald Trump right to believe that Iran's nuclear facilities have been 'completely obliterated'?
07:32 22/06/2025 Why did Donald Trump insert the US in Israel's war with Iran? Middle East 22/06/2025 How do Israelis feel about the US' strikes on Iran? Middle East 22/06/2025 Iran says all options are open to defend itself after US strikes Middle East 22/06/2025 Several Iranian missiles get through Israeli air defense, striking Tel-Aviv Middle East 22/06/2025 US strikes on Iran: what reactions on the international stage? Middle East 22/06/2025 US strikes on Iran: Tehran warns of everlasting consequences Middle East 22/06/2025 At least 430 Iranian civilians killed this week according to the health ministry Middle East 22/06/2025 Israel kills 3 top Iranian officers in Shiraz strike before US bombing Middle East 22/06/2025 The US had been moving B-2 planes to Guam for several days before striking Iran Middle East
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Trump's decision to strike Iran marks his riskiest foreign policy gamble
With his unprecedented decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites, directly joining Israel's air attack on its regional arch foe, U.S. President Donald Trump has done something he had long vowed to avoid - intervene militarily in a major foreign war. The dramatic US strike, including the targeting of Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear installation deep underground, marks the biggest foreign policy gamble of Trump's two presidencies and one fraught with risks and unknowns. Trump, who insisted on Saturday that Iran must now make peace or face further attacks, could provoke Tehran into retaliating by closing the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important oil artery, attacking US military bases and allies in the Middle East, stepping up its missile barrage on Israel and activating proxy groups against American and Israeli interests worldwide, analysts said. Such moves could escalate into a broader, more protracted conflict than Trump had envisioned, evoking echoes of the 'forever wars' that America fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, which he had derided as 'stupid' and promised never to be dragged into. 'The Iranians are seriously weakened and degraded in their military capabilities,' said Aaron David Miller, a former Middle East negotiator for Democratic and Republican administrations. 'But they have all sorts of asymmetric ways that they can respond... This is not going to end quick.' In the lead-up to the bombing that he announced late on Saturday, Trump had vacillated between threats of military action and appeals for renewed negotiation to persuade Iran to reach a deal to dismantle its nuclear program. A senior White House official said that once Trump was convinced that Tehran had no interest in reaching a nuclear agreement, he decided the strikes were 'the right thing to do'. Trump gave the go-ahead once he was assured of a 'high probability of success', the official said – a determination reached after more than a week of Israeli air attacks on Iran's nuclear and military facilities paved the way for the US to deliver the potentially crowning blow. 03:39 Nuclear threat remains Trump touted the 'great success' of the strikes, which he said included the use of massive 'bunker-buster bombs' on the main site at Fordow. But some experts suggested that while Iran's nuclear program may have been set back for many years, the threat may be far from over. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon, saying its program is for purely peaceful purposes. 'In the long term, military action is likely to push Iran to determine nuclear weapons are necessary for deterrence and that Washington is not interested in diplomacy,' the Arms Control Association, a non-partisan US-based organisation that advocates for arms control legislation, said in a statement. 'Military strikes alone cannot destroy Iran's extensive nuclear knowledge. The strikes will set Iran's program back, but at the cost of strengthening Tehran's resolve to reconstitute its sensitive nuclear activities,' the group said. Eric Lob, assistant professor in the Department of Politics and International Relations at Florida International University, said Iran's next move remains an open question and suggested that among its forms of retaliation could be to hit 'soft targets' of the U.S. and Israel inside and outside the region. Iranian reaction to the US strikes on its nuclear sites 01:16 But he also said there was a possibility that Iran could return to the negotiating table – 'though they would be doing so in an even weaker position' – or seek a diplomatic off-ramp. In the immediate aftermath of the US strikes, however, Iran showed little appetite for concessions. Iran's Atomic Energy Organization said it would not allow development of its 'national industry' to be stopped, and an Iranian state television commentator said every U.S. citizen or military member in the region would now be legitimate targets. Early on Sunday, Iran's foreign ministry issued a statement warning that Tehran 'considers it its right to resist with all its might against U.S. military aggression.' Karim Sadjadpour, an analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, posted on X: 'Trump indicated this is now the time for peace. It's unclear and unlikely the Iranians will see it the same way. This is more likely to open a new chapter of the 46-year-old US-Iran war than conclude it.' 'Regime change' Some analysts suggested that Trump, whose administration has previously disavowed any aim of dislodging the Iranian leadership, could be drawn into seeking 'regime change' if Tehran carries out major reprisals or moves to build a nuclear weapon. That, in turn, would bring additional risks. 'Beware mission creep, aiming for regime change and democratisation campaigns,' said Laura Blumenfeld, a Middle East analyst at the Johns Hopkins School for Advanced International Studies in Washington. 'You'll find the bones of many failed US moral missions buried in Middle East sands.' Jonathan Panikoff, a former U.S. deputy intelligence officer for the Middle East, said Iran's leadership would quickly engage in 'disproportionate attacks' if it felt its survival was imperilled. But Tehran will also have to be mindful of the consequences, he said. While actions such as closing the Strait of Hormuz would pose problems for Trump with the resulting higher oil prices and potential US inflationary impact, it would also hurt China, one of Iran's few powerful allies. At the same time, Trump is already facing strong pushback from congressional Democrats against the Iran attack and will also have to contend with opposition from the anti-interventionist wing of his Republican MAGA base. Trump, who faced no major international crisis in his first term, is now embroiled in one just six months into his second. Even if he hopes US military involvement can be limited in time and scope, the history of such conflicts often carries unintended consequences for American presidents. Trump's slogan of 'peace through strength' will certainly be tested as never before, especially with his opening of a new military front after failing to meet his campaign promises to quickly end wars in Ukraine and Gaza. 'Trump is back in the war business,' said Richard Gowan, UN director at the International Crisis Group. 'I am not sure anyone in Moscow, Tehran or Beijing ever believed his spiel that he is a peacemaker. It always looked more like a campaign phrase than a strategy.'
