School leavers party for weeks on midnight buses, and Norway says it's gone too far
The government is also worried about potential risks to teenagers' safety, as they dance on buses that are driven around during the night.
"We want this year's graduating class to be the last class that is allowed to use converted buses with sideways-facing seats and standing room while driving," says Jon-Ivar Nygard, Norway's Minister of Transport. "We can no longer send our young people off in unsafe buses."
For many prospective school-leavers in Norway the government's plan goes too far.
"The government wants to take away the sideways seating on the buses and just have group seating. I think it's the wrong way to go," complains Edvard Aanestad.
And when it comes to addressing problems of inclusivity on the buses, he and his friend Henrik believe the authorities are taking the wrong approach.
Only half of the 120 school-leavers in his year were part of a party-bus group, and they agree part of the reason was the high cost.
But the two young men say they spent years planning their celebrations, even getting jobs on the side to pay for the whole experience.
"This isn't going to help tackle exclusion," warns Edvard, who points out that banning some of the buses will mean there will be fewer buses to go around. "If anything, it's the opposite, so it's the wrong way to go."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
UK nuclear safety rules to be relaxed to speed up new power plants
Ministers are preparing to relax Britain's nuclear safety rules after a government report found that a culture of 'gold-plating' and 'risk aversion' was responsible for huge delays and ballooning costs. In an effort to speed up the development of Sizewell C and a new generation of small modular reactors (SMR) ministers will pledge to take on the 'needless bureaucracy' that can add billions of pounds to the costs. A taskforce appointed by Sir Keir Starmer found that regulation in the nuclear sector had become unnecessarily 'complex and inconsistent' and 'lacked proportionality'. It said a 'culture of risk aversion' was inflating the costs and timescales of new clean power projects as well as increasing the cost of replacing the UK's nuclear deterrent. The report, first reported by The Times, called for 'more fundamental and meaningful changes' to environmental protections than ministers have so far been willing to countenance. It said fast-track planning processes should be introduced for a new generation of SMRs built to standard designs and that a ban on nuclear reactors in 'semi-urban' areas must be rethought. The government's change of approach comes amid growing concerns from industry that regulators are taking an overly cautious approach to the risks posed by nuclear power stations. In one case, developers of a planned nuclear power station in Wales were told they would have to install filters to reduce radioactive discharges equivalent to one fiftieth of the dose from a dental x-ray. Under current rules reactors must be designed so that, even in the event of a meltdown, the radiation released would be no greater than natural background levels found in Cornwall. This is an event with a likelihood of occurring once in a million years. In June the government announced that Rolls-Royce had been selected as the preferred bidder to build the country's first SMRs with £2.5 billion of government support. The decision came a decade after George Osborne, then chancellor, championed the technology and pledged government support to get it off the ground. Ministers have so far commissioned just three reactors, none expected before 2035. The Czech Republic chose Rolls-Royce to supply six SMRs within a year, with plans for up to six units from the mid-2030s. The taskforce is due to propose a number of specific recommendations to ministers in the autumn and government sources said the intention was to implement them rapidly. Miatta Fahnbulleh, the minister for energy consumers, said it was time for a 'new approach' to nuclear regulation. 'For too long, big British infrastructure projects have been held back by needless bureaucracy,' she said. 'It's time for a new approach to getting nuclear projects off the ground more quickly, and at a lower cost. We look forward to working with the expert taskforce to modernise outdated regulations so we can unlock growth, jobs and energy security for the British people.' • Hinkley Point C's soaring costs blamed on red tape Tom Greatrex, chief executive of the Nuclear Industry Association, said: 'If the UK is serious about energy security and creating good jobs, we need a regulatory framework that is more proportionate and built for delivery — one that upholds safety and public trust while giving investors the confidence to move at pace. 'Smarter regulation will mean projects are approved faster, built more efficiently, and delivered at lower cost to consumers. The nuclear industry stands ready to work with government and regulators to make that happen.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Urgent recall issued for popular clothing item that threatens to cause severe burns and injuries
Thousands of pairs of socks have been urgently recalled due to the risk of severe burns. Fieldsheer Apparel Technologies has voluntarily recalled about 45,000 pairs of its heated merino wool socks after receiving multiple reports of injuries, including burns and blisters. An alert from the US Consumer Product Safety Commission warned the socks 'can cause pain and discomfort resulting in burns and blisters when worn during high-intensity activities that generate a combination of heat, excessive friction, moisture and pressure, posing an injury hazard.' There have been 11 reports of pain and discomfort to date, the agency said. Of those, four reports were for blisters and burns. The three models of recalled socks were MWMS05, MWMS07 and MWWS07. Each pair of socks was packaged with two lithium-ion battery packs and a charging cable. The socks were sold at major retailers including Home Depot, Meijer and online at Amazon from August 2021 through June 2025 and cost between $80 to $130. The socks were sold in black/gray, gray/pink, gray/orange, and black/orange color combinations and came in sizes small through extra-large. Pictured above are two of the sock models that have been recalled About 400,000 to 500,000 Americans suffer burn injuries every year, with burns from hot liquids and objects like stoves and irons being the most common causes. Burns can cause blisters to form on the skin. Blisters that open eliminate a protective layer of skin, allowing contaminants to enter the skin. This increases the risk of infections. Doctors have previously issued warnings about other heated products like blankets, as long-term use can increase the risk of permanent skin rashes. The heat is usually not enough to cause a burn, but it is enough to damage or cause changes to superficial blood vessels under the skin, as well as the collagen and elastin protein fibers of the skin, which leads to the distinct appearance and discoloration. Dr Ji Qi, a dermatologist in Baltimore, warned last year to use the lowest setting on heated products and only use them for a few minutes at a time. Customers who bought the recalled socks are urged to not discard the lithium-ion batteries in regular trash or recycling bins due to the risk of fire. The batteries should instead be taken to a municipal hazardous waste collection site. People who bought the socks should also immediately stop using them and contact Fieldsheer for a full refund or replacement product of equal value. Consumers can contact Fieldsheer at 888-908-6024 from 8am to 4pm PST, email cs@ or visit Fieldsheer's website for more information.
Sky News
5 hours ago
- Sky News
What does the data tell us about road traffic accidents?
Under "tougher" plans to tackle road deaths and injuries in England and Wales, the government has announced measures to make over-70s take compulsory eye tests every three years or lose their licence. But are they really needed? Drivers over the age of 70 already self-report their medical fitness to drive every three years, and British roads are safer now than they've ever been. In 2023, the latest year for which the Department for Transport has published data, the casualty rate on British roads fell to 398 per billion vehicle miles. It's the first time that figure has been under 400, and has halved since just 2006. In 1960, the casualty rate was 10 times higher than it is now. The total number of people killed on the UK's roads also reached a record low in 2023, other than the COVID-affected years of 2020 and 2021. There were 1,624 people killed in total, just under half of which were in cars. This figure has plateaued somewhat since 2010, however, after rapid improvements between 2006 and 2010. There was a similar plateau between 1994 and 2006 before the last significant piece of road safety legislation was introduced. The 2006 Road Safety Act introduced higher fines and more points for the most severe speeding offences, as well as greatly expanding the use of speed awareness courses. It was also the first year people could get points on their licence for using their phone. In the four years that followed, there was a 40% decrease in deaths among road users. In the 13 years since then, it's fallen just 12%. There had been a slight rise in deaths among older drivers for a few years between 2014 and 2019, but that has started to fall again now. There are now fewer deaths among over-70s compared with either the under-30s, people aged 30-49, or those between 50 and 69. In 2019, there were a similar number of deaths among people of each of these age cohorts. Academic studies have previously found that older people are also more likely to develop symptoms of depression, be admitted to care facilities, and even have a higher mortality rate, once they stop driving. The academics found that those links remained even after adjusting for other factors like baseline health and cognitive ability. Caroline Abrahams, charity director at Age UK, said: "It is certainly good for our eye health as we age to have a regular eye test - every two years the NHS advises - but this doesn't automatically mean that a compulsory eye test at age 70 is appropriate. People can develop eye problems at any age so why confine such an approach only to those aged 70 and not to younger drivers too? "From the data we have seen, there is no reason to suppose that eye problems lie behind a significant proportion of accidents. While there may be a case for introducing a regular mandatory eye test for drivers of all ages, it is not clear that this would have a big impact on the numbers of serious accidents involving older drivers." Are younger drivers a danger to themselves? Edmund King, president of the Automobile Association, said that the government's strategy is "much overdue", while pointing to the figures showing that the number of road deaths have plateaued since 2010. He said that making vision checks compulsory for older drivers was a "practical step that can make a real difference", but added that failing to introduce a six-month limit on new drivers transporting passengers of a similar age is "a major oversight". A limit like this has been active in parts of Australia since 2007. Research by road safety charity Brake says that, in the UK, around one in five drivers crash within a year of passing their test. The Department for Transport data also shows that younger people are also significantly more likely to die as passengers compared to people in other age groups. There has also been a suggestion that younger drivers are more likely to die as a result of not wearing seatbelts. More than a third of 17-29-year-olds who die on the roads didn't have their seatbelts on. But the same is true of 30-59 year olds. There is a significant difference between men and women however - 31% of men who died did so without wearing a seatbelt, compared with just 11% of women. That also means that 89% of women who died on the roads did so despite wearing a seatbelt, perhaps adding to evidence that suggests that seatbelts offer better protection to adult men. Drink driving Since 2014, Scotland has had a lower drink drive limit than the rest of the UK. The government's new proposals would reduce the drink-drive limit in England and Wales to the same level as in Scotland - 50mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood, instead of the current level of 80mg of alcohol. For an average-sized man, that means they would be over the limit after one pint of beer, instead of after two. In diverging from the other nations in the UK, the new standards in Scotland aligned with most of Europe. It seems to have had some impact. The number of collisions involving drink drivers has fallen by more than 40% in Scotland since it was introduced, compared with 20% in England over the same time period, and 38% in Wales. The improvement is less pronounced when it comes to the most serious drink-driving road accidents, though. They are down just 7% since 2014. Where are the safest, and most dangerous, places to drive? The Isle of Wight has the highest current fatality rate, after accounting for how much driving people do. There were 18 deaths per billion vehicle miles on the island in 2023. Next was Blackpool, with 16. The central London boroughs of Westminster, Kensington and Chelsea, and Lambeth were the only other local authorities with a rate higher than 10. At the other end of the scale, Stockport (Greater Manchester), Thurrock (Essex) and Nottingham each had fewer than one death per billion vehicle miles. When it comes to accidents that included not just deaths but also serious injuries, London has the worst record. Drivers in Westminster were most likely to end up in a serious collision, but the nine most dangerous local authorities in Great Britain were all London boroughs. Bradford completed the bottom 10. Bath and North East Somerset was the safest area, although three Welsh areas - Bridgend, Neath Port Talbot and Cardiff - joined South Gloucestershire in the top five. Scottish drivers were among the most likely to avoid being in crashes altogether. Eight of the 10 local authorities with the lowest overall collision rate were north of the border, although Rutland in the East Midlands had the lowest overall rate. The top 20 areas with the most collisions per mile driven were all in London. How does driving in the UK compare with other countries? The UK is one of the safest places to drive in Europe. Only Norway and Sweden had a lower rate of road deaths per head of population in 2023 than the UK's 25 deaths per million people. The figures in places like Italy, Greece and Portugal were more than twice as high. There aren't any directly comparable figures for 2023 for the US, but in 2022 their death rate from driving was five times as high as the UK, and 50% higher than the worst performing European country - Bulgaria. The Data and Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open source information. Through multimedia storytelling we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.
